Use of public school immunization data to determine community-level immunization coverage.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether immunization data collected on a child's entry into kindergarten, i.e., Chicago Public School Immunization Data (PSID), was comparable to coverage levels determined by the National Immunization Survey (NIS) and to use these data to identify community areas with consistently low immunization coverage. METHODS: The Chicago Department of Public Health obtained four years of PSID (2000-2003); these data included demographic information, home address, and immunization records. Coverage levels were determined in two ways: (1) one dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) and (2) four doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, three doses of poliovirus vaccine, and one dose of measles-containing vaccine (the 4:3:1 series), stratified by racial/ethnic group; these levels were compared to NIS estimates for the respective time periods. We used geographic information system software to illustrate variations in coverage levels between distinct community areas within Chicago. RESULTS: Year 2000 MCV coverage levels determined from PSID closely approximated NIS estimates (84.6% vs. 87.2% +/- 4.6%, respectively). MCV coverage levels determined by race/ethnicity from PSID were within the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all racial categories (white, 89.5% vs. 92.2% +/- 6.4%; black, 79.0% vs. 83.5% +/- 9.4%; Hispanic, 89.5% vs. 87.5% +/- 5.8%). Comparison of PSID and NIS 4:3:1 coverage levels revealed similar findings. For each study year, PSID identified 12 community areas with consistently low MCV coverage levels, i.e., < 80%. CONCLUSIONS: PSID closely approximated NIS coverage estimates for MCV and 4:3:1 immunization. These methods can be used by state and city health departments to identify and direct resources to communities at greatest need.

Assessing immunization registry data completeness in Bexar County, Texas.

BACKGROUND: Immunization information systems (or registries) are increasingly being used to promote and sustain high levels of vaccination coverage. However, the perception among many providers that registry data are too incomplete to be relied on when making immunization decisions has impeded the acceptance of registries. METHODS: To evaluate registry completeness, immunization coverage levels from the San Antonio Immunization Registry System (SAIRS) were compared with coverage levels derived from immunization records from 77 (37%) of the 210 clinics participating in the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program in 1998, 44 (21%) clinics in 1999, and 10 (5%) clinics in 2000. RESULTS: Clinic data indicated an average immunization coverage level for the 4:3:1 series of 39.8%. The overall coverage level for these clinics based on registry data was 64.1%. Registry-coverage levels for these clinics were < or =65% above the coverage levels based on clinic records. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization coverage levels based on SAIRS data were the same or higher than coverage levels based on clinic records. These data suggest that San Antonio's registry data were more complete than clinic records and may assist in changing provider perceptions regarding registry data completeness.