Shorter infusion time of ocrelizumab: Results from the randomized, double-blind ENSEMBLE PLUS substudy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is an approved intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody for multiple sclerosis (MS). Shortening the 600 mg infusion to 2 hours reduces the total site stay from 5.5-6 hours (approved infusion duration including mandatory pre-medication and post-infusion observation) to 4 hours. The safety profile of shorter-duration ocrelizumab infusions was investigated using results from ENSEMBLE PLUS. METHODS: ENSEMBLE PLUS is a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (NCT03085810). In ENSEMBLE, patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting MS received ocrelizumab 600 mg infusions every 24 weeks for 192 weeks. In ENSEMBLE PLUS, ocrelizumab 600 mg administered over the approved 3.5-hour infusion time (conventional duration) is compared with a 2-hour infusion (shorter duration); the durations of the initial infusions (2×300 mg, 14 days apart) were unaffected. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first Randomized Dose. RESULTS: From November 1, 2018, to December 13, 2019, 745 patients were randomized 1:1 to the conventional or shorter infusion group. At the first Randomized Dose, 99/373 patients (26.5%) in the conventional and 107/372 patients (28.8%) in the shorter infusion group experienced IRRs. The majority of IRRs were mild or moderate; >99% of all IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups (conventional infusion group, 99/99; shorter infusion group, 106/107). No IRRs were serious, life-threatening, or fatal. No IRR-related discontinuations occurred. During the first Randomized Dose, 22/373 (5.9%) and 39/372 (10.5%) patients in the conventional and shorter infusion groups, respectively, had IRRs leading to infusion slowing/interruption. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of ocrelizumab. CONCLUSION: The rates and severity of IRRs were similar between conventional and shorter infusions. No new safety signals were detected. Shortening the infusion time to 2 hours reduces the total site stay time (including mandatory pre-medication/infusion/observation) from 5.5-6 hours to 4 hours, and may reduce patient and site staff burden. A short video summarizing the key results is provided in supplemental material.

Pharmacokinetic study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate combined with rifampin in healthy volunteers.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) was studied in combination with rifampin in 24 healthy subjects in a multiple-dose, open-label, single-group, two-period study. All subjects were given tenofovir DF at 300 mg once a day (QD) from days 1 to 10 (period 1). From days 11 to 20 the subjects received tenofovir DF at 300 mg combined with rifampin at 600 mg QD (period 2). The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of tenofovir (day 10 and 20) and rifampin (day 20) were assessed. The drug-related adverse events (AEs) experienced during this study were mostly mild. Only one grade 3 AE possibly or probably related to the treatment (raised liver enzyme levels) occurred during period 2; the subject was withdrawn from the study. Pharmacokinetic data for 23 subjects were thus evaluable. Point estimates for the mean ratios of tenofovir with rifampin versus tenofovir alone for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC(0-24)), the maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and the minimum concentration of drug in plasma (C(min)) were 0.88, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively. The 90% classical confidence intervals for AUC(0-24), C(max), and C(min) were 0.84 to 0.92, 0.78 to 0.90, and 0.80 to 0.91, respectively, thus suggesting pharmacokinetic equivalence. Similarly, coadministration of rifampin and tenofovir DF did not result in changes in the values of the tenofovir pharmacokinetic parameters. For rifampin, the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters found in this study were comparable to those found in the literature, indicating that tenofovir DF has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of rifampin. In conclusion, adaptation of either the rifampin or the tenofovir DF dose for the simultaneous treatment of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in HIV-infected patients is probably not required.

Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India: a multicenter study.

Widespread antimony resistance renders conventional amphotericin B the only option for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in North Bihar, India. Because of its excellent safety profile, a large dose (7.5 mg/kg) of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) was given to each of 203 patients with VL at 4 treatment centers, and the patients were discharged the next day. At initial clinical and parasitological follow-up, performed on day 30 after treatment, evidence of a cure was seen in 195 (96%) of 203 patients (95% CI, 92-98); 4 patients experienced treatment failure. Two patients were lost to follow-up, 2 died (one due to progressive disease and another, 5 months after treatment, due to an unrelated illness), and 12 experienced relapses during follow-up. Thus, 183 patients (90%; 95% CI, 85-94) had obtained final cure 6 months after treatment. Very few adverse events (fever with rigor, in 9.8% of patients) were seen. Single-dose L-AmB (7.5 mg/kg) treatment is safe and effective, and it may be used for the mass treatment of VL in India.

Low-dose liposomal amphotericin B in refractory Indian visceral leishmaniasis: a multicenter study.

In this randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, multicenter trial, 84 patients with visceral leishmaniasis refractory to antimony therapy were administered liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) at cumulative doses of 3.75, 7.5, and 15.0 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days. Posttreatment apparent cure and definite cure were assessed at 2 weeks and 6 months after the end of therapy, respectively. Mild to moderate infusion-related fever and rigors were seen in 29 and 44% of patients, respectively. One patient each in the 3.75- and 7.5-mg groups had detectable parasites on splenic smear at posttreatment evaluation. At 6 months' follow-up, however, 2, 1, and 1 patients relapsed in the 3.75-, 7.5-, and 15.0-mg groups, resulting in definite cure rates of 89, 93, and 97%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the cure rates of the 3 groups. Low-dose liposomal amphotericin B given for 5 days can cure most patients with Indian kala-azar.

Safety and early efficacy assessment of liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) in adults with refractory or relapsed acute myeloblastic leukaemia: a phase I-II study.

We have conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose, early safety and efficacy of single-agent liposomal daunorubicin in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Successive cohorts of six patients received escalated doses of 75, 100, 125 or 150 mg/m2 of DaunoXome for three consecutive days. Responding patients received a further consolidation cycle of DaunoXome at a dose identical to the one inducing complete or partial remission at the various dose levels. Twenty-eight patients with a median age of 50.5 years were enrolled. A maximum tolerated dose was determined at 150 mg/m2. Twelve patients received the second cycle. DaunoXome was well tolerated at all administered levels; dose-limiting toxicities included nausea and vomiting, mucositis and two episodes of cardiotoxicity resulting in the death of two patients. The overall response rate was 46% with a median duration of response of 180 d and a median duration of survival of 208 d. Ten patients demonstrated a complete response following cycle 1, and a further four entered partial response with the first cycle (marrow blasts between 5% and 10%). Of these, three attained complete response with the second cycle (total complete response 13/28). Our results indicate that DaunoXome at a dose of 150 mg/m2 displays acceptable toxicity in a 3-d regimen followed by a 3-d consolidation course at 100 mg/m2/d. At this dose schedule, interestingly high remission rates were achieved, justifying further evaluation of DaunoXome for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML patients.