Medical Students' Perceptions of Orthopedics as a Career for Women.

OBJECTIVES: To determine potential factors influencing female medical students' interest and subsequent application to orthopedics, and to evaluate female and male medical students' perceptions of women in the field of orthopedics. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved survey was distributed in March 2020 and subsequently in April 2022 to medical students in the classes of 2023 and 2024 at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture. An e-mail link to the REDCap survey was sent to students across the southeast region of the United States, followed by three reminder e-mails. All 25 allopathic medical schools in the southeastern United States with an Orthopedics Interest Group listed on their institution's Web site were invited to participate in the study. Nine Orthopedics Interest Group leaders interested in participating were asked to provide the researchers with a list of fourth-year medical students who attended an event hosted by that group (215). A total of 39 respondents who completed the survey were included in this study. RESULTS: Overall, the majority of students (n = 35, 90%) believed that women faced more barriers to a career in orthopedics than did men. The most significant barriers to women entering the field of orthopedics were the perceived expectations of an orthopedic surgeon (n = 34, 87%), difficulty balancing career and family (n = 28, 72%), and demanding schedule (n = 13, 33%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both male and female medical students believe there are significant additional barriers to success for women in the field. Study participants report that expectations set by physicians, other healthcare professionals, and patients contribute to creating greater barriers that deter medical students interested in orthopedics from ultimately applying to the specialty.

Pediatric Cranioplasty Patients With Hostile Reconstructive Environments: Split Calvarial Versus Prosthetic Implant.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric cranial defects can be preceded by prior infection, radiation therapy, failed prior cranioplasty, or cerebrospinal fluid leak, leading to a complex reconstructive environment. The primary aim of this study was to investigate differences in outcomes between pediatric patients with hostile reconstructive environments who received split-calvarial autologous grafts as opposed to prosthetic grafts in cranioplasty. METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of 51 patients younger than 18 years who underwent cranioplasty with a hostile setting between 1998 and 2020. Patients were then stratified into prosthetic (45%) and autologous groups (54%). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complication, defined as requirement of a subsequent surgery or revision. RESULTS: Overall, there were no significant differences in age, sex, type of hostile setting, etiology of cranial defect, or side of the cranial defect between the 2 groups. Complication rate among the 2 graft groups was 18%. However, there were no significant differences in complications, defined as infection, failure or resorption of the graft, wound breakdown or necrosis, resulting bone defect, or hematoma, between the 2 populations. There was a significant difference in etiology between patients with complications, with patients who required a cranioplasty due to previous hemicraniectomy being nearly 5 times as likely to face a complication ( P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, there was no significant difference observed in complications between prosthetic and split-thickness autologous grafts in pediatric patients with hostile settings. It does, however, seem that patients who had a previous hemicraniectomy are more likely to face complications as a result of cranioplasty.

The Association of Enhanced Recovery Pathway and Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury is associated with increased postoperative length of hospital stay and increases the risk of postoperative mortality. The association between the development of postoperative acute kidney injury and the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the relationship between the implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway and the development of postoperative acute kidney injury. DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery pathway were compared to a hospital historical National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colorectal registry of patients. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 1052 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 2012 through 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The development of postoperative acute kidney injury was the primary outcome measured. RESULTS: Patients undergoing an enhanced recovery pathway had significantly greater rates of postoperative acute kidney injury than patients not undergoing an enhanced recovery pathway (13.64% vs 7.08%; p < 0.01). Our adjusted model indicated that patients who underwent an enhanced recovery pathway (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.48-3.59; p < 0.01) had an increased risk of acute kidney injury. Patients who developed acute kidney injury in the enhanced recovery cohort had a significantly longer median length of stay than those who did not (median 4 (interquartile range, 4-9) vs 3 (interquartile range, 2-5) days; p=0.04). LIMITATIONS: This study did not utilize urine output as a modality for detecting acute kidney injury. Data are limited to a sample of patients from a large academic medical center participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Interventions or programs in place at our institution that aimed at infection reduction or other initiatives with the goal of improving quality were not accounted for in this study. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is independently associated with the development of postoperative acute kidney injury.See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B69. LA ASOCIACIÓN DE VÍA DE RECUPERACIÓN MEJORADA Y LESIÓN RENAL AGUDA EN PACIENTES DE CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL: La lesión renal aguda se asocia con una mayor duración en la estancia hospitalaria y aumenta el riesgo de la mortalidad postoperatoria. La asociación entre el desarrollo de la lesión renal aguda postoperatoria y la implementación de un protocolo de Recuperación Mejorada después de la cirugía, sigue sin ser clara.Examinar la relación entre la implementación de una vía de Recuperación Mejorada y el desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente, de pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal electiva, en una vía de Recuperación Mejorada, se comparó con el registro histórico de los pacientes colorrectales del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica.Universidad de Alabama en Birmingham, un centro de referencia terciario.Un total de 1052 pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva desde 2012 hasta 2016.Desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Los pacientes sometidos a una vía de Recuperación Mejorada, tuvieron tasas significativamente mayores de lesiones renales agudas postoperatorias, en comparación con los pacientes de Recuperación no Mejorada (13.64% vs 7.08%; p < 0.01). Nuestro modelo ajustado indicó que los pacientes que se sometieron a una vía de Recuperación Mejorada (OR, 2.31; IC, 1.48-3.59; p < 0.01) tuvieron un mayor riesgo de lesión renal aguda. Los pacientes que desarrollaron daño renal agudo en la cohorte de Recuperación Mejorada, tuvieron una estadía mediana significativamente más larga en comparación con aquellos que no [mediana 4 (rango intercuartil (RIC) 4-9) versus 3 (RIC 2-5) días; p = 0.04].Este estudio no utilizó la producción de orina como una modalidad para detectar daño renal agudo. Los datos se limitan a una muestra de pacientes de un gran centro médico académico, que participa en el Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica. Las intervenciones o programas implementados en nuestra institución, destinados a la reducción de infecciones u otras iniciativas, con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad, no se tomaron en cuenta para este estudio.La implementación de una Recuperación Mejorada después del protocolo de cirugía, se asocia independientemente con el desarrollo de lesión renal aguda postoperatoria.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B69. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz-Healy).