Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 15(5): 231-5, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11574949

ABSTRACT

The goal of our study was to perform a multisite evaluation of a new urine dipstick called Multistix PROtrade mark (Bayer, Elkhart, IN), which has reagent pads for the simultaneous assay of urinary albumin, protein, and creatinine. Patients' urine specimens were assayed at four sites with these dipsticks and with the familiar Bayer Multistix 10SG dipsticks for protein. The new dipstick pads for albumin are impregnated with bis (3',3"-diiodo-4',4"-dihydroxy-5',5"-dinitrophenyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromo-sulfonephthalein (DIDNTB) dye. These dipsticks also have a novel pad that estimates urinary creatinine using the peroxidase activity of the copper-creatinine complex. We determined the interlaboratory agreement of these dipsticks by comparing dipstick results to values obtained by quantitative analytical methods. We found that dividing the dipsticks' albumin or protein results by the creatinine concentration reduced the number of false-positive albumin or protein values observed in concentrated urines, and reduced the number of false negatives in dilute urines. The ratio of albumin to creatinine, or protein to creatinine gives a better measure of albumin or protein excretion. Compared to reading by eye, the dipstick results agreed better with the quantitative assays when they were read by a reflectometer (Bayer Clinitek).


Subject(s)
Albumins/analysis , Creatine/urine , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Albuminuria/metabolism , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Humans , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results
2.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 15(5): 295-300, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11574957

ABSTRACT

We tested patients' urines for albumin, protein, and creatinine by quantitative and dipstick methods. The concentrations of these analytes were established by quantitative, cuvet-based chemistry methods that we assumed gave the "correct" values. There was good to excellent agreement of the dipstick results with the quantitative methods for the above three analytes. We found many patients who excreted pathological amounts of albumin and/or protein who did not have a diagnosis of kidney disease or other likely causes of proteinuria, suggesting that albuminuria and/or proteinuria were underdiagnosed in our group of patients. Those with cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, or diabetes showed the greatest predictive value of a positive test for albumin or protein by dipstick. Dipstick testing for albumin, protein, and creatinine had good or excellent agreement with quantitative methods. The dipstick tests were easy to use, simple, and low in cost, and can serve well for point-of-care testing.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/urine , Proteinuria/urine , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/urine , Diabetes Complications , Diabetes Mellitus/urine , Humans , Kidney Diseases/complications , Kidney Diseases/urine , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/urine , Predictive Value of Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...