Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Bull World Health Organ ; 79(10): 954-62, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11693978

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer is an important public health problem among adult women in developing countries in South and Central America, sub-Saharan Africa, and south and south-east Asia. Frequently repeated cytology screening programmes--either organized or opportunistic--have led to a large decline in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in developed countries. In contrast, cervical cancer remains largely uncontrolled in high-risk developing countries because of ineffective or no screening. This article briefly reviews the experience from existing screening and research initiatives in developing countries. Substantial costs are involved in providing the infrastructure, manpower, consumables, follow-up and surveillance for both organized and opportunistic screening programmes for cervical cancer. Owing to their limited health care resources, developing countries cannot afford the models of frequently repeated screening of women over a wide age range that are used in developed countries. Many low-income developing countries, including most in sub-Saharan Africa, have neither the resources nor the capacity for their health services to organize and sustain any kind of screening programme. Middle-income developing countries, which currently provide inefficient screening, should reorganize their programmes in the light of experiences from other countries and lessons from their past failures. Middle-income countries intending to organize a new screening programme should start first in a limited geographical area, before considering any expansion. It is also more realistic and effective to target the screening on high-risk women once or twice in their lifetime using a highly sensitive test, with an emphasis on high coverage (>80%) of the targeted population. Efforts to organize an effective screening programme in these developing countries will have to find adequate financial resources, develop the infrastructure, train the needed manpower, and elaborate surveillance mechanisms for screening, investigating, treating, and following up the targeted women. The findings from the large body of research on various screening approaches carried out in developing countries and from the available managerial guidelines should be taken into account when reorganizing existing programmes and when considering new screening initiatives.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries/economics , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Rationing , Humans , Income/classification , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged , Poverty , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/prevention & control , Precancerous Conditions/therapy , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears
4.
Int J Cancer ; 68(6): 770-3, 1996 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8980182

ABSTRACT

A total of 3784 women aged 35 and above living in 26 villages in rural Maharashtra state, India, were invited to undergo a pelvic examination, to evaluate the performance of unaided visual inspection by trained paramedical workers in detecting cervical cancer. Of this number, 2135 (56.4%) women complied with the invitation. Paramedical workers scored 1120 (57.3%) and 118 (6%) women as having abnormal cervices using the low- and high-threshold criteria respectively. There was good agreement between the visual findings of the paramedical workers and those of a gynaecologist. All subjects had a cervical smear. A total of 10 cervical cancers were detected by cytology/histology. The sensitivity of visual inspection by paramedical workers to detect cervical cancer was 90.0% using the low threshold and 60.0% with the high threshold to define a positive test. The values for specificity were 42.8% and 94.5% respectively. The results obtained by the gynaecologist were very similar. Cost savings implied by limiting cytology/other investigations to approximately half of the population pre-selected on the basis of visual inspection are likely to be offset by the necessity to repeat the test at frequent intervals, repeated follow-up visits and other investigations.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/pathology , Mass Screening/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Allied Health Personnel , Female , Gynecology , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Reproducibility of Results , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...