Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Health Commun ; 19(5): 532-44, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24359327

ABSTRACT

Perceived quality of lung cancer communication is strongly associated with receiving potentially curative surgery for early-stage disease. The patient characteristics associated with poor quality communication in the setting of new lung cancer diagnosis are not known, although race may be a contributing factor. Using data from a prospective study of decision making in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients in five academic and community medical centers (N = 386), the authors used logistic regression techniques to identify patient-level characteristics correlated with scoring in the lowest quartile of a communication scale and a single-item communication variable describing shared communication. Income, lung cancer diagnostic status, and trust score were significantly associated with the overall communication scale. Lung cancer diagnostic status and trust score were also associated with patient perceptions of the single shared communication item, in addition to participation in a religious organization. Improving patient perceptions of communication with their provider is an important next step in ensuring that eligible patients receive optimal care for this deadly disease. This analysis identifies several modifiable factors that could improve patient perceptions of patient-provider communication. The fact that patient perception of communication is a predictor of the decision to undergo surgery independent of race highlights the need for broad communication interventions to ensure that as many eligible patients as possible are receiving surgery.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Communication , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Patients/psychology , Patients/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Trust
2.
JAMA ; 303(23): 2368-76, 2010 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20551407

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Surgical resection for stage I or II non-small cell cancer remains the only reliable treatment for cure. Patients who do not undergo surgery have a median survival of less than 1 year. Despite the survival disadvantage, many patients with early-stage disease do not receive surgical care and rates are even lower for black patients. OBJECTIVES: To identify potentially modifiable factors regarding surgery in patients newly diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer and to explore why blacks undergo surgery less often than whites. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study with patients identified by pulmonary, oncology, thoracic surgery, and generalist practices in 5 communities through study referral or computerized tomography review protocol. A total of 437 patients with biopsy-proven or probable early-stage lung cancer were enrolled between December 2005 and December 2008. Before establishment of treatment plans, patients were administered a survey including questions about trust, patient-physician communication, attitudes toward cancer, and functional status. Information about comorbid illnesses was obtained through chart audits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Lung cancer surgery within 4 months of diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 386 patients met full eligibility criteria for lung resection surgery. The median age was 66 years (range, 26-90 years) and 29% of patients were black. The surgical rate was 66% for white patients (n = 179/273) compared with 55% for black patients (n = 62/113; P = .05). Negative perceptions of patient-physician communication manifested by a 5-point decrement on a 25-point communication scale (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.74) and negative perception of 1-year prognosis postsurgery (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.50; absolute risk, 34%) were associated with decisions against surgery. Surgical rates for blacks were particularly low when they had 2 or more comorbid illnesses (13% vs 62% for <2 comorbidities; OR, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01-0.25]; absolute risk, 49%) and when blacks lacked a regular source of care (42% with no regular care vs 57% with regular care; OR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.10-0.43]; absolute risk, 15%). CONCLUSIONS: A decision not to undergo surgery by patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer was independently associated with perceptions of communication and prognosis, older age, multiple comorbidities, and black race. Interventions to optimize surgery should consider these factors.


Subject(s)
Black People , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/ethnology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/ethnology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , White People , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Communication , Comorbidity , Decision Making , Female , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Physician-Patient Relations , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...