Ankle Instability: Facts and Myths to Protect Your Cartilage Repairing.

The majority of patients with an osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) report a history of trauma. Therefore, it is important to assess for concomitant ankle instability when dealing with patients with a symptomatic OLT. The History; Alignment; Ligaments; Others "(HALO)" approach can be a helpful tool in the evaluation of patients with an OLT. If conservative treatment fails, surgery may be indicated. Although there is a lack of comparative studies investigating the effect of stabilization procedures on cartilage repair, we believe that addressing instability is a key factor in improving patient outcome.

Tibiotalocalcaneal and Tibiotalar Arthrodesis for Severe Cavovarus Deformity: Tips and Tricks.

Cavovarus foot is a complex 3-dimensional deformity. Clinical history, physical examination, and comorbidity assessment are essential for preoperative evaluation. In severe cases, ankle or tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis can provide symptomatic relief and result in a plantigrade foot. This article emphasizes the importance of weight-bearing computed tomography for surgical planning and presents the authors' preferred technique for tibiotalocalcaneal, which includes a novel curved anterolateral incision, partial fibular onlay bridging graft, and patient-specific instrumentation for forefoot deformity correction. The tips and tricks aim to assist surgeons in better treating these challenging patients while optimizing preoperative planning.

Supramalleolar Osteotomies in Cavovarus Foot Deformity: Why Patient-Specific Instruments Make a Difference.

Supramalleolar osteotomy enables correction of the ankle varus deformity and is associated with improvement of pain and function in the short term and long term. Despite these beneficial results, the amount of surgical correction is challenging to titrate and the procedure remains technically demanding. Most supramalleolar osteotomies are currently planned preoperatively on 2-dimensional weight-bearing radiographs and executed peroperatively using free-hand techniques. This article encompasses 3-dimensional planning and printing techniques based on weight-bearing computed tomography images and patient-specific instruments to correct ankle varus deformities.

Ankle Joint Bone Density Distribution Correlates with Overall 3-Dimensional Foot and Ankle Alignment.

BACKGROUND: Altered stress distribution in the lower limb may impact bone mineral density (BMD) in the ankle bones. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the spatial distribution of BMD with use of weight-bearing cone-beam computed tomography (WBCT). Our hypothesis was that BMD distribution would be even in normal hindfeet, increased medially in varus hindfeet, and increased laterally in valgus hindfeet. METHODS: In this study, 27 normally aligned hindfeet were retrospectively compared with 27 valgus and 27 varus-aligned hindfeet. Age (p = 0.967), body mass index (p = 0.669), sex (p = 0.820), and side (p = 0.708) were similar in the 3 groups. Hindfoot alignment was quantified on the basis of WBCT data sets with use of multiple measurements. BMD was calculated with use of the mean Hounsfield unit (HU) value as a surrogate. The HU medial-to-lateral ratio (HUR), calculated from tibial and talar medial and lateral half-volumes, was the primary outcome of the study. RESULTS: The 3 groups significantly differed (p < 0.001) in terms of tibial HUR (median, 0.91 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.75 to 0.98] in valgus hindfeet, 1 [IQR, 0.94 to 1.05] in normal hindfeet, and 1.04 [IQR, 0.99 to 1.1] in varus hindfeet) and talar HUR (0.74 [IQR, 0.50 to 0.80] in valgus hindfeet, 0.82 [IQR, 0.76 to 0.87] in normal hindfeet, and 0.92 [IQR, 0.86 to 1.05] in varus hindfeet). Linear regression showed that all hindfoot measurements significantly correlated with tibial and talar HUR (p < 0.001 for all). The mean HU values for normally-aligned hindfeet were 495.2 ± 110 (medial tibia), 495.6 ± 108.1 (lateral tibia), 368.9 ± 80.3 (medial talus), 448.2 ± 90.6 (lateral talus), and 686.7 ± 120.4 (fibula). The mean HU value for each compartment was not significantly different across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hindfoot alignment and medial-to-lateral BMD distribution were correlated. In varus hindfeet, an increased HU medial-to-lateral ratio was consistent with a greater medial bone density in the tibia and talus as compared with the lateral parts of these bones. In valgus hindfeet, a decreased ratio suggested greater bone density in the lateral as compared with the medial parts of both the tibia and the talus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Correction of ankle varus deformity using patient-specific dome-shaped osteotomy guides designed on weight-bearing CT: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Dome-shaped supramalleolar osteotomies are a well-established treatment option for correcting ankle deformity. However, the procedure remains technically demanding and is limited by a two-dimensional (2D) radiographic planning of a three-dimensional (3D) deformity. Therefore, we implemented a weight-bearing CT (WBCT) to plan a 3D deformity correction using patient-specific guides. METHODS: A 3D-guided dome-shaped supramalleolar osteotomy was performed to correct ankle varus deformity in a case series of five patients with a mean age of 53.8 years (range 47-58). WBCT images were obtained to generate 3D models, which enabled a deformity correction using patient-specific guides. These technical steps are outlined and associated with a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome using the EFAS score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and visual analog pain scale (VAS). Radiographic assessment was performed using the tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), tibiotalar angle (TTS), talar tilt angle (TTA), hindfoot angle (HA), tibial lateral surface angle (TLS) and tibial rotation angle (TRA). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 40.8 months (range 8-65) and all patients showed improvements in the EFAS score, FAOS and VAS (p < 0.05). A 3-month postoperative WBCT confirmed healing of the osteotomy site and radiographic improvement of the TAS, TTS and HA (p < 0.05), but the TTA and TRA did not change significantly (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dome-shaped supramalleolar osteotomies using 3D-printed guides designed on WBCT are a valuable option in correcting ankle varus deformity and have the potential to mitigate the technical drawbacks of free-hand osteotomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5 case series.

Morphometric analysis of the incisura fibularis in patients with unstable high ankle sprains.

OBJECTIVE: The role of the syndesmotic ankle ligaments as extrinsic stabilizers of the distal tibiofibular joint (DTFJ) has been studied extensively in patients with high ankle sprains (HAS). However, research concerning the fibular incisura as intrinsic stabilizer of the DTFJ has been obscured by a two-dimensional assessment of a three-dimensional structure. Therefore, we aimed to compare the morphometry of the incisura fibularis between patients with HAS and a control group using three-dimensional radiographic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with a mean age of 44 years (SD = 15.2) diagnosed with an unstable HAS and twenty-five control subjects with a mean age of 47.4 years (SD = 6.5) were analyzed in this retrospective comparative study. The obtained CT images were converted to three-dimensional models, and the following radiographic parameters of the incisura fibularis were determined using three-dimensional measurements: incisura width, incisura depth, incisura height, incisura angle, incisura width-depth ratio, and incisura-tibia ratio. RESULTS: The mean incisura depth (M = 4.7 mm, SD = 1.1 mm), incisura height (M = 36.1 mm, SD = 5.3 mm), and incisura angle of the control group (M = 137.2°, SD = 7.9°) differed significantly from patients with a HAS (resp., M = 3.8 mm, SD = 1.1 mm; M = 31.9 mm, SD = 3.2 mm; M = 143.2°, SD = 8.3°) (P < 0.05). The incisura width, incisura width-depth ratio, and incisura-tibia ratio demonstrated no significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our three-dimensional comparative analysis has detected a shallower and shorter fibular incisura in patients with HAS. This distinct morphology could have repercussion on the intrinsic or osseous stability of the DTFJ. Future prospective radiographic assessment could determine to what extend the fibular incisura morphology contributes to syndesmotic ankle injuries caused by high ankle sprains.

3D, Weightbearing Topographical Study of Periprosthetic Cysts and Alignment in Total Ankle Replacement.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the association between hindfoot residual malalignment assessed on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) images and the development of periprosthetic cysts (PPCs) after total ankle replacement (TAR). We hypothesized that PPCs would be found predominantly medially in the varus configuration and laterally in the valgus configuration. METHODS: Cases of primary TAR with available WBCT imaging of the ankle were included in this retrospective study. The location of the PPC was marked and the following volumes were calculated: total (TCV), medial (MCV), central (CCV), and lateral (LCV) cyst volumes. Hindfoot alignment was measured as Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) calculated to define varus (<95% CI) and valgus (>95% CI) groups. Cyst volumes were compared between these 2 groups. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at the time of the WBCT was also retrieved. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine FAO thresholds for predicting an increased risk of PPC. RESULTS: Forty-eight TARs (mean follow-up, 44.6 months) were included, 81% of which had at least 1 PPC. The mean FAO was 0.12% (95% CI, -1.12 to 1.36). Patients with greater residual malalignment (P < .001) and those with longer follow-up (P < .001) presented with increased TCV. In varus cases, the MCV was greater than the LCV (P = .042), with a threshold FAO value of -2.75% or less predicting an increased MCV. In valgus cases, the LCV was greater than the MCV (P = .049), with a FAO threshold value of 4.5% or more predicting an increased LCV. CONCLUSION: In this series, the PPC volume after primary TAR significantly correlated with postoperative hindfoot malalignment and longer follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Long term clinical results of hallux varus correction by a reversed abductor hallucis transfer.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic hallux varus is a rare complication after hallux valgus surgery. Operative treatment comprises a wide variety of techniques, of which the reversed transfer of the abductor hallucis tendon is the most recent described technique. METHODS: This paper will present the long-term clinical results of the reversed transfer of the abductor hallucis longus. Therefore, we performed a prospective clinical observational study on 16 female patients. Our hypothesis is that the tendon transfer will persist in a good alignment and patient satisfaction on long term. There is a 100% follow-up rate with a range from 10 to 101 months. Patients were subjected to a clinical examination, three questionnaires and their general satisfaction. RESULTS: Out of 16 patients, at time of follow-up, we found a positive correlation between the subjective outcome score and alignment (r=0.59), and between the general satisfaction and alignment (r=0.77). Based on the general satisfaction we achieved a success satisfaction rate of 69% (11 patients). The other 31% (5 patients) patient group was only satisfied with major reservations or not satisfied at all. The two most invalidating complications were a coronal or sagittal malalignment or the combination of both. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the reverse abductor hallucis tendon transfer is a good technique to treat a supple iatrogenic hallux varus with an observed success satisfaction rate of 69% at a mean follow-up time of 48 (range 10-101) months. However, patients should be informed that on the long-term loss of correction is possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective clinical observational study: Level IIb.