Impact of shaggy aorta on intraoperative cerebral embolism during carotid artery stenting.

BACKGROUND: Careful selection of patients for carotid stenting is necessary. We suggest that patients with a shaggy aorta syndrome may be at higher risk for perioperative embolic complications. METHODS: The study is a retrospective subanalysis of the SIBERIA Trial. We included 72 patients undergoing transfemoral carotid artery stenting. Patients were monitored during the procedures using multifrequency transcranial Doppler with embolus detection and differentiation. Pre- and postprocedural (2 and 30 days) cerebral diffusion-weighted cerebral MRIs were performed. RESULTS: Forty-six patients had shaggy aorta syndrome. Intraoperative embolisms were recorded in 82.6% and 46.1% of patients with and without shaggy aorta syndrome, respectively (P=0.001). New asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions in the postoperative period occurred in 78.3% and in 26.9% of patients with and without shaggy aorta syndrome, respectively (P<0.001). There were no cases of stroke within 2 days in both groups. 3 (6.5%) cases of stroke within 30 days after the procedure were observed only in patients with shaggy aorta syndrome. There were no cases of contralateral stroke. Shaggy aorta syndrome (OR 5.54 [1.83:16.7], P=0.001) and aortic arch ulceration (OR 6.67 [1.19: 37.3], P=0.02) were independently associated with cerebral embolism. Shaggy aorta syndrome (OR 9.77 [3.14-30.37], P<0.001) and aortic arch ulceration (OR 12.9 [2.3: 72.8], P=0.003) were independently associated with ipsilateral new asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Shaggy aorta syndrome and aortic arch ulceration significantly increase the odds of intraoperative embolism and new asymptomatic ischemic brain lesions. Carotid endarterectomy or transcervical carotid stent should be selected in patients with shaggy aorta syndrome.

One-Year Results of Long femoropopliteal Lesions Stenting with Fasciotomy Lamina Vastoadductoria.

BACKGROUND: Fasciotomy can increase the mobility of the superficial femoral artery and decrease the incidence of stent fractures. This study aimed to compare the long-term patency of drug-eluting nitinol stents with and without fasciotomy in patients with prolonged superficial femoral artery occlusions. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 60 (1:1) patients with long femoropopliteal steno-occlusive lesions >200 mm. Patients in group 1 (Zilver) underwent recanalization of femoropopliteal artery occlusion with stenting. In group 2 (ZilverFas), the femoropopliteal occlusion was recanalized with stenting and fasciotomy of Gunter's canal. The follow-up assessment of the patency took place after 6-12 months. RESULTS: Twelve-month primary patency in Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 51% and 80%, respectively (P = 0.02). The freedom from target lesion revascularization in the Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 50% and 76%, respectively (P = 0.04). At 1 year, primary-assisted patency and secondary patency for the ZilverFas and Zilver groups were 83% vs. 62% (P = 0.07) and 86% vs. 65% (P = 0.05), respectively. In the Zilver and ZilverFas groups, the number of stent fractures was 14 and 7, respectively (P = 0.05). The multivariable Cox regression indicated that the stent fracture and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of restenosis and reocclusion. Fasciotomy reduced the risk of reocclusion and restenosis by 2.94 times. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that decompressing the stented segment with fasciotomy significantly improves the patency of the femoropopliteal segment and significantly reduces the number and severity of stent fractures.

Bypass Versus Interwoven Nitinol Stents for Long Femoro-Popliteal Occlusions: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare femoro-popliteal bypass and interwoven nitinol stenting for long occlusions of the femoro-popliteal segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single center retrospective propensity matching analysis of the symptomatic patients with long occlusion of the femoro-popliteal segment (> 20 cm), who underwent stenting with interwoven nitinol stent or femoro-popliteal bypass from 2012 to 2020. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: primary patency, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency. Secondary endpoints: major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events, primary sustained clinical improvement, survival. RESULTS: A total of 437 patients were enrolled: 294 in the bypass group and 143 in the endovascular therapy (EVT) group. After propensity score matching, 264 and 113 patients remained in the groups, respectively. A median occlusion length was 250 mm. One-year and two-year primary and secondary patency rates were comparable in both groups (two-year primary patency: 68.5% for bypass vs. 68.9% for EVT, p = 1.00). In the "above the knee" subgroup analysis, two-year secondary patency was higher in the EVT group than in the bypass group (90.9% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.048). In "below-the-knee" subgroup analysis, primary and primary assisted patency were statistically significantly higher in the EVT group than in artificial bypass subgroup (66.7% vs. 42.4%, p = .046 and 76.7% vs. 45.5%, p = .011, respectively). However, compared to autovenous bypass, the EVT group showed lower primary patency rates, although the differences are not significant. CONCLUSION: A nonselective endovascular strategy can allow for regular successful treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions longer than 25 cm.