Whither surgical quality assurance of breast cancer surgery (surgical margins and local recurrence) after paterson.

PURPOSE: The Kennedy report into the actions of the disgraced Breast Surgeon, Paterson focussed on issues of informed consent for mastectomy, management of surgical margins and raised concerns about local recurrence rates and the increasing emphasis on cosmesis after mastectomy for breast cancer. This article assesses whether Kennedy's recommendations apply to the UK as a whole and how to address these issues. New GMC advice on consent and newer nonevidenced innovations in immediate reconstruction have altered the level of informed consent required. Patients deserve a better understanding of the issues of oncological versus cosmetic outcomes on which to base their decisions. Involvement of the whole multidisciplinary team including Oncologists is necessary in surgical planning. Failure to obtain clear microscopic margins at mastectomy leads to an increased local recurrence, yet has received little attention in the UK. Whereas, other countries have used surgical quality assurance audits to reduce local recurrence; local recurrence rates are not available and the extent of variation across the UK in margin involvement after surgery, its management and relationship to local recurrence needs auditing prospectively to reduce unnecessary morbidity. To reassure public, patients and the NHS management, an accreditation system with more rigour than NHSBSP QA and peer review is now required. Resource and efforts to support its introduction will be necessary from the Royal College of Surgeons and the Association of Breast Surgeons. New innovations require careful evaluation before their backdoor introduction to the NHS. Private Hospitals need to have the same standards imposed.

Impact of Oncotype DX breast Recurrence Score testing on adjuvant chemotherapy use in early breast cancer: Real world experience in Greater Manchester, UK.

BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommended the Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) assay as an option for informing adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in node-negative, oestrogen receptor (ER)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer assessed to be at intermediate risk of recurrence based on clinicopathological factors. We evaluated the impact of RS testing on adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in routine clinical practice in a UK Cancer Network. METHODS: RS testing was performed in 201 females with newly diagnosed, ER+, HER2-negative, invasive breast cancer who underwent breast surgery with curative intent, were calculated to have a >3% overall survival benefit at 10 years from adjuvant chemotherapy based on PREDICT, and were considered for adjuvant chemotherapy. The impact of RS testing on adjuvant treatment decisions/associated cost was assessed. RESULTS: In all patients, the multi-disciplinary team recommended chemotherapy but the RS result allowed 127/201 patients (63.2%) to avoid unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy. Amongst ER+, HER2-negative, node-negative patients (eligible for Oncotype DX testing in UK guidelines), 60.3% were spared chemotherapy. In node-positive patients, the assay reduced the use of chemotherapy by 69.2%. The use of RS testing to guide treatment in these 201 patients was associated with significant cost saving (when considering the cost of RS testing for all patients plus chemotherapy and its associated cost for 74 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating RS testing into routine clinical practice for selected node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients significantly reduces the use of chemotherapy (p < 0.001) with its associated morbidity and costs.

Prediction of margin involvement and local recurrence after skin-sparing and simple mastectomy.

UNLABELLED: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) facilitates immediate breast reconstruction. We investigated locoregional recurrence rates after SSM compared with simple mastectomy and the factors predicting oncological failure. METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer that underwent mastectomy between 2000 and 2005 at a single institution were studied to ascertain local and systemic recurrence rates between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used to evaluate disease-free survival. RESULTS: Patients (n = 577) underwent simple mastectomy (80%) or SSM (20%). Median follow up was 80 months. Patients undergoing SSM were of younger average age, less often had involved lymph nodes (22% vs 44%, p < 0.001), more often had DCIS present (79% vs 53%, p < 0.001) and involved margins (29% vs 15%, p = 0.001). Involved surgical margins were associated with large size (p = 0.001). The 8-year local recurrence (LR) rates were 7.9% for SSM and 5% for simple mastectomy respectively (p = 0.35). Predictors of locoregional recurrence were lymph node involvement (HR 8.0, for >4 nodes, p < 0.001) and involved surgical margins (HR 3.3, p = 0.002). In node negative patients, SSM was a predictor of locoregional recurrence (HR 4.8 [1.1, 19.9], p = 0.033). CONCLUSION(S): Delayed reconstruction is more appropriate for node positive early breast cancer after post-mastectomy radiotherapy. Re-excision of involved margins is essential to prevent local recurrence after mastectomy.

PO-21 - Stromal fibroblasts in preinvasive breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ, DCIS) demonstrate a cancer-like procoagulant phenotypic switch that may facilitate invasion.

INTRODUCTION: Ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive breast cancer where cancer cells remain confined within the ductal basement membrane. However, genotypic changes have been identified in stroma surrounding DCIS, outside the basement membrane. Stromal fibroblasts undergo phenotypic change in cancer to promote tumour angiogenesis, proliferation, immunosuppression and metastasis and in vivo can induce invasion of DCIS. Phenotypic changes in DCIS stromal fibroblasts may potentially act as a precursor for invasion. AIM: To determine if stromal fibroblasts in DCIS have procoagulant changes similar to those seen in cancer-associated fibroblasts in invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of the prospective cohort study CHAMPion (Cancer induced Hypercoagulabulity as a Marker of Prognosis), patients with DCIS (n=72) and invasive breast cancer (n=292) were recruited. Stromal fibroblasts in tumour and corresponding normal breast tissue (distant from the cancer) were quantified (percentage IHC stained) for tissue factor (TF), thrombin, PAR1 and PAR2. Fibroblasts were identified morphologically, at a minimum distance of 0.2mm from ductal tissue, to avoid myoepithelial scoring. Scoring was performed in duplicate by two independent pathologists. RESULTS: Fibroblast TF expression was present in normal breast tissue (mean 43% ([SD 27%]) but markedly increased in DCIS (mean 62% [SD 27%], p=0.002). Fibroblast TF expression was further increased in invasive breast cancer (mean 74% [SD 23%], normal vs invasion, p<0.001; DCIS vs invasion, p=0.03). Fibroblast thrombin and PAR2, but not PAR1, expression was increased in DCIS compared to normal (thrombin: 60% vs 42%, p<0.001; PAR2: 58% vs 41%, p=0.002), however no further significant increase was seen in invasive cancer (thrombin 63%, PAR2 61%). Fibroblast tissue factor correlated with fibroblast thrombin expression (p<0.001, r=0.4) and fibroblast PAR2 expression (p<0.001, r=0.5), with thrombin and PAR2 expression also correlating (p<0.001, r=0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Procoagulant phenotypic changes, in terms of increased TF, thrombin and PAR2 expression, occur in stromal fibroblasts at the preinvasive stage. It needs to be determined if this change is functional and therefore a potential therapeutic target for preventing transition to invasion.

PO-36 - Thrombin Inhibition Preoperatively (TIP) in early breast cancer, the first clinical trial of NOACs as an anti-cancer agent: trial methodology.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is associated with a 3-4 fold increased risk of VTE. These patients have a 4-fold lower survival than those remaining free of VTE, implying VTE is a surrogate marker for aggressive cancer. Tumour expression of thrombin pathway markers are increased in the oestrogen receptor negative (ER-), high Ki67, more aggressive breast cancer subtypes. In in vitro and in vivo studies, the thrombin pathway promotes cancer growth and metastases, highlighting the potential role of the thrombin pathway as a therapeutic target in cancer. AIM: To determine whether 14days of a preoperative oral Factor Xa inhibitor (Rivaroxaban) in oestrogen receptor negative early breast cancer patients results in inhibition of tumour proliferation as determined by a reduction in tumour Ki67 from baseline (pre-treatment) to 14days post treatment start (at time of surgical excision). RATIONALE: The TF-VIIa-FXa complex activates Protease Activated Receptor (PAR)2 to induce angiogensis, growth factors and tumour cell migration. Thrombin, in part via PAR1, induces angiogenesis, tumour cell proliferation as well as in vivo metastasis. In early breast cancer, TF and PAR2 expression is increased in the stroma, particularly in the more aggressive ER-, high Ki67 (proliferation) cancers. Rivaroxaban is an orally active direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Through inhibition of the TF-FVIIa-FXa complex, it can downregulate TF-FVIIa-FXa activation of PAR2, and inhibit conversion of prothrombin to thrombin. We hypothesise that 14days of Rivaroxaban will reduce breast cancer proliferation, as a surrogate marker for anti-cancer efficacy, in early breast cancer patients awaiting resectional surgery. RESULTS: Trial methodology: A multi-centre phase II preoperative 'Window-of Opportunity' randomised controlled trial of Rivaroxaban compared to no treatment in ER-, stage I-III early breast cancer patients. Patients will be randomised 1:1:1 (Rivaroxaban 20mg od: Rivaroxaban 10mg od: no treatment) and receive 14 (+/-3) days of treatment in the window between diagnosis and surgery. Randomisation will be blinded to pathologists, but not to patients or clinicians. Primary analysis will be based on the two Rivaroxaban arms being combined to form a Rivaroxaban: no treatment, 2:1 trial design, with change in Ki67 from baseline (pre) to post Rivaroxaban/no treatment (post) being the primary endpoint, and the no treatment arm acting as a reference group. Subgroup analysis of the Rivaroxaban arm (20mg od:10mg od) will allow assessment of dose-response. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Funder: National Institute for Health Research Eudract No: 2014-004909-33 REC Number: 15/NW/0406 UKCRN ID: 19731 Expected commencement: January 2016. For further information please contact Chief Investigator: cliona.kirwan@manchester.ac.uk.

A randomised pilot study comparing 13 G vacuum-assisted biopsy and conventional 14 G core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer.

AIM: To compare the acceptability, safety, and feasibility of vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) and core needle biopsy (CNB) of axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This parallel, non-blinded, randomised study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service. Following written informed consent, women with abnormal appearing axillary lymph nodes and radiologically malignant breast masses were randomised 1:1 to lymph node sampling under local anaesthetic with either 14 G CNB or 13 G VAB in a single UK centre. Primary outcomes were study uptake rate and patient willingness to undergo a repeat procedure if necessary. Procedure duration, immediate and post-procedure pain scores, diagnostic yield, complications, and surgical histopathology were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-five women were approached; 81 (85.3%) consented and were randomised. Forty underwent CNB; 40 underwent VAB; one was excluded. Median age was 57 years. The median procedure time was 2 minutes for both techniques. The median number of samples obtained was three for CNB and four for VAB. Median pain scores for the procedure and first 3 days were 1/10 and 1/10 for CNB and 1/10 and 2/10 for VAB (p=0.11 and 0.04). More women were prepared to undergo repeat CNB compared to VAB, but the difference was not significant (38/39 versus 33/39; p=0.11). Two patients developed a haematoma after VAB. One CNB and six VABs failed to yield adequate tissue (p=0.11), but the sensitivity was similar at 79% and 78%. CONCLUSION: Study uptake was high. Acceptability of the two procedures was similar, but VAB was associated with more post-procedure pain. The sensitivity appears to be similar.

Pretreatment health measures and complications after surgical management of elderly women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with breast cancer are less likely to be offered surgery, partly owing to co-morbidities and reduced functional ability. However, there is little consensus on how best to assess surgical risk in this patient group. METHODS: The ability of pretreatment health measures to predict complications was investigated in a prospective cohort study of a consecutive series of women aged at least 70 years undergoing surgery for operable (stage I-IIIa) breast cancer at 22 English breast units between 2010 and 2013. Data on treatment, surgical complications, health measures and tumour characteristics were collected by case-note review and/or patient interview. Outcome measures were all complications and serious complications within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: The study included 664 women. One or more complications were experienced by 41·0 per cent of the patients, predominantly seroma or primary/minor infections. Complications were serious in 6·5 per cent. More extensive surgery predicted a higher number of complications, but not serious complications. Older age did not predict complications. Several health measures were associated with complications in univariable analysis, and were included in multivariable analyses, adjusting for type/extent of surgery and tumour characteristics. In the final models, pain predicted a higher count of complications (incidence rate ratio 1·01, 95 per cent c.i. 1·00 to 1·01; P = 0·004). Fatigue (odds ratio (OR) 1·02, 95 per cent c.i. 1·01 to 1·03; P = 0·004), low platelet count (OR 4·19, 1·03 to 17·12: P = 0·046) and pulse rate (OR 0·96, 0·93 to 0·99; P = 0·010) predicted serious complications. CONCLUSION: The risk of serious complications from breast surgery is low for older patients. Surgical decisions should be based on patient fitness rather than age. Health measures that predict surgical risk were identified in multivariable models, but the effects were weak, with 95 per cent c.i. close to unity.

Molecular phenotypes of DCIS predict overall and invasive recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Molecular phenotypes of invasive breast cancer predict early recurrence. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) exhibits similar phenotypes, but their frequency and significance remain unclear. To determine whether DCIS molecular phenotypes predict recurrence, 314 women (median age 57.7 years) with primary DCIS who were screened or entered DCIS trials in a specialist breast unit from 1990 to 2010 were studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Expression of Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) within primary DCIS was established using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients were subdivided into molecular phenotypes using IHC surrogates [Luminal A (ER/PR+HER2-), Luminal B (ER/PR+/HER2+), HER2 type (ER and PR-/HER2+) or triple negative (ER/PR/HER2)] and recurrence rates compared. RESULTS: Overall, there were 57 (18.2%) recurrences, 35 (11.2%) DCIS and 22 (7%) invasive cancer. A low rate of recurrence at 5 years was seen in Luminal A DCIS (7.6%), compared with 15.8%-36.1% in other phenotypes. Independent predictors of overall recurrence on multivariate analysis were involved (<1 mm) surgical margins (HR 4.31, P < 0.001), high-grade lesions (HR 2.28, P < 0.024) and molecular phenotype (HR 5.14, P = 0.001 for Luminal B; HR 6.46, P < 0.001 for HER2 type and HR 3.27, P = 0.028 for triple-negative disease compared with Luminal A DCIS). Independent predictors for invasive recurrence were high Ki67 expression (HR 1.04, P = 0.021) and molecular phenotype (HR 13.4, P = 0.014 for Luminal B; HR 11.4, P = 0.027 for HER2 type and HR 10.3, P = 0.031 for triple negative compared with Luminal A DCIS). CONCLUSIONS: DCIS molecular phenotype predicts for both overall and invasive recurrence. HER2 testing of DCIS could help clinicians individualise the treatment of patients with DCIS.

The sensitivity of pre-operative axillary staging in breast cancer: comparison of invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Axillary ultrasound (AUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of abnormal lymph nodes is important for pre-operative staging and planning the surgical management of the axilla. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) metastases are thought to be difficult to detect because the cells are small and on cytology resemble lymphocytes. To investigate this we directly compared the sensitivity of pre-operative axillary staging between ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHOD: Consecutive patients that presented in a single breast unit with pure IDC between April 2005 and December 2006 and pure ILC between January 2008 and December 2012 were retrospectively identified from pathology records. Pre-operative axillary ultrasound and FNA biopsy results were compared with post-operative histopathology from the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). RESULTS: A total of 275 and 142 axillae were identified in the IDC and ILC groups respectively. In the node positive patients there was no significant difference in the sensitivity of AUS (IDC vs. ILC; 58.7% vs. 52.8%). However, there was a significant difference in the sensitivity of ultrasound-guided FNA biopsy of abnormal nodes (IDC vs. ILC; 98.4% vs. 53.6%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AUS has comparative sensitivities between IDC and ILC populations. In contrast, FNA biopsy of abnormal axillary nodes is clearly less sensitive in the ILC group. In these patients, who have abnormal AUS, we suggest that a core biopsy is required to improve the pre-operative staging and prevent unnecessary surgical procedures.

The frequency of presentation and clinico-pathological characteristics of symptomatic versus screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

INTRODUCTION: DCIS accounts for 20% of screen-detected breast cancers, but also presents symptomatically. Historically, approximately 5% of DCIS was thought to be symptomatic, but accurate evaluation of the presentation of symptomatic DCIS is needed to determine its incidence and tumour biology. METHODS: Clinico-pathological details of a consecutive series of patients presenting to a single breast-unit, with a pre-operative diagnosis of DCIS, were selected. Data included age, mode of presentation, pre-operative clinical and radiographical findings. The final tumour histology, operation, size, grade, ER status (and HER2 expression in invasive cases) were recorded. RESULTS: 375 patients had a pre-operative histological diagnosis of DCIS. 308 (82%) screen-detected (median age 59), 67 (18%) presented via symptomatic clinics (median age 50). At final histology 286 (74%) were pure DCIS, and 67 (23%) had an invasive focus. 43% (29/67) of symptomatic cases had an invasive focus at final histology versus 19% (60/308) screen-detected (p ≤ 0.001). 31% (9/29) of symptomatic, versus 10% (6/60) of screen-detected cases with invasion were node positive (p = 0.05). 45% (28/62) intermediate/high-grade symptomatic cases had an invasive focus at final histology, compared to 19% (57/297) intermediate/high-grade screen-detected cases. 86% (212/248) screen-detected pure DCIS was ER positive compared to 68% (26/38) symptomatically presenting pure DCIS (p ≤ 0.001). Overall, 13% (38/248) pure DCIS presented symptomatically (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, thirteen percent of pure DCIS present symptomatically. Nearly half of symptomatically presenting DCIS at core biopsy has an occult invasive focus and is more frequently ER negative. Symptomatic DCIS with an invasive focus is more likely to have lymph node involvement.

Impact of full-field digital mammography on pre-operative diagnosis and surgical treatment of mammographic microcalcification.

Accurate pre-operative diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions correlates closely with the number of surgical procedures required for treatment. Correct diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification (MM) as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer is important because lesions upgraded to malignant diagnosis at surgery require repeat surgical procedures in 44 % of cases. Despite correct pre-operative diagnosis of MM, 26 % require second therapeutic operations to achieve surgical clearance. Theoretically, improved conspicuity of malignant MM using digital mammography could improve diagnostic work-up and improve surgical outcomes for MM. To determine the impact of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) on the diagnostic accuracy and positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy of MM and surgical management of MM, screening and symptomatic cases with MM (n = 1,479) were reviewed for women imaged between August 2007 and March 2010 using screen-film mammography (SFM) (n = 711), and using FFDM, imaged between April 2010 to March 2012 (n = 768). Demographic information including pre and postoperative diagnosis, and number and types of surgical procedures were recorded. Overall, 302 (128 invasive) and 251 (110 invasive) malignant lesions were diagnosed using SFM and FFDM, respectively. Reduction in PPV of biopsy was observed (SFM 42.5 %; FFDM 32.7 %, p < 0.001). Correct pre-operative diagnosis was achieved at first attempt more often with FFDM (SFM 80.6 %; FFDM 89.5 %, p < 0.001). For lesions with pre-operative diagnosis, B5 more cases achieved surgical clearance with a single therapeutic operation with FFDM (SFM 66.3 %; FFDM 76.7 %, p = 0.017), and more lesions over 2 cm underwent mastectomy as the initial surgical procedure (SFM 47.0 %; FFDM 62.9 %, p = 0.005). Correct pre-operative diagnosis of MM using digital mammography reduced second therapeutic operations but increased mastectomy rate in larger cancers over two centimetres. This will increase concerns about treatment of lesions detected in the screening programme with widespread use of digital mammography.

Is lack of surgery for older breast cancer patients in the UK explained by patient choice or poor health? A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Older women have lower breast cancer surgery rates than younger women. UK policy states that differences in cancer treatment by age can only be justified by patient choice or poor health. METHODS: We investigate whether lack of surgery for older patients is explained by patient choice/poor health in a prospective cohort study of 800 women aged ≥70 years diagnosed with operable (stage 1-3a) breast cancer at 22 English breast cancer units in 2010-2013. DATA COLLECTION: interviews and case note review. OUTCOME MEASURE: surgery for operable (stage 1-3a) breast cancer <90 days of diagnosis. Logistic regression adjusts for age, health measures, tumour characteristics, socio-demographics and patient's/surgeon's perceived responsibility for treatment decisions. RESULTS: In the univariable analyses, increasing age predicts not undergoing surgery from the age of 75 years, compared with 70-74-year-olds. Adjusting for health measures and choice, only women aged ≥85 years have reduced odds of surgery (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.44). Each point increase in Activities of Daily Living score (worsening functional status) reduced the odds of surgery by over a fifth (OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.15-0.35). Patient's role in the treatment decisions made no difference to whether they received surgery or not; those who were active/collaborative were as likely to get surgery as those who were passive, that is, left the decision up to the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Lower surgery rates, among older women with breast cancer, are unlikely to be due to patients actively opting out of having this treatment. However, poorer health explains the difference in surgery between 75-84-year-olds and younger women. Lack of surgery for women aged ≥85 years persists even when health and patient choice are adjusted for.

Zoledronic acid (zoledronate) for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole (ZO-FAST study): final 60-month results.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors are the preferred adjuvant endocrine therapy for the majority of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer. Although generally more effective than tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor therapy is associated with increased bone loss and fracture risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant letrozole (2.5 mg/day for 5 years; N = 1065) were randomly assigned to immediate zoledronic acid (zoledronate) 4 mg every 6 months for 5 years, or delayed zoledronate (initiated for fracture or on-study bone mineral density [BMD] decrease). The primary end point was the change in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months. Lumbar spine and total hip BMD at subsequent follow-up, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival were assessed as secondary end points. RESULTS: At 60 months (final analysis), the mean change in lumbar spine BMD was +4.3% with immediate zoledronate and -5.4% with delayed intervention (P < 0.0001). Immediate zoledronate reduced the risk of DFS events by 34% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; P = 0.0375) with fewer local (0.9% versus 2.3%) and distant (5.5% versus 7.7%) recurrences versus delayed zoledronate. In the delayed group, delayed initiation of zoledronate substantially improved DFS versus no zoledronate (HR = 0.46; P = 0.0334). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate zoledronate in postmenopausal women receiving letrozole preserved BMD and is associated with improved DFS compared with letrozole alone. Clinical Trials Registration No NCT00171340.

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss in premenopausal women: a need for therapeutic intervention?

Current clinical treatment guidelines recommend cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or both (with targeted therapy if indicated) for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer, depending on the biologic characteristics of the primary tumor. Some of these therapies can induce premature menopause or are specifically designed to suppress ovarian function and reduce circulating estrogen levels. In addition to bone loss associated with low estrogen levels, cytotoxic chemotherapy may have a direct negative effect on bone metabolism. As a result, cancer treatment-induced bone loss poses a significant threat to bone health in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Clinical trials of antiresorptive therapies, such as bisphosphonates, have demonstrated the ability to slow or prevent bone loss in this setting. Current fracture risk assessment tools are based on data from healthy postmenopausal women and do not adequately address the risks associated with breast cancer therapy, especially in younger premenopausal women. We therefore recommend that all premenopausal women with breast cancer be informed about the potential risk of bone loss prior to beginning anticancer therapy. Women who experience amenorrhea should have bone mineral density assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and receive regular follow-up to monitor bone health. Regular exercise and daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation are recommended. Women with a Z-score <-2.0 or Z-score ≤-1.0 and/or a 5-10% annual decrease in bone mineral density should be considered for bisphosphonate therapy in addition to calcium and vitamin D supplements.

Management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: practical guidance for prevention and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Bone mineral density (BMD)-based guidelines for bone-directed therapy in women with early breast cancer (EBC) appear inadequate for averting fractures, particularly during aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Therefore, an algorithm was developed to better assess risk and direct treatment (Hadji P, Body JJ, Aapro MS et al. Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1407-1416). Here, we provide updated guidance on pharmacologic interventions to prevent/treat aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL). DESIGN: Systematic literature review identified recent advances in preventing/treating AIBL. Individual agents were assessed based on trial size, design, follow-up, and safety. RESULTS: Fracture risk factors in patients with EBC remain unchanged (Hadji P, Body JJ, Aapro MS et al. Practical guidance for the management of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 1407-1416). The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool algorithm includes fracture risk factors plus BMD but does not adequately address AIBL effects. Several antiresorptives can prevent/treat AIBL. However, concerns regarding compliance and long-term efficacy/safety remain. Overall, evidence is strongest for twice-yearly zoledronic acid (ZOL), and recent advances support additional anticancer benefits from ZOL. CONCLUSIONS: All patients initiating AIs need advice regarding exercise, calcium/vitamin D supplements, baseline BMD monitoring (when available), and bone-directed therapy if T-score <-2.0 or at least two fracture risk factors were observed. Patients with T-score > -2.0 and no risk factors should be managed based on BMD loss during years 1-2. Unsatisfactory compliance/decreasing BMD after 12-24 months on oral bisphosphonates should trigger a switch to i.v. bisphosphonate.

Efficacy of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole: 36-month results of the ZO-FAST Study.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are accepted as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women (PMW) with hormone-responsive early breast cancer (EBC) with superior efficacy to tamoxifen. However, increased bone loss is associated with AIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PMW with EBC receiving letrozole (2.5 mg/day for 5 years) were randomly assigned to immediate zoledronic acid (ZOL; 4 mg every 6 months) or delayed ZOL (initiated only for fracture or high risk thereof). RESULTS: Patients (N = 1065) had a median age of 58 years; 54% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. At 36 months, mean change in L2-L4 bone mineral density (BMD) was +4.39% for immediate versus -4.9% for delayed ZOL (P < 0.0001). Between-group differences were 5.27% at 12 months, 7.94% at 24 months, and 9.29% at 36 months (P < 0.0001 for all). At 36 months, the immediate-ZOL group had a significant 41% relative risk reduction for disease-free survival (DFS) events (P = 0.0314). Adverse events are consistent with the known safety profiles of the study drugs. CONCLUSIONS: At 36 months, immediate ZOL was more effective in preserving BMD during letrozole therapy. Immediate versus delayed ZOL led to significantly improved DFS. Benefits are observed in the context of a favorable, well-established safety profile for letrozole and ZOL.

Safety of tibolone in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in breast cancer patients--design and baseline data 'LIBERATE' trial.

Many patients with a history of breast cancer (BC) will suffer from vasomotor symptoms, which can be induced or exacerbated by treatment with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. The LIBERATE trial was designed as a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to demonstrate that tibolone 2.5mg/day (Livial) is non-inferior to placebo regarding BC recurrence in women with vasomotor symptoms surgically treated for primary BC within the last 5 years. Secondary objectives are effects on vasomotor symptoms as well as overall survival, bone mineral density and health-related quality of life. Mean age at randomization was 52.6 years, and the mean time since surgery was 2.1 years. The mean daily number of hot flushes and sweating episodes was 7.3 and 6.1, respectively. For the primary tumor, Stage IIA or higher was reported for >70% of the patients. In subjects whose receptor status was known, 78.2% of the tumors were estrogen receptors positive. At randomization, tamoxifen was given to 66.2% of all patients and aromatase inhibitors to 7%. Chemotherapy was reported by 5% at randomization. The adjuvant tamoxifen use in LIBERATE allows a comparison with the Stockholm trial (showing no risk of BC recurrence associated with hormone therapy), which was stopped prematurely subsequent to HABITS. The LIBERATE trial is the largest, ongoing, well-controlled study for treatment of vasomotor symptoms in BC patients.