Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurophysiol ; 120(4): 1680-1694, 2018 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29924707

ABSTRACT

Stroke often involves primary motor cortex (M1) and its corticospinal projections (CST). As hand function is critically dependent on these structures, its recovery is often incomplete. The neuronal substrate supporting affected hand function is not well understood but likely involves reorganized M1 and CST of the lesioned hemisphere (M1IL and CSTIL). We hypothesized that affected hand function in chronic stroke is related to structural and functional reorganization of M1IL and CSTIL. We tested 18 patients with chronic ischemic stroke involving M1 or CST. Their hand function was compared with 18 age-matched healthy subjects. M1IL thickness and CSTIL fractional anisotropy (FA) were determined with MRI and compared with measures of the other hemisphere. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to M1IL to determine its input-output function [stimulus response curve (SRC)]. The plateau of the SRC (MEPmax), inflection point, and slope parameters of the curve were extracted. Results were compared with measures in 12 age-matched healthy controls. MEPmax of M1IL was significantly smaller ( P = 0.02) in the patients, indicating reduced CSTIL motor output, and was correlated with impaired hand function ( P = 0.02). M1IL thickness ( P < 0.01) and CSTIL-FA ( P < 0.01) were reduced but did not correlate with hand function. The results indicate that employed M1IL or CSTIL structural measures do not explain the extent of impairment in hand function once M1 and CST are sufficiently functional for TMS to evoke a motor potential. Instead, impairment of hand function is best explained by the abnormally low output from M1IL. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Hand function often remains impaired after stroke. While the critical role of the primary motor cortex (M1) and its corticospinal output (CST) for hand function has been described in the nonhuman primate stroke model, their structure and function have not been systematically evaluated for patients after stroke. We report that in chronic stroke patients with injury to M1 and/or CST an abnormally reduced M1 output is related to impaired hand function.


Subject(s)
Hand/physiopathology , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Stroke/physiopathology , Aged , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pyramidal Tracts/physiopathology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
2.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 126(3): 581-93, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25113275

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Motor learning results in changes of movement representation in primary motor cortex (M1) a process involving long-term potentiation (LTP). Pairing motor training with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 enhances the formation of a motor memory. Here we determined the effect of pairing M1 stimulation and the execution of training movements at different times and frequencies on the formation of a motor memory. METHODS: Formation of a motor memory was defined as increases in motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the training agonist (extensor carpi ulnaris muscle, ECU) and increases in peak acceleration of the trained movements that last more than 60min. Training consisted of auditory-paced ballistic wrist extension movements (30min, 0.5Hz) paired with 0.1, 0.25 or 0.5Hz subthreshold rTMS. The rTMS pulse was applied at either the onset, 100ms prior to or 300ms after the onset of training movement related increases in electromyographic (EMG) activity of ECU. This was compared to a Sham condition. RESULTS: Only 0.1Hz rTMS applied at the onset of the training related increase in ECU-EMG activity resulted in increases in MEP amplitudes and peak acceleration when compared to the Sham. CONCLUSIONS: The formation of motor memory is enhanced above the naïve level by co-administration of low frequency rTMS at the time of execution of training movements. SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate the importance of time and frequency of rTMS in these settings and should be considered in the design of rehabilitation treatment strategies using rTMS.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Memory/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Long-Term Potentiation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...