Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phlebology ; 35(5): 325-336, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31510866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of sclerotherapy is to induce fibrosclerosis of superficial veins. We postulated that inadvertent entry of sclerosants into deep veins can result in sclerotic occlusion, deep vein sclerosis, a non-thrombotic process distinct from spontaneous deep vein thrombosis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of d-dimer in differentiating between deep vein sclerosis and deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: Proximal trunks of great and small saphenous veins were treated with endovenous laser ablation. Venous tributaries and perforators were treated with foam ultrasound guided sclerotherapy. Ultrasound studies of lower limb deep veins were performed before and one week after the procedures, to detect deep vein occlusions (DVOs). d-dimer levels were measured for DVOs and long-term ultrasound studies monitored the recanalisation rates. RESULTS: In a six-year period, 9143 procedures were performed in 1325 patients for bilateral varicose veins. This included 1124 endovenous laser ablation and 8019 foam ultrasound guided sclerotherapy procedures. A total of 259 DVOs (2.83%) were identified on ultrasound which included 251 deep vein sclerosis (2.74%), seven deep vein thrombosis (0.07%) and one endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT, 0.08%). d-dimer values <0.5 µg/mL excluded deep vein thrombosis s, 0.5-1.0 µg/mL were more likely to be associated with deep vein sclerosis and >1.0 µg/mL were a more likely to be associated with deep vein thrombosis. Lower sclerosant concentrations and higher foam volumes were associated with increased risk of DVO (p < .0001). No significant relationship was found between DVO and gender or thrombophilia. Deep vein thrombosis and EHIT cases but not deep vein sclerosis patients were anticoagulated. None had thromboembolic complications. Patients were followed up for a median of 299 days (37-1994 days). Recanalisation rates were 71.1% for deep vein sclerosis (92.3% competent) and 71.4% for deep vein thrombosis (60.0% competent). CONCLUSIONS: Deep vein sclerosis is a relatively benign clinical entity distinct from deep vein thrombosis and does not require anticoagulation. Majority of affected veins on long-term follow-up regain patency and competence. d-dimer can be used to assist in differentiating deep vein sclerosis from deep vein thrombosis.


Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Saphenous Vein/surgery , Sclerosing Solutions/adverse effects , Sclerotherapy/adverse effects , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Vascular System Injuries/diagnosis , Veins/diagnostic imaging , Venous Insufficiency/therapy , Venous Thrombosis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Laser Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Saphenous Vein/diagnostic imaging , Sclerosing Solutions/administration & dosage , Sclerosis , Treatment Outcome , Vascular System Injuries/blood , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/etiology , Veins/injuries , Veins/pathology , Venous Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Venous Thrombosis/blood , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...