[Interoperability Working Group: core dataset and information systems for data integration and data exchange in the Medical Informatics Initiative]. / Arbeitsgruppe Interoperabilität: Kerndatensatz und Informationssysteme für Integration und Austausch von Daten in der Medizininformatik-Initiative.

The interoperability Working Group of the Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) is the platform for the coordination of overarching procedures, data structures, and interfaces between the data integration centers (DIC) of the university hospitals and national and international interoperability committees. The goal is the joint content-related and technical design of a distributed infrastructure for the secondary use of healthcare data that can be used via the Research Data Portal for Health. Important general conditions are data privacy and IT security for the use of health data in biomedical research. To this end, suitable methods are used in dedicated task forces to enable procedural, syntactic, and semantic interoperability for data use projects. The MII core dataset was developed as several modules with corresponding information models and implemented using the HL7® FHIR® standard to enable content-related and technical specifications for the interoperable provision of healthcare data through the DIC. International terminologies and consented metadata are used to describe these data in more detail. The overall architecture, including overarching interfaces, implements the methodological and legal requirements for a distributed data use infrastructure, for example, by providing pseudonymized data or by federated analyses. With these results of the Interoperability Working Group, the MII is presenting a future-oriented solution for the exchange and use of healthcare data, the applicability of which goes beyond the purpose of research and can play an essential role in the digital transformation of the healthcare system.

Towards a National Portal for Medical Research Data (FDPG): Vision, Status, and Lessons Learned.

Harmonizing medical data sharing frameworks is challenging. Data collection and formats follow local solutions in individual hospitals; thus, interoperability is not guaranteed. The German Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) aims to provide a Germany-wide, federated, large-scale data sharing network. In the last five years, numerous efforts have been successfully completed to implement the regulatory framework and software components for securely interacting with decentralized and centralized data sharing processes. 31 German university hospitals have today established local data integration centers that are connected to the central German Portal for Medical Research Data (FDPG). Here, we present milestones and associated major achievements of various MII working groups and subprojects which led to the current status. Further, we describe major obstacles and the lessons learned during its routine application in the last six months.

Towards a comprehensive and interoperable representation of consent-based data usage permissions in the German medical informatics initiative.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the German Medical Informatics Initiative is to establish a national infrastructure for integrating and sharing health data. To this, Data Integration Centers are set up at university medical centers, which address data harmonization, information security and data protection. To capture patient consent, a common informed consent template has been developed. It consists of different modules addressing permissions for using data and biosamples. On the technical level, a common digital representation of information from signed consent templates is needed. As the partners in the initiative are free to adopt different solutions for managing consent information (e.g. IHE BPPC or HL7 FHIR Consent Resources), we had to develop an interoperability layer. METHODS: First, we compiled an overview of data items required to reflect the information from the MII consent template as well as patient preferences and derived permissions. Next, we created entity-relationship diagrams to formally describe the conceptual data model underlying relevant items. We then compared this data model to conceptual models describing representations of consent information using different interoperability standards. We used the result of this comparison to derive an interoperable representation that can be mapped to common standards. RESULTS: The digital representation needs to capture the following information: (1) version of the consent, (2) consent status for each module, and (3) period of validity of the status. We found that there is no generally accepted solution to represent status information in a manner interoperable with all relevant standards. Hence, we developed a pragmatic solution, comprising codes which describe combinations of modules with a basic set of status labels. We propose to maintain these codes in a public registry called ART-DECOR. We present concrete technical implementations of our approach using HL7 FHIR and IHE BPPC which are also compatible with the open-source consent management software gICS. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed digital representation is (1) generic enough to capture relevant information from a wide range of consent documents and data use regulations and (2) interoperable with common technical standards. We plan to extend our model to include more fine-grained status codes and rules for automated access control.

Architecture of a Biomedical Informatics Research Data Management Pipeline.

In University Medical Centers, heterogeneous data are generated that cannot always be clearly attributed to patient care or biomedical research. Each data set has to adhere to distinct intrinsic and operational quality standards. However, only if high-quality data, tools to work with the data, and most importantly guidelines and rules of how to work with the data are addressed adequately, an infrastructure can be sustainable. Here, we present the IT Research Architecture of the University Medical Center Göttingen and describe our ten years' experience and lessons learned with infrastructures in networked medical research.

Changing requirements and resulting needs for IT-infrastructure for longitudinal research in the neurosciences.

The observation of growing "difficulties" in IT-infrastructures in neuroscience research during the last years led to a search for reasons and an analysis on how this phenomenon is reflected in the scientific literature. With a retrospective analysis of nine examples of multicenter research projects in the neurosciences and a literature review the observation was systematically analyzed. Results show that the rise in complexity mainly stems from two reasons: (1) more and more need for information on quality and context of research data (metadata) and (2) long-term requirements to handle the consent and identity/pseudonyms of study participants and biomaterials in relation to legal requirements. The combination of these two aspects together with very long study times and data evaluation periods are components of the subjectively perceived "difficulties". A direct consequence of this result is that big multicenter trials are becoming part of integrated research data environments and are not standing alone for themselves anymore. This drives up the resource needs regarding the IT-infrastructure in neuroscience research. In contrast to these findings, literature on this development is scarce and the problem probably underestimated.

Patients characteristics influencing the longitudinal utilization of steroids in multiple sclerosis--an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis is the most common disease in young adults affecting the central nervous system. Disease may progress with acute attacks (relapsing MS) or continuously (progressive MS). Glucocorticosteroids are used in the treatment of acute attacks. The aim of this study was to analyse characteristics of patients with MS, and their influence on current treatment patterns of relapses with glucocorticosteroids. DESIGN: In 2001, the German National MS Society initiated the German MS-Registry. Patients with relapsing MS were included (n = 5106) from this registry. Logistic regression models were used to detect trends over time. The likelihood of administration of steroids is modelled in dependence of calendar year and in dependence to confounders in treatment conditions. The sample size allows that odds ratios can be detected with a power of 90% (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Administration of glucocorticosteroids was influenced by EDSS (P < 0.0001), age (P < 0.0001) and disease duration (P < 0.0001). Therapy administration in an outpatient setting was more likely in patients with higher EDSS (P < 0.0001) and longer disease duration (P < 0.0001). The utilization of glucocorticosteroids increased with higher EDSS for all relapsing patients. Interestingly, all overutilization of glucocorticosteroids decreased over time and was accompanied by a steadily increased administration of emergent therapeutics. Although there are about 70% of registered patients with relapsing MS on immune-modulatory treatment, almost 60% of them received glucocorticosteroids for treatment of relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns with glucocorticosteroids in patients with MS are influenced mainly by EDSS and disease duration. The decline in the utilization of glucocorticosteroids is accompanied by an increase in natalizumab treatment.

Multiple sclerosis registries in Europe - results of a systematic survey.

BACKGROUND: Identification of MS registries and databases that are currently in use in Europe as well as a detailed knowledge of their content and structure is important in order to facilitate comprehensive analysis and comparison of data. METHODS: National MS registries or databases were identified by literature search, from the results of the MS Barometer 2011 and by asking 33 national MS societies. A standardized questionnaire was developed and sent to the registries' leaders, followed by telephone interviews with them. RESULTS: Twenty registries were identified, with 13 completing the questionnaire and seven being interviewed by telephone. These registries differed widely for objectives, structure, collected data, and for patients and centres included. Despite this heterogeneity, common objectives of the registries were epidemiology (n=10), long-term therapy outcome (n=8), healthcare research (n=9) and support/basis for clinical trials (n=8). While physician-based outcome measures (EDSS) are used in all registries, data from patients' perspectives were only collected in six registries. CONCLUSIONS: The detailed information on a large number of national MS registries in Europe is a prerequisite to facilitating harmonized integration of existing data from MS registries and databases, as well as comprehensive analyses and comparison across European populations.

The "DGPPN-Cohort": A national collaboration initiative by the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) for establishing a large-scale cohort of psychiatric patients.

The German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN) has committed itself to establish a prospective national cohort of patients with major psychiatric disorders, the so-called DGPPN-Cohort. This project will enable the scientific exploitation of high-quality data and biomaterial from psychiatric patients for research. It will be set up using harmonised data sets and procedures for sample generation and guided by transparent rules for data access and data sharing regarding the central research database. While the main focus lies on biological research, it will be open to all kinds of scientific investigations, including epidemiological, clinical or health-service research.