Psychological morbidity and problems of daily living in people with visual loss and diabetes: do they differ from people without diabetes?

AIMS: To examine psychological adjustment and changes in the activities of daily living in relation to visual loss in diabetes. METHODS: This was an incident cohort, longitudinal, observational study contrasting the adjustment of individuals with visual loss associated with diabetes and those whose visual loss arose from other conditions; in the year subsequent to registration for blindness and 12 months later, 124 individuals participated in the study (51 with diabetes and 73 without). Participants provided demographic and biomedical information, and completed the Brief COPE, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SF-36, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale and Social Avoidance and Distress Scale via interview. People with diabetes were compared with those without. RESULTS: Both diabetic and non-diabetic groups showed elevated and comparable levels of psychological morbidity, sustained over time. Significant differences in functional adjustment were found at initial interview: people with diabetes having more problems coping but these were no longer present 1 year later. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant and enduring elevation of anxiety and depression in those who were newly registered blind or visually handicapped. Taking these findings into account, psychological assessment should be developed for all those experiencing visual loss.

What is the prevalence of visual impairment in the general and diabetic populations: are there ethnic and gender differences?

AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of blindness and partial sight in the general and diabetic populations and to measure the impact of ethnicity and gender on these rates. METHODS: Data on visual impairment in the population to be studied was obtained from the Royal Leicestershire Rutland and Wycliffe Society for the Blind (RLRWSB). Using the validated technique of capture-mark-recapture (CMR), a census day was set and data from four sources collected: hospital admissions data, GP returns, wards, and mass media. Computer cross-linkage to Leicestershire Health Authority data ensured patients were alive and resident in Leicestershire at the census date. Estimates of diabetes, ethnicity and gender prevalence were calculated using the 1991 census. RESULTS: CMR calculations revealed that there was under ascertainment of visual impairment in the RLRWSB data. The CMR calculations with direct age standardization estimate the prevalence of blindness and partial sight in the general and diabetic populations to be 51.8/10 000 (CI 50.6-53.0) and 148.8/10 000 (CI 122.1-175.5), respectively. In the diabetic population there was a higher proportion of visually impaired females than males (P < 0.05), with no overall ethnic differences; however, rates were lower than expected in female Indo-Asians. In the general population there was a higher proportion of visually impaired Indo-Asian people (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown the prevalence of visual impairment in both the general and diabetic populations and has demonstrated both ethnic and gender differences. CMR allows the calculation of prevalence of blindness and partial sight from existing data. When comparing the prevalence of visual impairment, whether from diabetes or other causes, it is important to know the gender and ethnicity of the 'at risk' population, as well as the rates in the background population.

Comparative incidence of Type I diabetes in children aged under 15 years from South Asian and White or Other ethnic backgrounds in Leicestershire, UK, 1989 to 1998.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Estimates of incidence of Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in childhood populations vary around the world. This study aimed to estimate and compare the incidence of Type I diabetes in Leicestershire of children of South Asian and White or Other ethnic backgrounds. METHODS: All new cases of childhood-onset Type I diabetes diagnosed before 15 years of age in Leicestershire during the period 1989-98 were studied. Population data for Leicestershire from the 1991 census was used. Ethnicity was assigned to all children in the study according to their surnames. Incidence rates (95%-Confidence limits) for the South Asian and white or other ethnic group were estimated and compared. RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, 46 South Asian children and 263 children who were white or from another ethnic group fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. Crude incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were 19.2 (12.0, 29.1) girls and 20.3 (13.0, 30.3) boys for South Asians and 17.7 (14.8, 21.1) girls and 17.7 (14.8, 20.9) boys for whites/others. Age and sex-specific rates were higher for South Asians over 5 years of age but differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Type I diabetes incidence rates for South Asian children in Leicestershire were very similar to those for children who were in the white/other ethnic group, in contrast to very low rates reported from Asia. The convergence of rates for South Asians with other ethnic groups in Leicestershire suggests that environmental factors are more important than genetic predisposition in causing Type I diabetes in people of South Asian ethnic background.

Screening for Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK Indo-Asian population.

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has a high prevalence in Asian subjects. A simple method of screening using self-testing for postprandial glycosuria achieved a good response rate and a sensitivity which compared favourably to more expensive and invasive methods in a semirural Caucasian population. We examined its effectiveness in Asian subjects. METHODS: Caucasian and Indo-Asian subjects aged 35-70 years in two general practices in Leicester (n=9896 (6198=Asian subjects, 3698=Caucasian)) were screened. Those known to have diabetes were excluded. Subjects were asked to self-test for glycosuria 1 h after their main meal. Instruction and response cards were translated in Punjabi and Gujarati and sent to the Asian subjects, depending on age and surname. RESULTS: Response rate was 34.4% in Asian subjects compared to 54.0% in Caucasian subjects. Prevalence of glycosuria was 8.2% in Asian subjects and 3.2% in Caucasian subjects. Two hundred and thirty-nine subjects recorded glycosuria and 202 (84.5% of the total, 86.9% of Asian subjects, 78.1% of Caucasian) attended for oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Sixty-three (31.2%) were found to have diabetes (46, 73% Asian), 29 (14.4%) impaired glucose tolerance (24, 82.8% Asian) and 110 (54.4%) normal glucose tolerance (82, 74.6% Asian). Thus 30% of Asian subjects and 34% of Caucasian subjects had diabetes on OGTT. The prevalence of diabetes in 35-70 years in the total population after screening was 5.6% (6.8% in Asian subjects, 3.6% in Caucasian) and in the screened population was 12.7% (17.9% in Asian subjects, 6.3% in Caucasian). CONCLUSIONS: Screening for diabetes using this method, in terms of response rate, is not as effective in a large city setting, particularly in the Asian population. However, the yield of diabetes in the age group 35-64 years compares well to much more expensive and labour intensive approaches and its use in this population in a primary care setting is justified.

Trends in mortality of childhood-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Leicestershire: 1940-1991.

The relative risk of death by calendar date of diagnosis was investigated in a population-based incident cohort of 845 (463 males:382 females) IDDM diagnosed in Leicestershire before the age of 17 years between 1940 and 1989. The mortality status of 844 (99.9%) patients was determined as of the 31 December 1991, representing 14,346 person-years of risk. Trends in relative risk of death were investigated using Cox proportional hazards modelling for within cohort comparisons and age/sex and calendar time adjusted standardized mortality ratios (SMR) using generalized linear modelling for external comparisons. Median age at diagnosis was 10 years (range 3 months to 16 years); median duration of diabetes 15 years (range 1-51 years). Forty-four patients had died (5.2%; median age at death 31 years, range 11-51 years). A further four patients died at presentation (within 24 h) from ketoacidosis and are excluded from all analyses. Calendar date of diagnosis was found to be an important predictor of mortality. Adjusting for attained age there was evidence of a decline in relative risk of death with calendar date of diagnosis of 3.4% (95% CI, 0.005-6.9%) per annum, equivalent to a 32% fall per decade (95% CI, 5-51%), or 84% (95% CI, 21-97) from 1940 to 1989. The data are consistent with a large fall in mortality between the 1940s and 1950s representing over 50% of the total reduction in mortality between 1940 and 1991. Neither sex nor age at diagnosis were significant predictors of mortality. Over the study period 1940-89 the SMR (male and female combined) fell from 981 (541-1556) to 238 (60-953) relative to the general population. This population-based study shows that the prognosis for Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus has improved markedly over the period 1940-1991.

Glucose tolerance during pregnancy in Asian women.

The present study was aimed at examining differences in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) between two ethnic populations (immigrant Asians and indigenous White Caucasians) residing in Leicester, U.K. The study was divided into two parts: to determine the prevalence of GDM and to determine the level at which glycaemia may impose a risk to the mother and the foetus. Of a total of 12,005 pregnancies (4561 Asian and 7444 White Caucasian), over a 3-year period, 314 (6.8%) Asian and 504 (6.7%) White Caucasian were given a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 28-32 weeks for indications of 'large for date' pregnancies, hydramnios, glycosuria, a history of previous abortions, stillbirths, congenital abnormalities or glucose intolerance, and family history of diabetes. Abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) was taken as a 2-h venous plasma glucose greater than or equal to 7.8 mmol/l which reverted to normal when formally tested during the puerperium (WHO criteria, 1985). AGT was found in 1.38% Asian and 0.87% White Caucasian pregnancies (P less than 0.01). This was further divided into impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (2-h value 7.8-11.1 mmol/l) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (2-h value greater than or equal to 11.1 mmol/l). IGT was found in 1.2% Asian and 0.84% White Caucasian pregnancies (P less than 0.01), and GDM in 0.18% and 0.02% respectively (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)