Session Reactions Scale-3: Initial psychometric evidence.

Objective: This study aimed to develop an updated brief self-report post-session measure, suitable for collecting systematic feedback on clients' session reactions in the context of measurement-based care (MBC). Method: The Session Reactions Scale-3 (SRS-3; 33 items) was developed by extending and adjusting the Revised Session Reactions Scale. In Study 1, the psychometric properties of the SRS-3 were tested on N = 242 clients. In Study 2, a brief version of the SRS-3 (SRS-3-B; 15 items) was developed using a combination of conceptual, empirical, and pragmatic criteria. In Study 3, the psychometric properties of the SRS-3-B were tested on a new sample of N = 265 clients. Results: Exploratory factor analysis supported the use of the SRS-3-B as a two-factor (helpful reactions, hindering reactions) or unidimensional (overall session evaluation) instrument. The SRS-3-B was meaningfully related to another process measure (Individual Therapy Process Questionnaire) both on the item and factor levels. Conclusions: The SRS-3-B is a reliable process measure to elicit rich and clinically meaningful feedback from clients within the MBC context and as a research instrument to assess the helpful and hindering aspects of therapy sessions.

Therapist engagement in measurement-based care: The association between client outcomes and therapist viewing frequency.

Engagement in measurement-based care (MBC) has been shown to be an effective practice for optimizing psychotherapy outcomes. Best practices for MBC suggest that it is crucial for therapists to consistently review scores. However, the exact impact of this practice on MBC's effectiveness has yet to be fully elucidated. The current study examined the association between the frequency of therapists reviewing clients' depression scores and client psychotherapy outcomes. The sample consisted of 6182 clients diagnosed with depression who sought treatment from 2248 therapists through a practice research group. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was administered prior to sessions, and therapists could access the scores via their therapist portal. The results based on multilevel modelling revealed that how often therapists view their clients' PHQ-9 results was not a significant predictor of therapy outcomes. However, therapists who, across their caseloads, viewed client PHQ-9 scores more frequently facilitated better treatment outcomes. These results suggest that therapists who routinely engage in MBC facilitate better therapy outcomes. Implications for practice and research are provided.

Measurement-based care professional practice guideline: Don't forget the therapists!

Boswell et al. (2022) professional practice guideline builds an excellent, evidence-driven argument in favor of the routine implementation of measurement-based care (MBC). Nonetheless, as learned from the attempted implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies, presenting empirical evidence does not affect therapist behavior. As such, we argue for an actionable and practical professional practice guideline. We review some of the most hindering barriers to the implementation of MBC, and we offer guidance introducing some of the efforts needed to overcome them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Conceptual Invariance, Trajectories, and Outcome Associations of Working Alliance in Unguided and Guided Internet-Based Psychological Interventions: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of working alliance remains unclear for many forms of internet-based interventions (IBIs), a set of effective psychotherapy alternatives that do not require synchronous interactions between patients and therapists. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the conceptual invariance, trajectories, and outcome associations of working alliance across an unguided IBI and guided IBIs that incorporated clinician support through asynchronous text messaging or video messaging. METHODS: Adults with high education attainment (n=145) with subclinical levels of anxiety, stress, or depressive symptoms were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment conditions for 7 weeks. All participants received treatments from MyCompass, an unguided IBI using cognitive behavior therapy. Participants in condition 2 and 3 received supplemental, asynchronous clinician support through text and video, respectively. Working alliance with the IBIs was measured weekly using select items from the 12-item version of the Agnew Relationship Measure. Symptom and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment, and 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Working alliance with the IBIs was conceptually invariant across the 3 conditions. Working alliance followed a quadratic pattern of change over time for all conditions and declined significantly only in the text-support condition. After controlling for baseline symptoms, higher baseline levels of working alliance predicted less depression and less functional impairment at follow-up, whereas faster increases in working alliance predicted less worry at the end of treatment and at follow-up, all of which only occurred in the video-support condition. CONCLUSIONS: Working alliance with the IBIs was generally established in the initial sessions. Although working alliance is conceptually invariant across IBIs with or without clinician support, the associations between working alliance and treatment outcomes among IBIs may differ depending on clinician involvement and the modalities of support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05122429; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05122429.

Clinician perceptions of nomothetic and individualized patient-reported outcome measures in measurement-based care.

Objective: Measurement-based care (MBC), which encompasses routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and measurement feedback systems (MFSs), is an evidence-based practice (EBP) supporting treatment personalization and clinical responsiveness. Despite MBC's effectiveness, clinicians report reservations regarding its utility, which may be a function of overreliance on nomothetic (i.e., standardized) measures. Although research suggests that individualized (i.e., idiographic) patient-reported outcome measures (I-PROMs) may have the potential to overcome these obstacles, little is known regarding clinicians' perceptions of different measurement approaches to MBC. Methods: This study examined clinicians' perceptions of the clinical utility, relevance to treatment planning, and practicality of nomothetic, individualized, and combined clinical feedback provided by a simulated MFS. Three hundred and twenty-nine clinicians were randomized to one of three conditions that presented a clinical vignette comprising: (a) nomothetic, (b) individualized, or (c) combined clinical feedback. Results: Participants' perceptions of the clinical feedback were not affected by the measurement approach. However, cognitive behavioral participants reported more positive perceptions of all aspects associated with the clinical feedback. Conclusion: These results were consistent with previous findings, suggesting that clinicians' theoretical orientation may have a significant impact on their perceptions of MBC, and should be considered when designing and implementing these systems.

A Multimethod Study of Mental Health Care Patients' Attitudes Toward Clinician-Level Performance Information.

OBJECTIVE: Research demonstrates variability in mental health clinicians' overall and domain-specific outcomes for their patients. Despite calls to increase patient access to provider performance information, little is known about patients' attitudes toward and valuing of this information. This study explored patient attitudes, preferences, and values regarding the use of clinician outcome track records in provider selection and treatment decision making. METHODS: Community mental health patients (N=403) completed a multicomponent survey, and a subset of patients (N=15) completed a follow-up semistructured interview. Interview data were analyzed with consensual qualitative methods. RESULTS: Overall, participants endorsed valuing access to clinician outcome track record information and endorsed the belief that using such information would enhance the referral process and promote better mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Harnessing measurement-based information on clinicians' effectiveness to make more personalized treatment decisions could promote better treatment engagement, retention, and outcomes.

Feasibility and acceptability of a novel tool for the study of interpersonal processes in psychotherapy.

Psychotherapy process research methods often require extensive time and resources. Technology innovations, such as wearable sensors, have the potential to increase the efficiency of process data collection and processing. One such tool is the Sociometric Badge (SB), which is a portable, palm-sized device that can simultaneously record raw audio and data on social signals (e.g., speech patterns, body movement) in real-time and in varied contexts. In addition to describing the nature and implications of wearable sensing devices for psychotherapy research, this article reports results from a pilot study that examined the feasibility and acceptance of these assessment devices in comparison with traditional audio recording equipment. Undergraduate students (N = 306; Mage = 19.16 years, SD = 1.44; 50.3% female) were randomly placed into 153 dyads to mimic a psychotherapy dyad. Each dyad was randomly assigned to either a SB condition (n = 75 dyads) or a standard recording device condition (n = 78 dyads), and engaged in a conversation task. Participants completed self-report items assessing perceived relationship quality and experience with the respective recording device. Between-condition tests showed that perceived relationship quality did not differ between conditions. Participants in the audio recorder (vs. SB) condition reported more awareness of the device in the room. These findings reveal comparable acceptability and feasibility of SBs to traditional audio recorders in a simulated dyad, suggesting that wearable sensing devices may be suitable for research and practice in routine psychotherapy contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Mental health care consumers' relative valuing of clinician performance information.

BACKGROUND: Research demonstrates significant variability in mental health clinicians' overall and domain-specific effectiveness with their patients. Despite calls to increase patient access to performance information, little is known about patients' relative valuing of this information in the context of other treatment factors. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to obtain an understanding of patients' relative valuing of provider performance track records and other therapist and treatment characteristics for their mental health care decision making. METHOD: Participants were 403 (Mage = 41.20; 66.5% female) community mental health patients who completed a multicomponent survey that included an adapted delayed-discounting paradigm to examine the relative valuing. Multiple descriptive, quantitative indices of relative valuing were calculated, as well as an exploratory latent profile analysis to ascertain the presence of homogenous relative-valuing subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, participants valued provider track record information. They also evidenced relatively higher preference values for working with therapists who had specific efficacy in treating their primary problem domain, charged less, and with whom there is a high likelihood of establishing a good alliance. Two latent profiles were identified: one representing higher valuing of provider performance and another consistently representing less emphasis. Participants with higher track-record valuing were younger, believed that therapists are not interchangeable, and endorsed trust in the collection and use of performance information. CONCLUSION: Harnessing clinician information to make more personalized and informed treatment decisions could potentially promote better treatment engagement, retention, and outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record

An exploratory analysis of the impact of specific interventions: Some clients reveal more than others.

Recent work has highlighted that process-outcome relationships are likely to vary depending on the client, yet there is little direct evidence regarding specific intervention effects in individual clients. This study attempted to address the hypothesis that some clients reveal more than others regarding the impact of specific interventions. Intensive case study analyses were applied to 2 clients with principal major depressive disorder and comorbid anxiety disorders receiving transdiagnostic psychotherapy. Clients completed a battery of symptom and psychological assessments of mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal use, and emotion avoidance on many occasions throughout treatment. Time series analyses were applied to symptom and change construct data. Results included: (a) significant decreases in depression, anxiety, and emotion avoidance from baseline to posttreatment were observed, as well as significant increases in mindfulness and reappraisal; and (b) in one case, intervention strategies exerted little influence on changes in key variables; in the other, emotion exposure strategies had the strongest influence on increases in mindfulness and present-focused awareness strategies had the strongest influence on reductions in emotion avoidance. Even when different clients appear to similarly benefit from the same treatment, specific intervention effects on putative change factors may be more prevalent for some clients and less prevalent for others. Regular assessment is needed to determine if a client requires an alternative set of specific intervention strategies. (PsycINFO Database Record

Clinical errors as a lack of context responsiveness.

Although standardized treatments have the potential to decrease clinical errors, within-session responsiveness is complicated and complementary frameworks may be needed to foster enhanced responsiveness in the context of evidence-based treatments. Recent efforts have targeted the enhancement of flexibility and responsiveness in the delivery of manualized treatments, including the development of transdiagnostic treatments (i.e., protocols that are designed to be used across different diagnoses) intended to tailor intervention principles to the needs of individual patients. Context-Responsive Psychotherapy Integration (Constantino, Boswell, Bernecker, & Castonguay, 2013) offers an if-then framework that supports the utilization of evidence-based clinical strategies in response to the identification of specific process markers. Failure to identify or appropriately respond to such markers may result in negative therapeutic process as well as outcomes. This case study uses the context-response psychotherapy integration framework to understand critical moments of clinical decision-making through examining an individual treatment case that unilaterally terminated after seven sessions of transdiagnostic treatment. This illustrative empirical case analysis focuses on three potential clinical errors, as indicated by a lack of responsiveness to three candidate process markers: (a) low outcome expectations, (b) self-strivings, and (c) outcome monitoring. For each clinical error, alternative clinical strategies are discussed.

The Expanding Relevance of Routinely Collected Outcome Data for Mental Health Care Decision Making.

Evidence shows that routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and feedback using standardized measurement tools enhances the outcomes of individual patients. When outcome data from a large number of patients and clinicians are collected, patterns can be tracked and comparisons can be made at multiple levels. Variability in skills and outcomes among clinicians and service settings has been documented, and the relevance of ROM for decision making is rapidly expanding alongside the transforming health care landscape. In this article, we highlight several developing core implications of ROM for mental health care, and frame points of future work and discussion.

A meta-analytic review of the effects of exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

Consistent evidence indicates that exercise improves cognition and mood, with preliminary evidence suggesting that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may mediate these effects. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to provide an estimate of the strength of the association between exercise and increased BDNF levels in humans across multiple exercise paradigms. We conducted a meta-analysis of 29 studies (N = 1111 participants) examining the effect of exercise on BDNF levels in three exercise paradigms: (1) a single session of exercise, (2) a session of exercise following a program of regular exercise, and (3) resting BDNF levels following a program of regular exercise. Moderators of this effect were also examined. Results demonstrated a moderate effect size for increases in BDNF following a single session of exercise (Hedges' g = 0.46, p < 0.001). Further, regular exercise intensified the effect of a session of exercise on BDNF levels (Hedges' g = 0.59, p = 0.02). Finally, results indicated a small effect of regular exercise on resting BDNF levels (Hedges' g = 0.27, p = 0.005). When analyzing results across paradigms, sex significantly moderated the effect of exercise on BDNF levels, such that studies with more women showed less BDNF change resulting from exercise. Effect size analysis supports the role of exercise as a strategy for enhancing BDNF activity in humans, but indicates that the magnitude of these effects may be lower in females relative to males.