Hip Resurfacing Implant Orientation Analysis: A Comparison of a Computer-Added Design Technique and Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Accurate acetabular component orientation in hip resurfacing is mandatory. The aim of this study is to analyze if interpretation of pelvic radiographs with computer-added design (CAD) software is comparable to computed tomography (CT) in measurement of acetabular anteversion and inclination of a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) hip. METHODS: A consecutive series of 49 patients (50 hips) who underwent hip resurfacing arthroplasty between 2005 and 2007 with the BHR system were retrospectively included. The surgical procedure was performed by 1 orthopedic surgeon in the beginning of his learning curve. Computer-added design software was used to measure acetabular component orientation on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. These measurements were compared with CT measurements. We calculated the correlation between the CAD software and CT analysis. The degree of underestimation or overestimation was determined, and a Bland-Altman plot was created to visualize the agreement between CAD software and CT results. RESULTS: We analyzed 50 BHR hips with mean inclination of 54.6° and 55.6° and mean anteversion of 24.8° and 13.3° measured by CT and CAD, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient for inclination was 0.69 (P < .001) and for anteversion 0.81 (P < .001). Computer-added design showed a mean underestimated anteversion of 11.6° (P < .001). There was no significant underestimation or overestimation of inclination with CAD analysis compared to CT measurements. CONCLUSION: The CAD software is useful to assess acetabular inclination in hip resurfacing but underestimates anteversion.

A randomized controlled trial of nonoperative treatment versus open reduction and internal fixation for stable, displaced, partial articular fractures of the radial head: the RAMBO trial.

BACKGROUND: The choice between operative or nonoperative treatment is questioned for partial articular fractures of the radial head that have at least 2 millimeters of articular step-off on at least one radiograph (defined as displaced), but less than 2 millimeter of gap between the fragments (defined as stable) and that are not associated with an elbow dislocation, interosseous ligament injury, or other fractures. These kinds of fractures are often classified as Mason type-2 fractures. Retrospective comparative studies suggest that operative treatment might be better than nonoperative treatment, but the long-term results of nonoperative treatment are very good. Most experts agree that problems like reduced range of motion, painful crepitation, nonunion or bony ankylosis are infrequent with both nonoperative and operative treatment of an isolated displaced partial articular fracture of the radial head, but determining which patients will have problems is difficult. A prospective, randomized comparison would help minimize bias and determine the balance between operative and nonoperative risks and benefits. METHODS/DESIGN: The RAMBO trial (Radial Head - Amsterdam - Amphia - Boston - Others) is an international prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. The primary objective of this study is to compare patient related outcome defined by the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score' twelve months after injury between operative and nonoperative treated patients. Adult patients with partial articular fractures of the radial head that comprise at least 1/3rd of the articular surface, have ≥ 2 millimeters of articular step-off but less than 2 millimeter of gap between the fragments will be enrolled. Secondary outcome measures will be the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), pain intensity through the 'Numeric Rating Scale', range of motion (flexion arc and rotational arc), radiographic appearance of the fracture (heterotopic ossification, radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral arthrosis, fracture healing, and signs of implant loosening or breakage) and adverse events (infection, nerve injury, secondary interventions) after one year. DISCUSSION: The successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best treatment for stable, displaced, partial articular fractures of the radial head. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at the Dutch Trial Register: NTR3413.

No effect of dynamic loading on bone graft healing in femoral segmental defect reconstructions in the goat.

We studied if a static or dynamic mode of nail fixation influenced the healing of segmental defect reconstructions in long bones. Defects in the femur of goats were reconstructed using a cage filled with firmly impacted morsellised allograft mixed with a hydroxyapatite paste (Ostim). All reconstructions were stabilised with an intramedullary nail. In one group (n=6) the intramedullary nail was statically locked, in the second group (n=6) a dynamic mode of nail fixation was applied. We hypothesised that dynamisation of the nail would load, and by that stimulate the healing of the bone graft. Mechanical torsion strength of the reconstructions of the femur with the static and dynamic mode of nail fixation appeared to be 74.8±17.5% and 73.0±13.4%, respectively as compared with the contralateral femurs after 6 months. In all reconstructions, the grafts united radiographically and histologically to the host bone, and remodelled into a new vital bone structure. No large differences were found between newly formed bone areas inside and outside the mesh of the two groups. The area of callus outside the mesh in the dynamic mode of fixation group was smaller (p=0.042), whilst the percentage of bone outside the mesh was larger (p=0.049), as compared to the static mode of fixation group. The data suggest that healing of these defects with impacted morsellised graft in a cage is not significantly influenced by the mode of fixation of the nail in this model.

The presence of periosteum is essential for the healing of large diaphyseal segmental bone defects reconstructed with trabecular metal: a study in the femur of goats.

Large segmental diaphyseal bone defects can be reconstructed with massive structural allografts, but this technique is associated with high complication rates. Tantalum tabecular metal implants have been successfully used to restore bone defects associated with revision total knee or hip arthroplasties. The aim of this study was to investigate if tantalum cylinders could be used to reconstruct large load bearing segmental diaphyseal bone defects in the presence or absence of a periosteum coverage. Segmental bone defects were reconstructed with tantalum cylinders with or without preservation of the periosteum and stabilized by an intramedullary nail. Radiological analysis was performed postop and at 26 weeks follow-up. New bone was labeled with fluorochromes at 13 and 26 weeks follow-up. Reconstructions were tested mechanically and subsequently investigated histologically. Contra-lateral femurs were used as controls. Clinically all goats returned to normal functional loading after 2 weeks allowing unlimited weight bearing. Radiologically, all tantalum cylinders with periosteum coverage united with the host bone. Reconstructions with cylinders without periosteum coverage lead to radiological nonunion in five out of six cases. The strengths of the reconstruction with and without periosteum preservation were respectively 102.1% and 24.5% compared to controls. In the periosteum covered implants, bone contact was found at all levels of the tantalum cylinder and more and deeper bone ingrowth was found in this group. Tantalum cylinders seem a safe and reliable alternative for a massive cortical graft to reconstruct large diaphyseal bone defects in a goat model if healthy periosteum is present.

The stability of impacted morsellized bone grafts in a metal cage under dynamic loaded conditions: an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect.

INTRODUCTION: Reconstructions of segmental diaphyseal bone defects with massive allografts are related to complications like nonunion and fractures. A reconstruction of these defects with a cage filled with an impacted morsellized bone graft could be an alternative. The bone graft in these cages should ideally be loaded to prevent resorption. Loading of morsellized bone grafts however can cause instability. The goal of this study was to assess the stability of an impacted morsellized bone graft in a cage under dynamic loaded conditions in an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect. The second goal was to assess the influence of cage type, washing of the graft and bone-cage fit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two different cage types were filled with impacted morsellized bone graft. The grafts were used washed and unwashed and in variable bone-cage fit conditions. We recorded the bone graft deformation in the cage under dynamic loaded conditions. RESULTS: Stability appeared to be not very sensitive to the cage type and whether the bone chips were washed or not. However, quality of the fit of the cage with the bone segment was an important parameter and should be optimized during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Morsellized impacted bone graft in a cage is stable in dynamic loaded conditions in an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect. We believe that this method of reconstruction is a promising alternative for the reconstruction of large diaphyseal bone defects and should be tested relative to its biological merits in animal experiments.

Is an impacted morselized graft in a cage an alternative for reconstructing segmental diaphyseal defects?

Large diaphyseal bone defects often are reconstructed with large structural allografts but these are prone to major complications. We therefore asked whether impacted morselized bone graft could be an alternative for a massive structural graft in reconstructing large diaphyseal bone defects. Defects in the femora of goats were reconstructed using a cage filled with firmly impacted morselized allograft or with a structural cortical autograft (n = 6 in both groups). All reconstructions were stabilized with an intramedullary nail. The goats were allowed full weightbearing. In all reconstructions, the grafts united radiographically. Mechanical torsion strength of the femur with the cage and structural cortical graft reconstructions were 66.6% and 60.3%, respectively, as compared with the contralateral femurs after 6 months. Histologically, the impacted morselized graft was replaced completely by new viable bone. In the structural graft group, a mixture of new and necrotic bone was present. Incorporation of the impacted graft into new viable bone suggests this type of reconstruction may be safer than reconstruction with a structural graft in which creeping substitution results in a mixture of viable and necrotic bone that can fracture. The data suggest that a cage filled with a loaded morselized graft could be an alternative for the massive cortical graft in reconstruction of large diaphyseal defects in an animal model.