ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of angle of progression (AoP) of the fetal head for a failed vacuum delivery. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study that included women with a singleton pregnancy of ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, in cephalic presentation requiring vacuum extraction. Transperineal ultrasound was performed immediately before vacuum extraction, although AoP was measured on stored images after delivery. Vacuum extraction was defined as failed when the duration of extraction exceeded 20 min or the vacuum cup detached more than three times. We compared the demographic and ultrasound data of failed vacuum deliveries with those that were successful. The predictive value of AoP for failure of vacuum delivery was calculated. RESULTS: AoP was measured in 235 women. Vacuum extractions failed in 30 (12.8%) women (29/184 nulliparous and 1/51 parous) and resulted in 28 vaginal deliveries by forceps and two Cesarean deliveries. Median AoP was significantly lower in the vacuum failure group compared with those with successful vacuum delivery (136.6° (interquartile range (IQR), 129.8-144.1°) vs 145.9° (IQR, 135.0-158.4°); P < 0.01). As all but one failed vacuum extraction occurred among nulliparous women, the predictive value of AoP was calculated in this subgroup of women. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for prediction of vacuum extraction failure was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57-0.77) and the optimal AoP cut-off was 145.5°. Above this value, the rate of vacuum extraction failure fell below 5%. CONCLUSION: AoP is a predictive factor of failed vacuum extraction, especially among nulliparous women whose risk of failure is high. AoP measurement may help in choosing between forceps and vacuum extraction. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Subject(s)
Head , Labor Presentation , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Adult , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To give consistent data of the prevalence of intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), to assess risk factors and causes related to IUFD, to evaluate prevention of IUFD, to evaluate fetal autopsy and MRI and to determine the management of inhibition of lactation. METHODS: French and English publications were searched using PubMed, Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Intrauterine fetal death occurs in 2% of the pregnancies worldwide, and in around 0,5% of pregnancies in France (NP1). Major risk factors related to IUFD are maternal overweight, maternal age, and smoking, small for gestational age fetuses or placental abruption, and pre-gestational maternal diseases such as hypertension and diabetes (NP1). The most relevant causes of IUFD are placental anomalies, followed by abnormal karyotypes and congenital malformations (NP3). Data are insufficient to recommend a classification for causes of IUFD. Data concerning primary and secondary prevention do not recommend a specific management for the following of pregnancy. Fetal autopsy is still the gold standard of fetal examination, but fetal post-mortem MRI can be offered when fetal autopsy is refused (NP4). Inhibition of lactation should be started within 24hours postpartum with cabergoline, if the patient demands a treatment (NP4).
Subject(s)
Fetal Death , Female , Fetal Death/etiology , Fetal Death/prevention & control , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
Incarceration of the retroverted gravid uterus in the third trimester is a rare but distinctive diagnosis. Initial symptoms are more frequently urinary and digestive symptoms which became more acute at the third trimester. Severe abdominal pain associated with bleeding in early labor leads to make the diagnosis during an emergency cesarean section. However, the typical features of the clinical transvaginal exam and the abdominal ultrasound exam can confirm easily this diagnosis. We report two additional cases where Joël-Cohen incision for cesarean section was possible after manual reposition of the uterus. We discuss the diagnostic approach and the management regarding a literature review.
