Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Laparoscopy.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) unrelated to anesthesia, especially hydropneumothorax, are rare after gynecologic laparoscopy. Hydropneumothorax can cause respiratory failure and be life-threatening, however. Awareness, prompt diagnosis, and timely intervention are crucial for clinical management. We review the literature for PPCs, including pneumothorax, hydrothorax, hydropneumothorax, and pleural effusion following laparoscopy, and also present a recent case of hydropneumothorax seen at our institution.

Laparoscopic Myomectomy for a Plethora of Submucous Myomas.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a laparoscopic myomectomy technique for the removal of multiple submucous myomas. DESIGN: A step-by-step demonstration of the surgical procedure (Canadian Task Force classification III-C). SETTING: In cases of multiple submucous myomas, hysteroscopic resection of myomas might not be a viable option, especially in cases requiring fertility preservation. It may cause significant damage to the endometrial surface, leading to the formation of endometrial synechiae [1]. The procedure is technically challenging and requires prolonged operating time owing to impaired visibility and the need for repeated specimen removal. This can lead to complications, such as fluid overload and, rarely, air embolism [2]. Thus, laparoscopic myomectomy may be a better option in such cases [1]. INTERVENTIONS: A 30-year-old nulligravida presented with a 3-year history of heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea. She had received no symptom relief with hormonal medications and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. On examination, she was anemic, and her uterus was enlarged to 16-weeks gravid size. Ultrasonography revealed an intramural fundal myoma of 6 × 4.2 cm and numerous submucous myomas of 1 to 3.2 cm. During hysteroscopy, multiple submucous myomas of varying sizes ranging from type 0 to type 1 were seen. On laparoscopy, an incision was made on the uterine fundus with an ultrasonic device after injecting vasopressin (20 U in 200 mL dilution), and the fundal myoma was enucleated. The incision was then extended to open the endometrial cavity for the removal of the submucous myomas. Most of the myomas were removed with mechanical force, along with the minimal use of ultrasonic energy. A total of 46 myomas were removed, and the myometrium was closed in 2 layers. The duration of the surgery was 210 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 850 mL. The patient did not require blood transfusion, but was advised to take hematinics. At a 6-month follow-up, the patient reported significant improvement in her symptoms. A repeat hysteroscopy revealed moderate synechiae in the midline and 2 small submucous myomas near the internal os. The synechiae were incised with hysteroscopic scissors, and the submucous myomas were resected with a bipolar resectoscope. The patient was advised to attempt conception after 2 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic myomectomy is an alternative to hysteroscopic resection for multiple submucous myomas. A repeat hysteroscopy is useful for identifying any residual myomas and synechiae.