Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Obes Surg ; 27(3): 557-559, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28130706
2.
Nutrients ; 7(6): 3949-58, 2015 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26020836

ABSTRACT

Micronutrients play a pivotal role in achieving and maintaining optimum health across all life stages. Much of the U.S. population fails to meet Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) for key nutrients. This analysis aims to assess the contribution of fortified ready-to-eat cereals (RTEC) to micronutrient intake for U.S. residents aged 2-18, 19-99, and 2-99 years of age according to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2010 data. We used the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method to assess usual intake of 21 micronutrients and the percentage of the population under EARs and above Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL). Without fortification of RTECs, the percentage of those aged 2-18 years that were below EARs increased by 155, 163, 113, and 35% for niacin, iron, thiamin, and vitamin A, respectively. For vitamins B6 and zinc, the respective numbers were 118% and 60%. Adults aged 19-99 and 2-99 had lower percentages but similar outcomes. RTECs are associated with improved nutrient adequacy and do not widely affect prevalence above the UL. The data indicate that large proportions of the population fail to achieve micronutrient sufficiency without fortification, and that its use can help Americans reach national nutrient intake goals.


Subject(s)
Fast Foods , Food, Fortified , Nutrition Surveys , Trace Elements/administration & dosage , Vitamins/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
3.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 17(5): 842-62, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19396063

ABSTRACT

Rapid shifts in the demographics and techniques of weight loss surgery (WLS) have led to new issues, new data, new concerns, and new challenges. In 2004, this journal published comprehensive evidence-based guidelines on WLS. In this issue, we've updated those guidelines to assure patient safety in this fast-changing field. WLS involves a uniquely vulnerable population in need of specialized resources and ongoing multidisciplinary care. Timely best-practice updates are required to identify new risks, develop strategies to address them, and optimize treatment. Findings in these reports are based on a comprehensive review of the most current literature on WLS; they directly link patient safety to methods for setting evidence-based guidelines developed from peer-reviewed scientific publications. Among other outcomes, these reports show that WLS reduces chronic disease risk factors, improves health, and confers a survival benefit on those who undergo it. The literature also shows that laparoscopy has displaced open surgery as the predominant approach; that government agencies and insurers only reimburse procedures performed at accredited WLS centers; that best practice care requires close collaboration between members of a multidisciplinary team; and that new and existing facilities require wide-ranging changes to accommodate growing numbers of severely obese patients. More than 100 specialists from across the state of Massachusetts and across the many disciplines involved in WLS came together to develop these new standards. We expect them to have far-reaching effects of the development of health care policy and the practice of WLS.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/standards , Obesity/surgery , Weight Loss , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastric Bypass/methods , Health Policy , Humans , Massachusetts , Medicine , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/psychology , Patient Care Team , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Selection , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Risk Factors , Specialization , Survivors , United States
4.
J Am Diet Assoc ; 107(2): 256-64, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17258962

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To establish the first baseline of dairy and related nutrient intake in African Americans, an at-risk population of public health concern in the United States. To document dairy consumption in African Americans by age and sex during 1994-1998 and 1999-2000 and compare it with concomitant dairy, calcium, and related nutrient intakes in non-African-American adults and children. DESIGN: Duplicate and single 24-hour recalls were analyzed to determine dietary intake during the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals 1994-1996, 1998 (CSFII), and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000 (NHANES), respectively. SUBJECTS: African Americans and non-African Americans of all ages who participated in CSFII 1994-1996, 1998, and in NHANES 1999-2000; both surveys are a stratified random sample of the total civilian, noninstitutionalized US population. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Dairy food and nutrient intake per day were quantified according to age, sex, and ethnicity/race from CSFII 1994-1996, 1998, and NHANES 1999-2000. For NHANES, mean intakes from 1-day food records were sample-weighted, and standard errors estimated by the Taylor linearization method of SUDAAN (version 9.0, 2004, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC). Usual daily intakes of calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus were based on 2-day intake data from CSFII 1994-1996, 1998, and calculated using Software for Intake Distribution from Iowa State University. The percentage of individuals categorized as not meeting the Estimated Average Requirement for magnesium and phosphorus were calculated in the same way. RESULTS: CSFII 1994-1996, 1998, and NHANES 1999-2000 data both show that African Americans in all age groups consume fewer mean servings per day of total dairy, milk, cheese, and yogurt than non-African Americans, and have lower mean intakes of calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus. Significant differences were seen for men and women. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, young African-American women did not meet Dietary Reference Intakes for phosphorus, and all African Americans did not meet Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and magnesium. African Americans in all age groups did not meet dairy recommendations from the 2005 US Dietary Guidelines and the 2004 National Medical Association Consensus Report on the role of dairy and dairy nutrients in the diet of African Americans.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Dairy Products/statistics & numerical data , Diet Surveys , Diet/standards , Nutrition Policy , Nutritional Requirements , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Magnesium/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Assessment , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Phosphorus, Dietary/administration & dosage , Sex Distribution , United States
5.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 12(2): 183-92, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12737717

ABSTRACT

Obesity, overweight, and a sedentary lifestyle-all common conditions in breast cancer patients-are likely to be associated with poor survival and poor quality of life in women with breast cancer. Diet-related factors are thought to account for about 30% of cancers in developed countries. Most studies of diet and healthcare have focused on the role of single nutrients, foods, or food groups in disease prevention or promotion. Recent cancer guidelines on nutrition and physical activity emphasize diets that promote maintenance of a healthy body weight and a prudent dietary pattern that is low in red and processed meats and high in a variety of vegetables, fruits, and whole grains. Except for dietary fat, few nutritional factors in adult life have been associated with breast cancer. Extensive data from animal model research, international correlations linking fat intake and breast cancer rates, and case-control studies support the hypothesis that a high-fat diet is conducive to the development of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Conflicting findings from cohort studies, however, have created uncertainty over the role of dietary fat in breast cancer growth and recurrence. Results from large-scale nutritional intervention trials are expected to resolve such issues. As new and improved data on dietary factors and patterns accumulate, dietary guidelines for cancer risk reduction will become more focused.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Feeding Behavior , Obesity/complications , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hormones/metabolism , Humans , Obesity/metabolism , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...