ABSTRACT
With the trend in open heart surgery toward normothermic bypass and warm blood cardioplegia, greater demand is being placed on the perfusionist to select an oxygenator that will perform safely and efficiently under a variety of conditions. While manufacturers report performance parameters for their products, the data is often not comparable due to widely differing conditions. Recent in vitro evaluation techniques employed to characterize membrane oxygenators do not simulate the actual oxygenator conditions observed during cardiopulmonary bypass. Biocompatibility and drug delivery are reported but comparisons of different oxygenator performance parameters are not completely addressed. We have designed a test circuit and an evaluation protocol to simultaneously characterize the performance of multiple oxygenators under identical conditions. The test circuit is designed to simulate clinical conditions and to evaluate gas exchange, blood path pressures, gas path pressures, and hemolysis. Previously reported studies have relied on a comparison of a single membrane oxygenator and a single bubble oxygenator. Our protocol will compare multiple membrane oxygenators, in vitro, under similar clinically relevant conditions. Such testing would be done prior to animal or clinical trials. Furthermore in vitro tests should be more reproducible and more discriminating than are ex vivo tests.
