Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Ital J Pediatr ; 44(1): 64, 2018 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29866147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: AG is the most common cause of pediatric consultations among children between 2 and 5 years of age and it still leads to high mortality and morbidity. Its management is based on rehydration therapy, but this treatment is not effective in reducing duration of diarrhea. For this reason, other safer and less expensive interventions, which could be added to oral rehydration therapy, are of great interest. METHODS: A pilot, randomized, case-controlled trial was conducted in 60 children affected by AG (< 7 days) with mild-moderate dehydration, according to WHO recommendations, from1 year to 17 years old. Patients were divided into 2 Groups: Group 1 consisting of 30 children treated with Actitan F and standard oral rehydration (SOR); Group 2 consisting of 30 children who received only SOR. Both groups received treatment for seven days, respectively. Patients of Group 1 stopped for their own choice, SOR after the first 24 h and continued only with Actitan F. RESULTS: After 24 h of treatment, the median number of stools was 3.5 for Group 1, and 4 for Group 2. In Group 1 the difference between the number of stools at baseline (n = 5) and after 24 h of treatment (n = 3.5) was significant (p < 0.0001). At the end of treatment, the median duration of diarrhea in Group 1 was 5 days, compared with 4 days in the Group 2, this difference was not statically significant (p 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of Actitan F associated with SOR seems safe and effective treatment in shortening the duration of AG in children. Further studies confirming these data are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03356327 (retrospectively registered).


Subject(s)
Antidiarrheals/administration & dosage , Dehydration/drug therapy , Diarrhea/complications , Flavonoids/administration & dosage , Tannins/administration & dosage , Acute Disease , Administration, Oral , Age Factors , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Dehydration/etiology , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Female , Fluid Therapy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Gastroenteritis/complications , Gastroenteritis/diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Male , Pilot Projects , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 55(1): 72-5, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22437469

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The association between GERD and obesity has been frequently reported in adults. Data in children are scarce and inconclusive, evaluating only general obesity. Central adiposity has never been investigated in children as a possible risk factor for GERD. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms in overweight and obese children in comparison with a general normal-weight population and whether the GERD symptoms are associated with waist circumference (WC). METHODS: The study population consisted of 153 healthy children. A detailed clinical history and a physical examination were obtained from each patient. A questionnaire on reflux symptoms was completed by caregivers. RESULTS: The reflux symptomatic score resulted significantly higher in obese than in normal-weight children and in children with WC >90th percentile compared with those with WC <75th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data show that both total and abdominal obesity are risk factors for the development of GERD symptoms in children. The risk of GERD symptoms rises progressively with the increase in both body mass index and waist circumference, even in normal-weight children.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Waist Circumference , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Deglutition Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Heartburn/epidemiology , Humans , Irritable Mood , Male , Obesity, Abdominal/complications , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vomiting/epidemiology
3.
J Pediatr ; 159(1): 50-6, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21392790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of triple eradication therapy versus symptomatic therapy in children with Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic active gastritis (H pylori-ACAG). STUDY DESIGN: Symptomatic patients with H pylori-ACAG (n=31) were randomly assigned into two groups: (1) patients infected with H pylori who were treated with triple eradication therapy (n = 16); and (2) patients infected with H pylori who were treated with symptomatic therapy (n=15). RESULTS: After 1 year of follow-up, macroscopic appearance was significantly different in group B (P=.023), and chronic inflammation, H Pylori density, and activity were significantly higher in group B than in group A (P=.022, .007, and .002, respectively); however, we did not find a significant difference in the symptoms comparing both groups (P=.287). After 1 year of follow-up, we observed the persistence of the H pylori infection in all children who had not received eradication treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is no correlation between eradication of H pylori infection and improvement of dyspeptic symptoms. Self-eradication does not occur within 1 year of follow-up. A trend toward a higher rate of chronic inflammation in noneradicated children at 1 year limited the time of our study.


Subject(s)
Antacids/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gastritis/drug therapy , Gastritis/microbiology , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Aluminum Hydroxide/therapeutic use , Amoxicillin/therapeutic use , Breath Tests , Child , Child, Preschool , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Female , Humans , Magnesium Hydroxide/therapeutic use , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Urea
4.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 6(5): 556-60, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18378497

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with constipation frequently complain of dyspeptic symptoms that may be explained by reflex inhibition of upper-gastrointestinal motor activity by colonic stimuli. We sought to evaluate the following: (1) the prevalence of functional constipation (FC) and gastric emptying characteristics in children with functional dyspepsia (FD), and (2) the efficacy of osmotic laxatives on constipation, dyspeptic symptoms, and gastric motility. METHODS: We recruited 42 children (males/females, 22/20; mean age, 80.5 mo) affected by FD (Rome II criteria). All subjects underwent ultrasonographic measurement of the total gastric emptying time (TGEt) at baseline (T0) and after 3 months (T3). Children's bowel habits and the dyspeptic symptomatic score were evaluated at entry and after 1 (T1), 2 (T2), and 3(T3) months. Constipated patients were treated with osmotic laxatives for 3 months. Dyspeptic children without constipation represented the comparison group. RESULTS: FC was present in 28 of 42 (66.6%) patients. Constipated dyspeptic children had significantly more prolonged TGEt than subjects without constipation (median value [interquartile range], 180 (50) vs 150 (28) min, respectively; P = .004). Patients on osmotic laxatives had a significant decrease in TGEt at 3 months (P < .001). The median dyspeptic symptomatic score as well as the number and consistency of evacuations per week significantly improved at T1 in comparison with T0 and even more at T2 and T3 (P < .001, for each). CONCLUSIONS: In our study group, the majority of children with FD were affected by FC associated with delayed gastric emptying. Normalization of bowel habit may improve gastric emptying as well as dyspeptic symptoms.


Subject(s)
Constipation/drug therapy , Dyspepsia/drug therapy , Gastric Emptying/physiology , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Laxatives/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Constipation/diagnosis , Constipation/epidemiology , Dyspepsia/diagnosis , Dyspepsia/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastric Emptying/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Motility/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Transit , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
5.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 102(6): 1291-7, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17319927

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of acid-suppressive maintenance therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in children, after the healing of reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Forty-eight children (median age 105 months, range 32-170) with erosive reflux esophagitis were initially treated with omeprazole 1.4 mg/kg/day for 3 months. Patients in endoscopic remission were assigned in a randomized, blinded manner by means of a computer-generated list to three groups of 6-month maintenance treatment: group A (omeprazole at half the starting dose, once daily before breakfast), group B (ranitidine 10 mg/kg/day, divided in two doses), and group C (no treatment). Endoscopic, histological, and symptomatic scores were evaluated at: T0, enrollment; T1, assessment for remission at 3 months after enrollment (healing phase); T2, assessment for effective maintenance at 12 months after T0 (3 months after the completion of the maintenance phase). Relapse was defined as the recurrence of macroscopic esophageal lesions. After the completion of the maintenance phase, patients without macroscopic esophagitis relapse were followed up for GERD symptoms for a further period of 30 months. RESULTS: Of 48 initially treated patients, 46 (94%) healed and entered the maintenance study. For all patients, in comparison to T0, the histological, endoscopic, and symptomatic scores were significantly reduced both at T1 and T2 (P<0.0001, for each). No significant difference was found in these three scores, comparing group A, B, and C at T1 and T2. A relapse occurred in one patient only, who presented with macroscopic esophageal lesions at T2. Three months after the completion of the maintenance phase, 12 (26%) patients complained of symptoms sufficiently mild to discontinue GERD therapy, excluding the patient who showed macroscopic esophagitis relapse. Three of 44 (6.8%) patients reported very mild GERD symptoms within a period of 30 months after maintenance discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Our pediatric population showed a low rate of erosive esophagitis relapse and GERD symptom recurrence long term after healing with omeprazole, irrespective of the maintenance therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Esophagitis, Peptic/drug therapy , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Ranitidine/administration & dosage , Ranitidine/therapeutic use , Recurrence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...