Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anal Chem ; 81(18): 7604-10, 2009 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19702277

ABSTRACT

The diversity of experimental workflows involving LC-MS/MS and the extended range of mass spectrometers tend to produce extremely variable spectra. Variability reduces the accuracy of compound identification produced by commonly available software for a spectral library search. We introduce here a new algorithm that successfully matches MS/MS spectra generated by a range of instruments, acquired under different conditions. Our algorithm called X-Rank first sorts peak intensities of a spectrum and second establishes a correlation between two sorted spectra. X-Rank then computes the probability that a rank from an experimental spectrum matches a rank from a reference library spectrum. In a training step, characteristic parameter values are generated for a given data set. We compared the efficiency of the X-Rank algorithm with the dot-product algorithm implemented by MS Search from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on two test sets produced with different instruments. Overall the X-Rank algorithm accurately discriminates correct from wrong matches and detects more correct substances than the MS Search. Furthermore, X-Rank could correctly identify and top rank eight chemical compounds in a commercially available test mix. This confirms the ability of the algorithm to perform both a straight single-platform identification and a cross-platform library search in comparison to other tools. It also opens the possibility for efficient general unknown screening (GUS) against large compound libraries.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Organic Chemicals/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Chromatography, Liquid
2.
Proteomics ; 4(8): 2333-51, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15274127

ABSTRACT

We present an integrated proteomics platform designed for performing differential analyses. Since reproducible results are essential for comparative studies, we explain how we improved reproducibility at every step of our laboratory processes, e.g. by taking advantage of the powerful laboratory information management system we developed. The differential capacity of our platform is validated by detecting known markers in a real sample and by a spiking experiment. We introduce an innovative two-dimensional (2-D) plot for displaying identification results combined with chromatographic data. This 2-D plot is very convenient for detecting differential proteins. We also adapt standard multivariate statistical techniques to show that peptide identification scores can be used for reliable and sensitive differential studies. The interest of the protein separation approach we generally apply is justified by numerous statistics, complemented by a comparison with a simple shotgun analysis performed on a small volume sample. By introducing an automatic integration step after mass spectrometry data identification, we are able to search numerous databases systematically, including the human genome and expressed sequence tags. Finally, we explain how rigorous data processing can be combined with the work of human experts to set high quality standards, and hence obtain reliable (false positive < 0.35%) and nonredundant protein identifications.


Subject(s)
Body Fluids/chemistry , Gene Expression Profiling , Information Management/methods , Proteins/analysis , Proteins/chemistry , Proteomics/methods , Chromatography/instrumentation , Chromatography/methods , Computational Biology , Databases, Factual , Humans , Information Management/instrumentation , Mass Spectrometry/instrumentation , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Peptides/analysis , Proteins/genetics , Proteins/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...