Nurse-led sedation for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation seems safe for a selected patient population.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a high-volume procedure with increasing demands on hospital resources. Local anaesthesia with sedation supervised by an anaesthesiology team is the current standard of care. We aimed to describe our experience with a simplified, nurse-led sedation (NLS) protocol. This study enrolled 128 consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI with self-expandable Evolut R prosthesis between November 2019 and April 2021. Operators selected 50% of patients for NLS based on the clinical expectation of lower risk of procedural difficulties. Nurse-led sedation protocol demanded only mild to moderate levels of sedation. The clinical outcomes were determined from the local TAVI registry and the national mortality database. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the NLS (n = 64) and anaesthesiologist-led sedation (ALS) (n = 64) groups except higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (48.4% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.035) and peripheral vascular disease (20.3% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.036) in the ALS group. There was a trend for the larger prostheses used in the ALS group (P = 0.058). The procedural results did not differ, and coronary care team backup was rarely needed in the NLS group (6% of patients). The in-hospital outcomes were identical from both clinical and echocardiography perspectives, and 30-day mortality was low in both groups (1.5%). For the NLS group, preparation in the catheterization laboratory was quicker by 6.4 min (P = 0.01), and intensive care unit stay was shorter (2.03 vs. 3.48 days, P = 0.001). In conclusion, the NLS for the selected transfemoral TAVI population seems safe.

Might simplification of transcatheter aortic valve implantation reduce the burden on hospital resources?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) varies considerably in terms of the procedural approach taken and the hospital length of stay (LoS); both directly affect the cost of care. Our coronary and standard cardiology unit aimed to simplify TAVI (and thus shorten the LoS) while maintaining safety. A shorter LoS would also reduce the burden on hospital resources and free up beds for other patients. Data on 214 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at a single centre between April 2018 and March 2021 were retrospectively collected. A simplified protocol was implemented in January 2020; patients were stratified by whether they underwent TAVI before or after simplification. All procedural phases were simplified. For cost comparison purposes, the LoS was defined as the number of hospitalization days from admission to discharge. The total hospitalization cost was the sum of the direct and indirect (including reallocated overhead) costs. The LoS fell significantly (by 36%) after TAVI simplification. The times in the coronary care unit (CCU) and standard cardiac unit (SCU) also fell significantly (by 33% and 37% respectively). Patients in the simplified TAVI group were discharged, on average, 6 days after admission. The CCU costs decreased by 31% and the SCU costs by 39%. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation simplification did not compromise safety. Indeed, patients who underwent the simplified procedure seemed to develop fewer complications, especially bleeding. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation simplification significantly reduced the LoS and other costs without compromising patient safety.

Bioresorbable scaffold implantation in STEMI patients: 5 years imaging subanalysis of PRAGUE-19 study.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) Absorb™ clinical use has been stopped due to higher rate of device thrombosis. Scaffold struts persist longer than 2 years in the vessel wall. Second generation devices are being developed. This study evaluates long-term invasive imaging in STEMI patients. METHODS: PRAGUE-19 study is an academic study enrolling consecutive STEMI patients with intention to implant Absorb™ BRS. A total of 83 STEMI patients between December 2012 and March 2014 fulfilled entry criteria. Coronary angiography and optical coherence tomography at 5 year follow-up was performed in 25 patients. RESULTS: Primary combined clinical endpoint (death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization) occurred in 12.6% during the five-year follow-up with overall mortality 6.3%. Definite scaffold thrombosis occurred in 2 patients in the early phase after BRS implantation. Quantitative coronary angiography after 5 years demonstrated low late lumen loss of 0.11 ± 0.35 mm with binary restenosis rate of 0%. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated complete resorption of scaffold struts and mean lumen diameter of 3.25 ± 0.30 and 3.22 ± 0.49 (P = 0.73) at baseline and after 5 years, respectively. Three patients developed small coronary artery aneurysm in the treated segment. CONCLUSION: Invasive imaging results 5 years after BRS implantation in STEMI showed complete resorption of scaffold struts and stable lumen vessel diameter. Trial registration ISRCTN43696201 (retrospectivelly registred, June 7th, 2019). https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN43696201.

Immune-inflammatory response after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation in a long-term perspective.

A higher rate of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) thrombosis has been observed after device implantation compared to implantation of permanent metallic stents in recently published studies. The mechanism of BVS thrombosis is currently under debate. To assess whether the immune-inflammatory response after BVS implantation is a potential trigger of BVS thrombosis. The PRAGUE-19 study was an academic study that enrolled consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with the intention to implant a BVS. A laboratory sub-study included 49 patients with an implanted BVS (of which 38 underwent the complete 2-year follow-up) and 52 patients having an implanted permanent metallic stent as the control group (of which 30 underwent the complete 2-year follow-up). Samples for inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)] were taken before BVS or stent implantation, on days 1 and 2 after device implantation and at 1 month and 2 years for a clinical control. The primary combined clinical endpoint of the sub-study (death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularization) occurred in 4.08% of the BVS group and 7.69% of the control group (p = 0.442) during the 2-year follow-up period, with overall mortality of 2.04% in the BVS group and 1.92% in the control group (p = 0.966). Definite BVS thrombosis occurred in one patient in the subacute phase; there was no late or very late thrombosis. Two definite stent thromboses were observed in the control group: one in the subacute phase and the other in the late phase. Baseline inflammatory marker levels did not differ between the groups. Lower levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP were observed in the BVS group compared to the control group (12.02 ± 5.94 vs. 15.21 ± 5.33 pg/ml; p < 0.01; 3952.9 ± 1704.75 ng/ml vs. 4507.49 ± 1190.01 ng/ml; p = 0.037, respectively) on days 1 and 2 (12.01 ± 6.31 vs. 13.85 ± 6.01 pg/ml; p = 0.089; 4447.92 ± 1325.31 ng/ml vs. 4637.03 ± 1290.99 ng/ml; p = 0.255, respectively). No differences in IL-6 or hs-CRP were observed after 1 month or 2 years in the clinical control. Levels of TNF-α did not differ between the groups in the early period after BVS or metallic stent implantation, nor during follow-up. The immune-inflammatory response is lower during the early phase after BVS implantation compared to that after metallic stent implantation, but the responses did not differ in the long term.

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: One More Angiographic Evidence of Microvascular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) aetiology has not been completely understood yet. One proposed pathogenic mechanism was coronary microvascular dysfunction (MVD). This study compared coronary flow and myocardial perfusion in patients with TC, microvascular angina (MVA), and a control group (CG). METHODS: Out of 42 consecutive patients presented to our centre with TC from 2013 to 2017; we retrospectively selected 27 patients. We compared them with a sex- and age-matched group of 27 MVA cases and 27 patients with normal coronary arteries (CG). The flow was evaluated in the three coronary arteries as TIMI flow and TIMI frame count (TFC). Myocardial perfusion was studied with Blush-Score and Quantitative Blush Evaluator (QuBE). RESULTS: TFC, in TC, revealed flow impairment in the three arteries compared to the CG (left anterior descending artery (LAD): 22 ± 8, 15 ± 4; p = 0.001) (right coronary artery: 12 ± 4, 10 ± 3; p = 0,025) (left circumflex: 14 ± 4, CG 11 ± 3; p = 0,006). QuBE showed myocardial perfusion impairment in the LAD territory in TC comparing with both the CG (8,9 (7,2-11,5) versus 11,4 (10-15,7); p = 0,008) and the MVA group (8,9 (7,2-11,5) versus 13,5 (10-16); p = 0,006). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that coronary flow is impaired in TC, reflecting a MVD. Myocardial perfusion defect was detected only in the LAD area.

Optical coherence tomography in STEMI with bioresorbable scaffold: possible cause of coronary flow impairment? A sub-study from the Prague 19 trial.

This study assessed the Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) impact on the coronary flow in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after bioresorbable scaffold implantation. Only few data about OCT use in STEMI are available and coronary flow before and after OCT is not well studied yet. 54 patients with OCT performed at the end of procedure from the Prague 19 trial were selected and coronary flow was evaluated as TIMI frame count (TFC) before and just after OCT. Significant increase in TIMI frame count after OCT [from 9.5 (6.75-12.25) to 11.5 (8-15.25) frames; p = 0.001] and high verapamil administration (18%) was reported. OCT at the end of primary percutaneous coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffold is a feasible procedure. However, it seems to be associated with flow deterioration.

Long-term follow-up after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in STEMI patients: PRAGUE-19 study update.

AIMS: Early clinical results after implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are encouraging, but long-term data are missing. This study evaluates long-term outcome in STEMI patients with implanted BVS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PRAGUE-19 study is an academic study enrolling consecutive STEMI patients with the intention to implant BVS. A total of 580 STEMI patients were screened between December 2012 and March 2015; 117 patients fulfilled entry criteria and BVS was successfully implanted in 114 (97%) of them. The primary combined clinical endpoint (death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularisation) occurred in 11.5% during the mean follow-up period of 730±275 days with overall mortality of 4.4%. Definite scaffold thrombosis occurred in two patients in the early phase after BVS implantation; there was no late thrombosis. Quantitative coronary angiography (10 patients) at three years demonstrated late lumen loss of 0.2±0.33 mm and optical coherence tomography showed minimal lumen area of 5.3±1.37 mm2 and neointimal hyperplasia area of 2.9±0.48 mm2. BVS struts were still visible at three years and 99.4% of them were well apposed and covered. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging clinical and imaging results after BVS implantation in STEMI patients persist during long-term follow-up.

Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiac Output State after MitraClip Therapy in Nonanaesthetized Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

Background. Surgical correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) can lead to postoperative low cardiac output state. We aimed to assess the acute hemodynamic changes after percutaneous MitraClip therapy (a unique model without influence of factors linked to surgical procedure) in patients with functional MR without the influence of general anaesthesia. Methods. We studied invasive hemodynamic parameters in 23 patients before procedure (conscious, nonsedated patients), during procedure (intubated patients), and the first day after MitraClip implantation (conscious, extubated patients). Results. Mitral valve clipping significantly increased cardiac index (CI) (from 2.0 ± 0.5 to 3.3 ± 0.6 L/min/m2; p < 0.01). Conversely, there was significant reduction in the mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (from 18.6 ± 5.7 to 10.5 ± 3.8 mmHg; p < 0.01), mean pulmonary artery pressure (from 29.8 ± 10.9 to 25.2 ± 10.3 mmHg; p = 0.03), and pulmonary vascular resistance index (from 531 ± 359 to 365 ± 193 dyn·s·cm-5/m2; p = 0.03). Conclusions. The functional MR therapy with percutaneous MitraClip device results in significant increase in CI (+66%) and concomitant decrease in PCWP (-42%). None of our patients developed low cardiac output state. Our results support the idea that significant part of low cardiac output state after cardiac surgery is due to surgery related factors rather than due to increase in afterload after MR elimination.

Neointimal coverage and late apposition of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: OCT data from the PRAGUE-19 study.

Incomplete stent apposition and uncovered struts are associated with a higher risk of stent thrombosis. No data exist on the process of neointimal coverage and late apposition status of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) when implanted in the highly thrombogenic setting of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess the serial changes in strut apposition and early neointimal coverage of the BVS using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in selected patients enrolled in the PRAGUE-19 study. Intracoronary OCT was performed in 50 patients at the end of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute STEMI. Repeated OCT of the implanted BVS was performed in 10 patients. Scaffold area, scaffold mean diameter and incomplete strut apposition (ISA) were compared between baseline and control OCT. Furthermore, strut neointimal coverage was assessed during the control OCT. Mean scaffold area and diameter did not change between the baseline and control OCT (8.59 vs. 9.06 mm(2); p = 0.129 and 3.31 vs. 3.37 mm; p = 0.202, respectively). Differences were observed in ISA between the baseline and control OCT (0.63 vs. 1.47 %; p < 0.05). We observed 83.1 % covered struts in eight patients in whom the control OCT was performed 4-6 weeks after BVS implantation, and 100 % covered struts in two patients 6 months after BVS implantation. Persistent strut apposition and early neointimal coverage were observed after biodegradable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

One-Year Clinical and Computed Tomography Angiographic Outcomes After Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The PRAGUE-19 Study.

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) represent promising new technology, but data on their long-term outcomes in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) setting are missing. The aim was to analyze 1-year clinical and computed tomographic angiographic outcomes after BVS implantation in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: PRAGUE-19 is a prospective multicenter single-arm study enrolling consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with intention-to-implant BVS. A total of 343 STEMI patients were screened during 15 months enrollment period, and 70 patients (mean age 58.6±10.3 and 74% males) fulfilled entry criteria and BVS was successfully implanted in 96% of them. All patients were invited for clinical and computed tomographic angiographic control 1 year after BVS implantation. Restenosis was defined as ≥75% area stenosis within the scaffolded segment. Three events were potentially related to BVS: 1 in-stent restenosis (treated 7 months after pPCI with drug-eluting balloon), 1 stent thrombosis (treated 2 weeks after pPCI by balloon dilatation-this patient stopped all medications after pPCI), and 1 sudden death at home 9 months after pPCI. Four other patients had events definitely unrelated to BVS. Overall, 1-year mortality was 2.9%. Computed tomographic angiography after 1 year was performed in 59 patients. All BVS were widely patent, and binary restenosis rate was 2% (the only restenosis mentioned above). Mean in-scaffold minimal luminal area was 7.8±2.6 mm(2), area stenosis was 20.1±16.3%, minimal luminal diameter was 3.0±0.6 mm, and diameter stenosis was 12.8±11.1%. CONCLUSIONS: BVS implantation in STEMI is feasible and safe and offers excellent 1-year clinical and angiographic outcomes.

[Fully absorbable drug eluting coronary stent: where do we stand in 2014?]. / Plne vstrebatelný lékový koronární stent: kde jsme v roce 2014?

Coronary stent is routinely used in majority percutaneous coronary interventions for a long time. They have an important role, especially, in the first months after intervention. We can consider as a breakthrough point the development of stent which has ability to absorb in intervened artery after a few years. The review presents current techniques of fully absorbable coronary stents and also provides clinical trials and experiences available in 2014. The article continues with discussion between supporters and opponents of this new technique, but definitive conclusion can't be done yet. The authors conclude the review with their own opinion. There are many encouraging data in patients with good clinical outcome after implantation of absorbable stents in more than 10 years follow-up.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study 'Prague 19'.

AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation became the default strategy for all consecutive STEMI patients between 15 December 2012 and 30 August 2013. A total of 142 patients underwent p-PCI; 41 of them (28.9%) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BVS implantation. The BVS device success was 98%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was restored in 95% of patients, and acute scaffold recoil was 9.7%. An optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy (21 patients) demonstrated excellent procedural results with only a 1.1% rate of scaffold strut malapposition. Edge dissections were present in a 38% of patients, but were small and clinically silent. Reference vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly lower than that measured by OCT by 0.29 (±0.56) mm, P = 0.028. Clinical outcomes were compared between BVS group and Control group; the latter was formed by patients who had implanted metallic stent and were in Killip Class I or II. Combined clinical endpoint was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was the same in both groups; 95% for BVS and 93% for Control group, P = 0.674. CONCLUSION: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute STEMI is feasible and safe. The procedural results evaluated by angiography and OCT are excellent. The early clinical results are encouraging.

Shock index: a simple clinical parameter for quick mortality risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Early identification of patients at risk for developing cardiogenic shock allows rapid decision making to determine reperfusion and transportation to a PCI centre. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate shock index (SI) as a marker for patients at risk of cardiogenic shock. METHODS: A total of 644 consecutive patients (73% male) with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevations were analyzed retrospectively. Primary PCI was performed in 92% of patients, and 7% of patients underwent rescue PCI. The SI parameter was defined as the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure at hospital admission. RESULTS: SI (odds ratio [OR], 81.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.76-676.51; P<0.001), age (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; P<0.001), and diabetes (OR, 4.94; 95% CI, 1.44-16.97; P<0.011) were independent predictors of mortality. In the group of patients with SI≥0.8, 20% died, whereas in the group with SI<0.8, 4% of patients died (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed clinical parameter SI correlates with patients' prognosis and could therefore be used as a simple indicator of mortality risk of acute myocardial infarction. The simplicity of this proposed index makes its use accessible in large-scale clinical practices for risk stratification during first contact with patients.

Long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to hospitals without catheterization laboratory and randomized to immediate thrombolysis or interhospital transport for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Five years' follow-up of the PRAGUE-2 Trial.

AIM: Randomized trials in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) showed improved early outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) compared with thrombolysis (TL). It is less known whether the early benefit is sustained during the long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PRAGUE-2 trial enrolled 850 STEMI patients presenting to community hospitals without cath-labs within 12 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomized into the groups 'TL in community hospital' (n = 421) and 'interhospital transfer for p-PCI' (n = 429). Follow-up data were available in 416 (98.8%) patients in the TL group and 428 (99.8%) in the p-PCI group. At 5 year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of composite endpoint (death from any cause or recurrent infarction or stroke or revascularization) was 53% in TL patients compared with 40% in p-PCI patients (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.38-2.33; P < 0.001). The respective cumulative incidence of death from any cause was 23 and 19% (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.99-1.82; P = 0.06), recurrent infarction 19 vs. 12% (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.15-2.58; P = 0.009), stroke 8 vs. 8% (HR 1.65; 95% CI 0.84-2.23; P = 0.18), revascularization 51 vs. 34% (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.21-2.35; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The early benefit from the p-PCI strategy (over TL) is sustained during the 5 years' follow-up. It can be almost exclusively derived from differences in event rate during the first month.

One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial.

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary bypass surgery has become a widely used technique during recent years. However, limited data are available with regard to 1-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the beating heart in unselected consecutive bypass surgery candidates. The aim of this study was to compare 1-year angiographic patency of bypass grafts done on the beating heart (off pump) with those done classically (on pump). METHODS AND RESULTS: The PRAGUE-4 trial randomized 400 consecutive nonselected cardiac surgery candidates into group A (on pump; n=192) and group B (off pump; n=208). One-year follow-up coronary angiography was done in 255 patients. The arterial graft patency after 1 year was 91% in both groups. Saphenous graft patency was 59% (on pump) versus 49% (off pump; P=NS). Saphenous graft patency per patient was lower in the off-pump group: 0.7 patent anastomosis per patient versus 1.1 patent anastomosis in the on-pump group (P<0.01). There were 46% on-pump patients with all grafts patent versus 52% off-pump patients (P=NS). Grafts anastomosed distally to collateralized chronic total occlusions of native coronary arteries remained patent in 100% on the left anterior descending artery compared with 23% on other arteries (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The patency of arterial coronary bypass grafts done on the beating heart is excellent and equal to grafts done on pump. The off-pump procedure in the unselected patient population results in fewer patent saphenous grafts per patient.