Impact of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Lung Resection.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data showing the benefit of liposomal bupivacaine as part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in reducing opioid use in minimally invasive lobectomies. METHODS: A retrospective observational study compared three cohorts of patients undergoing lobectomies between January 2015 and December 2021. The control group neither received liposomal bupivacaine intraoperatively nor underwent an ERAS protocol. The liposomal bupivacaine cohort only received a nerve block, whereas the ERAS cohort received a nerve block intraoperatively and underwent an ERAS protocol. Primary outcome was post-operative opioid consumption. RESULTS: There were 433 patients in this study (n=87 for controls, n=138 for liposomal bupivacaine alone, and n=208 for ERAS/liposomal bupivacaine). There was a statistically significant difference in the amount of opioids used between the control (43 OME) and liposomal bupivacaine alone cohort (30.5 OME) (p<.001); between control vs. ERAS/liposomal bupivacaine cohort (17 OME) (p<.001); and between liposomal bupivacaine alone and ERAS/liposomal bupivacaine cohorts (p<.001). Hospital stay was not statistically different between the two groups of interest (3 days); however, hospital stay differed from the control (4 days). 30-day readmission was not significantly different between the 3 groups (p=.43). CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal bupivacaine alone as part of a larger ERAS protocol significantly reduced opioid use and hospitalization duration; however, the reduction in opioid use was much greater with incorporation of liposomal bupivacaine into an ERAS protocol rather than in isolation. Prospective studies are needed to determine reproducibility and applicability of liposomal bupivacaine for opioid use reduction in other US hospital systems.

Choice of intrapleural fibrinolytic agents in the treatment of adult complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema: Network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate use of intrapleural fibrinolytic agents in patients with complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema remains unclear, especially regarding the choice of fibrinolytic agents. We conducted a network meta-analysis comparing outcomes of intrapleural fibrinolytic agents in patients with complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through April 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated outcomes in patients with complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema who were treated with intrapleural fibrinolytic agents. The outcomes of interest were surgical requirements, bleeding, length of hospital stay, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Our analysis included 10 RCTs that enrolled 1085 patients treated with intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) (n = 138), TPA + deoxyribonuclease (DNase) (n = 52), streptokinase (n = 311), urokinase (n = 75), DNase (n = 51), or placebo (n = 458). The rates of surgical requirement were significantly lower with TPA and TPA + DNase than with placebo (risk ratio [RR]; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36 [0.14-0.97], p = 0.038, RR [95% CI] = 0.25 [0.08-0.78], p = 0.017, respectively). The risk of bleeding was higher with TPA + DNase than with placebo (RR [95% CI] = 10.91 [1.53-77.99], p = 0.017), as well as TPA and TPA + DNase than with urokinase (RR [95% CI] = 17.90 [1.07-299.44], p = 0.044, RR [95% CI] = 89.3 [2.88-2772.49], p = 0.010, respectively). All-cause mortality was similar among the groups. CONCLUSION: TPA and TPA + DNase reduced the rates of surgical requirement compared with placebo. However, TPA + DNase increased the risk of bleeding compared with placebo. Intrapleural agents for complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema should be selected with an individual risk assessment.

Implementation of Staging Guidelines in Early Esophageal Cancer: A Study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adoption and clinical impact of endoscopic resection (ER) in early esophageal cancer. BACKGROUND: Staging for early esophageal cancer is largely inaccurate. Assessment of the impact of ER on staging accuracy is unknown, as is the implementation of ER. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2608 patients captured in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database between 2015 and 2020. Patients with clinical T1 and T2 esophageal cancer without nodal involvement (N0) who were treated with upfront esophagectomy were included. Staging accuracy was assessed by clinical-pathologic concordance among patients staged with and without ER. We also sought to measure adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network staging guidelines for esophageal cancer staging, specifically the implementation of ER. RESULTS: For early esophageal cancer, computed tomography/positron emission tomography/endoscopic ultrasound (CT/PET/EUS) accurately predicts the pathologic tumor (T) stage 58.5% of the time. The addition of ER to staging was related to a decrease in upstaging from 17.6% to 10.8% ( P =0.01). Adherence to staging guidelines with CT/PET/EUS improved from 58.2% between 2012 and 2014 to 77.9% between 2015 and 2020. However, when ER was added as a staging criterion, adherence decreased to 23.3%. Increased volume of esophagectomies within an institution was associated with increased staging adherence with ER ( P =0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CT/PET/EUS for the staging of early esophageal cancer is accurate in only 56.3% of patients. ER may increase staging accuracy as it is related to a decrease in upstaging. ER is poorly utilized in staging of early esophageal cancer. Barriers to the implementation of ER as a staging modality should be identified and corrected.

The Impact of Age and Need for Emergent Surgery in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Observation of paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) may lead to emergent surgery for hernia-related complications. This study evaluated urgent or emergent repair outcomes to quantify the possible sequelae of failed conservative PEH management. METHODS: The impact of operative status (elective vs urgent or emergent) on perioperative mortality or major morbidity for patients who underwent hiatal hernia repair for a PEH diagnosis from 2012 to 2021 in the Society of Thoracic Surgery General Thoracic Surgery Database was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 2082 (10.9%) of 19,122 patients with PEHs underwent urgent or emergent repair. Patients undergoing nonelective surgery were significantly older than patients undergoing elective surgery (median age, 73 years [interquartile range, 63-82 years] vs 66 years [interquartile range, 58-74 years]) and had a lower preoperative performance score (P < .001). Nonelective surgical procedures were more likely to be performed through the chest or by laparotomy rather than by laparoscopy (20% vs 11.4%; P < .001), and they were associated with longer hospitalizations (4 days vs 2 days; P < .001), higher operative mortality (4.5% vs 0.6%; P < .001), and higher major morbidity (27% vs 5.5%; P < .001). Nonelective surgery was a significant independent predictor of major morbidity in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 2.06; P < .001). Patients more than the age of 80 years had higher operative mortality (4.3% vs 0.6%; P < 0.001) and major morbidity (19% vs 6.1%; P < .001) than younger patients overall, and these older patients more often had nonelective surgery (26% vs 8.6%; P < .001) CONCLUSIONS: The operative morbidity of PEH repair is significantly increased when surgery is nonelective, particularly for older patients. These results can inform the potential consequences of choosing watchful waiting vs elective PEH repair.

Radial head arthroplasty: a descriptive study of 970 patients in an integrated health care system.

BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is commonly performed for isolated comminuted radial head fractures and in conjunction with traumatic elbow instability. However, there is a paucity of literature directly describing the characteristics and outcomes of patients who undergo RHA in a community-based setting. We describe a cohort of 970 RHA performed in the California regions of a US integrated health care system over a 9-year period. Patient demographics, implant selection, 90-day acute postoperative events, and cumulative reoperation/revision rates are included. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary RHA were identified (2009-2017). Patient characteristics and demographics, including age, body mass index, gender, diabetes status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, primary diagnosis, and concomitant procedures were described. Crude cumulative revision and reoperation probabilities were calculated as 1 minus the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with follow-up time calculated as the time from the index RHA to revision/reoperation date for those with the outcome of interest and time from index RHA to censoring date (eg, date of death, health care termination, study end date [March 31, 2018]) for those without the outcome. Ninety-day postoperative incidence of emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, and mortality was calculated as the number of patients with the event of interest over the number of patients at risk. RESULTS: A total of 970 patients underwent primary unilateral RHA by 205 surgeons during the study period. Annual procedure volume increased from 53 procedures in 2009 to 157 procedures in 2017. More patients were female, without diabetes, and had an ASA classification of 1 or 2. Fracture was the predominant indication for RHA (98.4%) and more than half (54.3%) had concomitant procedures performed. Most implants were press fit (63.2%) over loose fit, and >90% were monopolar. Three-year cumulative revision and reoperation probabilities following RHA were 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.0%-8.5%) and 8.2% (95% CI = 6.5%-10.3%), respectively. Revisions and reoperations tended to occur within the first postoperative year. Of the 970 RHA patients, 83 (8.5%) had a 90-day ED visit, 58 (6.0%) had a 90-day readmission, and 1 (0.1%) died within a 90-day postoperative period. CONCLUSION: This large cohort of RHA patients provides information about the practice of RHA at large and in the community. Surgeons are performing more RHA over time and choosing press fit stems more often. Revisions and reoperations tended to occur early. Readmission and ED visits were low but not negligible, with pain being the most common reason for ED visit.

Conversion to Thoracotomy During Thoracoscopic vs Robotic Lobectomy: Predictors and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Conversion to thoracotomy during minimally invasive lobectomy for lung cancer is occasionally necessary. Differences between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) lobectomy conversion have not been described. METHODS: We queried The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Patients with prior thoracic operations and metastatic disease were excluded. Univariable comparisons with χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed. RESULTS: There were 27,695 minimally invasive lobectomies from 269 centers. Conversion to thoracotomy occurred in 11.0% of VATS and 6.0% of RATS (P < .001). Conversion was associated with increased mortality (P < .001), major complications (P < .001), and intraoperative (P < .001) and postoperative (P < .001) blood transfusions. Conversion from RATS occurred emergently (P < .001) and for vascular injury (P < .001) more frequently than from VATS, but there was no difference in overall major complications or mortality. Mortality after conversion was 3.1% for RATS and 2.2% for VATS (P = .24). Clinical cancer stage II or III (P < .001), preoperative chemotherapy (P = .003), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = .006), body mass index (P < .001), and left-sided resection (P = .0002) independently predicted VATS conversion. For RATS clinical stage III (P = .037), left-sided resection (P = .041), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = .002) predicted conversion. Lower volume centers had increased rates of conversion (P < .001) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from minimally invasive to open lobectomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conversion occurs more frequently during VATS compared with RATS, albeit less often emergently, and with similar rates of overall mortality and major complications. Predictors, urgency, and reasons for conversion differ between RATS and VATS lobectomy and may assist in patient selection.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2021 Update on Outcomes and Research.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD) remains the largest and most robust thoracic surgical database in the world. Participating sites receive risk-adjusted performance reports for benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives. The GTSD also provides several mechanisms for high-quality clinical research using data from 271 participant sites and nearly 720,000 procedures since its inception in 2002. Participant sites are audited at random annually for completeness and accuracy. During the last year and a half, the GTSD Task Force continued to refine the data collection form, ensuring high-quality data while minimizing data entry burden. In addition, the STS Workforce on National Databases has supported robust GTSD-based research program, which led to 10 scholarly publications in 2020. This report provides an update on outcomes, volume trends, and database improvements as well as a summary of research productivity resulting from the GTSD over the preceding year.

Diltiazem Does Not Prevent Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower rates of adverse events compared to thoracotomy. Despite this, postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs in at least 10% of patients. Our objective is to determine if prophylaxis with diltiazem significantly reduced POAF events. METHODS: Patients without prior history of atrial fibrillation who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy from 2007 to 2016 at one institution were analyzed in a retrospective cohort study utilizing a prospective database. Patients treated from 2007 to 2012 received no prophylaxis. Patients treated after 2012 received diltiazem postoperatively. All patients were monitored with continuous telemetry postoperatively. Multivariate direct logistic regression was performed to determine independent predictors of POAF. We report adjusted odds ratios and accompanying 95% confidence intervals, with P < 0.05 denoting statistical significance. RESULTS: The final regression model included 416 patients (52 with POAF, 364 without). In univariate analysis, the variables of body mass index and history of congestive heart failure, diabetes, or hypertension, and prophylaxis status did not meet inclusion criteria. Age, gender, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack, and vascular disease were included. Only ages 65 to 74 (P = 0.03) and ≥75 (P = 0.02), compared to <65, were statistically significant predictors of POAF. Adjusted odds ratios of ages 65 to 74 and ≥75 were 2.88 and 2.62, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diltiazem prophylaxis did not significantly reduce POAF incidence following thoracoscopic lobectomy. Further study is warranted since POAF remains an unwanted source of morbidity and cost for lobectomy patients.

Characteristics of Rotator Cuff Repairs Revised to Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Successful repair of a torn rotator cuff may prevent progression to rotator cuff arthropathy. However, previous studies have shown a substantial rate of failure after rotator cuff repair and characteristics of surgically repaired rotator cuffs that go on to shoulder arthroplasty have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the patient characteristics and rate at which patients who underwent rotator cuff repair progressed to shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair in a large, closed healthcare system in 2008. The EMR was queried for rotator cuff repair CPT with ICD-9 codes for rotator cuff. The resultant dataset was then cross-referenced with a separate internal shoulder arthroplasty registry to determine which patients went onto shoulder arthroplasty. Demographic variables, descriptors of tear pathology and repair characteristics were collected and compared between patients who subsequently underwent shoulder arthroplasty and those that did not. RESULTS: A total of 882 rotator cuff repair patients were included within this study. Of the initial 882 cuff repairs, there were 12 patients (1.4%) that went on to have arthroplasty. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty after rotator cuff repair were significantly older at time of surgery and had greater comorbidity burdens. Patients who ended up with shoulder arthroplasty had the procedure an average of 4.77 ± 3.28 (SD) years after rotator cuff repair, with 11 of 12 patients having a diagnosis of rotator cuff arthropathy at the time of shoulder replacement. CONCLUSION: In a closed system, tracking rotator cuff repairs over 9.1 years revealed a small number that went on to subsequent shoulder arthroplasty. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were significantly older and had greater comorbidity burdens than those who did not. Patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty usually either had shoulder arthroplasty within 1 year or after 5 years. Enhanced understanding of which patients may progress to arthroplasty may provide a better initial choice of operative intervention in those patients.

The impact of comprehensive air purification on patient duration of stay, discharge outcomes, and health care economics: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Infectious airborne and surface pathogens constitute a substantial and poorly explored source of patient subclinical illness and infections. With that in mind, a system of advanced air purification technology was designed to destroy the DNA and RNA of all bacteria, fungi, and viruses. This study compares the effects of advanced air purification technology versus high efficiency particulate air filtration with respect to certain metrics of health care economics and resource utilization at a large, community-based, urban hospital. Our hypothesis was that the use of the advanced air purification technology would decrease health care durations of stay, lead to fewer nonhome discharges, and decrease hospital charges. METHODS: After the installation of advanced air purification technology, 3 resultant air purification "zones" were established: zone C, a control floor with high efficiency particulate air filtration; zone B, a mixed high efficiency particulate air and advanced air purification technology floor; and zone A, a comprehensive advanced air purification technology remediation. This study included nonbariatric surgical patients admitted to any zone between December 2017 and December 2018, with reported case mix index on discharge. We analyzed hospital duration of stays, discharge destination, and hospital charges with adjustment for severity of illness using the case mix index. The likelihood of mortality, health care-associated infection, and readmission for each study zone was examined using logistic regression adjusting for case mix index, age, sex, and source of admission. RESULTS: The study included 1,002 patients across the 3 zones, with mean age of 55.8 years (53.7% female), average case mix index of 1.98, and mortality of 1.7%. Compared with zone C, patients in zones A and B demonstrated decreased hospital stays, a greater percentage of home discharges (86.5-87.8% vs 64.7%), and less hospital charges. In addition, logistic regression modeling performed on 999 study patients showed that the likelihood of mortality, hospital-acquired infections, and readmissions did not differ among the 3 zones. A trend toward a lesser incidence of hospital-acquired infections was noted in zones A and B (0.40% and 0.48%, respectively) when compared with zone C (0.63%). CONCLUSION: Patients in the advanced air purification technology zones demonstrated statistically significant improvements in durations of stay, discharge to home, and costs after adjusting for case mix index. In addition, a trend toward fewer hospital-acquired infections in advanced air purification technology zones was noted. These findings suggest that environmental factors may affect key clinical and economic outcomes, supporting further research in this important and largely unexplored area.

The association between glenoid component design and revision risk in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a proven treatment for glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis, with superior results compared with hemiarthroplasty. However, glenoid component loosening remains a problem and is one of the most common causes of failure in TSA. Multiple component designs have been developed in an attempt to reduce loosening rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk of revision after anatomic TSA according to the glenoid component design. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study including patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary elective TSA for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2017. Patients with missing implant information, who received stemless humeral implants, or who received augmented glenoid implants, were excluded. Glenoid component designs used were categorized into 4 mutually exclusive treatment groups: polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth, polyethylene-metal hybrid, polyethylene all-cemented pegged, and polyethylene cemented keeled. Multivariable competing risk regression was used to evaluate the risk of glenoid loosening as a cause-specific revision by the glenoid component design. RESULTS: Of the 5566 TSA included in the final cohort, 39.2% of glenoid implants were polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth, 31.1% were polyethylene-metal hybrid, 26.0% were polyethylene all-cemented pegged, and 3.6% were polyethylene cemented keeled. At 6-year final follow-up, 4.1% of TSA were revised for any cause, and 1.4% for glenoid loosening. Compared with the polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth design, no difference in glenoid loosening revision risk was observed for the polyethylene-metal hybrid design (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-3.20). However, both the polyethylene all-cemented pegged (HR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.08-5.66) and polyethylene cemented keeled (HR = 3.84, 95% CI = 1.13-13.00) designs had higher risks for revision due to glenoid loosening. CONCLUSIONS: We observed glenoid component designs to be associated with differential risks in revision due to glenoid loosening with polyethylene all-cemented pegged glenoids and polyethylene cemented keeled glenoids having higher risks when compared with polyethylene central-pegged ingrowth glenoids. Surgeons may want to consider the glenoid component design when performing anatomic TSA.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2020 Update on Outcomes and Research.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD) remains the largest and most robust thoracic surgical database in the world. The GTSD provides participant sites with risk-adjusted performance reports for benchmarking and facilitates quality improvement initiatives. In addition the GTSD provides several mechanisms for high-quality research using data from over 283 participant sites and nearly 620,000 procedures since its inception in 2002. Participant sites are audited at random annually to ensure continued completeness and accuracy of the GTSD. In 2020 the GTSD migrated to a cloud-based interactive data platform, and the Task Force continues to refine the data collection form to decrease data entry burden while maintaining data quality, granularity, and relevance. This report provides an update on outcomes, volume trends, and database improvements as well as a summary of research productivity resulting from the GTSD over the preceding year.

Risk Factors for Re-Revision Surgery in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Revision shoulder arthroplasty is an expensive undertaking with notable morbidity to the patient and less predictable outcomes. Therefore, it is important to avoid even further surgery in these patients. We sought to report the annual revision burden from a large integrated healthcare system and identify patient and operative factors that may predispose patients to revision failure, necessitating further surgery. METHODS: Annual revision burden as a proportion of the overall shoulder arthroplasties performed from 2005 to 2017 was obtained. Patients who underwent aseptic revision between 2005 and 2017 comprised the study sample. Patient characteristics evaluated for re-revision risk included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, and diabetes status, whereas surgical characteristics included surgeon cumulative revision volume, revision procedure type, and top reason for revision by primary procedure type. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between the specified factors and re-revision risk. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2017, revisions represented 5.3% to 7.8% of all shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed. Factors associated with re-revision surgery risk by procedure type included increasing BMI and hemiarthroplasty revision procedure compared with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) revision procedure for hemiarthroplasty primaries; diabetes, revision because of instability, and lower cumulative surgeon revision procedure volume for RTSA primaries; and TSA revision procedure compared with RTSA revision procedure for TSA primaries. CONCLUSION: The annual revision shoulder arthroplasty volume increased over the study period. Patient factors, including BMI and diabetes were associated with higher re-revision risks for hemiarthroplasty and RTSA primaries, respectively. RTSA revised for instability had a higher risk of re-revision compared with other indications. TSA and hemiarthroplasty requiring aseptic revision may be best treated with RTSA as opposed to another TSA or hemiarthroplasty. Further studies are needed to verify these findings and identify how the mechanism of failure may affect the procedure selection in the revision setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Revision Risk of Soft Tissue Allograft Versus Hybrid Graft After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: When a harvested hamstring autograft is deemed by the surgeon to be of inadequate diameter, the options include using the small graft, using another autograft from a different site, augmenting with an allograft (hybrid graft), using a different configuration of the graft (eg, 5- or 6-stranded), or abandoning the autograft and using allograft alone. A small graft diameter is associated with a higher revision risk, and using another autograft site includes added harvest-site morbidity; therefore, use of a hybrid graft or an allograft alone may be appealing alternative options. Revision risk for hybrid graft compared with soft tissue allograft is not known. PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk for aseptic revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a soft tissue allograft compared with ACLR using a hybrid graft in patients 25 years and younger. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Data from a health care system's ACLR registry were used to identify primary isolated unilateral ACLRs between 2009 and 2016 using either a hybrid graft (hamstring autograft with soft tissue allograft) or a soft tissue allograft alone. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate risk for aseptic revision after ACLR according to graft used after adjustment for age, allograft processing, tunnel drilling technique, and region where the primary ACLR was performed. RESULTS: The cohort included 2080 ACLR procedures; a hybrid graft was used for 479 (23.0%) ACLRs. Median follow-up time was 3.4 years (interquartile range, 1.8-5.1 years). The crude 2-year aseptic revision probability was 5.4% (95% CI, 4.3%-6.7%) for soft tissue allograft ACLR and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.3%-6.4%) for hybrid graft ACLR. After adjustment for covariates, soft tissue allograft ACLR had a higher risk of aseptic revision during follow-up compared with hybrid graft ACLR (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.21-3.31; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Soft tissue allografts had a 2-fold higher risk of aseptic revision compared with hybrid graft after ACLR. Future studies evaluating the indications for using hybrid grafts and the optimal hybrid graft diameter is needed.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score Rating for Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD) has developed composite quality measures for lobectomy and esophagectomy. This study sought to develop a composite measure including all resections for lung cancer. METHODS: The STS lung cancer composite score is based on 2 outcomes: risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. GTSD data were included from January 2015 to December 2017. "Star ratings" were created for centers with 30 or more cases by using 95% Bayesian credible intervals. The Bayesian model was performed with and without inclusion of the minimally invasive approach to assess the impact of approach on the composite measure. RESULTS: The study population included 38,461 patients from 256 centers. Overall operative mortality was 1.3% (495 of 38,461). The major complication rate was 7.9% (3045 of 38,461). The median number of nodes examined was 10 (interquartile range, 5 to 16); the median number of nodal stations sampled was 4 (interquartile range, 3 to 5). Positive resection margins were identified in 3.7% (1420 of 38,461). A total of 214 centers with 30 or more cases were assigned star ratings. There were 7 1-star, 194 2-star, and 13 3-star programs; 70.6% of resections were performed through a minimally invasive approach. Inclusion of minimally invasive approach, which was adjusted for in previous models, altered the star ratings for 3% (6 of 214) of the programs. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in the STS GTSD perform lung cancer resection with low morbidity and mortality. Lymph node data suggest that participants are meeting contemporary staging standards. There is wide variability among participants in application of minimally invasive approaches. The study found that risk adjustment for approach altered ratings in 3% of participants.

Perioperative Clindamycin Use in Penicillin Allergic Patients Is Associated With a Higher Risk of Infection After Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study determines whether infection rates differ between prophylactic antibiotic use for patients with or without penicillin allergy before shoulder arthroplasty surgery. METHODS: Seven thousand one hundred forty primary shoulder arthroplasties operated between 2005 and 2016 were identified. We compared deep surgical site infection risk of patients who received perioperative vancomycin alone (6.2%, N = 444) or clindamycin alone (7.1%, N = 508) for penicillin allergy versus patients who received cefazolin alone without penicillin allergy (86.7%, N = 6,188). RESULTS: Seventy deep infections (1.2% 5-year cumulative incidence) were observed. The most common organism was Cutibacterium acnes (39.4%, N = 27). Compared with patients treated with cefazolin, infection risk was not different for those treated with vancomycin (hazard ratio = 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 3.30, P = 0.8), but a higher risk of infection was identified for those treated with clindamycin alone (hazard ratio = 3.45, 95% confidence interval 1.84 to 6.47, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A higher risk of postoperative infection is found after prophylactic use of intravenous clindamycin antibiotic after shoulder arthroplasty. Vancomycin is preferred over clindamycin for patients with penicillin allergy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database 2019 Update on Outcomes and Quality.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD) remains the most robust thoracic surgical database in the world, providing participating institutions semiannual risk-adjusted performance reports and facilitating multiple quality improvement initiatives each year. In 2018, the STS GTSD Data Collection Form was substantially revised to acquire the most important variables with the least data manager burden. In addition, a composite quality measure for all pulmonary resections for cancer was developed, and the impact that minimally invasive approaches have on the model was assessed. The 2018 database audit found that the accuracy of the database remains high, ranging from 92.5% to 98.4%. In 2019, the STS GTSD Task Force plans to focus on increasing generalizability of the database, initiating esophagectomy outcome public reporting, and creating customizable real-time dashboards. This review summarizes all national aggregate outcome, quality measurement, and improvement initiatives from the STS GTSD over the past 12 months.

The increasing role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder is a well established treatment for proximal humerus fractures not amenable to open reduction internal fixation. However, orthopedic surgeons have recently increased utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in the treatment of these injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of hemiarthroplasty and RTSA between 2009 and 2016 for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures within a large United States integrated healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted using our integrated healthcare system's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. Shoulder arthroplasty cases performed for an acute proximal humerus fracture between the years of 2009 and 2016 were identified. Revision rates were determined, as well as changes in age and gender distribution of the cohort during the study period. RESULTS: In 2015, RTSA utilization surpassed that of hemiarthroplasty for the first time in the healthcare system. The utilization of RTSA in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures increased from 4.5% of all arthroplasties in 2009 to 67.4% of arthroplasties in 2016. During the study period, patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty were younger and less likely to be female. Crude revision rate was 4.0% for hemiarthroplasty and 3.2% for RTSA. CONCLUSIONS: RTSA is increasingly being utilized for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures and now appears to be the treatment of choice. While hemiarthroplasty appears to be falling out of favor in the treatment of fractures of the shoulder, surgeons may still be preferentially using the procedure in younger patients.