TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis: a content analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the validity and informational value of TikTok content about epicondylitis. The hypothesis tested herein was that TikTok video content would not provide adequate and valid information. METHODS: The term "epicondylitis" was used as a keyword to comprehensively search for TikTok videos, and the first 100 videos that were retrieved were subsequently included for analysis. The duration, number of likes, number of shares and number of views were recorded for each video. Furthermore, the videos were categorized on the basis of their source (medical doctor, physiotherapist, or private user), type of information (physical therapy, anatomy, clinical examination, etiopathogenesis, patient experience, treatment, or other), video content (rehabilitation, education, or patient experience/testimony), and the presence of music or voice. Assessments of video content quality and reliability were conducted using the DISCERN tool, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS). RESULTS: A total of 100 videos were included in the analysis: 78 (78.0%) were published by physiotherapists, 18 were published by medical doctors (18.0%), and 4 were published by private users (4.0%). Most of the information pertained to physical therapy (75; 75.0%) and most of the content was about rehabilitation (75; 75.0%). The mean length of the videos was 42.51 ± 24.75 seconds; the mean number of views was 193,207.78 ± 1,300,853.86; and the mean number of comments, likes, and shares were 22.43 ± 62.54, 1578.52 ± 8333.11, and 149.87 ± 577.73, respectively. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 18.12 ± 5.73, 0.80 ± 0.53, and 1.30 ± 0.52, respectively. Videos posted by medical doctors/private users had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos posted by physiotherapists. Videos that focused on education or patient experience had higher scores (p < 0.05) than videos based on rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: TikTok can be an unreliable source of information regarding epicondylitis treatment. It is common to find nonphysicians who share medical advice on the platform, with medical treatments demonstrating the weakest level of supporting evidence. Elbow surgeons should advise their patients that treatment recommendations from TikTok may not align with established guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Cross-sectional study.

Contribution of cartilage to size and shape of radial head circumference: magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 78 elbows.

BACKGROUND: The aims of our study were to quantify cartilage thickness at the minimum and maximum diameters of the radial head circumference and to investigate its influence on the size and shape of the proximal radius. METHODS: We analyzed high-definition magnetic resonance imaging scans of 78 healthy elbows in 19 men and 20 women, with a mean age of 28 (21-32) years. All measurements were estimated in the axial plane just distal to the fovea radialis. Maximum and minimum bone diameters, maximum and minimum total diameters (including cartilage thickness), and cartilage thickness were calculated. Cartilage thickness was measured at 4 different points: (1) at the articular side of the maximum diameter (point A), (2) at the nonarticular side of the maximum diameter (point B), (3) at the medial side of the minimum diameter (point C), and (4) at the lateral side of the minimum diameter (point D). Pearson correlation and t test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean maximum and minimum bone diameters and maximum and minimum total diameters were 22.2, 21.5, 24.0, and 23.2 mm, respectively. All differences between diameters were statistically significant. Mean cartilage thickness at points A, C, and D was 1.7, 0.8, and 0.8 mm, respectively. No measurable cartilage thickness was found at point B. No significant correlation was found between bone diameters and cartilage thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage surface significantly increases and modifies the size and shape of the radial head. The observation that cartilage thickness varies between subjects and does not correlate with bone parameters suggests that the diameters of the radial head cannot be inferred from indirect measurements of dry bones or radiographs.

The ulnar greater sigmoid notch "coverage angle": bone and cartilage contribution. Magnetic resonance imaging anatomic study on 78 elbows.

BACKGROUND: To study the degree of coverage provided by the greater sigmoid notch (GSN) to the humeral trochlea, as well as the contribution of the olecranon and coronoid process cartilage tips to this angle, and its variations. METHODS: We recruited 39 healthy volunteers, comprising 19 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 28 years (range, 21-32 years). High-definition magnetic resonance images were obtained for the right and left elbows. Four angles were measured on the sagittal plane passing through the coronoid and olecranon tips: angle A, identified by 2 lines from the trochlea center to the olecranon bone-cartilage junction and olecranon cartilage tip; angle B, identified by 2 lines from the trochlea center to the olecranon and coronoid bone-cartilage junction; angle C, identified by 2 lines from the trochlea center to the coronoid bone-cartilage junction and coronoid cartilage tip; and GSN coverage angle (GSN-ca), defined as the sum of angles A, B, and C. Pearson correlation tests, t tests, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean angle A, angle B, and angle C values were 6° (range, 2°-12°), 182° (range, 153°-204°), and 9° (range, 2°-16°), respectively. No correlations were found between these 3 angles. The mean GSN-ca was 198° (range, 167°-222°), and the GSN-ca was less than 180° in 8% of the cases. No significant differences emerged for side or gender or for total length of the ulna. CONCLUSION: The GSN showed significantly different shapes on the sagittal plane that we defined as closed type when the GSN-ca was greater than 180° (92%) and as open type when the GSA-ca was less than 180° (8%). The cartilage tip contribution varied and was not correlated with that of bone.

Critical time period for recovery of functional range of motion after surgical treatment of complex elbow instability: prospective study on 76 patients.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Complex elbow instability (CEI) is one of the most troublesome pathologies that orthopaedic surgeons have to face. One of the key requirements regarding the CEI surgical treatment is an early rehabilitation programme to avoid the elbow stiffness caused by a long period of immobilisation. Although this is well known, no study has ever examined how, and to what extent, the functional range of motion (ROM) is recovered during the various stages of a prompt rehabilitation. Our aims were: (1) to prospectively analyse the pattern of ROM recovery in a series of patients with CEI who underwent early rehabilitation and (2) to identify the period of time during rehabilitation in which the greatest degree of motion recovery is obtained. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients (78 elbows) with CEI were followed up for 2 years. All the patients underwent anatomical and stable ostheosynthesis of all the fractures, radial head replacement in Mason III fractures, ligament injuries reconstruction and early rehabilitation that started 2 days after surgery. Two surgeons evaluated the ROM with a hand-held goniometer every 3 weeks for the first 3 months, then at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: At the 3-week follow-up, the mean flexion (F), extension (E), pronation (P) and supination (S) were 113°, 29°, 60° and 62°, respectively. At the 6-week and 9-week follow-up, F, E, P and S were 119°, 23°, 70° and 69° and 123°, 24°, 72° and 71°, respectively. At the 3-month follow-up, these values were 131°, 18°, 76° and 72°, while at the 6-month follow-up they were 136°, 15°, 79° and 77°, respectively. Thereafter, the ROM improvement was not significant. DISCUSSION: This study shows that the first 6 months represent the critical rehabilitation period to obtain a functional elbow; indeed, 70% of the patients recovered functional ROM between the third and sixth month, though the recovery of flexion proved to be slower than that of the other elbow movements. Thereafter, improvement continued, though at a lower rate, until the end of the first year, when approximately 80% of the patients had recovered the functional ROM. CONCLUSIONS: Following CEI surgical treatment, a rehabilitation programme needs to be started promptly and continued for at least 6 months because a significant improvement of ROM occurs prevalently in this period, which should be considered the critical time period to obtain a functional elbow in a majority of patients.

Change in quality of life and cost/utility analysis in open stage-related surgical treatment of elbow stiffness.

The goals of this study were to examine the improvement in quality of life achieved after open surgical treatment of elbow stiffness and to verify the cost/utility ratio of surgery. Thirty-three patients (22 men and 11 women) underwent surgery. The etiologies of elbow stiffness were posttraumatic conditions (n=26), primary osteoarthritis (n=5), and rheumatoid arthritis (n=2). Surgery included 14 ulnohumeral arthroplasties, 6 ulnohumeral arthroplasties associated with radiocapitellar replacement, 5 ulnohumeral arthroplasties associated with radial head replacement, and 8 total elbow arthroplasties. All patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, the modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the Short Form 36 after a mean follow-up of 26 months. Possible variables affecting clinical outcome and quality of life improvement were assessed. The cost/utility ratio was evaluated as diagnosis-related group reimbursement per quality-adjusted life year. Mayo Elbow Performance Scores and modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores increased, on average, by 43 and 41 points, respectively (P<.0001). Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores decreased, on average, by 44 points (P<.0001). The improvement in the SF-36 physical and mental component summary score was 7.6 and 7, respectively (P=.0001 and .0018). The cost/utility ratio ranged between 670 and 817 Euro/quality-adjusted life year. A significant correlation was found between pain score and quality of life improvement. An inverse correlation emerged between pre- and postoperative quality of life score. The current study shows that open surgery significantly improves quality of life and elbow function. Selecting the surgical procedure that most effectively reduces pain appears to be the most relevant variable responsible for quality of life improvement. Surgery shows a satisfactory cost/utility ratio, justifying a health spending increase to reduce the social costs resulting from lingering elbow stiffness.

Soft tissue constraint injuries in complex elbow instability: surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.

The surgical procedures for and outcomes of soft tissue constraint reconstruction in complex elbow instability have been rarely investigated. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes in a series of patients with complex elbow instability in whom the associated soft tissue constraint injures were identified and treated based on the pathoanatomic changes found intraoperatively. Forty-five patients (23 men and 22 women; mean age, 54 years) with complex elbow instability were followed prospectively. Surgical treatment included the anatomic reduction and internal fixation of any fracture and radial head replacement in Mason type III injuries. Soft tissue constraint lesions were then repaired based on the type of lesion (eg, proximal or distal ligament avulsion, middle-zone lesion, or presence of detached bony fragments). Posterolateral capsular lesions and common extensor and flexor origin injuries were also repaired. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically after a mean of 25 months. Functional range of motion was achieved in 39 (86%) patients. Average Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score were 94, 5.6, and 89, respectively. At last follow-up, 42 (93%) patients showed no evidence of elbow instability, 2 (4%) patients had mild varus instability, and 1 (2%) patient had moderate posterolateral instability. The accurate identification of pathoanatomic changes of elbow soft tissue constraint lesions associated with complex elbow instability is an essential prerequisite to planning proper surgical treatment. The results of this study show that, in patients with complex elbow instability, once the fracture has been treated and each type of soft tissue constraint lesion adequately repaired, a high percentage of satisfactory functional outcomes may be achieved.

Anatomical variations of the proximal radius and their effects on osteosynthesis.

PURPOSE: In fractures of the radial head and neck requiring open reduction and internal fixation, osteosynthesis may be safely applied in a limited zone. We conducted a morphometric study of the proximal radius at the level of the safe zone to identify different morphologic types of this anatomical region. METHODS: We analyzed 44 dried cadaveric radii. We measured the whole length of the radius, the length of the neck and head, and the minimum and maximum diameter of the radial head. The morphologic aspect of the neck-head curvature of the safe zone was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. RESULTS: The proximal radius at the level of the safe zone exhibited different radii of bending. In particular, we identified a morphologic type A, which showed a flat profile (25% of cases), morphologic types B and C, which showed a low concave curvature (64%), and a marked concave curvature (11%), respectively, of the safe zone. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of the proximal radius in the safe zone shows substantial morphologic variations that should be taken into account when operating on fractures of the proximal radius, to avoid malunions, pain, and stiffness of the elbow joint. A preoperative radiograph of the contralateral uninjured radius may be helpful in selecting the most appropriate internal fixation device to reconstruct the proximal radius after comminuted fractures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the proper bending radius of the safe zone allows the surgeon to select the most appropriate plate, and to achieve good fracture reduction and anatomical restoration of the proximal radius.

The applicability of the Mayo Clinic congruent radial head plate: cadaveric study.

In the last few years, several anatomical plates have been introduced to improve the results of ORIF in Mason Type II and III radial head fractures. However, no study analyzed whether currently used plates match adequately the profile of the proximal radius in the "safe zone". In the present investigation, we evaluate the congruence between the proximal radius and a currently used plate. Forty-four radial dried cadaveric bones were analyzed. The plate congruence was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. The congruence of the tested plate with the proximal radius was good in 27.3% of specimens, while it was moderate or poor in the remaining 43.2% and 29.5% of cases, respectively. The profile of the proximal radius in the "safe zone" shows substantial morphologic variations which should be taken into account to avoid a malunion of the proximal radius. A preoperative radiograph of the contralateral uninjured radius may be helpful in order to select the most appropriate plate profile in comminuted radial head and neck fractures.