Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Behav Brain Res ; 224(2): 259-71, 2011 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21664382

ABSTRACT

The laboratory environment existing outside the test situation itself can have a substantial influence on results of some behavioral tests with mice, and the extent of these influences sometimes depends on genotype. For alcohol research, the principal issue is whether genotype-related ethanol effects will themselves be altered by common variations in the lab environment or instead will be essentially the same across a wide range of lab environments. Data from 20 inbred strains were used to reduce an original battery of seven tests of alcohol intoxication to a compact battery of four tests: the balance beam and grip strength with a 1.25 g/kg ethanol dose and the accelerating rotarod and open-field activation tests with 1.75 g/kg. The abbreviated battery was then used to study eight inbred strains housed under a normal or reversed light-dark cycle, or a standard or enriched home cage environment. The light-dark cycle had no discernable effects on any measure of behavior or response to alcohol. Cage enrichment markedly improved motor coordination in most strains. Ethanol-induced motor coordination deficits were robust; the well-documented strain-dependent effects of ethanol were not altered by cage enrichment.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Depressants/pharmacology , Environment , Ethanol/pharmacology , Photoperiod , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Animals , Ataxia/chemically induced , Ataxia/psychology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Hand Strength/physiology , Hypothermia/chemically induced , Hypothermia/physiopathology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred Strains , Motor Activity/drug effects , Postural Balance/drug effects , Vibration
2.
PLoS One ; 4(6): e5801, 2009 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19495421

ABSTRACT

The second to fourth digit ratio (2Dratio4D) is sexually differentiated in a variety of species, including humans, rats, birds, and lizards. In humans, this ratio tends to be lower in males than in females. Lower digit ratios are believed to indicate increased prenatal testosterone exposure, and are associated with more masculinized behavior across a range of traits. The story seems more complicated in laboratory mice. We have previously shown that there is no sex difference in the digit ratios of inbred mice, but found behavioral evidence to suggest that higher 2Dratio4D is associated with more masculinized behaviors. Work examining intrauterine position effects show that neighbouring males raise pup digit ratio, suggesting again that higher digit ratios are associated with increased developmental androgens. Other work has suggested that masculinization is associated with lower digit ratios in lab mice. Here, we examine the fore- and hindlimb digit ratios of 20 inbred mouse strains. We find large inter-strain differences, but no sexual dimorphism. Digit ratios also did not correlate with mice behavioral traits. This result calls into question the use of this trait as a broadly applicable indicator for prenatal androgen exposure. We suggest that the inbred mice model presents an opportunity for researchers to investigate the genetic, and gene-environmental influence on the development of digit ratios.


Subject(s)
Extremities/anatomy & histology , Extremities/physiology , Androgens/metabolism , Animals , Female , Forelimb/anatomy & histology , Forelimb/physiology , Hindlimb/anatomy & histology , Hindlimb/physiology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Sex Factors , Species Specificity
3.
Curr Protoc Neurosci ; Chapter 9: Unit 9.26, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18428672

ABSTRACT

There are many behavioral assays to assess sensitivity to ethanol intoxication in mice. Most are simple to implement, and are sensitive to a particular dose range of ethanol. Most reflect genetic influences, and each test appears to reflect the contribution of a relatively distinct collection of genes. This genetic heterogeneity implies that no single test can claim to capture the construct "ethanol intoxication" completely. Depending on the test, and when measurements are made, acute functional tolerance to even a single dose of ethanol must be considered as a contributing factor. Whether or not a test is conducted in naïve mice or as part of a test battery can influence sensitivity, and do so in a strain-dependent manner. This unit reviews existing tests and recommends several.


Subject(s)
Alcoholic Intoxication/physiopathology , Central Nervous System Depressants/toxicity , Disease Models, Animal , Ethanol/toxicity , Mice , Animals
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...