Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone ; 133: 115188, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843681

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The usefulness of FRAX in predicting major bone fractures in patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis treatment has been confirmed in previous studies. For meaningful clinical use, the prognostic and intervention FRAX thresholds need to be established. METHODS: The primary aim of our study was to calculate the optimal cut-off point of FRAX for the best prediction of an increased bone fracture risk in dialysis patients and additionally, to propose its intervention threshold, indicating the need for antifracture pharmacological treatment. The study included 718 hemodialysis patients, who were followed up for two years. Thirty low-energy major bone fractures were diagnosed during the study period. We used the Polish version of FRAX (without the DXA examination) and some particular variables of the FRAX calculator. The optimal cut-off point for prediction of an increased major bone fracture risk was based on the analysis of the sensitivity and specificity curves of FRAX. RESULTS: The analysis revealed FRAX >5% (sensitivity of 70.0%, specificity of 69.8%) as the prognostic threshold for major bone fractures. Its sensitivity for bone fracture prediction was significantly higher, but specificity lower than those of FRAX ≥10%, used in general Polish population. The reason for this can be an underestimation of bone fracture risk with FRAX in dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the FRAX prognostic threshold for identification of an increased risk of major bone fractures in hemodialysis patients is >5%. We propose to use this specific value of FRAX as an intervention threshold for pharmacological antifracture treatment in hemodialysis patients.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Osteoporotic Fractures , Bone Density , Humans , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
2.
Anestezjol Intens Ter ; 42(4): 184-6, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21252832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to review our three year experience with translumbar insertion of dialysis catheters. METHODS: In five adult patients (4 males and one female, mean age 45 yr), requiring dialysis due to end-stage chronic renal failure, the inferior vena cava was cannulated because of the impossibility of using any other approach. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopy. After visualisation of the inferior vena cava by injection of contrast medium into a peripheral vein, the vena cava was punctured with a 20 cm long needle, at the L3 level. The position of the needle was confirmed by injection of contrast medium, and the vein was then cannulated with a peel-away cannula, using a standard Seldinger technique. Subsequently, a pre-tunneled silastic catheter was introduced and secured. RESULTS: The catheters were used for from 3 to 10 months. No case of permanent catheter dysfunction was noted. Three episodes of temporary thrombosis, in two patients, were successfully treated with heparin and urokinase. Three catheters became contaminated, but they were treated without the necessity for catheter removal. CONCLUSION: The described method is a safe and effective way of securing haemodialysis access in patients where a standard approach is not possible.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Lumbosacral Region , Renal Dialysis/methods , Vena Cava, Inferior , Adult , Bacteremia/etiology , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Thrombosis/etiology , Urea/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...