Multimodal imaging and electrophysiological study in the differential diagnosis of rest tremor.

Introduction: Distinguishing tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (tPD) from essential tremor with rest tremor (rET) can be challenging and often requires dopamine imaging. This study aimed to differentiate between these two diseases through a machine learning (ML) approach based on rest tremor (RT) electrophysiological features and structural MRI data. Methods: We enrolled 72 patients including 40 tPD patients and 32 rET patients, and 45 control subjects (HC). RT electrophysiological features (frequency, amplitude, and phase) were calculated using surface electromyography (sEMG). Several MRI morphometric variables (cortical thickness, surface area, cortical/subcortical volumes, roughness, and mean curvature) were extracted using Freesurfer. ML models based on a tree-based classification algorithm termed XGBoost using MRI and/or electrophysiological data were tested in distinguishing tPD from rET patients. Results: Both structural MRI and sEMG data showed acceptable performance in distinguishing the two patient groups. Models based on electrophysiological data performed slightly better than those based on MRI data only (mean AUC: 0.92 and 0.87, respectively; p = 0.0071). The top-performing model used a combination of sEMG features (amplitude and phase) and MRI data (cortical volumes, surface area, and mean curvature), reaching AUC: 0.97 ± 0.03 and outperforming models using separately either MRI (p = 0.0001) or EMG data (p = 0.0231). In the best model, the most important feature was the RT phase. Conclusion: Machine learning models combining electrophysiological and MRI data showed great potential in distinguishing between tPD and rET patients and may serve as biomarkers to support clinicians in the differential diagnosis of rest tremor syndromes in the absence of expensive and invasive diagnostic procedures such as dopamine imaging.

Combined cortical thickness and blink reflex recovery cycle to differentiate essential tremor with and without resting tremor.

Objective: To investigate the performance of structural MRI cortical and subcortical morphometric data combined with blink-reflex recovery cycle (BRrc) values using machine learning (ML) models in distinguishing between essential tremor (ET) with resting tremor (rET) and classic ET. Methods: We enrolled 47 ET, 43 rET patients and 45 healthy controls (HC). All participants underwent brain 3 T-MRI and BRrc examination at different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 100-300 msec). MRI data (cortical thickness, volumes, surface area, roughness, mean curvature and subcortical volumes) were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images. We employed two decision tree-based ML classification algorithms (eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and Random Forest) combining MRI data and BRrc values to differentiate between rET and ET patients. Results: ML models based exclusively on MRI features reached acceptable performance (AUC: 0.85-0.86) in differentiating rET from ET patients and from HC. Similar performances were obtained by ML models based on BRrc data (AUC: 0.81-0.82 in rET vs. ET and AUC: 0.88-0.89 in rET vs. HC). ML models combining imaging data (cortical thickness, surface, roughness, and mean curvature) together with BRrc values showed the highest classification performance in distinguishing between rET and ET patients, reaching AUC of 0.94 ± 0.05. The improvement in classification performances when BRrc data were added to imaging features was confirmed by both ML algorithms. Conclusion: This study highlights the usefulness of adding a simple electrophysiological assessment such as BRrc to MRI cortical morphometric features for accurately distinguishing rET from ET patients, paving the way for a better classification of these ET syndromes.

Combined blood Neurofilament light chain and third ventricle width to differentiate Progressive Supranuclear Palsy from Parkinson's Disease: A machine learning study.

INTRODUCTION: Differentiating Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) from Parkinson's Disease (PD) may be clinically challenging. In this study, we explored the performance of machine learning models based on MR imaging and blood molecular biomarkers in distinguishing between these two neurodegenerative diseases. METHODS: Twenty-eight PSP patients, 46 PD patients and 60 control subjects (HC) were consecutively enrolled in the study. Serum concentration of neurofilament light chain protein (Nf-L) was assessed by single molecule array (SIMOA), while an automatic segmentation algorithm was employed for T1-weighted measurements of third ventricle width/intracranial diameter ratio (3rdV/ID). Machine learning (ML) models with Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost algorithms based on 3rdV/ID and serum Nf-L levels were tested in distinguishing among PSP, PD and HC. RESULTS: PSP patients showed higher serum Nf-L levels and larger 3rdV/ID ratio in comparison with both PD and HC groups (p < 0.005). All ML algorithms (LR, RF and XGBoost) showed that the combination of MRI and blood biomarkers had excellent classification performances in differentiating PSP from PD (AUC ≥0.92), outperforming each biomarker used alone (AUC: 0.85-0.90). Among the different algorithms, XGBoost was slightly more powerful than LR and RF in distinguishing PSP from PD patients, reaching AUC of 0.94 ± 0.04. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the usefulness of combining blood and simple linear MRI biomarkers to accurately distinguish between PSP and PD patients. This multimodal approach may play a pivotal role in patient management and clinical decision-making, paving the way for more effective and timely interventions in these neurodegenerative diseases.

Neuroimaging correlates of postural instability in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Postural instability (PI) is a common disabling symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD), but little is known on its pathophysiological basis. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to identify the brain structures associated with PI in PD patients, using different MRI approaches. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 142 PD patients and 45 control subjects. PI was assessed using the MDS-UPDRS-III pull-test item (PT). A whole-brain regression analysis identified brain areas where grey matter (GM) volume correlated with the PT score in PD patients. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) were also used to compare unsteady (PT ≥ 1) and steady (PT = 0) PD patients. Associations between GM volume in regions of interest (ROI) and several clinical features were then investigated using LASSO regression analysis. RESULTS: PI was present in 44.4% of PD patients. The whole-brain approach identified the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) as the only regions associated with the presence of postural instability. VBM analysis showed reduced GM volume in fronto-temporal areas (superior, middle, medial and inferior frontal gyrus, and STG) in unsteady compared with steady PD patients, and the GM volume of these regions was selectively associated with the PT score and not with any other motor or non-motor symptom. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant atrophy of fronto-temporal regions in unsteady PD patients, suggesting that these brain areas may play a role in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying postural instability in PD. This result paves the way for further studies on postural instability in Parkinsonism.

Neuroimaging correlates of postural instability in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the brain structures associated with postural instability (PI) in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP). METHODS: Forty-seven PSP patients and 45 control subjects were enrolled in this study. PI was assessed using the items 27 and 28 of the PSP rating scale (postural instability score, PIS). PSP patients were compared with controls using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). In PSP patients, LASSO regression model was used to investigate associations between VBM-based Region-Of-Interest grey matter (GM) volumes and different categories of the PSP rating scale. A whole-brain multi-regression analysis was also used to identify brain areas where GM volumes correlated with the PIS in PSP patients. RESULTS: VBM analysis showed widespread GM atrophy (fronto-temporal-parietal-occipital regions, limbic lobes, insula, cerebellum, and basal ganglia) in PSP patients compared with control subjects. In PSP patients, LASSO regression analysis showed associations of the right cerebellar lobules IV-V with ocular motor category score, and the left Rolandic area with bulbar category score, while the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was negatively correlated with the PIS. The whole-brain multi-regression analysis identified the right IFG as the only area significantly associated with the PIS. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, two different approaches demonstrated that the IFG volume was associated with PIS in PSP patients, suggesting that this area may play a role in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying PI. Our findings may have important implications for developing optimal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation protocols targeting IFG in parkinsonism with postural disorders.

Differentiating between common PSP phenotypes using structural MRI: a machine learning study.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating Progressive supranuclear palsy-Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS) from PSP-Parkinsonism (PSP-P) may be extremely challenging. In this study, we aimed to distinguish these two PSP phenotypes using MRI structural data. METHODS: Sixty-two PSP-RS, 40 PSP-P patients and 33 control subjects were enrolled. All patients underwent brain 3 T-MRI; cortical thickness and cortical/subcortical volumes were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images. We calculated the automated MR Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) and its second version including also the third ventricle width (MRPI 2.0) and tested their classification performance. We also employed a Machine learning (ML) classification approach using two decision tree-based algorithms (eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost] and Random Forest) with different combinations of structural MRI data in differentiating between PSP phenotypes. RESULTS: MRPI and MRPI 2.0 had AUC of 0.88 and 0.81, respectively, in differentiating PSP-RS from PSP-P. ML models demonstrated that the combination of MRPI and volumetric/thickness data was more powerful than each feature alone. The two ML algorithms showed comparable results, and the best ML model in differentiating between PSP phenotypes used XGBoost with a combination of MRPI, cortical thickness and subcortical volumes (AUC 0.93 ± 0.04). Similar performance (AUC 0.93 ± 0.06) was also obtained in a sub-cohort of 59 early PSP patients. CONCLUSION: The combined use of MRPI and volumetric/thickness data was more accurate than each MRI feature alone in differentiating between PSP-RS and PSP-P. Our study supports the use of structural MRI to improve the early differential diagnosis between common PSP phenotypes, which may be relevant for prognostic implications and patient inclusion in clinical trials.

Cortical involvement in essential tremor with and without rest tremor: a machine learning study.

INTRODUCTION: There is some debate on the relationship between essential tremor with rest tremor (rET) and the classic ET syndrome, and only few MRI studies compared ET and rET patients. This study aimed to explore structural cortical differences between ET and rET, to improve the knowledge of these tremor syndromes. METHODS: Thirty-three ET patients, 30 rET patients and 45 control subjects (HC) were enrolled. Several MR morphometric variables (thickness, surface area, volume, roughness, mean curvature) of brain cortical regions were extracted using Freesurfer on T1-weighted images and compared among groups. The performance of a machine learning approach (XGBoost) using the extracted morphometric features was tested in discriminating between ET and rET patients. RESULTS: rET patients showed increased roughness and mean curvature in some fronto-temporal areas compared with HC and ET, and these metrics significantly correlated with cognitive scores. Cortical volume in the left pars opercularis was also lower in rET than in ET patients. No differences were found between ET and HC. XGBoost discriminated between rET and ET with mean AUC of 0.86 ± 0.11 in cross-validation analysis, using a model based on cortical volume. Cortical volume in the left pars opercularis was the most informative feature for classification between the two ET groups. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated higher cortical involvement in fronto-temporal areas in rET than in ET patients, which may be linked to the cognitive status. A machine learning approach based on MR volumetric data demonstrated that these two ET subtypes can be distinguished using structural cortical features.

Cortical atrophy distinguishes idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus from progressive supranuclear palsy: A machine learning approach.

INTRODUCTION: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) share several clinical and radiological features, making the differential diagnosis challenging. In this study, we aimed to differentiate between these two diseases using a machine learning approach based on cortical thickness and volumetric data. METHODS: Twenty-three iNPH patients, 50 PSP patients and 55 control subjects were enrolled. All participants underwent a brain 3T-MRI, and cortical thickness and volumes were extracted using Freesurfer 6 on T1-weighted images and compared among groups. Finally, the performance of a machine learning approach with random forest using the extracted cortical features was investigated to differentiate between iNPH and PSP patients. RESULTS: iNPH patients showed cortical thinning and volume loss in the frontal lobe, temporal lobe and cingulate cortex, and thickening in the superior parietal gyrus in comparison with controls and PSP patients. PSP patients only showed mild thickness and volume reduction in the frontal lobe, compared to control subjects. Random Forest algorithm distinguished iNPH patients from controls with AUC of 0.96 and from PSP patients with AUC of 0.95, while a lower performance (AUC 0.76) was reached in distinguishing PSP from controls. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a more severe and widespread cortical involvement in iNPH than in PSP, possibly due to the marked lateral ventricular enlargement which characterizes iNPH. A machine learning model using thickness and volumetric data led to accurate differentiation between iNPH and PSP patients, which may help clinicians in the differential diagnosis and in the selection of patients for shunt procedures.

Magnetic Resonance Planimetry in the Differential Diagnosis between Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

The clinical differential diagnosis between Parkinson's disease (PD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is often challenging. The description of milder PSP phenotypes strongly resembling PD, such as PSP-Parkinsonism, further increased the diagnostic challenge and the need for reliable neuroimaging biomarkers to enhance the diagnostic certainty. This review aims to summarize the contribution of a relatively simple and widely available imaging technique such as MR planimetry in the differential diagnosis between PD and PSP, focusing on the recent advancements in this field. The development of accurate MR planimetric biomarkers, together with the implementation of automated algorithms, led to robust and objective measures for the differential diagnosis of PSP and PD at the individual level. Evidence from longitudinal studies also suggests a role of MR planimetry in predicting the development of the PSP clinical signs, allowing to identify PSP patients before they meet diagnostic criteria when their clinical phenotype can be indistinguishable from PD. Finally, promising evidence exists on the possible association between MR planimetric measures and the underlying pathology, with important implications for trials with new disease-modifying target therapies.