Access to Oncology Medicines in Canada: Consensus Forum for Recommendations for Improvement.

Patient access to new oncology drugs in Canada is only possible after navigating multiple sequential systemic checkpoints for national regulatory approval, health technology assessment (HTA) and collective government price negotiation. These steps delay access and prevent health care providers from being able to prescribe optimal therapy. Eighteen Canadian oncology clinicians from the medicine, nursing and pharmacy professions met to develop consensus recommendations for defining reasonable government performance standards around process and timeliness to improve Canadian cancer patients' access to best care. A modified Delphi methodology was used to identify consensus on 30 questions involving five themes: accountability, disparities, endpoints, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness. It was agreed that greater transparency is required across regulatory and HTA processes. Health professionals in oncology are frustrated for their patients because they are unable to deliver the modern guideline-supported therapies they want to provide due to delays in approval or funding. Canadian health care providers request improvements in timely access to life-saving therapeutics in line with other comparator countries. Clinicians expect urgent improvements in Canadian health systems to give our patients their best chance of survival.

Association between human papillomaviruses, metabolic syndrome, and all-cause death; analysis of the U.S. NHANES 2003-2004 to 2015-2016.

INTRODUCTION: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection, attributed to 4.5% of all cancers worldwide. Co-infection with the metabolic syndrome (MetS), a common cluster of cardiometabolic risk factors, has been shown to increase the persistence of HPV. The purpose of this study was to estimate the association between HPV and MetS on mortality risk. METHODS: Data for the current study was drawn from seven consecutive cycles (2003-2004 to 2015-2016) of the U.S. NHANES. The final analytic sample consisted of 5,101 individuals aged 18-65y with HPV and MetS information with follow-up to Dec. 31st, 2019. Baseline HPV status was assessed by either vaginal swab, penile swab or oral rinse and used to classify participants as: no HPV (n = 1,619), low (n = 1,138), probable (n = 672), and high-risk (n = 1,672; 22% type 16, and 10% type 18) HPV using IARC criteria. MetS was assessed by the Harmonized criteria. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 9.4 y with 240 all-cause deaths (no HPV: n = 46 deaths; low-risk: n = 60 deaths; probable: n = 37 deaths, and; high-risk: n = 97 deaths). HPV status alone revealed no associations with mortality in fully adjusted models. Cross-classification into discrete MetS/HPV strata yielded an increased risk of mortality in females with high-risk HPV/MetS relative to the no MetS/no HPV group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, low, probable, and high-risk HPV and MetS were differentially related to mortality risk in men and women. Further work is necessary to separate the temporal, age, vaccination, and sex effects of HPV diagnosis in these relationships using prospective studies with detailed histories of HPV infection and persistence.

Development of an eHealth Tool for Capturing and Analyzing the Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Cancer Treatment.

Introduction: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many different types of cancer, but it is associated with a myriad of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been identified as valuable tools for continuously collecting patient-centered data and are frequently used in oncology trials. However, few studies still research an ePRO follow-up approach on patients treated with Immunotherapy, potentially reflecting a lack of support services for this population. Methods: The team co-developed a digital platform (V-Care) using ePROs to create a new follow-up pathway for cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. To operationalize the first 3 phases of the CeHRes roadmap, we employed multiple methods that were integrated throughout the development process, rather than being performed in a linear fashion. The teams employed an agile approach in a dynamic and iterative manner, engaging key stakeholders throughout the process. Results: The development of the application was categorized into 2 phases: "user interface" (UI) and "user experience" (UX) designs. In the first phase, the pages of the application were segmented into general categories, and feedback from all stakeholders was received and used to modify the application. In phase 2, mock-up pages were developed and sent to the Figma website. Moreover, the Android Package Kit (APK) of the application was installed and tested multiple times on a mobile phone to proactively detect and fix any errors. After resolving some technical issues and adjusting errors on the Android version to improve the user experience, the iOS version of the application was developed. Discussion: By incorporating the latest technological developments, V-Care has enabled cancer patients to have access to more comprehensive and personalized care, allowing them to better manage their condition and be better informed about their health decisions. These advances have also enabled healthcare professionals to be better equipped with the knowledge and tools to provide more effective and efficient care. In addition, the advances in V-Care technology have allowed patients to connect with their healthcare providers more easily, providing a platform to facilitate communication and collaboration. Although usability testing is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and user experience of the app, it can be a significant investment of time and resources. Conclusion: The V-Care platform can be used to investigate the reported symptoms experienced by cancer patients receiving Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and to compare them with the results from clinical trials. Furthermore, the project will utilize ePRO tools to collect symptoms from patients and provide insight into whether the reported symptoms are linked to the treatment. Clinical Relevance: V-Care provides a secure, easy-to-use interface for patient-clinician communication and data exchange. Its clinical system stores and manages patient data in a secure environment, while its clinical decision support system helps clinicians make decisions that are more informed, efficient, and cost-effective. This system has the potential to improve patient safety and quality of care, while also helping to reduce healthcare costs.

Understanding the role of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) status on adherence behaviors among women with abnormal cervical cytology.

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of oncogenic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing into cervical screening there is a renewed focus on primary prevention among high-risk groups. To date, little is known about the effectiveness of this program, and the extent to which individual-level factors, such as psychosocial health and agency, may play a role. In particular, it is unclear if knowledge of one's oncogenic HPV status impacts on adherence behaviors amongst women with screening abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to identify if clinical, demographic or psychosocial factors predict non-adherence with recommended colposcopy follow-up. METHODS: This prospective pilot study included 145 women referred to a large Toronto colposcopy clinic between December, 2013 and September, 2014. Demographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics were collected at three points in time: (1) at initial colposcopy consultation; (2) 4-6 weeks following initial consultation, and; (3) at time of follow-up appointment (within 12 months of initial consultation). RESULTS: Overall, 13% (n = 145) of the women were classified as non-adherent. Older women (OR = 0.73, p < 0.01) and those with higher-grade lesions (OR = 0.10, p < 0.01) were less likely to be non-adherent, whereas current smokers (OR = 22.46, p < 0.01) were more likely to be non-adherent. While not statistically significant, variation in rates of non-adherence amongst the various HPV status groups (untested; 15.3%, HPV positive; 5.3%, HPV negative; 6.7%) warrants further study. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study indicate that younger women, those with higher-grade lesions and current smokers were more likely to be non-adherent to recommended colposcopy follow-up. While HPV status did not reach statistical significance, the direction of this finding suggests that testing for HPV may have a positive reinforcing role on adherence to follow-up. The direction of this finding warrants further study, and potentially a practical clinical goal as HPV testing for women becomes standard of care.

Cervical Screening and Colposcopy Management of Women Age 24 and Under.

OBJECTIVES: In 2012, Ontario's cervical cancer screening program changed the age of initial screening from 18 years of age to 21 and identified women aged 21-24 years as a special population whose cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions should be managed conservatively. In order to provide insight into these changes, we sought to examine patient, provider, and clinical characteristics of cervical cancer screening and colposcopy care in women aged 12-24 years. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study of all women in Ontario, aged 12-24 years, who underwent a Pap test between 2012 and 2014. Variables measured included, patient age, cytologic result of the index Pap test; colposcopy and definitive treatment within 1.5 years of the index Pap test; and carcinoma in situ (CIS) and invasive cervical cancer (ICC) 1.5 years after the index Pap test. Descriptive statistics were calculated for variables, and incidence rates per 100 000 women screened were calculated for CIS and ICC. RESULTS: A total of 270 391 index Pap tests were performed. The majority of patients were between 18 and 24 years of age (12-17 y: 5.5%; 18-20 y: 24.3%; 21-24 y: 70.1%). Overall, 87.0% of Pap tests were normal, 6.9% of women underwent subsequent colposcopy, and 1.1% received any treatment. Of women with a high-grade result, 86.6% (n = 1279) underwent colposcopy and 42.8% (n=632) received any treatment. Of women with a low-grade result, 42.3% (n = 13 856) underwent colposcopy, and 6.0% (n = 1955) had any treatment. Age-standardized rates of CIS and ICC in were 161.5 and 1.0 per 100 000 women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the change in the screening guidelines, women under the age of 21 continue to be screened. This study highlights the low risk of ICC in women under age 25 and lays groundwork for re-examining screening guidelines for women in this age group. Furthermore, colposcopy referrals for women with a low-grade result on an index Pap test, and treatment of women under 24 years of age continue to be high. Future work must address the over-utilization of population-based screening, as well as factors related to adherence to screening guidelines.

A Scoping Review of Undocumented Immigrants and Palliative Care: Implications for the Canadian Context.

Approximately 30-40 million undocumented immigrants worldwide suffer restricted health care. A scoping review was conducted to determine what is known about this population's palliative end-of-life care experiences. The scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. Databases searched included CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, Scopus, and PHRED. Search terms included uninsured care, palliative care, undocumented immigrants, and terminally ill. The search revealed limited peer-reviewed and grey literature on the topic. A total of six articles met inclusion criteria, of which four were case descriptions. Barriers to palliative care included lack of advanced care planning, lack of health insurance, poverty, fear of deportation, and limited English ability. Undocumented immigrants were more likely to have delayed access to and inadequate palliative end-of-life care. If palliative care is a human right, it is imperative that further research be conducted and policies put in place to better serve this vulnerable population at end-of-life.

The human papillomavirus vaccine: an oncology nursing issue.

In Canada, approximately 1,500 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer every year, and 581 will die of the disease (WHO/ICO Information Centre on HPV and Cervical Cancer, 2007). The importance of preventing cervical cancer is clear, as the effects that this disease has on the lives of women and their families regardless of culture, sex, nationality or country is evident. With the recent media attention and release of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in Canada, it is crucial that oncology nurses understand HPV, its role in the development of cervical cancer, and the HPV vaccine. A brief overview of HPV and its involvement in the development of cervical cancer will be discussed in this paper. In addition, information on the HPV vaccine and its implications, as well as the current policy for the vaccine in Canada will be addressed. It will become evident how the role of the oncology nurse, as an educator and advocate regarding the implementation of this vaccine is crucial for successful acceptance of this vaccine. Finally, future implications of the vaccine and avenues of research will be touched upon.