The major specificity-determining amino acids of the tomato Cf-9 disease resistance protein are at hypervariable solvent-exposed positions in the central leucine-rich repeats.

The interaction between tomato and the leaf mold pathogen Cladosporium fulvum is controlled in a gene-for-gene manner by plant Cf genes that encode membrane-anchored extracytoplasmic leucine-rich repeat (LRR) glycoproteins, which confer recognition of their cognate fungal avirulence (Avr) proteins. Cf-9 and Cf-4 are two such proteins that are 91% identical yet recognize the sequence-unrelated fungal avirulence determinants Avr9 and Avr4, respectively. As shown previously, Cf-4 specificity is determined by three putative solvent-exposed residues in the central LRR and a deletion of two LRR relative to Cf-9. In this study, we focused on identifying the specificity determinants of Cf-9. We generated chimeras between Cf-9 and its close homologue Cf-9B and identified five amino acid residues that constitute major specificity determinants of Cf-9. Introduction of these residues into Cf-9B allowed recognition of Avr9. Consistent with a role in recognition specificity, the identified residues are putatively solvent exposed in the central LRR and occupy hypervariable positions in the global Cf alignment. One of the specificity residues is not found in any other known Cf protein, suggesting the importance of diversifying selection rather than sequence exchange between homologues. Interestingly, there is an overlap between the Cf-4 and Cf-9 specificity-determining residues, precluding a protein with dual specificity.

Building up of the plastid transcriptional machinery during germination and early plant development.

The plastid genome is transcribed by three different RNA polymerases, one is called plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP) and two are called nucleus-encoded RNA polymerases (NEPs). PEP transcribes preferentially photosynthesis-related genes in mature chloroplasts while NEP transcribes preferentially housekeeping genes during early phases of plant development, and it was generally thought that during plastid differentiation the building up of the NEP transcription system precedes the building up of the PEP transcription system. We have now analyzed in detail the establishment of the two different transcription systems, NEP and PEP, during germination and early seedling development on the mRNA and protein level. Experiments have been performed with two different plant species, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Results show that the building up of the two different transcription systems is different in the two species. However, in both species NEP as well as PEP are already present in seeds, and results using Tagetin as a specific inhibitor of PEP activity demonstrate that PEP is important for efficient germination, i.e. PEP is already active in not yet photosynthetically active seed plastids.

Hybrid transcription system for controlled plastid transgene expression.

Plastid transformation technologies have developed rapidly over the last few years, reflecting their value in the study of the principal mechanisms of plastid gene expression and commercial interest in using plastids as bioreactors. Application of this technology is still limited by the difficulty of obtaining regulated, selective expression of plastid transgenes. The plastid genome is transcribed by two different types of RNA polymerase. One of them is of the eubacterial type of polymerase, and its subunits are encoded in the plastid genome [plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP)]. The other one is of the phage type and nucleus-encoded [nucleus-encoded RNA polymerase (NEP)]. To obtain selective transgene expression, we have made use of the similarities and differences between the eubacterial and the plastid eubacterial type transcription systems. We created a hybrid transcription system in which the transgene is placed under the control of a eubacterial promoter which does not exist in the plastid genome and which is not recognized by the plastid endogenous transcriptional machinery. Selective transcription of the transgene is achieved by the supply of a chimeric transcription factor that interacts with PEP and directs it specifically to the foreign eubacterial-type transgene promoter. This hybrid transcription system could be used for biotechnological and fundamental research applications as well as in the characterization of the evolutionary differences between the eubacterial and the plastid eubacterial-type transcription systems.

Characterization of Arabidopsis plastid sigma-like transcription factors SIG1, SIG2 and SIG3.

The plastid genome is transcribed by nucleus-encoded (NEP) and plastid-encoded (PEP) RNA polymerases. PEP is a prokaryotic-type enzyme whose activity is regulated by sigma-like transcription initiation factors that are nucleus-encoded. cDNAs coding for six different potential a-like factors have been cloned and sequenced recently. However, functional analyses of these factors are still limited. We have used an anti-sense approach in order to study the function of SIG1, SIG2 and SIG3. Only SIG2 anti-sense plants show a visible phenotype characterized by chlorophyll deficiency. Surprisingly, this phenotype is different from the phenotype of SIG2 knockout plants in that the chlorophyll deficiency is limited to cotyledons. In later developmental stages, the SIG2 anti-sense plants can overcome SIG2 mRNA under-expression by adjusting SIG2 protein levels to that of wild-type plants, suggesting that SIG2 expression is also regulated at the post-transcriptional level. The efficient recovery of the wild-type phenotype could also be supported by partial take-over of SIG2 function by one of the six other sigma factors. A good candidate for such substitution of SIG2 function represents SIG3. SIG3 is constitutively expressed during plant development and its specificity in promoter discrimination is less pronounced than that of SIG1 and SIG2. Finally, SIG3 protein is enhanced in SIG2 anti-sense plants when compared to wild-type plants. SIG2 is present as a soluble factor while SIG3 is partly attached to the plastid membranes. We suggest that membrane localization is necessary for efficient SIG3 function. Therefore, SIG3 cannot substitute for SIG2 function in early chloroplast biogenesis, when plastid membranes are not yet made up.

A nucleus-encoded maize protein with sigma factor activity accumulates in mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Plants contain nuclear gene families that encode proteins related to the principal sigma factors of eubacteria. As sigma factors function in transcription, the plant proteins have been presumed or demonstrated to associate with the eubacteria-like RNA polymerase of chloroplasts. In maize, five sig cDNA sequences have been reported, and four of the products are present in plastids as predicted. However, in vitro chloroplast import assays and computer algorithms gave ambiguous results with the fifth protein, ZmSig2B. Unlike the other maize sigma factors, ZmSig2B is expressed throughout developing seedling leaves, as well as in roots and etiolated tissues. To determine the subcellular location of ZmSig2B, we have now used immunoblot assays to show that it co-purifies with both mitochondria and plastids. Its NH2-terminal 153 amino acids, translationally fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP), targeted GFP to chloroplasts and mitochondria in bombarded maize leaves. A putative role for ZmSig2B in mitochondrial transcription is supported by its presence in a maize mitochondrial transcription extract. ZmSig2B also exhibits the expected properties of a chloroplast sigma factor: recombinant ZmSig2B binds to a chloroplast promoter and initiates transcription in vitro when combined with Escherichia coli core RNA polymerase. Therefore ZmSig2B is an unusual nucleus-encoded sigma factor that appears to function in both chloroplasts and mitochondria.