Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Physiother ; 68(1): 37-42, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34952812

ABSTRACT

QUESTION: In women who are unable to contract their pelvic floor muscles voluntarily, what is the effect of an intravaginal electrical stimulation regimen on their ability to contract the pelvic floor muscles and on self-reported urinary incontinence? DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors and intention-to-treat analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four women with pelvic floor muscle function assessed by bi-digital palpation to be grade 0 or 1 on the Modified Oxford Scale. INTERVENTION: For 8 weeks, participants randomised to the experimental group received weekly 20-minute sessions of intravaginal electrical stimulation with instructions to attempt pelvic floor muscle contractions during the bursts of electrical stimulation in the final 10 minutes of each session. The control group received no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was ability to voluntarily contract the pelvic floor muscles, evaluated through vaginal palpation using the Modified Oxford Scale. Secondary outcomes were prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence symptoms assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire on Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) score from 0 to 21. RESULTS: Sixty-one participants provided outcome data. After the intervention, the ability to contract the pelvic floor muscles was acquired by 36% of the experimental group and 12% of the control group (absolute risk difference 0.24, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.43). The experimental group also improved by a mean of 2 points more than the control group on the ICIQ-UI-SF score (95% CI 0.02 to 3.97). CONCLUSION: In women who are unable to contract their pelvic floor muscles voluntarily, 8 weeks of intravaginal electrical stimulation with voluntary contraction attempts improved their ability to contract their pelvic floor muscles and reduced the overall severity and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. Although the main estimates of these effects indicate that the effects are large enough to be worthwhile, the precision of these estimates was low, so it is not possible to confirm whether the effects are trivial or worthwhile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03319095.


Subject(s)
Urinary Incontinence, Stress , Urinary Incontinence , Electric Stimulation , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Muscle Contraction , Pelvic Floor , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/therapy
2.
J Physiother ; 66(1): 27-32, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843420

ABSTRACT

QUESTION: In women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), what is the average effect of the addition of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic organ prolapse symptoms, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life, sexual function and perceived improvement after surgery? DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessors, and intention-to-treat analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six women with an indication for POP surgery. INTERVENTION: The experimental group received a 9-week pelvic floor muscle training protocol with four sessions before the surgery and seven sessions after the surgery. The control group received surgery only. OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptoms were assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), which is scored from 0 'unaffected' to 300 'worst affected'. Secondary outcomes were assessed using vaginal manometry, validated questionnaires and Patient Global Impression of Improvement, which is scored from 1 'very much better' to 7 'very much worse'. All participants were evaluated 15 days before surgery, and at Days 40 and 90 after surgery. RESULTS: There was no substantial difference in POP symptoms between the experimental and control groups at Day 40 (31 (SD 24) versus 38 (SD 42), adjusted mean difference -6, 95% CI -25 to 13) or Day 90 (27 (SD 27) versus 33 (SD 33), adjusted mean difference -4, 95% CI -23 to 14). The experimental group perceived marginally greater global improvement than the control group; mean difference -0.4 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.1) at Day 90. However, the estimated effect of additional perioperative pelvic floor muscle training was estimated to be not beneficial enough to be considered worthwhile for any other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In women undergoing POP surgery, additional perioperative pelvic floor muscle training had negligibly small effects on POP symptoms, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life or sexual function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ReBEC, RBR-29kgz5.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Pelvic Floor/physiopathology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/rehabilitation , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Perioperative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/physiopathology , Perioperative Period , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 39(1): 361-366, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31737927

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess women's self-perception of their pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction and its agreement with an assessed PFM contraction. Further, to assess a possible correlation between women's self-perception and reports of urinary incontinence (UI) and between PFM contraction and severity of UI. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study including 82 women. The study was conducted in a basic healthcare unit in Brazil. PFM contraction was assessed by a physiotherapist and estimated by women using the Modified Oxford Scale (MOS). UI symptoms were assessed using a validated questionnaire (ICIQ-UI-SF). A descriptive analysis of the data was performed. The weighted κ coefficient, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze data. RESULTS: Eighty-two women with a mean age of 46.83 (±17.94) were analyzed. The majority (98.8%) believed they were able to voluntarily contract their PFM, but only 33% correctly estimated their PFM considering the examiner assessment as reference. No agreement (κ = 0.139, P = .087) was found between the examiner's classification and the women's estimation of their PFM contraction. Women's self-perception did not correlate with the ICIQ-IU-SF (r's = .011, P = .922). A moderate negative correlation was found between the assessed PFM contraction and the ICIQ-UI-SF score (r's = -.406, P = .00). CONCLUSION: Most of the women did not show an accurate self-perception of PFM contraction. No correlation between women's self-perception and the ICIQ-UI-SF score was found, but a negative correlation was found between the assessed PFM contraction and the ICIQ-UI-SF score.


Subject(s)
Muscle Contraction/physiology , Pelvic Floor/physiology , Self Concept , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pelvic Floor/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...