ABSTRACT
Background and Aims: Modern health care faces a plethora of challenges including the delivery of quality and cost-efficient care. Physicians are first-hand observers of clinical problems but may lack the requisite training and education to develop innovations that improve patient care. Few medical education programs address innovation, leadership, and transdisciplinary collaboration despite being highlighted by national medical and education organizations including the American Medical Association. The University of Minnesota has implemented the Augustine program over the last 10-years to produce physicians that are leaders in medical innovation. Methods: As a novel joint engineering-medical school curriculum to educate medical students, residents, and fellows, the Augustine program incorporates engineering coursework, biomedical research, and a multidisciplinary design and business development experience to produce physicians capable of designing and marketing "disruptive technologies." The Augustine program takes 1-year to complete in addition to the 4-year medical education and provides a Master of Biomedical Engineering upon completion. Results: Augustine program graduates (n = 6) have reported significant contributions related to the joint engineering-medical education including peer-reviewed publications (Median: 13), deployable assets (Median: 2), and intellectual property (Median: 1). Most surveyed graduates (n = 5, 83%) continue to be active contributors to medical innovation and all (n = 6, 100%) utilize their transdisciplinary education to improve patient care. Conclusion: Augustine program graduates impact the entire spectrum of innovation and continue to improve patient care. The program will seek to emphasize the inclusion of physician residents and fellows with position expansion. The addition of a multi-week medical innovation clerkship will provide a more focused experience for students unable to dedicate an entire year to a transdisciplinary experience.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Loss or compromise of artificial airways in critically ill adults can lead to serious adverse events, including death. In contrast to primary emergency airway management, the optimal management of such scenarios may not be well defined or appreciated. RECENT FINDINGS: Endotracheal tube cuff leaks may compromise both oxygenation and ventilation, and supraglottic cuff position must first be recognized and distinguished from other reasons for gas leakage during positive pressure ventilation. Although definitive management involves tube exchange, if direct visualization is possible temporizing measures can often be considered. Unplanned extubation confers variable and context-specific risks depending on patient anatomy and physiological status. Because risk factors for unplanned extubation are well established, bundled interventions can be employed for mitigation. Tracheostomy tube dislodgement accounts for a substantial proportion of death and disability related to airway management in critical care settings. Consensus guidelines and algorithmic management of such scenarios are key elements of risk mitigation. SUMMARY: Management of lost or otherwise compromised artificial airways is a key skill set for adult critical care clinicians alongside primary emergency airway management.
