Angiogenic gene therapy in patients with nonrevascularizable ischemic heart disease: a phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of AdVEGF(121) (AdVEGF121) versus maximum medical treatment.

The demonstration that angiogenic growth factors can stimulate new blood vessel growth and restore perfusion in animal models of myocardial ischemia has led to the development of strategies designed for the local production of angiogenic growth factors in patients who are not candidates for conventional revascularization. The results of recent clinical trials of proangiogenesis gene therapy have been disappointing; however, significant limitations in experimental design, in particular in gene transfer strategies, preclude drawing definitive conclusions. In the REVASC study cardiac gene transfer was optimized by direct intramyocardial delivery of a replication-deficient adenovirus-containing vascular endothelial growth factor (AdVEGF121, 4 x 10(10) particle units (p.u.)). Sixty-seven patients with severe angina due to coronary artery disease and no conventional options for revascularization were randomized to AdVEGF121 gene transfer via mini-thoracotomy or continuation of maximal medical treatment. Exercise time to 1 mm ST-segment depression, the predefined primary end-point analysis, was significantly increased in the AdVEGF121 group compared to control at 26 weeks (P=0.026), but not at 12 weeks. As well, total exercise duration and time to moderate angina at weeks 12 and 26, and in angina symptoms as measured by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Class and Seattle Angina Questionnaire were all improved by VEGF gene transfer (all P-values at 12 and 26 weeks < or =0.001). However, if anything the results of nuclear perfusion imaging favored the control group, although the AdVEGF121 group achieved higher workloads. Overall there was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups, despite the fact that procedure-related events were seen only in the thoracotomy group. Therefore, administration of AdVEGF121 by direct intramyocardial injections resulted in objective improvement in exercise-induced ischemia in patients with refractory ischemic heart disease.

Does ticlopidine reduce reocclusion and other adverse events after successful balloon angioplasty of occluded coronary arteries? Results from the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA).

OBJECTIVES: Ticlopidine reduces stent thrombosis and other adverse events among patients receiving coronary stents. Whether ticlopidine is beneficial after balloon angioplasty is unknown. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcome of patients undergoing balloon angioplasty treated with both aspirin and ticlopidine versus aspirin alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a databank analysis of the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA), a randomized trial with angiographic follow-up comparing the frequency of reocclusion after angioplasty of a subtotal or total coronary occlusion in patients receiving >/=1 heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stent versus balloon angioplasty alone. In TOSCA, 102 patients undergoing balloon angioplasty were treated with both aspirin and ticlopidine (generally for 15-30 days) and 94 were treated with aspirin alone, by physician preference. After 6 months, failure to sustain patency (less than Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow on follow-up angiography) occurred in 23% of patients on ticlopidine and aspirin versus 16% of patients on aspirin alone (P =.21); the frequency of target vessel revascularization was also similar in the 2 groups (32% vs 25%, P =.27). Myocardial infarction was infrequent in both groups (2.0% vs 1.1%, respectively, P not significant). Patients treated with aspirin and ticlopidine had more adverse angiographic and procedural characteristics, including longer lesions and treatment lengths. Multivariate analysis to adjust for these and other differences failed to reveal a benefit of ticlopidine in maintaining patency and reducing adverse clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: After balloon angioplasty of a subtotal or total coronary occlusion, no reduction in adverse events was observed among patients in whom ticlopidine was added to aspirin, even after adjustment for clinical and lesion characteristics.

Predictors of improvement in left ventricular function after percutaneous revascularization of occluded coronary arteries: a report from the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA).

BACKGROUND: The Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) is a multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the effect of stenting with > =1 heparin-coated stent on long-term patency after percutaneous coronary intervention by balloon angioplasty of occluded coronary arteries. The purpose of the current study was to compare the effect of stenting and balloon angioplasty on global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and regional wall motion and to examine what clinical and angiographic factors may have an effect on left ventricular function in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analysis at the core angiographic laboratory of paired baseline and follow-up left ventricular angiograms, as well as target vessel patency, was possible in 244 of 410 cases. An improvement in LVEF was observed in the entire group (59.4% +/- 11% to 61.0% +/- 11%, P =.003). The LVEF change was +1.84 +/- 7.54 in the stent group (P =.009) and 1.28 +/- 8.16 in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty group (P =.085). There was no significant intergroup difference. Patients with duration of occlusion < or =6 weeks had an improvement in LVEF (+2.98 +/- 8.68, P =.0006), whereas those with an occlusion duration of > 6 weeks had no improvement (+0.48 +/- 7.01, P not significant). Multivariate analysis revealed baseline LVEF <60%, duration of occlusion < or =6 weeks, and Canadian Cardiology Society angina class I or II to be independent predictors of improvement in LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: The restoration of coronary patency of nonacute occluded coronary arteries is associated with a small but significant improvement in regional and global left ventricular function, especially in patients with recent occlusions and depressed left ventricular function. In spite of significant effect on long-term patency, stenting of nonacute coronary occlusions does not result in significantly better left ventricular function compared with balloon angioplasty in this setting.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry.

BACKGROUND: The SHOCK Registry prospectively enrolled patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in 36 multinational centers. METHODS: Cardiogenic shock was predominantly attributable to left ventricular pump failure in 884 patients. Of these, 276 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after shock onset and are the subject of this report. RESULTS: The majority (78%) of patients undergoing angiography had multivessel disease. As the number of diseased arteries rose from 1 to 3, mortality rates rose from 34.2% to 51.2%. Patients who underwent PCI had lower in-hospital mortality rates than did patients treated medically (46.4% vs 78.0%, P < .001), even after adjustment for patient differences and survival bias (P = .037). Before PCI, the culprit artery was occluded (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 0 or 1 flow) in 76.3%. After PCI, the in-hospital mortality rate was 33.3% if reperfusion was complete (grade 3 flow), 50.0% with incomplete reperfusion (grade 2 flow), and 85.7% with absent reperfusion (grade 0 or 1 flow) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter registry of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is consistent with a reduction in mortality rates as the result of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Coronary artery patency was an important predictor of outcome. Measures to promote early and rapid reperfusion appear critically important in improving the otherwise poor outcome associated with cardiogenic shock.

One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock.

CONTEXT: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of early revascularization (ERV) on 1-year survival for patients with AMI complicated by CS. DESIGN: The SHOCK (Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock) Trial, an unblinded, randomized controlled trial from April 1993 through November 1998. SETTING: Thirty-six referral centers with angioplasty and cardiac surgery facilities. PATIENTS: Three hundred two patients with AMI and CS due to predominant left ventricular failure who met specified clinical and hemodynamic criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to an initial medical stabilization (IMS; n = 150) group, which included thrombolysis (63% of patients), intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (86%), and subsequent revascularization (25%), or to an ERV group (n = 152), which mandated revascularization within 6 hours of randomization and included angioplasty (55%) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (38%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality and functional status at 1 year, compared between the ERV and IMS groups. RESULTS: One-year survival was 46.7% for patients in the ERV group compared with 33.6% in the IMS group (absolute difference in survival, 13.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2%-24.1%; P<.03; relative risk for death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95). Of the 10 prespecified subgroup analyses, only age (<75 vs >/= 75 years) interacted significantly (P<.03) with treatment in that treatment benefit was apparent only for patients younger than 75 years (51.6% survival in ERV group vs 33.3% in IMS group). Eighty-three percent of 1-year survivors (85% of ERV group and 80% of IMS group) were in New York Heart Association class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with AMI complicated by CS, ERV resulted in improved 1-year survival. We recommend rapid transfer of patients with AMI complicated by CS, particularly those younger than 75 years, to medical centers capable of providing early angiography and revascularization procedures.

Long-term effects of cholesterol lowering and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on coronary atherosclerosis: The Simvastatin/Enalapril Coronary Atherosclerosis Trial (SCAT).

BACKGROUND: This long-term, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial, angiographic trial evaluated the effects of cholesterol lowering and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on coronary atherosclerosis in normocholesterolemic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: There were a total of 460 patients: 230 received simvastatin and 230, a simvastatin placebo, and 229 received enalapril and 231, an enalapril placebo (some subjects received both drugs and some received a double placebo). Mean baseline measurements were as follows: cholesterol level, 5.20 mmol/L; triglyceride level, 1.82 mmol/L; HDL, 0.99 mmol/L; and LDL, 3.36 mmol/L. Average follow-up was 47.8 months. Changes in quantitative coronary angiographic measures between simvastatin and placebo, respectively, were as follows: mean diameters, -0.07 versus -0.14 mm (P:=0.004); minimum diameters, -0.09 versus -0.16 mm (P:=0. 0001); and percent diameter stenosis, 1.67% versus 3.83% (P:=0.0003). These benefits were not observed in patients on enalapril when compared with placebo. No additional benefits were seen in the group receiving both drugs. Simvastatin patients had less need for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (8 versus 21 events; P:=0.020), and fewer enalapril patients experienced the combined end point of death/myocardial infarction/stroke (16 versus 30; P:=0.043) than their respective placebo patients. CONCLUSIONS: This trial extends the observation of the beneficial angiographic effects of lipid-lowering therapy to normocholesterolemic patients. The implications of the neutral angiographic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition are uncertain, but they deserve further investigation in light of the positive clinical benefits suggested here and seen elsewhere.

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

OBJECTIVES: This SHOCK Study report seeks to provide an overview of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI) and the outcome with various treatments. The outcome of patients undergoing revascularization in the SHOCK Trial Registry and SHOCK Trial are compared. BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock is the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized for acute MI. The randomized SHOCK Trial reported improved six-month survival with early revascularization. METHODS: Patients with CS complicating acute MI who were not enrolled in the concurrent randomized trial were registered. Patient characteristics were recorded as were procedures and vital status at hospital discharge. RESULTS: Between April 1993 and August 1997, 1,190 patients with CS were registered and 232 were randomized in the SHOCK Trial. Predominant left ventricular failure (78.5%) was most common, with isolated right ventricular shock in 2.8%, severe mitral regurgitation in 6.9%, ventricular septal rupture in 3.9% and tamponade in 1.4%. In-hospital Registry mortality was 60%, with ventricular septal rupture associated with a significantly higher mortality (87.3%) than all other categories (p < 0.01). The risk profile and mortality were lower for Registry patients who were managed with thrombolytic therapy and/or intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation, coronary angiography, angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass surgery. After adjusting for these differences, the extent to which survival was improved with early revascularization was similar to that observed in the randomized SHOCK Trial. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective Registry the etiology of CS was a mechanical complication in 12%. The similarity of the beneficial treatment effect in patients undergoing early revascularization in the SHOCK Trial Registry and SHOCK Trial provides strong support for the generalizability of the SHOCK Trial results.

Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock (CS) after acute myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: Little information is available about the relationships between timing, clinical substrate, management and outcomes of shock. METHODS: The multinational SHOCK Trial Registry enrolled MI patients with CS from 1993 to 1997. Cardiogenic shock was predominantly attributable to left ventricular (LV) failure in 815 Registry patients for whom temporal data were available. We examined factors related to the timing of shock onset and the relation of temporal onset to in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, shock developed a median of 6.2 h after MI symptom onset. Shock onset varied by culprit artery: left main, median 1.7 h; right, 3.5 h; circumflex, 3.9 h; left anterior descending (LAD), 11.0 h; saphenous vein graft, 10.9 h (p = 0.025). Early shock (< 24 h) occurred in 74.1% and was associated with chest pain at shock onset, ST-segment elevation in two or more leads, multiple infarct locations, inferior MI, left main disease and smoking. Late shock (> or = 24 h) was associated with recurrent ischemia, Q waves in two or more leads and LAD culprit vessel. Mortality was higher in patients with early versus late shock (62.6% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Shock onset after acute MI occurred within 24 h in 74% of the patients with predominant LV failure. Mortality was slightly higher in patients developing shock early rather than later. Many factors influence when shock develops, which has implications for its management.

Cardiogenic shock due to acute severe mitral regurgitation complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we use emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK?

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to define the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Methods for early identification and optimal treatment of such patients have not been defined. METHODS: The SHOCK Trial Registry enrolled 1,190 patients with CS complicating AMI. We compared 1) the cohort with severe mitral regurgitation (MR, n = 98) to the cohort with predominant left ventricular failure (LVF, n = 879), and 2) the MR patients who underwent valve surgery (n = 43) to those who did not (n = 51). RESULTS: Shock developed early after MI in both the MR (median 12.8 h) and LVF (median 6.2 h) cohorts. The MR patients were more often female (52% vs. 37%, p = 0.004) and less likely to have ST elevation at shock diagnosis (41% vs. 63%, p < 0.001). The MR index MI was more frequently inferior (55% vs. 44%, p = 0.039) or posterior (32% vs. 17%, p = 0.002) than that of LVF and much less frequently anterior (34% vs. 59%, p < 0.001). Despite having higher mean LVEF (0.37 vs. 0.30, p = 0.001) the MR cohort had similar in-hospital mortality (55% vs. 61%, p = 0.277). The majority of MR patients did not undergo mitral valve surgery. Those undergoing surgery exhibited higher mean LVEF than those not undergoing surgery; nevertheless, 39% died in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The data highlight opportunities for early identification and intervention to potentially decrease the devastating mortality and morbidity of severe post-myocardial infarction MR.

Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether routine implantation of coronary stents is the best strategy to treat flow-limiting coronary stenoses is unclear. An alternative approach is to do balloon angioplasty and provisionally use stents only to treat suboptimum results. We did a multicentre trial to compare the outcomes of patients treated with these strategies. METHODS: We randomly assigned 479 patients undergoing single-vessel coronary angioplasty routine stent implantation or initial balloon angioplasty and provisional stenting. We followed up patients for 6 months to determine the composite rate of death, myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery, and target-vessel revascularisation. RESULTS: Stents were implanted in 227 (98.7%) of the patients assigned routine stenting. 93 (37%) patients assigned balloon angioplasty had at least one stent placed because of suboptimum angioplasty results. At 6 months the composite endpoint was significantly lower in the routine stent strategy (14 events, 6.1%) than with the strategy of balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting (37 events, 14.9%, p=0.003). The cost of the initial revascularisation procedure was higher than when a routine stent strategy was used (US$389 vs $339, p<0.001) but at 6 months, average per-patient hospital costs did not differ ($10,206 vs $10,490). Bootstrap replication of 6-month cost data showed continued economic benefit of the routine stent strategy. INTERPRETATION: Routine stent implantation leads to better acute and long-term clinical outcomes at a cost similar to that of initial balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting.

Co-morbidity data in outcomes research: are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review?

Evaluation of co-morbidity data is essential in health outcomes research. Co-morbidity data derived from administrative databases has been criticized for lacking the accuracy required for clinical research. We compared co-morbidity data derived from a Canadian provincial hospitalization database with chart review in 817 adults treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention at a single tertiary care hospital between 1994 and 1995. While the administrative database tended to under-estimate the prevalence of some co-morbid conditions, the agreement between chart review and administrative data was good to very good for most conditions. Asymptomatic conditions were noted to have lower levels of agreement. Multivariate risk models for all-cause mortality constructed from both data sources were almost identical, suggesting minimal misclassification. The results indicate that clinical data abstracted from most Canadian hospitalization databases can provide reliable information regarding baseline co-morbid conditions believed to influence survival in a population undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether immediate suture closure of 8F femoral arterial puncture sites can facilitate same-day discharge after coronary angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: After coronary angioplasty, 100 patients were randomly assigned to immediate sheath removal with the double-suture Prostar-Plus device or delayed sheath removal with application of a c-clamp. After suture closure, mobilization at 4 hours after sheath removal and discharge 4 hours later were planned. Patients treated with the c-clamp had sheaths removed 4 hours after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, were mobilized 6 hours later, and discharged the following day. Patients were assessed for groin complications at 8, 24, and 72 hours. Overall, patients who received suture closure were mobilized at 7.1 +/- 5.3 hours and discharged 11. 15 +/- 6.22 hours after sheath removal versus 15.49 +/- 3.9 hours and 21.9 +/- 3.8 hours for patients with the c-clamp (P <.001). Initial failure of the suture device occurred in 5 patients, with 1 requiring surgery for an entrapped device. After the procedure, patients with suture closure more frequently had an ooze of blood (55% vs 24%, P <.001) and a trend to more overt external bleeding (10% vs 2%, P = not significant). Hematomas were reported by 20% of patients in both groups at 72 hours. Overall, patients preferred the suture closure method of sheath removal when assessed by a simple questionnaire. An economic analysis by cost minimization demonstrated potential hospital cost saving. CONCLUSIONS: Suture closure of 8F arterial puncture sites can facilitate early mobilization and same-day discharge and is considered acceptable by more patients compared with application of the c-clamp. There is potential to realize cost savings with a strategy of same-day discharge.

Improved clinical outcome after widespread use of coronary-artery stenting in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The introduction and refinement of coronary-artery stenting dramatically changed the practice of percutaneous coronary revascularization in the mid-1990s. We analyzed one-year follow-up data for all percutaneous coronary interventions performed in a large, unselected population in Canada to determine whether the use of coronary stenting has been associated with improved outcomes. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on all percutaneous coronary interventions performed on residents of British Columbia, Canada, between April 1994 and June 1997 were linked to province-wide health care data bases to provide the date of the following end points: subsequent target-vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, and death. Baseline characteristics and procedural variables were identified and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for 9594 procedures divided into seven groups, one for each sequential half-year period. RESULTS: The overall burden of coexisting illnesses remained stable throughout the study period. A large increase in the rate of coronary stenting (from 14.2 percent in the period from April to June 1994 to 58.7 percent in the period from January to June 1997) was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of adverse cardiac events at one year (from 28.8 percent to 22.8.percent; adjusted relative risk, 0.79; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.90; P<0.001). This reduction in adverse events was exclusively due to a large reduction in subsequent target-vessel revascularization (from 24.4 percent to 17.0 percent; adjusted relative risk, 0.72; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.83; P<0.001) without significant changes in the overall rates of myocardial infarction (5.4 percent, P=0.28) or death (3.9 percent, P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The need for target-vessel revascularization during one year of follow-up decreased after percutaneous coronary intervention during the mid-1990s. The reduction was coincident with the introduction and subsequent widespread use of coronary stenting.

Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: The leading cause of death in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction is cardiogenic shock. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate early revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: Patients with shock due to left ventricular failure complicating myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to emergency revascularization (152 patients) or initial medical stabilization (150 patients). Revascularization was accomplished by either coronary-artery bypass grafting or angioplasty. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation was performed in 86 percent of the patients in both groups. The primary end point was mortality from all causes at 30 days. Six-month survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 66+/-10 years, 32 percent were women and 55 percent were transferred from other hospitals. The median time to the onset of shock was 5.6 hours after infarction, and most infarcts were anterior in location. Ninety-seven percent of the patients assigned to revascularization underwent early coronary angiography, and 87 percent underwent revascularization; only 2.7 percent of the patients assigned to medical therapy crossed over to early revascularization without clinical indication. Overall mortality at 30 days did not differ significantly between the revascularization and medical-therapy groups (46.7 percent and 56.0 percent, respectively; difference, -9.3 percent; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -20.5 to 1.9 percent; P=0.11). Six-month mortality was lower in the revascularization group than in the medical-therapy group (50.3 percent vs. 63.1 percent, P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiogenic shock, emergency revascularization did not significantly reduce overall mortality at 30 days. However, after six months there was a significant survival benefit. Early revascularization should be strongly considered for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in occluded coronary arteries: the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA).

BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty (PTCA) of occluded coronary arteries is limited by high rates of restenosis and reocclusion. Although stenting improves results in anatomically simple occlusions, its effect on patency and clinical outcome in a broadly selected population with occluded coronary arteries is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighteen centers randomized 410 patients with nonacute native coronary occlusions to PTCA or primary stenting with the heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stent. The primary end point, failure of sustained patency, was determined at 6-month angiography. Repeat target-vessel revascularization, adverse cardiovascular events, and angiographic restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) constituted secondary end points. Sixty percent of patients had occlusions of >6 weeks' duration, baseline flow was TIMI grade 0 in 64%, and median treated segment length was 30.5 mm. With 95.6% angiographic follow-up, primary stenting resulted in a 44% reduction in failed patency (10.9% versus 19.5%, P=0.024) and a 45% reduction in clinically driven target-vessel revascularization at 6 months (15.4% versus 8.4%, P=0.03). The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events was similar for both strategies (PTCA, 23.6%; stent, 23.3%; P=NS). Stenting resulted in a larger mean 6-month minimum lumen dimension (1.48 versus 1.23 mm, P<0.01) and a reduced binary restenosis rate (55% versus 70%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting of broadly selected nonacute coronary occlusions is superior to PTCA alone, improving late patency and reducing restenosis and target-vessel revascularization.

An open design, multicentre, randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus stenting, with a heparin-coated stent, of totally occluded coronary arteries: rationale, trial design and baseline patient characteristics. Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of totally occluded coronary arteries is performed in a variety of clinical settings and for a variety of indications. Most commonly it is performed for relief of symptoms of myocardial ischemia. Studies have also suggested that PTCA of occluded arteries beyond the acute phase of myocardial infarction may improve left ventricular function even in the absence of objective evidence of ischemia. One of the major limitations of total occlusion PTCA is a high rate of reocclusion, reported to be as high as 40%. Recently, small studies have suggested that stenting may improve the long term outcome after PTCA of total coronary occlusions. OBJECTIVES: To determine in a prospective, randomized trial whether long term patency and clinical outcome following successful PTCA of a totally occluded coronary can be improved by the use of of a heparin-coated stent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two strategies once the guide wire had crossed the occluded segment of the target artery: PTCA alone, or PTCA followed by insertion of Palmaz-Shatz heparin-coated stent(s). Randomization was stratified according to duration of the coronary occlusion: six weeks or less, and more than six weeks. The primary end-point is failure of sustained patency (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade less than 3) at six months. Secondary end-points are change in minimal luminal diameter, target vessel revascularization at one year, cardiovascular events at one year, and change in global and regional left ventricular function. BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS: All 410 patients have been randomly assigned to the PTCA alone (n = 208) or PTCA plus stent (n = 202) group. Mean age was 58 +/- 11 years and 18% were female. Prior myocardial infarction had been documented in 67% of patients. The duration of occlusion was six weeks or less in 40% and more than six weeks in 60% of patients. In 64% of patients TIMI flow was grade 0 and in 36% it was grade 1. STUDY IMPLICATIONS: The trial will demonstrate whether the use of a heparin-bonded stent can improve long term patency and clinical outcome in patients undergoing clinically indicated PTCA of totally occluded coronary arteries. If a significant reduction in reocclusion and clinical events is demonstrated, the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA) would offer a more effective long term revascularization strategy in future trials testing the open artery hypothesis.

Early and intermediate term clinical outcome after multiple coronary stenting.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the immediate and intermediate term clinical outcome of multiple coronary stenting. DESIGN: Consecutive patients were prospectively entered on a dedicated database. Follow up information was obtained from outpatient and telephone interviews with patients and family physicians. SETTING: A tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: 140 consecutive patients underwent multiple coronary stenting between April 1994 and November 1996. Most patients had unstable coronary syndromes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death, cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and repeat angioplasty (PTCA). RESULTS: The angiographic success rate was 100% and the clinical procedural success rate 93%. The mean (SD) follow up was 11.9 (7.2) months (range 2-32). The mean (SD) number of stents per patient was 2.4 (0.7). The mean (SD) number of lesions treated per patient was 1.4 (0.6). There were four in-hospital deaths (2.9%) and five patients (3.6%) had an MI before hospital discharge. All in-hospital deaths occurred in patients presenting with an acute MI and cardiogenic shock. Three patients (2.2%) had a late MI. One patient with stent thrombosis underwent emergency CABG. Three patients (2.2%) underwent late CABG. Eight patients (5.7%) had a repeat PTCA. Eighty three patients (61.5%) were asymptomatic at follow up and 121 (86.4%) were free from major clinical events. CONCLUSION: In an era of increased operator experience, high pressure stent deployment, and reduced anticoagulation with antiplatelet treatment alone, multiple coronary stenting may be performed with a high procedural success rate and good intermediate term outcome.

Multiple coronary stenting in unstable angina: early and late clinical outcomes.

We examined clinical outcomes in 110 consecutive patients with unstable angina who underwent multiple coronary stenting over a 32-mo period. The main outcome measures were death, stroke, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and repeat angioplasty. The angiographic success rate was 100%, and the procedural success rate was 96%. There were no in-hospital deaths and five (4.5%) patients had a myocardial infarction prior to discharge. There were four (3.6%) stent thromboses with one (0.9%) patient requiring urgent bypass surgery and two (1.8%) requiring repeat angioplasty. At late follow-up (11.9+/-7.1 mo), there was (0.9%) death and three patients (2.8%) suffered myocardial infarction. Three (2.8%) patients underwent late bypass surgery and five (4.6%) had a repeat angioplasty. At follow-up, 86% of patients were event free. We conclude that multiple coronary stenting in unstable angina may be performed with a high procedural success rate and good long-term outcome.

Left main intervention revisited: early and late outcome of PTCA and stenting.

We reviewed our experience with 28 unselected, consecutive patients undergoing left main coronary artery (LMCA) angioplasty who had been considered unsuitable for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Fourteen patients (50%) had a protected LMCA circulation. Balloon angioplasty was performed in 11 patients (39.3%), and stents were implanted in 17 patients (60.7%). The procedure was elective in 22 patients (78.6%) and acute in the setting of myocardial infarction/cardiogenic shock in 6 (21.4%). The mean follow-up duration was 15.9 +/- 12 months. There were 5 early (before hospital discharge) and 4 late deaths (total 32.1%), 1 myocardial infarction (3.6%), 6 repeat angioplasties (21.4%), and 3 subsequent CABG (10.7%). All 5 early deaths occurred in patients with cardiogenic shock and unprotected circulation. The results of our study suggest that when patients have prohibitive surgical risks, elective LMCA angioplasty and/or stenting may be undertaken with a high procedural success rate. However, our data do not support intervention in the presence of acute myocardial infarction/cardiogenic shock.