The contribution of donor quality to differential graft survival in African American and Caucasian renal transplant recipients.

Although a number of factors contributing to the disparity in graft survival between African American (AA) and Caucasian kidney transplant recipients have been described, the role of donor quality is less well understood. This study was undertaken to determine the impact of donor quality differences on this disparity, based on review of UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) data on deceased donor renal transplantation from 2000 to 2010. Donor quality was determined by the kidney donor risk index (DRI), and was compared between AA and Caucasian recipients. There were 33,405 Caucasians and 22,577 African Americans in the study, with mean DRI of 1.17 versus 1.27 (p < 0.001), respectively. In analysis 2,446 recipients of each race matched by propensity scoring (based on medical, socioeconomic and immunologic covariates), mean DRI was 1.25 for Caucasians and 1.28 (p = 0.02) for AA. The hazard ratio (HR) for graft failure associated with AA race was 1.8 (p < 0.001) on unadjusted analysis, and decreased to 1.6 (p < 0.001) after matching for DRI. These results indicate a significant disparity in quality of kidneys received by African Americans, which propensity analysis indicates is partially explained by differences in medical, immunologic and socioeconomic factors. Furthermore, this difference in donor quality partially accounts for poorer graft survival in African Americans.

Analysis of BK viral infection after alemtuzumab induction for renal transplant.

UNLABELLED: Induction immunosuppression has provided great advances in reducing the incidence of acute rejection (AR) following kidney transplantation. Despite this success, there has been recent concern over possible increased rates of viral complications when such powerful immunosuppressive therapy is used. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of BK viral infection following kidney transplantation under alemtuzumab induction therapy. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, a retrospective study was performed of all patients undergoing kidney transplantation under alemtuzumab induction at a single center. The incidence of BK viremia was determined, and univariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with the development of BK viremia. Further analysis was undertaken, using standard statistical methods, to determine the rates of graft survival and hazard ratio (HR) for AR in patients with and without BK viremia. RESULTS: There were 456 patients in the current study, with a mean age of 51 years. The majority of these (61.8%) were male, and 73.5% were Caucasian. The overall incidence of BK viremia identified on routine screening was 6.6%. Univariate analysis failed to identify any significant predictors of BK viremia. One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival for patients who developed BK viremia was 96.6%, 91.7%, and 91.7%, respectively, compared with 94.1%, 87.8%, and 80.2% for patients without BK viremia (P = 0.860). BK viremia was associated with a significantly increased risk for AR (HR 3.48, 95% confidence interval 1.24-9.76; P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: The incidence of BK viremia following alemtuzumab induction appears to be in concordance with the published literature, with satisfactory graft survival rates. BK viremia is, however, associated with an increased risk for AR.

Laparoscopic liver surgery: a synopsis.

The complex vascular and biliary anatomy of the liver poses great challenges even to experienced surgeons. However, with the experience accrued over the past two decades, surgery of the liver has become standardized. In the past few years innovative surgical techniques have permitted liver surgery to be performed using the minimally invasive approach. Large clinical series have been reported which demonstrate the safety and oncological integrity of the approach. This review highlights the current state of laparoscopic liver surgery with emphasis on problems unique to the procedure.

The history of human composite tissue allotransplantation.

Restoration of amputations and disfigurement are represented in ancient mythology, but the modern history of composite tissue allotransplantation begins with World War II injuries that generated seminal immunologic experiments by Medawar and co-workers. These studies led to the first successful human allografts in the 1950s by Peacock with composite tissue and Murray and co-workers with solid organs. Pharmacologic immunosuppression brought rapid growth of solid organ transplantation over the next 50 years, but composite tissue transplantation virtually disappeared. This evolution was judged to be a consequence of the greater antigenicity of skin, which that was insurmountable by the available immunosuppression. In the mid-1990s, progress in immunosupression allowed skin-bearing grafts, led by successful hand transplants, which produced a renaissance in composite tissue allotransplantation. Since then, graft types have expanded to over 10, and graft numbers to over 150, with success rates that equal or exceed solid organs. The field has emerged as one of the most exciting in contemporary medicine, although accompanied by substantial challenges and controversy. This paper reviews the origins and progress of this field, assessing its potential for future evolution.

Individualization of immunosuppressive therapy. III. Sirolimus associated with a reduced incidence of malignancy.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the occurrence of neoplasms among 1008 renal transplant recipients treated with a sirolimus-cyclosporine (CsA) +/- prednisone (Pred) regimen. METHODS: A comprehensive database of demographic, laboratory, clinical, and histopathologic features of these patients all followed in our transplant center was analyzed using Student t test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous and chi-square test for categorical variables. Comparisons were performed with information in the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry (IPITTR). RESULTS: During the mean patient follow-up of 62.3 +/- 26.1 months (range 27.1 to 131), 36 tumors occurred in 35 patients (3.6%) at 32.5 +/- 29.8 months. The most common neoplasms were skin tumors (2.4%), a value that was significantly lower than the 6% rate observed with CsA-azathioprine-Pred treatment. Also, the 0.4% incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders and 0.2% incidence of renal cell carcinomas were less than half of those previously reported with a combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. The distribution of tumor types was similar to that reported to the IPITTR. The mean trough drug concentrations in affected recipients at the time of diagnosis were within the putative target ranges. CONCLUSION: Renal transplant recipients treated with the sirolimus-CsA +/- Pred combination showed a low incidence of tumors of similar types as those encountered with other regimens.

Liver transplantation for primary or metastatic sarcoma to the liver.

Sarcoma is generally a rare disease in the US, with poor survival in patients with both primary angiosarcoma and metastatic disease from sarcoma and GIST. In order to determine if liver transplantation for sarcoma is a realistic option, we examined records of all patients in the US component of the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry were reviewed. Those patients with liver failure from primary or metastatic liver sarcoma were evaluated. Patient outcome analysis was then performed. Patient and tumor demographics were reviewed as well as patient survival after transplantation. 19 patients are identified having received liver transplantation after treatment for sarcoma of the liver, 6 patients with primary hepatic sarcoma and 13 patients with metastatic sarcoma of the liver. Recurrence was almost universal in 18 of 19 patients (95%) after a median interval of 6 months. Survival for the group as a whole was 47% for 1-year, 15% for 3-years and 5% for 5-years. Given the early recurrence of tumor and meager 1-year survival outcome, liver transplantation is a poor therapeutic choice for patients with either primary or metastatic liver sarcoma, including high-grade leiomyosarcoma (GIST) regardless of primary site or primary therapy.

Early corticosteroid withdrawal under modern immunosuppression in renal transplantation: multivariate analysis of risk factors for acute rejection.

UNLABELLED: Early corticosteroid withdrawal has been shown to be effective in low-risk patient populations in a number of US and European multicenter trials. However, patient populations traditionally considered to be at high risk for acute rejection (eg, African Americans, repeat transplant recipients, sensitized patients) are usually excluded from these trials. Since our initial experience with early withdrawal almost 10 years ago, we have included high-immunologic-risk patients. We have accumulated enough high-risk patients with early withdrawal to allow the first multivariate analysis of risk factors for acute rejection in early withdrawal under modern immunosuppression. METHODS: Early withdrawal was performed under prospective IRB-approved protocols. Statistical analysis included chi square test and logistic regression. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven and graded by Banff 1997 criteria. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients underwent early withdrawal: 82% had at least one mismatched DR antigen, 17% had delayed graft function, 33% were African American, and 18% were repeat transplant recipients. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for acute rejection indicated that two factors induced a statistically significant alteration in acute rejection risk: repeat transplant recipients (4.3-fold increased risk) and thymoglobulin induction (0.30 risk (ie, 70% reduction in risk compared to patients not receiving thymoglobulin induction). Sensitized recipients and African Americans were also at increased risk but did not quite reach statistical significance. These data strongly support the use of T-cell depleting antibody induction therapy in high-risk patients undergoing early withdrawal under modern immunosuppression.

Corticosteroid avoidance ameliorates lymphocele formation and wound healing complications associated with sirolimus therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Sirolimus (RAPA) and corticosteroids (CS) both inhibit wound healing. To evaluate the possibility that RAPA and CS have additive effects on wound healing, we evaluated the effects of corticosteroid avoidance (CSAV) on wound healing complications in patients treated with RAPA. METHODS: One hundred nine patients treated with a CSAV regimen (no pretransplantation or posttransplantation CS) were compared with a historical control group (n = 72) that received cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and CS. The CSAV group received low-dose CsA, MMF, RAPA, and thymoglobulin induction. Complications were classified as follows: wound healing complications (WHC) or infectious wound complications (IWC). WHC included lymphocele, hernia, dehiscence, diastasis, and skin edge separation. IWC included wound abscess and empiric antibiotic therapy for wound erythema. RESULTS: The CSAV group was largely CS-free: 11% of patients received CS for rejection, 12% of patients received CS for recurrent disease, and 85% of patients are currently off CS. The CSAV group had a significantly lower incidence of WHC (13.7% vs 28%; P = .03) and lymphoceles (5.5% vs 16%; P = .02) than the control group. There was no difference in the incidence of IWC between the 2 groups. Patients who received CSAV were 18% less likely (P = .57) to develop any type of complication, 41% less likely (P = .20) to develop a WHC, and 71% less likely (P = .018) to develop a lymphocele. CONCLUSIONS: CSAV in a RAPA-based regimen results in a marked reduction in WHC and lymphoceles. Therefore, CSAV provides a promising approach for addressing WHC associated with RAPA therapy.

Body weight alterations under early corticosteroid withdrawal and chronic corticosteroid therapy with modern immunosuppression.

UNLABELLED: Weight gain is a well-known complication of corticosteroid maintenance therapy. The purpose of our study was to compare patterns of weight gain under chronic corticosteroid therapy (CCST) to those observed under early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Renal transplant recipients who underwent early CSWD in IRB-approved prospective trials were compared to a historical control group of patients receiving CCST who were matched for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients with early CSWD were compared to 132 patients who received CCST. Mean population weight gain was significantly higher in CCST patients at 12 months (5.52 kg vs 3.05 kg, P < .05) posttransplant. Caucasian CSWD patients demonstrated a greater reduction in weight gain with CSWD than African Americans (mean weight decrease 2.9 vs 1.9 kg/patient, P < .05). Patients who were overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25-30) or obese (BMI > 30) demonstrated a greater reduction in weight gain with CSWD at 1 year (mean reduction in weight gain with CSWD 5.3 kg/patient and 4.4 kg/patient) than did patients of normal weight (BMI < 25; 0.1 kg/patient, P < .01 and <.05 versus BMI < 25). CONCLUSIONS: Early CSWD patients gain significantly less weight than CCST patients following transplantation. Marked variations in the effect of early CSWD on weight gain may be observed due to race and pretransplant BMI. Caucasians and overweight patients demonstrate greater benefits from CSWD than African Americans and patients with normal BMI.

A prospective, pilot study of early corticosteroid cessation in high-immunologic-risk patients: the Cincinnati experience.

BACKGROUND: The first prospective trial of steroid withdrawal dedicated to high-immunologic-risk patients is reported herein. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled prospectively in an IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol. Immunosuppression included corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) at 7 days, tacrolimus (target trough level 4 to 8 ng/mL), sirolimus (target trough level 8 to 12 ng/mL), and Mycophenolate Mofetil (2 g/d). Induction with daclizumab (2 mg/kg) on posttransplant days (PTD) 0 and 14 was administered to the first 10 patients. The protocol for the next 15 patients was modified because of high acute rejection rates to include received T-cell-depleting antibody induction therapy with thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg) on PTDs 0 and 2 followed by daclizumab on Postoperative day (POD) 14. Recipient inclusion criteria included: (1) repeat transplant recipients; or (2) patients with a peak PRA > or =25%. All rejection episodes were diagnosed by biopsy and graded using Banff '97 criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled and median follow-up was 402 days. Forty percent of recipients were black, 68% of patients were repeat transplant recipients, 68% received deceased donor kidneys, and 36% had a peak flow PRA >25%. Overall acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival rates of 40%, 88%, and 96%, respectively, were observed for the duration of the study. Acute rejection occurred in 6 of 10 patients (60%) with daclizumab induction; however, acute rejection rates fell to 27% when thymoglobulin was introduced (P = .1). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports our previous observations in a multivariate analysis of early CSWD patients, wherein polyclonal antibody induction therapy reduced acute rejection. High-immunologic-risk patients may be able to undergo early CSWD with acceptable rates of acute rejection.

Global cardiovascular risk under early corticosteroid cessation decreases progressively in the first year following renal transplantation.

UNLABELLED: A primary reason to eliminate corticosteroids from immunosuppressive regimens in solid organ transplant recipients is improved cardiovascular risk profiles. Although a number of studies have documented that corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) regimens reduce hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and weight gain, global assessments of cardiovascular risk under CSWD have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to document cardiovascular risk under CSWD using a global risk assessment by Framingham risk assessment. METHODS: Framingham global cardiovascular risk assessments were performed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplant on patients enrolled in prospective, IRB-approved early (<7 days of corticosteroids) CSWD trials. Framingham score was based on age, sex, presence of diabetes, HDL and total cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure. All patients were nonsmokers. Left ventricular hypertrophy assessment by EKG criteria was not available at all time points and therefore were not included. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three patients were included in the analysis. Fourteen percent of patients had evidence of coronary heart disease (prior MI, CABG, PTCA, or significant cardiovascular disease as evidenced by angiography) prior to transplant. Complete information was available for 160 patients at baseline, 132 at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 93 at 12 months posttransplant. Mean 10-year risk (expressed as percent) for developing coronary heart disease decreased over time: 8.03 at baseline, 8.31 at 3 months, 7.40 at 6 months, and 7.20 at 12 months, indicating that global cardiovascular risk fell at 1 year posttransplant by about 10% in renal transplant recipients undergoing early CSWD. CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of cardiovascular risk by Framingham risk factor assessment allows incorporation of several cardiovascular risk factors into a single estimate, thereby accounting for differential effects of each individual factor on global cardiovascular risk. This experience indicates that global cardiovascular risk decreases by approximately 10% at 1 year posttransplant in renal transplant recipients who undergo early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD).

African American renal transplant recipients benefit from early corticosteroid withdrawal under modern immunosuppression.

African Americans have historically been considered high-risk renal transplant recipients due to increased rejection rates and reduced long-term graft survival. Modern immunosuppression has reduced rejections and improved graft survival in African Americans and may allow successful corticosteroid withdrawal. Outcomes in 56 African Americans were compared to 56 non-African Americans enrolled in early withdrawal protocols. Results are reported as African American versus non-African American. Acute rejection at 1 year was 23% and 18% (P = NS), while patient and graft survival was 96% versus 98% and 91% versus 91% (P = NS), respectively. In conclusion, early withdrawal in African Americans is associated with acceptable rejection rates and excellent patient and graft survival, indicating that the risks and benefits of early withdrawal are similar between African Americans and non-African Americans. Additional followup is needed to determine long-term renal function, graft survival, and cardiovascular risk in African Americans with early steroid withdrawal.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: significance of central nervous system involvement.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding central nervous system (CNS) involvement in patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The purpose of this study was to review the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry (IPITTR) experience with CNS involvement by PTLD. METHODS: Nine hundred ten PTLD cases from the United States were reported to the IPITTR and reviewed for CNS involvement. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six transplant recipients with PTLD (15%) had CNS involvement. The highest incidence of CNS involvement occurred in pancreas (3 of 11; 27%) and kidney transplant recipients (76 of 429; 18%). Fifteen cases occurred in children and 121 cases in adults. For both children and adults, isolated CNS disease was associated with better survival when compared with multiple-site involvement (children: 29% vs 0%; adults: 12% vs 6%; P < .05). Three-year survival in PTLD patients with CNS involvement was 9.4% and without CNS involvement was 49.4% (P < .01). Radiation therapy alone appeared to provide the best survival rates (25%). CONCLUSIONS: CNS involvement in transplant recipients with PTLD carries an ominous prognosis; however, isolated CNS involvement has a better prognosis than CNS plus extracranial involvement. Radiation therapy alone provides the best results, but this may be a reflection of isolated CNS disease.

Chemotherapy for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry experience.

INTRODUCTION: Very little published data exist regarding the results of chemotherapy treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The purpose of the study was to review the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry experience with PTLD treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with PTLD who received chemotherapy were identified and data collected regarding demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrence rates, and survival. RESULTS: One hundred ninety three solid organ transplant recipients with PTLD who received chemotherapy were identified. Most patients were male (142:51) and Caucasian (148; 16 AA, 29 unspecified). Most PTLD were B-cell predominant (81%), monoclonal (71), and CD 20+ (60% of patients tested). Organ transplanted included: kidney, 92 (48%); heart, 54 (28%); liver, 30 (16%); pancreas, 8 (4%); and lung, 9 (5%). Median time to presentation posttransplant was 24.5 months (range 0.8 to 226.5 months). Ninety patients received CHOP, 12 ProMACE, 65 other multidrug regimens, and 23 patients received single-agent chemotherapy. Five-year survival for these four regimens were: 24%, 25%, 32%, and 5%. PTLD-specific death rates were 34%, 34%, 40%, and 48%. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent chemotherapy appears to be inferior to other chemotherapy regimens for PTLD as it is associated with lower survival.

Prostate cancer prior to solid organ transplantation: the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry experience.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men, and with routine prostrate specific antigen (PSA) screening, is being diagnosed with increasing frequency. To date, reported experiences with transplantation in men with a history of PCA are limited to only a few patients. This study presents the first series of transplant recipients with a history of PCA. METHODS: Analysis of transplant recipients with a history of pretransplant PCA was performed on the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry database. PCA were staged using American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria. Statistics analysis was performed by chi-square and Student t tests. RESULTS: Ninety patients with preexisting PCA were identified: 77 renal, 10 heart, and three liver transplant recipients. Mean age at PCA diagnosis was 61.3 +/- 6.3 years. Median interval between diagnosis and transplantation was 19.3 months, and median follow-up after transplantation was 20.5 months. Median time to PCA recurrence was 10.6 months after transplantation and median survival time with recurrent PCA was 49.2 months after transplant. Patient mortality was 28.8%, and PCA-related death rate was 7.8%. PCA recurrence rate was 17.7%. Tumor recurrence rates in stage I and II disease (14 and 16%) were lower than in stage III disease (36%). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, death rate to disease other than PCA is three times that due to PCA. PCA recurrence rates are relatively low in patients who initially presented with stage I and II disease, and are half that of patients with stage III disease.

De novo colorectal cancer: five-year survival is markedly lower in transplant recipients compared with the general population.

INTRODUCTION: The biological behavior of most solid tumors in transplant recipients has not been adequately compared to the general population. The purpose of the present study was to compare outcomes in de novo colorectal cancer (CRC) following solid organ transplantation to those observed in the general population (SEER) database. METHODS: All transplant recipients with de novo CRC in the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry were identified and analyzed and the data were compared to CRC patients in the SEER National Cancer Institute (NCI) database. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty transplant recipients with de novo CRC were identified, among which were 93 (62%) kidney, 29 (19.3%) heart, 27 (18%) liver, and 1 (0.7%) lung recipients. Median age of transplant recipients was 54 years, compared to a median age of 72 years for patients in the SEER NCI database. However, compared to patients from the SEER NCI database, recipients with Duke's A through C stage disease were noted to experience a significant decrease in 5-year survival. The results in Duke's C patients were particularly dismal. CONCLUSIONS: The early age at presentation of CRC in transplant recipients suggests that the development of de novo CRC may be effected by immunosuppression. Decreased 5-year survival rates in transplant recipients compared to the general population suggest that CRC in transplant patients is biologically more aggressive. These data cannot distinguish whether the lower survival rates are because the CRC are inherently biologically more aggressive or whether immunosuppression allows for more aggressive clinical behavior of CRC.

Skin cancer following transplantation: the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry experience.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to analyze a large series of skin cancers in solid organ transplant recipients to determine their biologic behavior. METHODS: A retrospective review of all US transplant recipients with skin cancer reported to the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry was performed. RESULTS: Transplant recipients from the United States with skin malignancies were identified (n = 2018) and assigned to 1 of 3 groups: squamous cell cancer (SCC), basal cell cancer (BCC), or combined malignancies (BCC/SCC). Squamous cell to basal cell cancer ratio was found to be 1.9 to 1. The ratio of extrarenal to renal allograft recipients was identical for all 3 groups (3:1). The median interval from transplant to skin cancer diagnosis was greater than 4 years in each group and longest in those with isolated SCC lesions. In the SCC group, there was a 9% incidence of nodal or secondary site involvement affecting the cervix, perineum, or lung. The highest recurrence rate was demonstrated in the combined malignancy group. Cancer-specific deaths were significantly higher in the SCC (8%) and BCC/SCC (6.8%) groups compared to the BCC (3.6%) group. CONCLUSIONS: This large experience indicates that SCC is more common than BCC in transplant recipients. SCC alone or in combination with BCC appears aggressive and is associated with significant mortality.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in liver transplantation: a matched controlled study.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections on transplant recipients. METHODS: Liver and kidney recipients with MRSA infections were retrospectively identified and compared to an age, gender, UNOS status, organ transplanted, and transplant date matched (2:1) non-MRSA-infected recipient control group. All MRSA infections were initially treated with vancomycin, and four (33%) liver recipients were converted to linezolid therapy after failing to improve with vancomycin. RESULTS: The overall MRSA infection incidence was 1.4% (24/1770) with MRSA more common in liver (3.75%; 12/320) than kidney transplants (0.8%; 12/1450) (P < .001). The most common sites of MRSA infection were blood (42%), lung (38%), and abdomen (29%). The MRSA group had a greater percentage of prior antibiotic usage (79% vs 40%; P < .0015). The MRSA group experienced more posttransplant complications (52% vs 19%; P < .011)), and exhibited a trend toward greater length of stay in the intensive care unit (7.8 vs 4.6 days; P = .09), but not overall length of stay. Survival was similar in MRSA and non-MRSA groups (75% vs 88%; P = .17). No significant differences in mortality were noted between liver and kidney recipients infected with MRSA (P = .6). CONCLUSION: MRSA infection is associated with a higher incidence of posttransplant complications and antibiotic usage in both liver and kidney recipients compared to patients with MRSA infection.

Pilot study of early corticosteroid elimination after pancreas transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Early corticosteroid withdrawal has recently been shown to be possible in recipients of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants; however, its feasibility in solitary pancreas recipients has not been documented. In the present study, we provide evidence that early withdrawal can be achieved in pancreas as well as pancreas-kidney recipients. METHODS: Twenty type I diabetics underwent 13 pancreas-kidney transplants and 7 pancreas-only transplants with early withdrawal (methylprednisone 6-day taper). Additional immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and thymoglobulin induction (five doses). RESULTS: Transplants included 13 pancreas-kidney, 6 pancreas after kidney transplant, and 1 pancreas after islet transplant. Overall mean follow-up was 7.3 months. One episode of pancreas transplant rejection after pancreas-only transplant was detected on protocol biopsy without biochemical abnormalities. One renal allograft rejection occurred 65 days posttransplant in a pancreas-kidney recipient and was graded as a Banff IA rejection. A single pancreas graft loss occurred due to thrombosis 6 days after pancreas-kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that relatively short thymoglobulin induction (five doses) with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil can allow early withdrawal in both pancreas-kidney and pancreas-only transplant recipients.

Donor kidneys with small renal cell cancers: can they be transplanted?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether incidentally discovered, small renal cell cancers (RCC) in donor kidneys can be excised and safely transplanted. METHODS: The Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry database was searched and all small RCC that were identified and resected prior to transplantation of deceased and living donor kidneys were reviewed. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrence, and survival were examined. RESULTS: Fourteen kidneys were identified in which small RCC were noted at the time of procurement and where the tumors were excised ex vivo and then transplanted. Eleven kidneys were obtained from living related donors and three were from deceased donors. Median tumor size was 2 cm (range 0.5 to 4 cm). All 14 tumors were of histological Furhman grade II/VI (n = 8) or Furhman grade I/VI (n = 6). All kidneys had pathologically confirmed negative margins. The mean age of the recipients was 40.8 +/- 9.2 years, with the majority being men (11 men; 3 women). Median follow-up for this group was 69 months (range 14 to 200 months). There have been no recurrences of tumor in these recipients and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient and graft survivals are 100%, 100%, and 93%. CONCLUSIONS: These data represent the only data available (to our knowledge) on this issue. This experience indicates that donor kidneys with small, incidental RCC and low histological grade (Furhman grade I and II/IV) can be managed with excision and transplantation, with a low risk of tumor recurrence in the recipient.