A phase I pharmacokinetic and safety study of Paclitaxel Injection Concentrate for Nano-dispersion (PICN) alone and in combination with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies and biliary tract cancers.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel injection concentrate for nano-dispersion (PICN) is a Cremophor-free, nanotechnology-driven paclitaxel formulation. This phase I study examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PICN alone and in combination with carboplatin. Its early efficacy in unresectable biliary tract cancers (BTCs) was also evaluated. METHODS: This multi-center study comprised two parts. Part A contained a dose-escalation cohort following "3 + 3" design using PICN monotherapy in advanced solid tumors (Part A1); Part A2 dose-expansion cohort was then conducted in advanced BTCs due to observed efficacy in Part A1. Part B1 and B2 evaluated escalating dose of PICN with carboplatin in advanced solid tumors. PICN was administered as a 30 min-infusion every 3 weeks without pre-medications for hypersensitivity reactions. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients received PICN monotherapy in Part A and 21 received PICN plus carboplatin in Part B. The MTD of PICN was determined to be 295 mg/m2 both as a monotherapy and in combination with carboplatin at AUC 5. Dose-proportional exposure in paclitaxel Cmax and AUC was observed overdose range from 175 to 325 mg/m2 for PICN monotherapy and its combination with carboplatin. Carboplatin did not alter PICN exposure. Clinically significant toxicities mainly include neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. PICN monotherapy yielded a response rate of 20% in unresectable BTCs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the safety and stable pharmacokinetics of PICN as a monotherapy and in combination with carboplatin. Single-agent PICN showed promising antitumor activity in advanced BTCs, warranting further studies to investigate its role in gastrointestinal cancers.

Key considerations in the preclinical development of biosimilars.

Biosimilar development requires several steps: selection of an appropriate reference biologic, understanding the key molecular attributes of that reference biologic and development of a manufacturing process to match these attributes of the reference biologic product. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the FDA guidance documents state that, in lieu of conducting extensive preclinical and clinical studies typically required for approval of novel biologics, biosimilars must undergo a rigorous similarity evaluation. The aim of this article is to increase understanding of the preclinical development and evaluation process for biosimilars, as required by the regulatory agencies, that precedes the clinical testing of biosimilars in humans.

Developing clinical trials for biosimilars.

Biosimilars offer the prospect of providing efficacious and safe treatment options for many diseases, including cancer, while potentially increasing accessibility with greater affordability relative to biologics. Because biologics are large, complex molecules that cannot be exactly duplicated, biosimilars cannot be considered "generic" versions of biologic drugs. This review will examine important considerations for biosimilar clinical trials. Since the aim of biosimilar manufacturing is to produce a molecule highly similar to the reference biologic, a comparability exercise is needed to demonstrate similarity with the reference biologic product based on physicochemical characterization. In vitro analytical studies and in vivo studies as well as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) assessments also are conducted. Lastly, because it may not be possible to fully characterize a biosimilar in relation to its reference biologic, robust pharmacovigilance strategies are utilized to ensure that any matters in regard to safety can be monitored. Other key topics will be discussed, including regulatory guidance for the evaluation of biosimilars, clinical trial design considerations, and whether data submitted for the approval of a biosimilar for one indication can be extrapolated to other indications for which the reference biologic is approved. European and Canadian experiences in biosimilar development will be reviewed.

Phase I evaluation of XL019, an oral, potent, and selective JAK2 inhibitor.

This phase I study evaluated selective JAK2 inhibitor XL019 in 30 patients with myelofibrosis. The initial dose cohorts were 100, 200, and 300 mg orally on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Central and/or peripheral neurotoxicity developed in all patients. Subsequently, patients were treated on lower doses; neurotoxicity was again observed, leading to study termination. Peripheral neuropathy resolved in 50%, and central neurotoxicity in all patients within months after therapy cessation. Myelosuppression was minimal. The terminal half-life of XL019 was approximately 21 h, with steady state reached by Day 8. International Working Group defined responses were seen in three (10%) patients.

GABAergic organization of the auditory cortex in the mustached bat (Pteronotus p. parnellii).

The structure and distribution of neurons and axon terminals (puncta) immunostained for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the parietotemporal neocortex of the mustached bat (Pteronotus p. parnellii) was studied. The types of GABAergic neurons and puncta (putative terminals) were analyzed, and the immunocytochemical patterns were compared to those in cat auditory cortex (AC). The classic map of mustached bat primary auditory cortex (AI) corresponds to a belt of granular six-layered cortex on the temporal convexity. This area encompasses the Doppler-shifted constant frequency 60 kHz domain (DSCF) described in physiological investigations, as well as its flanking, low-frequency, posterior field (AIp) and the anterior high-frequency region (AIa). Many types of GABAergic neurons correspond to those in cat primary AC. However, the bat had a significantly lower proportion of such cells in five of the six layers. The classes of GABAergic neurons in most layers were small, medium-sized, and large multipolar cells, and bipolar and bitufted neurons. Types found in only one or two layers included horizontal cells (layers I and VI) or extraverted multipolar neurons (layer II). Only layer IV had comparable percentages (∼ 26%), suggesting that the GABAergic influence on lemniscal thalamocortical input is conserved phylogenetically. While the cellular basis for GABAergic cortical processing may reflect shared neural circuits and common modes of inhibitory processing, laminar differences could underlie adaptations specific to microchioptera.