The Use of Organic Rankine Cycles for Recovering the Heat Lost in the Compression Area of a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit.

The use of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) is a viable solution for the recovery of waste heat. For an air separation unit (ASU) with a production of V˙O2=58300mN3/h operating in Romania, the value of utilization of the heat transferred to the cooling system of the compression area represents 21% of the global system electrical energy input. To recover this thermal energy and transform it into mechanical energy, an ORC system was proposed. To maximize the production of mechanical power, an exergy analysis was performed. Exergy analysis was used to choose the most suitable organic fluid and find the optimum constructive structure of the Rankine cycle. The calculation of the exergy destruction in the key apparatuses of the system allowed investigation into the optimization search procedure. The large exergy destruction in the liquid preheater suggested the decrease in the temperature difference in this part of the evaporator by increasing the inlet temperature of the liquid; and an internal recuperative heat exchanger was used for this purpose. When permitted, the overheating of the vapors also reduced the temperature difference between the heat source and the organic fluid during the heat transfer process. The analysis was comparatively performed for several organic fluids such as R-245fa, R123, n-pentane and R717. The use of ammonia, that offered the possibility of superheating the vapors at the turbine inlet, brought a gain of mechanical power corresponding to 6% economy in the electrical energy input of the global plant.

Exergetic Analysis of a Cryogenic Air Separation Unit.

This case study analyzes a cryogenic air separation unit (ASU) with a production of V˙O2=58,300 [m3Nh] of gaseous oxygen with a concentration greater than 98.5%, operating in Romania on a steel plant platform. The goal of the paper is to provide an extensive model of exergetic analysis that could be used in an optimization procedure when decisional parameters are changed or structural design modifications are implemented. For each key part of the Air Separation Unit, an exergetic product and fuel were defined and, based on their definition, the coefficient of performance of each functional zone was calculated. The information about the magnitude of the exergetic losses offers solutions for their future recovery. The analysis of the exergy destructions suggests when it is worth making a larger investment. The exergetic analysis of the compression area of the ASU points out an exergy destruction and loss of 37% from the total plant's electrical energy input. The exergy loss with the heat transferred to the cooling system of compressors can be recovered; for the exergy destruction portion, the challenge between investment and operating costs should be considered. The exergy destruction of the air separation columns found the High Pressure Column (HPC) to be more destructive than the Low Pressure Column. The share of the exergy destruction in the total plant's electrical energy input is 8.3% for the HPC. The local COP of the HPC, calculated depending on the total exergy of the local product and fuel, is 62.66%. The calculus of the air separation column is performed with the ChemSep simulator.