Performance of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in Confirming Feeding Tube Placement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

BACKGROUND: A feeding tube (FT) is routinely placed in critically ill patients, and its correct placement is confirmed with a chest X-ray (CXR), which is considered the gold standard. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (USG) in verifying FT placement compared to a CXR in an intensive care unit (ICU). METHOD: This was a prospective single-blind study conducted on patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. The FT placements were verified through a fogging test and USG at the neck and subxiphoid points. The results of confirmation of FT placement through USG were compared with those obtained using CXRs. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were included in this study. The FT positions were accurately confirmed by overall USG assessments in 71 patients. The percentage of FT placements correctly identified by neck USG was 97.5%, while the percentage of those identified by epigastric USG was 75%. The corresponding patients' CXRs confirmed correct FT placement in 76 patients. The overall USG assessment had a sensitivity of 92.11% and specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value of 98.59%, and a negative predictive value of 33.33%. The USG findings also showed a significant association between FT size and BMI. FTs with a size of 14Fr were better visualized (p = 0.008), and negative USG findings had a significantly higher BMI (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: USG is a simple, safe, and reliable bedside assessment that offers relatively high sensitivity in confirming correct FT placement in critically ill patients.

Assessment of Awareness of Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity (LAST) among Postgraduate Trainees.

Introduction: Although uncommon, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) may impose fatal risk to the patients. We investigated the awareness of LAST and knowledge on local anaesthetics among our postgraduate trainees. Materials and Methods: A total of 134 postgraduate trainees from the departments of general surgery (Surgical), orthopaedic surgery (Ortho), otorhinolaryngology (ENT), obstetrics and gynaecology (OBGYN), as well as anaesthesiology and intensive care (Anaesth) were recruited. A validated questionnaire was used to assess awareness and knowledge. All participants attended a medical-education session and completed the questionnaire as preassessment and postassessment. Data were analysed, and comparisons between disciplines were conducted. Results: The trainees' awareness of LAST was overall poor at preassessment which improved almost 6-folds at postassessment. Surprisingly, only 20 (45.5%) participants from the anaesthesiology group had awareness of LAST at preassessment, and none of the participants were from surgical, orthopaedic, and obstetrics and gynaecology departments. Preassessment scores were significantly higher in the anaesth group as compared to all other groups; with a difference in the average score for Anaesth vs Surgical of 3.46 (95%, CI:2.17, 4.74), Anaesth vs Ortho of 3.64 (95%, CI:2.64, 4.64), Anaesth vs ENT of 3.43 (95%, CI:2.20, 4.67), and Anaesth vs OBGYN of 6.93 (95%, CI:5.64, 8.21). However, there was no significant difference of awareness scores between all participants at postassessment scores. Conclusion: The overall level of awareness was poor. However, the implementation of an education session significantly improved the knowledge and awareness across all disciplines.

The Impact of Educational Intervention on Attitude Toward Organ Donation Among Health Care Workers in Malaysia.

BACKGROUND: The attitudes of the health care workers (HCWs) are essential in influencing organ donation rate. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of an educational intervention on attitudes toward organ donation among HCWs. METHODS: A questionnaire-based interventional study was conducted with 458 HCW from 5 hospitals in Malaysia. A 26-item self-administered questionnaire was distributed online as a preintervention test. Respondents then went through website-based educational materials followed by a post-intervention questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 345 (75.3%) respondents completed the tests. Their attitude toward organ donation was positive preintervention. After the intervention, respondents expressed an increase willingness to donate their own organs (P = .008) and their relatives' organs (P < .001) after death; were more willing to adopt organ donation as part of end-of-life care (P =.002); were more comfortable talking to relatives about organ donation (P =.001); and expressed an increase consideration to execute the action at any time (P =.001). There was increased willingness to admit to the intensive care unit for facilitating organ donation (P =.007); to employ the same resources to maintain a potential brain-dead donor (P < .001); and to support organ donation in case they or their relatives were diagnosed with end-stage organ failure (P =.008). However, there was an increase in negative attitudes regarding the association between organ donation with health care failure (P =.004) and with pain (P =.003). Positive attitude scores were higher after the intervention (P < .001). CONCLUSION: An educational website-based intervention was able to improve the attitudes of HCWs toward organ donation.