Multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes before symptom onset are associated with a worse disease outcome in women with recent-onset inflammatory polyarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Previous evidence suggests that women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) may be at greater risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. Additionally, one study reported that female patients with rheumatoid arthritis with a history of preonset APOs showed a worse 2-year radiographic outcome than did patients with no APOs. The authors' aim was to investigate the relationship between preonset APOs (spontaneous abortion or stillbirth) and disease outcome in women with inflammatory polyarthritis (IP). METHODS: The Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR) is a primary-care-based cohort of patients with recent-onset IP; 1586 gravid women who joined NOAR during 1990-2004 were included in this analysis. The authors examined the relationship between patient-reported preonset APOs and disease outcome, measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28(CRP)) (for a subgroup of patients), using linear random effects analysis, adjusted for age and other factors. RESULTS: In a predominantly parous cohort (99%), 397 (25%) women reported ≥1 APO before symptom onset. The rates of APOs in NOAR were comparable to the general population. On average, women with a history of ≥2 APOs had significantly higher HAQ and DAS28 scores over time than women with no APOs (mean difference in HAQ 0.13 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.26); DAS28, 0.56 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.11)). This relationship was more pronounced in women with ≥3 APOs (mean difference in HAQ 0.23 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.43); DAS28, 0.98 (95% CI 0.23 to 1.74)). CONCLUSION: Women with two or more APOs before IP onset had a worse disease outcome than women with no APOs.

The relationship between oral contraceptive use and functional outcome in women with recent-onset inflammatory polyarthritis: results from the Norfolk Arthritis Register.

OBJECTIVE: Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) may prevent the development of rheumatoid arthritis, but the influence of OC use on disease outcome is unresolved. The purpose of this study was to examine functional outcome and OC use in women with inflammatory polyarthritis (IP). METHODS: The Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR) is an inception cohort of patients with recent-onset IP. We studied patient-reported history of OC use in 663 women who were born after 1945 and who had not used OCs during followup. OC use during followup was additionally investigated in 265 women who were <50 years old and had not undergone menopause or hysterectomy during followup. All patients were recruited to the NOAR between 1990 and 2004. Functional ability was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), with adjustment for age at symptom onset. RESULTS: The median followup was 4.9 years. In the investigation analyzing OC use before symptom onset, patients who had used OCs before symptom onset had lower HAQ scores throughout followup than patients who had not taken OCs before symptom onset (difference in score at 5-year followup -0.35; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.51, -0.19). Patients who were taking OCs at baseline had lower HAQ scores over time than women who were not taking OCs at baseline but had previously done so (mean difference -0.21; 95% CI -0.40, -0.02). In the investigation analyzing OC use during followup, OC use during followup was associated with lower HAQ scores over time than no OC use during followup (mean difference -0.06; 95% CI -0.16, 0.03); however, this was only significant for women with moderate or severe functional disability at the previous assessment (mean difference -0.23; 95% CI -0.40, -0.07). Further adjustment for potential confounders and exclusion of hormone replacement therapy users had little impact. CONCLUSION: OC use is generally associated with a beneficial functional outcome in IP, and use before and at symptom onset appeared to have the most consistent benefit.

Parity, time since last live birth and long-term functional outcome: a study of women participating in the Norfolk Arthritis Register.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between pre-symptom onset live births and functional outcome in women with inflammatory polyarthritis (IP). METHODS: 1872 women with no subsequent pregnancies were registered with the Norfolk Arthritis Register between 1990 and 2004 and followed-up for a median of 5 years. Functional disability over time was assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The number and calendar year of past live births were recorded. Differences in HAQ score over time by parity and time since last live birth (latency), adjusted for age and symptom duration, were examined using linear random effects models. The results were then adjusted for a number of potential confounders. RESULTS: 1553 women (83%) had ≥1 live births before symptom onset. The median latency was 26 years (IQR 16-35). Parous women had significantly lower HAQ scores over time than nulliparous women (-0.19, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.06). Increasing latency was associated with increasing HAQ score; the mean HAQ score of women with a latency of approximately 32 years was the same as for nulliparous women. This was independent of autoantibody status, socioeconomic status, smoking history and comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Parous women who develop IP have better functional outcome over time than nulliparous women who develop IP. The beneficial effect of parity diminishes with time.

The NOAR Damaged Joint Count (NOAR-DJC): a clinical measure for assessing articular damage in patients with early inflammatory polyarthritis including rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Norfolk Arthritis Register Damaged Joint Count (NOAR-DJC) in patients with early inflammatory polyarthritis (IP). METHODS: The NOAR-DJC examines deformity in 51 joints. Deformity is defined as inability to adopt the anatomical position, reduction in range of movement by at least one-third, and/or surgical alteration of the joint. Reliability was investigated by assessing intra- and inter-observer agreement in 40 and 32 patients, respectively. Validity was assessed by correlating the NOAR-DJC with the eroded joint count (criterion validity), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (convergent construct validity) and tender and swollen joint counts (divergent construct validity) and by discriminating between those who did and did not satisfy criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (discriminant validity). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient for the intra- and inter-rater studies were 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79, 0.94, P<0.00001] and 0.74 (95% CI 0.53, 0.86, P<0.00001), respectively. Correlations with eroded joint counts and HAQ scores after 5 yr follow-up were r(s) = 0.42 (95% CI 0.35, 0.49, P<0.01) and r(s) = 0.45 (95% CI 0.4, 0.5, P<0.01), respectively. Correlations with tender and swollen joint counts were weak (r(s) = 0.28 and r(s) = 0.33). CONCLUSION: The NOAR-DJC is a quick, reliable and valid tool for assessing articular damage in patients with early IP.