Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Crit Care Nurse ; 42(3): 27-36, 2022 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35322267

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the number of patients requiring intensive care nation-wide, leading to nurse staffing shortages in many units. LOCAL PROBLEM: At the beginning of the statewide COVID-19 surge, a tertiary teaching hospital in the upper Midwest experienced a sharp increase in patients needing intensive care. To relieve the resulting staffing shortage, it implemented a pilot program to bring general care nurses into its 21-bed mixed specialty intensive care unit to free intensive care unit nurses to help staff the hospital's COVID-designated units. METHODS: Using a team nursing model, the intensive care unit recruited, oriented, and incorporated 13 general care nurses within 4 days. Education and resources were developed to distinguish team nurses from intensive care unit nurses, introduce them to the intensive care unit environment, outline expectations, communicate between team nursing pairs, and guide charge nurses in making staffing decisions and assignments. Staff feedback identified additional resources, barriers, and successes. An adaptive process was used to improve and update tools and resources on the basis of staff needs. RESULTS: The pilot program ran for 6 weeks. Positive outcomes included a reduced need for float nurses and self-perceived reduction in nursing workload. The principal barrier was charge nurses' challenges involving staffing-to-workload balance based on the existing staffing model. This model identified productivity of a general care nurse and an intensive care unit nurse as equivalent, despite differences in their skill sets. CONCLUSION: Team nursing in the intensive care unit is an agile tactic easily replicated in dire staffing situations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Humans , Nursing, Team , Pandemics , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Workload
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 68(3): 395-402, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25488326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown in multiple surgical specialties to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS) after surgery, but they have not been described for patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: A standardized ERAS pathway was developed through multidisciplinary collaboration which addressed all phases of surgical care for patients undergoing free-flap breast reconstruction using an abdominal donor site. Two surgeons used the ERAS pathway, and results were compared with a historical cohort of the same 2 surgeons' patients treated by traditional care after surgery (TRAS). All patients underwent surgery between September 2010 and September 2013. The primary outcome measure was hospital LOS. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were analyzed: 49 in the ERAS cohort, and 51 in the TRAS cohort, with a total of 181 flaps. Mean hospital LOS was shorter with ERAS than TRAS (3.9 vs 5.5 days; P<0.001). Total inpatient postoperative opioid usage for the first 3 days, in oral morphine equivalents, was less for ERAS than TRAS (167.3 vs 574.3 mg; P<0.001), a decrease of 71%, with similar pain scores for the 2 groups. Overall 30-day major complication rates were not significantly different between the groups (P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of an ERAS pathway significantly decreased hospital LOS in our study. The pathway also significantly decreased the amount of opioids used postoperatively by 71%, without a consequent increase in patient-reported pain.


Subject(s)
Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mammaplasty/methods , Microsurgery , Surgical Flaps , Wound Healing/physiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Management , Pain Measurement , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 16(2): 121-4, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22459520

ABSTRACT

This quality improvement pilot study evaluated the effect of massage therapy on pain, anxiety, and overall well-being in women who received mastectomies at a busy hospital practice. Participants reported a significant reduction in pain, stress, and muscle tension, as well as an increase in relaxation. Oncology nurses should consider the feasibility of massage therapy as a valuable nonpharmcologic pain management strategy.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/nursing , Massage , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Pain/nursing , Breast Neoplasms/nursing , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Evidence-Based Nursing , Female , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...