Endovascular Management of Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) Aneurysm - Adequate Access is Essential for Success - Case Report.

BACKGROUND: An aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with a diameter of 2.2 cm was found incidentally on an ultrasound (US) examination in a 26-year-old woman. The only known risk factor was an intracranial aneurysm that was found on her grandmother's autopsy. Based on pregnancy planning and the current literature, endovascular management with a covered stent was proposed. CASE REPORT: Self-expandable, covered stent (Bard, Fluency®) was implanted using a single transfemoral approach. A stiff guidewire and a large sheath distorted the anatomy, which resulted in an incomplete aneurysmal neck covering. In the absence of additional covered stents, the procedure was terminated. Two weeks later, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) confirmed persistent aneurysmal perfusion due to the incomplete neck coverage. A multidisciplinary board opted for a second endovascular attempt, this time with a longer covered stent via the transaxillary approach in order to reduce anatomical distortion. Balloon, expandable, cobalt-chrome covered stent (Jotec, E-ventus BX®) was implanted in the SMA, covering the aneurysmal neck and overlapping the previously implanted covered stent. Angiography confirmed a complete exclusion of the aneurysm. A control US performed three weeks later confirmed a patent covered stent and complete aneurysmal exclusion. There was a mild median nerve damage periprocedurally that resolved in three months. The most recent US control examination, performed eleven months after the procedure, showed an excluded aneurysm and a patent covered stent. There were no clinical signs of bowel ischaemia during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular management of SMAA proved to be safe and efficient. The "access from above" is probably safer and should be considered in the majority of cases with acceptable sizes of access vessels. Mid-term results in our patient are good and life-long follow-up is planned to prevent late complications.

Early identification of patients with the risk for postoperative carotid restenosis development.

Multiple randomized trials over the last decade for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis have proven the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in reducing the risk of stroke. The aim of this prospective non-randomizing cohort study was to determine the incidence of carotid arteries restenosis after CEA as well as to ascertain the clinical and etiological characteristics for the development of restenosis. Treatment data from 178 KBC Rijeka patients that had undergone CEA in the period 1. 09. 2005-30. 8. 2009 has been processed. All patients are monitored trough our Neurosonology laboratory algorythm--first Doppler ultrasound examination within the first week after CEA and the following after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. After this time once a years. The average monitoring time was 21 month (1-36 months). In the stated period 27 restenosis was diagnosed (15.16%). Only four of them were symptomatic (14.81%). Patient survival rate is 98% in the first 12 and 92% in the first 36 months. Carotid restenosis is usually asymptomatic. Non-invasive postoperative carotid arteries color Doppler screening is essential in the early identification of patients with the risk for the development of restenosis.

Comparison between carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy in early outcome.

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a widely used method in prevention of stroke for carotid artery stenosis as an alternative to surgical treatment. Initial studies reveal higher morbidity and mortality rates for CAS than acceptable standards for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of this study was to compare results in a series of CAS with concurrent risk-matched group of CEA patients. The study included two groups of 50 patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. We compared early outcome (30 days after procedure) in risk-matched groups of patients that underwent these procedures. Post procedural complications were equally frequent in both groups. There was no significant difference in perioperative complication rates (P = 0.871). Comparison of these two methods shows that CAS and CEA are competitive methods for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Particularly in symptomatic patients with high risk for surgery CAS is alternative treatment.

Spontaneous recanalization of internal carotid artery occlusion.

We present a case of spontaneous recanalization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) that occurred in a 51-year-old male patient. The occlusion of the right ICA was asymptomatic and was detected incidentally during imaging of the opposite carotid artery. The patient underwent neuroradiologic analysis and a tapered, flame-like occlusion suggestive of the right ICA dissection was detected. One month later, a carotid Doppler ultrasound demonstrated patent right carotid artery with normal spectral flow. Five-month follow-up showed that the ICA remained patent.

[Pseudoaneurysm after renal transplantation]. / Pseudoaneurizma nakon transplantacije bubrega.

AIMS: Renal arterial pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of renal transplantation that often causes a graft loss. A recent successful outcome of the operative treatment and a reappearance of a pseudoaneurysm and a possibility of watchful followup of pseudoaneurysm encouraged us to present our modest experience with pseudoaneurysm after renal transplant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our series of 843 renal transplants performed during 37 years vascular complications were observed in 57 (6.76%) patients. Pseudoaneurysm occurred in three patients (0.35%). The first pseudoaneurysm was found in 1973. A 23-year-old male patient received a double renal artery kidney from HLA identical brother. The upper renal artery was anastomosed by an end-to-end way with the internal iliac artery, and and the lower renal artery by end-to-side way to the external iliac artery. Five weeks after transplant an arteriography was performed because of the bruits heard over the transplant. A 15 x 10-mm pseudoaneurysm was revealed on the end-to-end anastomosis between internal iliac and upper renal artery. Six weeks after transplant a renal arterial resection and an end-to-side anastomosis between renal artery and common iliac artery was performed. The 38-year-old male patient received his second transplant from a 17-year-old female donor dead after craniocerebral trauma in December 2004. Two renal arteries were anastomosed separately with external iliac artery using aortic patches. Two and half moths after transplant he was admitted for an increase of creatinine level and hypertension. Color Doppler, dynamic scintigraphy and an angiography revealed a 20 x 1,3 mm aneurysmatic formation at the anastomosis of upper renal artery. The flow in the belonging part of the transplant was reduced. At surgical intervention a saphenous vein graft between internal iliac artery and renal artery was performed. Ischemia time was 15 min. The pseudoaneurysm was removed. A hole on external iliac artery was closed with a saphenal patch. The 38-year-old female patient received her second transplant in January 2005 from cadaver. There were 3 arteries. The upper polar arterywas first anastomosed to principal renal artery Then both arteries were anastomosed to external iliac artery termino-laterally. RESULTS: In the first patient a lesion of the ureteral anastomosis caused an infection, thrombosis of lower artery and a graft loss 4 months and half after transplant. The second patient was admitted urgently 3.5 months after the repair of his pseudoaneurysm because of the pain in the pelvic region. He was working that day during several hours in sitting position on his terrace. Immediate examination with color Doppler revealed a large 6 x 7-cm pseudoaneurysm medially of the transplant. An arteriography demonstrated a pseudoaneurysm with a blood leakage most likely at the site of the closure of external iliac artery with a saphenal vein patch. The arteriography showed a slower and diminished blood flow in the lower part of the transplant. At intervention the pseudoaneurysm was removed. The external iliac artery was considerably damaged and replaced with Goretex prostesis 6 mm. Unfortunately the transplant lower artery could not be saved. A microbiological examination of pseudoaneurysm in both patients was negative. In the third case we chose a watchful follow-up. Last Doppler controls show reduction of psudoaneurysm. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The development of a pseudoaneurysm of a transplant artery is very rare complication. Since actually ultrasonography is routinely used, a pseudoaneurysm can be easily detected. Color Doppler allows a differential diagnosis from hematoma, urinoma and lymphocele. Unfortunately a pseudoaneurysm after renal transplant often causes a loss of the transplant. The first patient had successful resection of a pseudoaneurysm, but the transplant was lost because of infection. The other patient had a subsequent pseudoaneurysm after the repair of the first. Unfortunately its repair caused an exclusion of the lower part of the kidney, but the residual renal function is satisfactory. In the third patient we chose a follow-up aware that each intervention could cause a graft loss.