Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
1.
SAGE Open Med ; 8: 2050312120926351, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32537157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Our hands play a remarkable role in our activities of daily living and the make-up of our identities. In the United States, an estimated 41,000 individuals live with upper limb loss. Our expanding experience in limb transplantation-including operative techniques, rehabilitation, and expected outcomes-has often been based on our past experience with replantation. Here, we undertake a systematic review of replantation with transplantation in an attempt to better understand the determinants of outcome for each and to provide a summary of the data to this point. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted PubMed searches from 1964 to 2013 for articles in English. In total, 53 primary and secondary source articles were found to involve surgical repair (either replantation or transplantation) for complete amputations at the wrist and forearm levels. All were read and analyzed. RESULTS: Hand replantations and transplantations were compared with respect to pre-operative considerations, surgical techniques, post-operative considerations and outcomes, including motor, sensation, cosmesis, patient satisfaction/quality of life, adverse events/side effects, financial costs, and overall function. While comparison of data is limited by heterogeneity, these data support our belief that good outcomes depend on patient expectations and commitment. CONCLUSION: When possible, hand replantation remains the primary option after acute amputation. However, when replantation fails or is not possible, hand transplantation appears to provide at least equal outcomes. Patient commitment, realistic expectations, and physician competence must coincide to achieve the best possible outcomes for both hand replantation and transplantation.

2.
Microsurgery ; 39(1): 53-61, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30159931

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of outcomes after face transplantation (FT) is necessary to provide sound evidence on the benefits of this life-giving surgery. Current methods for outcomes assessment, however, are imprecise or prone to subjectivity. Software-based video analysis may allow fast, objective and retrospective assessment of restoration of facial movements and functions after FT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recorded videos of 7 subjects before as well as every 3-6 months after facial transplantation. Patients performed the same sequence of facial movements in every video: smile, open mouth, purse lips, wrinkle nose, frown, close eyes, and lift eyebrows. The videos were retrospectively analyzed using EMOTIENT software, which is capable of automatic tracking and detailed measurements of facial movements and expressions. These measurements were subsequently compared to the same patient at different time points, as well as to the normal population. RESULTS: Open mouth, wrinkle nose and smile functions significantly improved in all patients when compared to pre-transplant functions; this improvement was significant at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplant, respectively. Lip purse, eye closure and frown functions improved by 6, 9, and 18 months after transplantation, respectively; however, improvement in these particular functions was not significantly with respect to pre-transplant. Face transplantation did not improve any of the patients' ability to lift their eyebrows. Most remarkably, mouth opening and smiling functions both reached values comparable to the normal population at 3 and 12 months after transplantation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Software-based video analysis provides a valuable assessment tool capable of objective, precise and reproducible analysis of facial movements and functions after FT.


Subject(s)
Facial Expression , Facial Injuries/surgery , Facial Transplantation , Motor Activity/physiology , Software , Video Recording , Adult , Facial Injuries/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Recovery of Function , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Surg Res ; 232: 137-145, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30463709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury remains the major limiting factor for limb replantation and transplantation. Static cold storage (SCS) on ice currently represents the standard mode of preservation but is limited to 6 h of duration. Ex vivo machine perfusion has evolved as a potential alternative to safely extend the duration of ex vivo preservation by providing continuous supply of oxygen and nutrients. This study aims to evaluate underlying molecular mechanisms of both preservation modalities. METHODS: We assessed molecular changes in amputated porcine forelimbs stored on ice at 4°C for 2 h (n = 2) and limbs perfused with Perfadex solution at 10°C for 2 h (n = 3) or 12 h (n = 3) before replantation. Muscle biopsies were examined for histological changes and gene expression levels using H&E staining and a hypoxia-related PCR gene array, respectively. RESULTS: Histology revealed only minor differences between the ice (SCS) and perfusion groups after 2 h of preservation, with decreased muscle fiber disruption in the perfusion groups compared with the ice (SCS) group. Perfused limbs demonstrated downregulation of genes coding for glycolytic pathways and glucose transporters after 2 h and 12 h when compared with SCS after 2 h. Similarly, genes that induce angiogenesis and those that are activated on DNA damage were downregulated in both perfusion groups as compared with SCS. CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion of porcine limbs resulted in less activation of hypoxia-related gene families when compared with SCS. This may indicate a state more closely resembling physiological conditions during perfusion and potentially limiting ischemic injury. Our study confirms ex vivo perfusion for up to 12 h as a viable alternative for preservation of vascularized composite tissues.


Subject(s)
Extremities/surgery , Hypoxia/metabolism , Organ Preservation , Replantation , Animals , Cold Temperature , DNA Damage , Female , Glucose/metabolism , Perfusion , Swine , Transcriptome , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/genetics
4.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(3): 405e-411e, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29927830

ABSTRACT

Living donation has become a medically and ethically accepted practice in solid organ transplantation. Published proceedings from the international kidney transplant community and from the Ethics Committee of The Transplantation Society articulated the general principles and specific recommendations for living donation, which remain the backbone of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network requirements and policies. Meanwhile, there have been major advancements in another revolutionary field of transplant medicine: vascularized composite allotransplantation. Recent interventions have demonstrated potential for superior functional and aesthetic outcomes in a single operation when compared to staged conventional reconstructions. In view of these successes, the indications for vascularized composite allotransplantation are expected to broaden to include less extensive types of transplants, which would introduce the possibility of using living vascularized composite allotransplantation donors. In this article, the authors discuss the feasibility and ethics associated with living donation of vascularized composite allografts. The authors explore the current guidelines and policies set by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regarding living organ donation. In addition, the authors provide several clinical scenarios in which living donation of vascularized composite allotransplantation could be used to augment the reconstructive ladder currently used by reconstructive surgeons to guide their reconstructive strategies.


Subject(s)
Composite Tissue Allografts/transplantation , Living Donors , Tissue and Organ Procurement/standards , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/standards , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/ethics , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/methods
5.
Transpl Int ; 31(7): 677-688, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29421860

ABSTRACT

More than thirty-five facial allograft transplantations (FAT) have been reported worldwide since the pioneering case performed in France in the year 2005. FAT has received tremendous interest by the medical field and the general public while gaining strong support from multiple disciplines as a solution for reconstructing complex facial defects not amenable/responsive to conventional methods. FAT has expanded the frontiers of reconstructive microsurgery, immunology and transplantation, and established its place in the cross section of multiple disciplines. The procedure introduces complex scientific, ethical, and societal issues. Patients and physicians are called to deal with a variety of-sometimes everlasting-challenges, such as immunosuppression management and psychosocial hurdles. This review reflects on the surgical and scientific advancements in FAT and milestones reached in the last 12 years. It aims to encourage active discussion regarding the current practices and techniques used in FAT and suggest future directions that may allow transitioning into the next phase of FAT, which we describe as safe, reliable, and accessible standard operation for selected patients.


Subject(s)
Facial Transplantation/trends , Allografts , Facial Transplantation/adverse effects , Facial Transplantation/ethics , Facial Transplantation/psychology , Humans , Patient Selection , Transplantation Immunology , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 29(4): 843-847, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29381613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trismus can be a challenging consequence of ballistic trauma to the face, and has rarely been described in the setting of face transplantation. Almost half of all current face transplant recipients in the world received transplantation to restore form and function after a ballistic injury. Here we report our experience and challenges with long standing trismus after face transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of our face transplant recipients whose indication was ballistic injury. We focused our review on trismus and assessed the pre-, peri- and postoperative planning, surgery and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Two patients received partial face transplantation, including the midface for ballistic trauma. Both patients suffered from impaired mouth opening, speech intelligibility, and oral competence. Severe scarring of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) required intraoperative release in both patients, and additional total condylectomy on the left side 6 months posttransplant for 1 patient. Posttransplant, both patients achieved an improvement in mouth opening; however, there was persistent trismus. One year after transplantation, range of motion of the jaw had improved for both patients. Independent oral food intake was possible 1 year after surgery, although spillage of liquids and mixed consistency solids persisted. Speech intelligibility testing showed impairments in the immediate postoperative period, with improvement to over 85% for both patients at 1 year posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Ballistic trauma to the face and subsequent reconstructive measures can cause significant scarring and covert injuries to structures such as the TMJ, resulting in long standing trismus. Meticulous individual planning prior to interventions such as face transplantation must take these into account. We encourage intraoperative evaluation of these structures as well as peri- and postoperative treatment when necessary. Due to the nature of the primary injury, functional outcomes after face transplantation in these patients may differ substantially from those of other indications.


Subject(s)
Facial Transplantation/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Trismus , Adult , Face/physiopathology , Face/surgery , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Trismus/etiology , Trismus/physiopathology , Trismus/surgery , Wounds, Gunshot
7.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 26(2S): 682-686, 2017 Jun 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28654949

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Facial transplantation is a relatively new option for individuals with severe facial disfigurements. Clinical case studies on existing patients indicate many instances of persistent facial motor impairment for facial expression, speech, and swallowing. These preliminary findings motivate additional research on the impact of lip-strengthening exercises following facial transplantation. METHOD: In this study, we assessed the efficacy of an 8-week, biofeedback-driven, lip closure-strengthening exercise program in a single patient 1-year status post-full facial transplantation. Exercise was at 60% of peak strength. Outcome measures included instrumental measures of lip strength and mobility, clinical measures of speech, and patient-reported outcomes in feeding and facial expression. RESULTS: Results revealed improvements in labial strength, speed of lip movement, and range of motion during speech. A 3-point improvement in sentence speech intelligibility was also observed following strength-training exercise. The patient reported improvements in her ability to drink from a straw and communicate via facial expression. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings motivate additional research on the efficacy of lip-strengthening exercises following facial transplantation.


Subject(s)
Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Exercise Therapy/methods , Facial Muscles/transplantation , Facial Transplantation , Lip/transplantation , Muscle Strength , Biomechanical Phenomena , Eating , Facial Expression , Facial Muscles/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Lip/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Recovery of Function , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Hand Surg Am ; 42(9): 751.e1-751.e6, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648330

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To date, there have been over 100 upper extremity transplantations (UET) performed worldwide. However, little data are available regarding institutional screening practices or description of the population of patients that seek transplantation as a treatment modality for their upper extremity disabilities. We performed a review of our institutional experience in an attempt to better understand our referral patterns and identify factors that may be associated with successful screening. METHODS: Contact demographic data, injury characteristics, and mode of referral were retrospectively reviewed from 2010 through 2015. Differences in demographic data, injury-related characteristics, and clinical trial outcomes were assessed with the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: There were a total of 89 UET contacts. The average age was 35.2 years, with most contacts being white (n = 24). The majority were male (n = 66; 75.0%) and the most common indication for referral was trauma (n = 43; 55.8%). Of the 89 contacts, 20 (22.5%) were physician referrals and 69 (77.5%) were self-referrals. Physician referrals led to the most screened and accepted contacts, whereas self-referrals more often led to immediate exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: This study gives an overview of the demographic composition of our UET contacts, with a specific emphasis on mode of referral. We have identified that physician referrals have led to more screened and accepted patients versus self-referred individuals. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV.


Subject(s)
Arm/transplantation , Hand Transplantation , Referral and Consultation , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Arm Injuries/ethnology , Arm Injuries/surgery , Boston , Female , Hand Injuries/ethnology , Hand Injuries/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
9.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 139(5): 1175e-1183e, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28445377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Facial allotransplantation provides a unique opportunity to restore facial form and function in severely disfigured patients. Using a single unilateral facial artery for vascularization can significantly reduce surgical duration and thus facilitate the practice of face transplantation. METHODS: A 33-year-old man with a history of high-energy ballistic trauma received a facial allograft comprising the lower two-thirds of the face, including maxilla and mandible. Vascular anastomoses involved one unilateral facial artery and two veins. Vascularization patterns, airway volume, and facial functions were assessed before and 1 year after transplantation. In addition, immunosuppressive therapy and rejection episodes were recorded. RESULTS: One year after transplantation, the facial allograft is well perfused and gradually improving in function. Unilateral facial artery anastomosis remains patent and collateralization with the contralateral side is taking place through collaterals of the submental arteries. Bony perfusion of the maxilla and mandible is provided periosteally. Bilateral venous outflow is evident. Airway volume is significantly increased compared with before transplantation, and gastrostomy and tracheostomy tubes have been securely removed. The recipient has gained the abilities to smell, speak, feel, and grimace 1 year after transplantation. Steroids were successfully weaned after 9 months, leaving the patient on dual immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Two rejection episodes occurred, of which one was treated by steroid pulse and the other by adjusting the maintenance therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this patient, a facial allograft comprising the lower two-thirds of the face including the maxilla and mandible is sufficiently perfused by one unilateral facial artery. Bilateral venous outflow, however, seems to be necessary. Facial allotransplantation can significantly and securely improve facial form and function. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.


Subject(s)
Allografts/blood supply , Facial Injuries/surgery , Myocutaneous Flap/blood supply , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Adult , Arteries , Bone Transplantation , Humans , Male , Mandible/transplantation , Maxilla/transplantation , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 139(4): 922e-932e, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28350667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges in traumatic amputation is the need to keep ischemia time brief (4 to 6 hours) to avoid ischemic damage and enable successful replantation. The current inability to meet this challenge often leads to traumatic limb loss, which has a considerable detrimental impact on the quality of life of patients. METHODS: The authors' team built a portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenator device for the perfusion of amputated extremities with oxygenated acellular solution under controlled parameters. The authors amputated forelimbs of Yorkshire pigs, perfused them ex vivo with acellular Perfadex solution for 12 hours at 10°C in their device, and subsequently replanted them into the host animal. The authors used limbs stored on ice slurry for 4 hours before replantation as their control group. RESULTS: Clinical observation and histopathologic evaluation both demonstrated that there was less morbidity and less tissue damage to the cells during preservation and after replantation in the perfusion group compared with the standard of care. Significant differences in blood markers of muscle damage and tissue cytokine levels underscored these findings. CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrated the feasibility and superiority of ex vivo hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion for preservation of amputated limbs over conventional static cold storage and herewith a substantial extension of the allowable ischemia time for replantation after traumatic amputation. This approach could also be applied to the field of transplantation, expanding the potential pool of viable donor vascularized composite allografts.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Extremities/injuries , Extremities/surgery , Hypothermia, Induced , Ischemia/prevention & control , Reperfusion/methods , Replantation/methods , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Swine , Time Factors
11.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 41(1): 211-220, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28008464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture remains the most frequent long-term complication after augmentation mammoplasty with silicone implants. Thereby, the main part of the fibrotic capsule is collagen. The collagenase of the bacterium Clostridium histolyticum is approved for the treatment of fibrotic diseases and has been demonstrated to be effective for capsular fibrosis treatment in the short term. However, long-term effectiveness is currently unknown but mandatory for clinical utilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight rats received miniature silicone implants and an injection with either collagenase (treatment group) or plain solvent solution (control group) 120 days post insertion. Ten and 60 days after the injections, the rats underwent 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high-resolution ultrasound (HR-US). Capsule tissue was harvested, and capsule thickness and collagen density were evaluated through histology. Furthermore, the expression levels of inflammatory (CD68, IL4, IL10, IL12, IL13), pro-, and anti-fibrotic (TGFb1, TGFb3, Smad3, Col1-4) genes were analyzed using qRT-PCR. RESULTS: On days 10 and 60 after injection of collagenase, histology showed that capsule thickness was significantly reduced in the treatment group when compared with the control (p < 0.05). Thickness measurements were verified by MRI and HR-US analysis. Skin perforation occurred in two cases after collagenase injection. The initial up-regulation of pro-fibrotic and inflammatory genes 10 days after collagenase injection did not persist in the long term. Contrarily, on day 60, a slight trend towards lower expression levels with a significant down-regulation of TGFb3 was detected in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: The collagenase of the bacterium C. histolyticum effectively degrades capsular fibrosis around silicone implants with stable outcomes throughout 60 days post injection. Skin perforation and adequate and uniform drug distribution within the implant pocket are issues that need to be addressed. Further studies are warranted to clarify whether collagenase injections have the potential to become a viable treatment option for capsular contracture. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors 46 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 47 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 48 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 49 Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Breast Implants/adverse effects , Clostridium histolyticum , Implant Capsular Contracture/therapy , Microbial Collagenase/administration & dosage , Silicone Gels/adverse effects , Animals , Biopsy, Needle , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Breast Implantation/methods , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Fibrosis/diagnostic imaging , Fibrosis/pathology , Fibrosis/therapy , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Implant Capsular Contracture/diagnostic imaging , Implant Capsular Contracture/pathology , Injections, Intralesional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pregnancy , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Inbred Lew , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reference Values , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods
12.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 139(1): 194-203, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28027248

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Face transplantation has emerged as a clinical reality for the restoration of complex facial defects. Critical to the advancement of the burgeoning field of reconstructive transplantation is the quality of the methods used to measure and report the impact of face transplantation on quality of life. METHODS: A systematic search using PubMed and EMBASE was conducted for all studies matching the a priori inclusion criteria from 2005 through 2015. Bibliographies of included studies were also reviewed. Two authors (M.A.A and H.K) independently performed screening of titles. RESULTS: The authors identified 17 articles reporting on quality-of-life outcomes among 14 face transplant recipients. Combinations of objective and subjective measures were used to assess quality of life. Instruments used to assess quality of life after face transplantation included over 25 different instruments. Four centers, comprising eight patients, have reported using prospective, systematic data with validated instruments. Overall, there is reported improvement in quality of life after face transplantation. Heterogeneity and a paucity of data between articles preclude a quantitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Anecdotal and subjective reports of improvements in quality of life after face transplantation constitute the majority of reported outcomes in the English peer-reviewed literature. Improved efforts in methods and standardization of collection and reporting of quality-of-life data after face transplantation are needed to better appreciate the impact of face transplantation on quality of life and justify lifelong immunosuppression and its attendant risks and morbidity.


Subject(s)
Facial Transplantation , Quality of Life , Health Status Indicators , Humans
13.
Transplantation ; 101(6): 1381-1386, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27140518

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge of the impact of facial vascularized composite allograft (VCA) procurement on the transplantation outcomes of the concomitantly recovered solid organs is limited to isolated case reports and short-term results. Here we report on a nationwide analysis of facial allograft donor surgery experience and long-term outcomes of the concomitantly recovered solid organs and their recipients. METHODS: There were 10 facial VCA procurements in organ donors between December 2008 and October 2014. We identified the population of subjects who received solid organs from these 10 donors using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We retrospectively reviewed operative characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Six of 10 donor surgeries were performed at outside institutions, all on brain-dead donors. Mean operative duration for facial VCA recovery was 6.9 hours (range, 4-13.25 hours). A total of 36 solid organs were recovered and transplanted into 35 recipients. Survival rates for kidney and liver recipients were 100% and 90% at a median follow-up of 33 and 27.5 months, respectively (range, 6-72 months). Graft survival rates for kidneys and livers were 15 of 16 (94%) and 9 of 10 (90%), respectively. Recipient and graft survival rates for hearts and lungs were 75% (n = 4) and 100% (n = 3) at mean follow-up time of 14.75 and 16 months, respectively. A liver recipient died at 22 months from unknown causes and a heart recipient died of leukemia at 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: Facial VCA procurement does not appear to adversely affect the outcomes of transplant recipients of concomitantly recovered solid organ allografts.


Subject(s)
Composite Tissue Allografts , Facial Transplantation/methods , Graft Survival , Organ Transplantation/methods , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Adult , Facial Transplantation/adverse effects , Facial Transplantation/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Organ Transplantation/mortality , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/adverse effects , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/mortality , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
14.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 69(12): 1636-1647, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27720683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Facial self-inflicted gunshot wounds (SIGSWs) cause a devastating midfacial defect and pose a challenging problem to the reconstructive surgeon. Face transplantation (FT) has the potential for near-normal restoration in otherwise non-reconstructible defects. Two out of 7 FT recipients at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) sustained SIGSWs. In this study, we illustrate the role of FT in the management of SIGSWs through an aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial examination of outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of individuals with SIGSWs who were screened at BWH between 2008 and 2015. We then collected data of the injuries, modes of conventional reconstruction (CR), and deficits. For the FT recipients, we critically reviewed the psychosocial screening process and post-transplantation aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: A total of six individuals post-SIGSWs were screened for FT. All of them had undergone CR, with five receiving loco-regional flaps and free tissue transfers, and one undergoing serial debridement and primary soft-tissue repair. Following CR, all suffered from residual functional and aesthetic deficits. Two underwent partial FT and one is currently undergoing FT screening. We describe the pre-transplant psychosocial screening process and the aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes of the SIGSW FT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: We examined the facial SIGSW injury, outcomes of CR, and the mechanism of FT to offer a potential solution to the shortcomings of CR. More importantly, we highlight the critical nature of the psychosocial component of the multidisciplinary evaluation given the history of mental illness and suicidal behavior in this subset of patients.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Facial Injuries , Facial Transplantation , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Self-Injurious Behavior/diagnosis , Wounds, Gunshot , Adult , Bone Transplantation/adverse effects , Bone Transplantation/methods , Decision Making, Computer-Assisted , Facial Injuries/etiology , Facial Injuries/physiopathology , Facial Injuries/psychology , Facial Injuries/surgery , Facial Transplantation/adverse effects , Facial Transplantation/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Psychological Techniques , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Flaps , Treatment Outcome , United States , Wounds, Gunshot/diagnosis , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery
15.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 138(4): 690e-701e, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27673540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Face transplantation has emerged as a viable option for certain patients in the treatment of devastating facial injuries. However, as with autologous free tissue transfer, the need for secondary revisions in face transplantation also exists. The authors' group has quantified the number of revision operations in their cohort and has assessed the rationale, safety, and outcomes of posttransplantation revisions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of the authors' seven face transplants was performed from April of 2009 to July of 2015. The patients' medical records, preoperative facial defects, and all operative reports (index and secondary revisions) were critically reviewed. RESULTS: The average number of revision procedures was 2.6 per patient (range, zero to five procedures). The median time interval from face transplantation to revision surgery was 5 months (range, 1 to 10 months). Most interventions consisted of debulking of the allograft, superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication and suspension, and local tissue rearrangement. There were no major infections, allograft skin flap loss, or necrosis. One patient suffered a postoperative complication after autologous fat grafting in the form of acute rejection that resolved with pulse steroids. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary revisions after face transplantation are necessary components of care, as they are after most conventional free tissue transfers. Secondary revisions after face transplantation at the authors' institution have addressed both aesthetic and functional reconstructive needs, and these procedures have proven to be safe in the context of maintenance immunosuppression. Patient and procedure selection along with timing are essential to ensure patient safety, optimal function, and aesthetic outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.


Subject(s)
Facial Injuries/surgery , Facial Transplantation/methods , Reoperation/methods , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 138(1): 224-231, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27348655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Face transplantation has been shown to improve the functional and aesthetic deficits of facially disfigured individuals. Given promising short-term results, it is important to examine whether face transplantation centers are effectively reaching the targeted facial disfigurement population. The authors' center reviewed their face transplantation contacts to assess patient recruitment and outreach performance. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of their face transplantation contacts from the time of their institutional review board protocol approval (February of 2008) to October of 2015. They investigated the relationship between referral pattern (i.e., physician versus self) with the contact's demographic characteristics (i.e., age, sex, race, mechanism of injury, and geographic location) and clinical trial status. RESULTS: There were a total of 72 face transplantation contacts. The average age of the contacts was 38 years, and the majority were men [n = 41 (56.9 percent)]. Most were white (n = 33), and the most prevalent mechanism of injury was burns (46.4 percent). The majority of the contacts resided within the United States (n = 47), with most from the Northeastern United States (n = 21). Of the 72 contacts, 35 (48.6 percent) were physician referrals and 37 (51.4 percent) were self-referrals. Physician referrals have led to the most screened and transplanted contacts in their center, whereas self-referral often led to immediate exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: The authors show the diversity of patient characteristics and referral patterns in their clinical trial. Furthermore, they describe the relationship of characteristics to outcomes in their cohort and identify areas of improvement, such as patient and physician education. Lastly, they are reminded of the potential impact on the burn community.


Subject(s)
Burns/surgery , Facial Injuries/surgery , Facial Transplantation/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Selection , Referral and Consultation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
17.
PLoS One ; 11(5): e0156428, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27232716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The fibrotic capsule that surrounds silicone implants consists mainly of collagen. The FDA-approved collagenase of the bacterium clostridium histolyticum provides a reasonable treatment option. Safety and efficacy at the female breast site must be evaluated before clinical utilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We incubated 20 samples of fibrotic capsule as well as 12 full thickness skin grafts harvested from the female breast site for 24 hours with different doses of collagenase. Outcome measures involved histological assessment of thickness and density of the capsule tissue as well as the skin grafts. Furthermore, we performed a collagen assay and immunohistochemistry staining for collagen subtypes. RESULTS: Collagenase treatment was able to degrade human capsule contracture tissue ex-vivo. The remaining collagen subtype after degradation was type 4 only. 0.3 mg/ml of collagenase was most effective in reducing capsule thickness when compared with higher concentrations. Of note, effectiveness was inversely related to capsule density, such that there was less reduction in thickness with higher capsule densities and vice versa. Furthermore, the application of 0.3mg/ml collagenase did not lead to thinning or perforation of full thickness skin grafts. CONCLUSION: Adjustment of collagenase dose will depend on thickness and density of the contracted capsule. A concentration of 0.3mg/ml seems to be safe and effective in an ex-vivo setting. The remaining collagen subtype 4 is suitable to serve as a neo-capsule/acellular tissue matrix. Collagenase treatment for capsular contracture may soon become a clinical reality.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants/adverse effects , Implant Capsular Contracture/pathology , Microbial Collagenase/pharmacology , Silicone Gels/adverse effects , Collagen/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Implant Capsular Contracture/drug therapy , Implant Capsular Contracture/etiology , Microbial Collagenase/therapeutic use , Skin/drug effects , Skin/metabolism
18.
J Craniofac Surg ; 27(2): 286-92, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26967066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Face transplantation (FT) has emerged as a viable option for treating devastating facial injuries. Most reported outcomes have demonstrated satisfactory motor and sensory restoration despite differences in technique. The authors have developed an algorithm of facial nerve management in these challenging patients. Our principles of management are illustrated by 2 specific patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 2 full face transplants was performed. Both patients required nerve grafting during full FT. Patient 1 due to short donor facial nerve stumps and patient 2 due to intraoperative soft tissue swelling. Patient 2 required a nerve transfer 11 months after full FT due to impaired motor recovery opposite the side of nerve grafting. Follow-up examinations consisting of manual muscle testing and Sunnybrook Facial Grading System 6 to 42 months after full FT with selected video examinations were critically reviewed. RESULTS: Patient 1 had symmetrical motor recovery with gradual improvements noted throughout. At 6 months, Patient 2 had asymmetrically improving motor function. After nerve transfer, the patient showed gradual improvement in motor recovery, symmetry, and tone. Videos for each patient demonstrate the evolution of the patients' ability to smile from 6 to 42 months. DISCUSSION: The authors describe their assessment of motor recovery and management of facial nerve reconstruction as it pertains to FT. Finally, the authors illustrate the principles of nerve transfer are applicable to FT recipients.


Subject(s)
Facial Nerve/physiopathology , Facial Nerve/surgery , Facial Transplantation/methods , Facial Transplantation/rehabilitation , Nerve Transfer/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cleft Lip/complications , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/complications , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/surgery , Facial Muscles/innervation , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Motor Neurons/physiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Adjustment , Smiling/physiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/surgery
19.
Ann Plast Surg ; 76(3): 355-60, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26808757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traumatic amputation is the second leading cause of limb loss in the United States. The preferred treatment is salvage and replantation of the amputated limb, whenever possible, and allotransplantation is a novel procedure whereby healthy limbs are procured from deceased organ donors and transplanted into the amputee recipient. A major restriction for both procedures is the irrecoverable muscle damage occurring due to ischemia. We investigated the feasibility of using a novel lightweight, mobile perfusion device specifically designed to perfuse amputated porcine limbs with an acellular perfusion solution to delay ischemic muscle damage prior to transplantation or replantation. METHODS: Bilateral hind limbs of Yorkshire pigs were amputated; one of the limbs was preserved by perfusion in the mobile perfusion device, and the other by storage in ice slurry for 12 hours. RESULTS: Five sets of bilateral limbs were preserved as described previously. A defined pressure of 30 mm Hg was reliably maintained in the arterial system without loss of flow. Comparison of the perfusate composition before and after limb passage revealed significant differences. Muscle biopsies showed a consistent progression of clusters of hypoxic cells in the control limbs with time. Similar changes could not be observed in the perfused tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We have designed and built a small, mobile perfusion device that is operational and that more closely mimics the normal physiological environment when compared with the current standard of preservation in ice slurry. This project may have far-reaching implications for the treatment of limb loss through replantation and transplantation.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Traumatic/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Replantation , Tissue Preservation/instrumentation , Amputation, Traumatic/pathology , Animals , Feasibility Studies , Female , Limb Salvage , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Random Allocation , Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Reperfusion Injury/pathology , Swine , Tissue Preservation/methods , Treatment Outcome , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
20.
Transpl Int ; 29(6): 655-62, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265179

ABSTRACT

The advent of more potent immunosuppressants led to the first successful human upper extremity transplantation in 1998. At this time, >100 upper extremity transplants, 30 face transplants, and a variety of other vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) procedures have been performed around the world. VCA recipients present unique challenges for transplantation. The incidence of acute rejection exceeds 80% in hand and face transplantation and is well documented, whereas reports about antibody-mediated rejection and chronic rejection remain scarce. Immunosuppression protocols commonly used at US centers are derived from solid organ transplantation protocols. Novel approaches to minimize rejections in VCA may include improved HLA matching and considerations toward cytomegalovirus infection status. New graft preservation techniques may decrease immunogenicity prior to transplant. Novel monitoring methods such as valid biomarkers, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and sentinel flaps may enable earlier diagnosis of rejection. Cell-based therapies are being explored to achieve immunosuppressive regimen minimization or even tolerance induction. The efficacy of local immunosuppression in clinical VCA remains controversial. In conclusion, although immunosuppressive strategies adapted from SOT have demonstrated good midterm results, focusing on the unique features of VCA grafts may enable additional, more specific treatment strategies in the future and improved long-term graft outcomes.


Subject(s)
Allografts , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/methods , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/standards , Animals , Antibodies/immunology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , HLA Antigens/immunology , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Transplantation, Homologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...