A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment of acute lisfranc injuries: Open reduction and internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the Lisfranc complex, although relatively rare carry a high morbidity and are often associated with other injuries. Despite a number published studies to determine the best operative management, there is an ongoing debate to whether open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or primary arthrodesis (PA) produces the best outcomes for patients. There have been further studies published in the last few years that have not been assessed as part of the wider literature and therefore we wished to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with inclusion of outcomes not assessed in the previous studies. METHODS: We performed a structured search for retrospective and prospective comparative papers and identified 8 relevant articles (2 RCT studies and 6 non-RCT studies) that compared the outcomes of ORIF versus PA; these studies included a total of 547 patients. Each of the studies was assessed for suitability and quality before inclusion. We performed a statistical analysis of the aggregated results as part of the review. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of ORIF versus PA in terms of return to work or activity (Odds Ratio 0.80 (CI 95%, 0.32-2.02, P=0.64)) and satisfaction rates (Odds Ratio 0.15 (CI 95%, 0.01-.00, P=0.25)). Patients undergoing ORIF have a higher risk of undergoing further surgery to remove the metalwork (Odds Ration 13.13 (CI 95%, 7.65-22.54, P<0.00001)) or to undergo secondary fusion, but, the overall complication rates appear to be equivalent in both groups (risk difference 0.03 (CI 95%, -0.15-0.21, P=0.76)). CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no significant differences in the functional outcomes, the overall power of the studies is low. The rates of metalwork removal and secondary fusion were higher in the ORIF group and this risk should be presented to the patient when counselling them for any procedure. We noted that there is a high level of heterogeneity in the type of injuries and measured outcomes included in each study and, therefore, further trials are needed to determine the best treatment across the spectrum of Lisfranc complex injuries.

Achillon versus open surgery in acute Achilles tendon repair.

BACKGROUND: Open Achilles tendon repairs (OATR) are associated with high complication rates. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques like the Achillon Achilles tendon repair (AATR) were developed to reduce this. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare OATR with AATR. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search including all studies that compared the two techniques. Outcomes assessed included overall complication rate, re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, wound length, The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Scores (AOFAS) scores and return to sports. RESULTS: Eight studies were suitable for inclusion totalling 210 patients in the AATR group vs 233 patients in the OATR group. Total complication rates were significantly reduced in the Achillon patients with odd ratio of 0.14 (CI 95%, 0.08-0.27, P<0.00001) in favour. There were no significant differences in re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, return to sports and AOFAS scores following repair between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: AATR has fewer overall complications compared with OATR. It should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair.

Is Achillon repair safe and reliable in delayed presentation Achilles tendon rupture? A five-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: To assess the outcome of delayed repair of ruptured Achilles tendon using the Achillon mini-open technique. METHODS: A review of all patients who underwent delayed repair (>10 days post injury) of ruptured Achilles tendon with mini invasive technique was compared to acute repairs carried out at the same unit. Leppilahti Score and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) were utilised. Complication rates including re-rupture were also reviewed. RESULTS: 14 patients were identified as having delayed repair (11-31 days). The mean follow-up period was 71 months (range: 58-92). There were no statistically significant difference in the Leppilahti Score and ATRS compared to patients treated acutely (<10 days post injury) in the same time period. 79% of patients with delayed repair reported good to excellent, comparable to 80% of patients having undergone acute repair. CONCLUSIONS: For those patients who would benefit from surgical repair, a mini-open technique using the Achillon suture-passing device remains a safe and reliable option for delayed presentation of 11-31 days.

Ankle syndesmosis repair and rehabilitation in professional rugby league players: a case series report.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The distal tibiofibular joint is described as a syndesmosis. Traditionally, severe syndesmotic injuries with diastasis have been treated surgically with screw fixation. This case series details an ankle syndesmosis tightrope repair and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol that reduces the amount of time to return to professional rugby league in the UK. The aim of this study was to describe players' journey from injury, through diagnosis to surgery, rehabilitation and return to participation, detailing time scales and methods used at each stage to highlight the change in current practice. METHODS: Players were identified via a single orthopaedic surgeon in the UK who specialises in ankle syndesmosis repair. Between January 2010 and September 2015, adult men playing full-time professional rugby league in the UK Super League with ankle syndesmosis injuries were identified. RESULTS: Eighteen players from six different clubs were included. The most common mechanism of injury was forced dorsiflexion/eversion. The average return to participation was 64 days (SD 17.2, range 38-108). This compares favourably to reports of between 120 and 180 days following screw fixation. CONCLUSION: Ankle syndesmosis tightrope repair and an accelerated rehabilitation protocol is as safe as traditional methods. The accelerated rehabilitation protocol promotes early weight-bearing and has shown to expedite the return to sport for professional Rugby League players. It is possible to return to sport 2 months after a tightrope repair and accelerated rehabilitation, compared with 3-6 months post screw fixation. This is extremely encouraging for the professional sporting population.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery For Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

The minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach has been popularised as an alternative to the standard open approach in acute Achilles tendon repair. Advocates of MIS suggest earlier functional recovery, due to reduced trauma to adjacent soft tissues. Critics, however, argue that due to inadequate surgical exposure, complications of such surgery are higher compared to an open technique. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, prospective studies weas conducted to compare MIS and open surgery in acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 854 patients. Although re-rupture rates were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.43), there were significantly more complications in the open surgery group (P = <.00001). MIS in acute Achilles tendon ruptures result in similar re-rupture rates, sural nerve injury rates and return to sport time in comparison with open surgical method, but with significantly less post-operative complications.

The geometric architecture of the subtalar and midtarsal joints in rheumatoid arthritis based on magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in vivo the 3-dimensional (3-D) geometric architecture of the subtalar and midtarsal joints in normal and rheumatoid arthritic (RA) feet, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis. METHODS: MRI was performed on 23 patients with RA, all of whom had disease activity in the subtalar and/or midtarsal joints. Image processing techniques were used to create 3-D reconstructions of the calcaneus (C), cuboid (c), navicular (N), and talus (T) bones. Twenty-four standard architectural parameters were measured from the reconstructions and were compared with data from 10 normal subjects. These parameters defined both 3-D distance and angular relationships among the 4 bones studied. Pattern classification techniques were used to establish a geometric architecture foot profile for the RA patients. The degree of individual patient fit to the new RA foot profile and to profiles for normal, pes planus, and pes cavus foot types was derived. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship of foot architecture to inflammatory disease characteristics and physical examination variables. RESULTS: Subtalar or midtarsal pain was reported by all 23 patients, and 22 of the 23 patients presented with >/=1 clinical feature of pes planovalgus deformity. In 21 patients, ultrasonography revealed synovitis at >/=1 tarsal joint or surrounding tendon. In the RA group, the normalized distances between the geometric centroids were significantly closer for bone pairs Cc and cT and significantly distracted for bone pair CN compared with the distances in normal subjects. In RA patients (versus normal subjects), the angles subtended at the bone centroids were significantly decreased in 3 bone groups (CNc, TCN, and TNc) and significantly increased in 3 bone groups (CcN, CcT, NTc). The angles formed between the major principal axes of bone pairs CT and cT were significantly increased in RA patients compared with those in normal subjects. Pattern classification defined 11 RA feet as having normal structure and 12 as having abnormal structure. However, the abnormal feet did not fit consistently with structures defined for RA, pes planus, or pes cavus foot types. Logistic regression demonstrated that subtalar joint synovitis was the only predictive factor for abnormal subtalar and midtarsal architecture (odds ratio 19.2, 95% confidence interval 1.77-200.0). CONCLUSION: This unique 3-D MRI-based technique successfully quantified the effects of RA on the geometric architecture of the foot and the patient-specific nature of these changes. This technique can be used to provide logical therapy for correction.