Subject(s)
Aneurysm/physiopathology , Catheterization, Peripheral , Femoral Artery , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Thrombolytic Therapy , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Amputation, Surgical , Calcinosis/drug therapy , Calcinosis/physiopathology , Child, Preschool , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Ischemia/drug therapy , Ischemia/surgery , Leg/blood supply , Leg/surgery , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Treatment Failure , Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A 6-year experience with surgical management of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) was examined to determine the influence of infrapopliteal outflow vessel patency on the long-term success of popliteal artery aneurysmorrhaphy. METHODS: Arteriograms were reviewed to characterize the anatomy of the infrapopliteal arterial runoff. Regular clinical evaluation and prospective serial duplex scan surveillance assessed graft patency. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients underwent 45 popliteal aneurysmorrhaphies. Elective repair was performed in 32 limbs (71%); emergency treatment was needed for 13 limbs (29%) because of acute limb-threatening ischemia. All patients were managed with PAA exclusion and reversed saphenous vein grafting. Only 20 limbs (44%) had a patent trifurcation with three continuous vessels to the ankle, 13 (29%) had two continuous tibial vessels, 10 (22%) had one patent runoff artery, and 2 (4%) had no vessel continuous to the foot. With a mean follow-up of 19.1 months, the 5-year primary graft patency by life-table analysis was 95 +/- 12.3%, with a 5-year assisted primary patency of 97 +/- 10.0%. One vein graft underwent elective secondary revision. Another graft thrombosed, requiring a secondary bypass. Outcome did not correlate with the status of the runoff anatomy. Limb salvage was 100%. CONCLUSION: The use of autologous reversed vein grafting and attention to technical details yielded normal graft hemodynamics and excellent long-term patency and limb salvage despite the suboptimal runoff anatomy associated with PAAs.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm/surgery , Popliteal Artery/physiopathology , Popliteal Artery/surgery , Saphenous Vein/transplantation , Vascular Patency , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Remission InductionABSTRACT
Three hundred forty-eight teaching (TH) and 282 nonteaching (NTH) hospitals were surveyed to determine how intensive care unit (ICU) care is delivered to surgical patients and current views on surgical critical care. Teaching hospitals were more likely than NTHs to have a separate surgical ICU (92% versus 37%), a dedicated ICU service/physician (37% versus 7%), and a surgeon as director of the ICU (67% versus 29%). All THs and 33% of NTHs provided 24 hour in-house coverage for the ICU. A majority of respondents preferred a surgeon as ICU director (TH, 85%; NTH, 67%) and felt that critical care was an essential part of surgery (THs, 87%; NTHs, 74%). Most (THs, 58%; NTHs, 56%) thought that a cooperative effort between the primary service and an ICU service provided better patient care, but only 37% of THs and 22% of NTHs provided care with such a system. Many (THs, 45%; NTHs, 33%) thought that surgeons are willingly relinquishing ICU care. Surgeons continue to desire responsibility for their patients in the ICU and most prefer ICU service involvement provided by surgeons. This discrepancy between what is practiced and what is desired, along with proposed changes in reimbursement for surgery and the recent definition of critical care as an essential part of surgery, may stimulate greater involvement of surgeons in critical care.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Hospitals/standards , Intensive Care Units/standards , Physician Executives/psychology , Quality of Health Care , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Data Collection , Hospital Bed Capacity , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , WorkforceABSTRACT
One-hundred and two patients with hemophilia A, hemophilia B, or acquired antibody to factor VIII who had undergone invasive procedures were cross referenced with patients participating in an ongoing prospective natural history study of HIV-1 infection in hemophiliacs. Matching revealed that HIV-1 status was known for 83 patients (83%) who had undergone 169 procedures between July 1979 and April 1988. Invasive procedures were classified as clean in 108 patients (63.9%), clean-contaminated in 45 (26.6%), contaminated in 2 (1.2%), and infected in 14 (8.3%). Wound infection rates by HIV-1 status were as follows (95% confidence intervals): HIV+ 1.4% (0% to 5%), HIV- 0% (0% to 9%), and procedure before testing HIV+ 1.5% (0% to 6%). There were no significant differences between the wound infection rates of HIV-positive and HIV-negative hemophiliacs nor in the wound infection rate among all three subgroups of patients (p greater than 0.5, Fisher's Exact Test). We conclude that surgery in HIV-1-infected patients who have not progressed to AIDS does not entail an increased risk of postoperative wound infections.
