Using a Trigger Tool to Assess Adverse Drug Events in a Children's Rehabilitation Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Some of the most common actions after an adverse drug event (ADE) have been carefully listed, studied, and described as "triggers." Trigger-based tools for finding and evaluating ADEs have been validated in varied patient populations. A recent article described the frequency and severity of ADEs in hospitalized children in tertiary care children's hospitals. Our objective was to discover whether children in a pediatric rehabilitation setting are at higher risk for ADEs because of polypharmacy, or at a lower risk because of relative overall clinical stability. METHODS: A pediatric inpatient trigger tool was used in 3 groups of children hospitalized in a pediatric rehabilitation setting. ADE frequencies and patient characteristics were compared with values from a multicenter study using the same tools in pediatric tertiary care hospitals. Changes in ADE frequency over time were assessed (2005, n=20; 2006, n=20; 2008, n=19). RESULTS: No serious ADEs were newly discovered using the trigger tool. Nearly all of the ADEs (16 of 17) discovered by the trigger tool had not been voluntarily reported to the hospital's event reporting program. ADE frequencies expressed per patient were higher than those seen in tertiary care children's hospitals. Longer lengths of stay resulted in lower ADE frequencies when expressed per day. ADE frequency increased in the institution over time, reflecting increases in the acuity and complexity of patients cared for at this facility. Many ADEs affected bowel frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic chart review using a trigger tool discovered ADEs that had not been voluntarily reported or evaluated. ADEs in pediatric rehabilitation patients occurred less often than those in tertiary pediatric care when expressed as rates per day, but were more frequent when expressed per patient or per medication. Types and severity of ADEs in pediatric rehabilitation can guide monitoring and attention to specific areas of care.

Sucrose analgesia: identifying potentially better practices.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to review the use of oral sucrose for procedural pain management in NICUs, develop potentially better practice guidelines that are based on the best current evidence, and provide ideas for the implementation of these potentially better practices. METHODS: A collaboration of 12 centers of the Vermont Oxford Network worked together to review the strength of the evidence, clinical indications, dosage, administration, and contraindications and identify potential adverse effects for the use of sucrose analgesia as the basis of potentially better practices for sucrose analgesia guidelines. Several units implemented the guidelines. RESULTS: Through reviews and inputs from all centers of the evidence, consensus was reached and guidelines that included indication, dosage per painful procedure, age-related dosage over 24 hours, method of delivery, and contraindications were developed. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines now are available from a consensus group, and suggestions for implementation of guidelines, based on implementation of other pain management strategies, were developed.

Evaluation and development of potentially better practices to prevent chronic lung disease and reduce lung injury in neonates.

OBJECTIVE: Despite increased knowledge and improving technology, chronic lung disease (CLD) rates in extremely low birth weight infants have remained constant for 20 years. One reason for this is an ineffective translation of research-proven improvements into practice. The Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative Year 2000 (NIC/Q 2000) was created to provide participating nurseries the tools necessary to effect change. The objective of this study was to develop and implement a process that uses quality improvement techniques to collaboratively improve CLD rates. METHODS: Nine member hospitals of the NIC/Q 2000 collaborative formed a focus group aiming to decrease CLD rates. The focus group established goals and outcome measures, created a list of potentially better practices (PBPs) based on available literature, benchmarked and performed site visits, encouraged individual site implementation of PBPs, developed a database, and measured outcomes. RESULTS: The goal "decrease CLD rates in extremely low birth weight infants" was established. Nine PBPs were identified, and 57 PBPs were implemented by the 9 participating sites. Twelve site visits were conducted, and a 435-patient database of infants with a mean birth weight of 789 g was established. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative use of quality improvement techniques resulted in creation of a logical, efficient, and effective process to improve CLD rates. Group creation of PBPs, based on literature review and reinforced with site visits, internal data analysis, and improved individual site outcomes, resulted in accelerated and effective change, unlikely to occur if attempted outside of the collaborative.

Implementing potentially better practices to reduce lung injury in neonates.

OBJECTIVE: Adherence to basic quality improvement principles enhances the implementation of potentially better practices (PBPs) and requires extensive planning and education. Even after PBPs have been identified and acknowledged as desirable, effective implementation of these practices does not occur easily. The objective of this study was to identify and assess implementation strategies that facilitate quality improvements in the respiratory care of extremely low birth weight infants. METHODS: The 9 members of the Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative Year 2000 Reducing Lung Injury focus group identified 9 PBPs in a evidence-based manner to decrease chronic lung disease in extremely low birth weight newborns. Each site implemented several or all PBPs based on a site-specific selection process. Each site was asked to submit 1 or more examples of experiences that highlighted effective implementation strategies. This article reports these examples and emphasizes the principles on which they are based. RESULTS: The 9 participating institutions implemented a total of 57 PBPs (range: 1-9; median: 5). Including previous implementation, the 9 participating institutions implemented a total of 70 of a possible 81 PBPs before or during the study period (range: 5-9; median: 8). We report 7 approaches that facilitated PBP implementation: information availability, feedback, perseverance, collaboration, imitation, recognition of implementation complexity, and tracking of process indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement efforts are enhanced by identifying and then implementing PBPs. In our experience, implementation of these PBPs can be difficult. Implementation strategies, such as those identified in this article, can improve the chances that quality improvement efforts will be effective.