Polymyxin B Etest® compared with gold-standard broth microdilution in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae exhibiting a wide range of polymyxin B MICs.

OBJECTIVES: Polymyxins have been revitalized to combat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). However, evaluating the activity of these agents by traditional broth dilution methods is not practical for busy clinical laboratories. We compared polymyxin B activity using two quantitative susceptibility testing methods, Etest® and broth microdilution (BMD), against CRE isolates from patients at an academic medical centre. METHODS: Polymyxin B activity against 70 CRE clinical isolates was determined by Etest® according to the manufacturer and by BMD according to CLSI guidelines. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC® 27853 and Escherichia coli NCTC 13846 served as quality control strains. The EUCAST colistin susceptibility breakpoint of Enterobacteriaceae (≤2 mg/L) was used. Essential agreement was isolates with an MIC within 1 log2 dilution over total isolates. Categorical agreement was number of isolates in the same susceptibility category (susceptible or resistant) over total isolates. Major and very major error rates were calculated using number of susceptible and number of resistant isolates, respectively, as the denominator. McNemar's test was used for determining a difference in susceptibility between methods. RESULTS: The CRE isolates were primarily Klebsiella spp. (49%) and Enterobacter spp. (36%). Polymyxin B susceptibility was significantly higher by Etest® compared with BMD (97% versus 77%; p 0.0001). Categorical agreement was 80%, but essential agreement was low (10%). False non-susceptibility was never observed by Etest® (BMD reference), but the very major errors were high (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Etest® reporting of false susceptibility may result in inappropriate antibiotic use and treatment failure clinically. We do not recommend using Etest® for polymyxin B susceptibility testing for routine patient care.

Antibiotic cycling to decrease bacterial antibiotic resistance: a 5-year experience on a bone marrow transplant unit.

Multidrug-resistant pathogens have important effects on clinical outcomes. Antibiotic cycling is one approach to control anti-microbial resistance, but few studies have examined cycling in hematology-oncology units. Antibiotic cycling was implemented in January 1999 at our hematology-oncology unit, alternating piperacillin-tazobactam (pip-tazo) and cefepime in 3 months periods, until June 2004. Clinical isolates were compared in post- and pre-intervention periods and with the susceptibility among the solid organ transplant intensive care unit (TICU) isolates. The rate of Gram-negative isolates remained stable. Among Gram-negatives, susceptibility to cefepime and pip-tazo remained stable. There was an increase in Enterococcus spp. (P=0.007), and susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin decreased (odds ratio (OR): 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-0.89 and OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.09-0.58). Compared with the TICU, there was increased susceptibility to pip-tazo and cefepime among enterics (OR: 7.32, 95% CI: 4.44-12.07 and OR: 8.82, 95% CI: 2.1-37.13) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR: 4.27, 95% CI: 1.47-12.4 and OR: 4.61, 95% CI: 1.75-12.1) and decreased susceptibility to ampicillin and vancomycin among enterococci (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.63 and OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.26-0.56). Cycling was associated with preserved antibiotic susceptibility among Gram-negatives, but with an increase in Enterococcus spp. and vancomycin and ampicillin resistance among enterococci.

The contribution of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling with Monte Carlo simulation to the development of susceptibility breakpoints for Neisseria meningitidis.

This study used pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling and MICs of 15 antimicrobial agents, derived from testing a large international culture collection, to assist in the development of interpretative criteria, i.e., breakpoints, for Neisseria meningitidis. PK parameters, protein binding, percentage penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and the variability of these values, were extracted from the published literature for the 15 agents. PK-PD parameters have not been developed specifically for N. meningitidis in animal or human studies. Thus, it was necessary to invoke PK-PD targets from other organisms that cause infections at similar sites. The PK-PD targets utilised were: time above the MIC for at least 50% of the dosing interval for all beta-lactams, chloramphenicol, sulphafurazole and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole; an AUC/MIC ratio of >or=25 for the tetracyclines and macrolides; and an AUC/MIC ratio of >or=125 for the fluoroquinolones. A 10 000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was designed with the usual dosing regimens of each antimicrobial agent at MIC values of 0.03-64 mg/L in both serum and CSF. The PK-PD breakpoint was defined as the MIC at which the calculated target attainment was >or=95%. Using these assumptions, the proposed PK-PD breakpoints were: azithromycin, 0.125 mg/L; doxycycline, 0.25 mg/L; cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, 0.5 mg/L; penicillin G, meropenem, rifampicin, tetracycline and minocycline, 1 mg/L; chloramphenicol and sulphafurazole, 2 mg/L; and ampicillin, ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 4 mg/L. Proposed PK-PD breakpoints applicable to CSF were: penicillin and cefotaxime, 0.06 mg/L; rifampicin, 0.125 mg/L; ceftriaxone, meropenem and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 0.25 mg/L; ampicillin, 0.5 mg/L; and chloramphenicol, 1 mg/L.

Continuous infusion beta-lactams for intensive care unit pulmonary infections.

This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion beta-lactams against pulmonary isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients managed in intensive care units (ICUs) in the USA. Multiple 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations were performed by integrating pharmacokinetic data from healthy individuals with 2408 MICs from the 2002 Intensive Care Unit Surveillance System database. These pharmacodynamic simulations suggested that continuous infusion regimens of cefepime, aztreonam, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g have the greatest likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in the ICU. Beta-lactams are unlikely to achieve pharmacodynamic targets against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii when administered as monotherapy.

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: epidemiology, detection, and treatment.

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are extremely broad spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes found in a variety of Enterobacteriaceae. Most strains producing these beta-lactamases are Klebsiella pneumoniae, other Klebsiella species (i.e., K. oxytoca), and Escherichia coli. When producing these enzymes, organisms become highly effective at inactivating various beta-lactam antibiotics. In addition, ESBL-producing bacteria are frequently resistant to many classes of antibiotics, resulting in difficult-to-treat infections. Other problems due to ESBL-producing bacteria are difficulty in detecting the presence of ESBLs, limited treatment options, and deleterious impact on clinical outcomes. Clinicians should be familiar with the clinical significance of these enzymes and potential strategies for dealing with this growing problem.

Effect of removal of duplicate isolates on cumulative susceptibility reports.

The objective of our study is to assess the impact of different methods of duplicate isolate removal on cumulative susceptibility reports. Over a 1-year period, we studied the effect of 3 methods of duplicate isolate removal on the cumulative percentage susceptibility of 9 Gram-negative bacilli to 15 antimicrobials. Raw data from which no duplicate isolates were removed (NR) were generated by the Sensititre breakpoint susceptibility testing system. D3 and D7 were methods of duplicate isolate removal defined as follows: same patient, bacterial species, irrespective of susceptibility within either three (D3) or seven (D7) calendar days of the date of the previous culture. The third method evaluated was an algorithm utilized by Cerner, a laboratory management program that defines duplicate isolates as follows: same patient, bacterial species, and NCCLS susceptibility category to an individual antimicrobial. Differences in percentage susceptibility between the three methods of duplicate isolate removal and NR were assessed. The number of isolates studied ranged from 80 (E. aerogenes) to 681 (P. aeruginosa). Of the methods of duplicate isolate removal, the highest percentage susceptibility occurred most frequently with Cerner followed by D7 and D3. Differences in percentage susceptibility between methods of removal and NR ranged from -11 to 25%, -5 to 8%, and -3 to 10%, with Cerner, D3, and D7, respectively. The percentage susceptibility was at least 5% higher than NR with a method of removal for 15 individual organism/antimicrobial combinations in which susceptibility was > or = 70% by at least one of the methods. These occurred most frequently with Enterobacter species and Cerner. Although there is no consensus on the ideal method of duplicate isolate removal, one should be cognizant that these manipulations may produce different cumulative susceptibility reports.

Activity of piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by time-kill.

Pseudomonal infections have a high rate of morbidity and mortality, thus combination therapy is often recommended. We compared the activity of piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with amikacin, ciprofloxacin, or trovafloxacin at different concentrations against P. aeruginosa using time-kill methodology. MICs were determined for 4 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. Time-kill studies were conducted over 24 h. Each drug was tested alone and in combination using the following concentrations: 2 and 1/4, 1/4 and 2, and 1/4 and 1/4xMIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin, ciprofloxacin, or trovafloxacin. Combinations were classified as synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. Synergy was defined as > or = 2-log(10) decrease in CFU/mL at 24 h with the combination when compared to the most active single agent and the number of surviving organisms for the antimicrobial combination was > or =2-log(10) less than the initial inoculum. The MICs for piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin, ranged from 4/4-512/4, 0.5-4, 0.125-4, and 0.5-8 microg/mL, respectively. Fifty eight percent of the combinations using concentrations of 1/4xMIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and 2xMIC of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin or 2xMIC of piperacillin/tazobactam and 1/4xMIC of amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and trovafloxacin were synergistic. Although no differences existed in synergistic activity between the two combinations, the 1/4 and 2xMIC maintained colony counts below the limit of quantification for 24 h for a significantly greater percentage of isolates than the 2 and 1/4xMIC combinations (75 and 25%, respectively; p = 0.04). Overall, synergy was most frequently (42%) noted with the piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin combinations followed by 33 and 8% of the piperacillin/tazobactam and trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin combinations. No combination demonstrated antagonism. Further more extensive studies are necessary to determine clinical significance.

A comparison of dynamic characteristics of fluconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus neoformans using time-kill methodology.

This study evaluated the in vitro pharmacodynamics of fluconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus neoformans. MICs were determined for three clinical isolates according to NCCLS guidelines (M27). Time-kill studies were performed using antifungal concentrations of 0.25-32 x MIC and inocula of 10(3) and 10(5) CFU/ml. At predetermined time points over 72 hours, samples of each inoculum/drug combination were withdrawn and plated using a spiral plater. Colony counts were determined after incubation at 35 degrees C for 48 hours. Area under the kill curves (AUKCs) were plotted versus the AUC/MIC ratios. Inoculum effect was evaluated by calculating an estimated AUKC for the low inoculum then comparing it to the measured low inoculum using the unpaired Student's t-test. The MICs of fluconazole and itraconazole for isolate 97-1199, 97-1061, and 97-585 were 2, 4, 32 microg/ml and 0.03, 0.06, 0. 5 microg/ml, respectively. For amphotericin B, the MIC was 0. 25 microg/ml for each isolate. The triazoles demonstrated fungistatic activity against each isolate at both inocula with the exception of itraconazole against C. neoformans 97-585. Maximal suppression was noted at concentrations 8-16 x MIC correlating with an AUC/MIC of 192 for both inocula. Conversely, amphotericin B was fungicidal and displayed concentration-dependent activity against each isolate at both inocula. Maximal killing was observed at concentrations >4 x MIC for the low inoculum and >8 x MIC for the high inoculum for each isolate. No statistically significant differences were detected between the measured and estimated AUKCs for each antifungal agent. In conclusion, our results suggest that the triazoles were most effective against C. neoformans when concentrations were maintained at 8-16 x MIC. Amphotericin B, on the other hand, was concentration-dependent; thus, greater activity was exerted at higher concentrations.

Effect of macrolides as part of initial empiric therapy on medical outcomes for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the outcomes of hospitalized patients receiving a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin with or without a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). BACKGROUND: The initial treatment of CAP is usually based on empirically selected antibiotic therapy. The need for coverage of atypical pathogens in hospitalized patients is widely debated, and regional variations may exist. METHODS: All patients admitted to a community hospital or to a university hospital for 1 year who were aged > or =18 years and had a principal discharge diagnosis of pneumonia with no organism specified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification were evaluated. Each patient's medical chart was reviewed by a clinical pharmacist at each facility. The following information was collected for each patient using a standardized form: demographic characteristics, coexisting illnesses, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, antibiotic regimens, length of parenteral and oral therapy, laboratory and radiographic findings (ie, blood urea nitrogen, glucose, hematocrit, sodium, PO2, pH, and pleural effusion), physical examination results, and mortality. Patients treated with a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin with or without a macrolide were included in this analysis. Categoric variables were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients met the entry criteria and were treated with a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin with (116 patients) or without (97 patients) a macrolide. The mean (+/- SD) age of the patients was 62.2+/-19.6 years; 47% were male. The most common comorbid conditions were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Of the 116 patients who received a macrolide, the majority (66%) received erythromycin. Other macrolides used were clarithromycin (19%) and oral azithromycin (15%). There were no statistical differences between patients who did and did not receive a macrolide in terms of comorbid illnesses, length of hospital stay (5.2+/-2.8 vs 5.2+/-3.4 days, respectively), length of intravenous antibiotic therapy (4.4+/-2.5 vs 4.1+/-2.3 days, respectively), or mortality (0.9% vs 3.1%, respectively; P = 0.333). The only difference between the groups was in age. Those patients who received a macrolide were significantly younger than those who received only a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin (57.4+/-19.2 years vs 67.9+/-18.5 years; P < 0.001). However, when age and severity of illness were taken into account, no difference existed between the patients who received a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin alone or in combination with a macrolide. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the addition of a macrolide to a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin as initial therapy for the treatment of CAP may not be necessary. A randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing a nonpseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin alone and in combination with a macrolide is warranted.

Pharmacodynamics of fluconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against Candida albicans.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic activity of fluconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against Candida albicans. Susceptibilities were determined according to the NCCLS guidelines (M27). Time-kill studies were performed using antifungal concentrations of 0.25-32 x MIC. Samples were withdrawn at predetermined timepoints, then plated using a spiral plater. Colony counts were determined after incubation at 35 degrees C for 24 h. The AUKC(0-48) was plotted against the concentration/MIC ratio. Candida isolates (95-2672, 96-15, and 95-2542) were classified as susceptible, susceptible-dose dependent, and resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole (MIC = 0.25 and 0.03 microg/mL, 32 and 0.5 microg/mL, 64 and 1 microg/mL; respectively). All three isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B (MIC = 0.13 microg/mL). Fluconazole inhibited the growth of the susceptible and S-DD isolates and was ineffective at all concentrations against the resistant isolate. Itraconazole, on the other hand, inhibited growth of the susceptible isolate, but was ineffective for the S-DD and resistant isolates. Maximal effectiveness was noted at the concentration 8 x MIC and 2 x MIC for fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively. Amphotericin B demonstrated concentration-dependent antifungal activity. The times necessary for the colony counts to fall below the limit of quantification were inversely related to increasing concentrations of amphotericin B. The maximal effect for amphotericin B was recorded at 2 x MIC. In summary, the triazoles inhibit growth of susceptible C. albicans; however, careful consideration should be given to the MIC for S-DD isolates because itraconazole may not be active if the MIC is reported in the higher susceptible-dose dependency range. In reference to amphotericin B, optimal activity may be achieved by maximizing the peak drug concentration/MIC ratio.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime administered by intermittent and continuous infusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefepime administered by intermittent and continuous infusion against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, and Staphylococcus aureus. BACKGROUND: Because beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit time-dependent bactericidal activity and lack prolonged postantibiotic effects against many bacteria, the goal of therapy is to maintain serum drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the relevant pathogen over most of the dosing interval. Continuous infusion is a mode of drug administration that can provide serum drug concentrations continuously above the MIC for most bacterial pathogens. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled. Each received cefepime 2 g by intermittent bolus q12h and, on another day, was randomly assigned to receive 4 or 3 g administered by continuous infusion over 24 hours. RESULTS: For the intermittent regimen, the mean (+/- SD) pharmacokinetic findings were: maximum serum concentration, 112.9 +/- 21.1 microg/mL; minimum serum concentration, 1.3 +/- 0.5 microg/mL; and half-life, 2.6 +/- 0.4 hours. For the 3- and 4-g continuous infusion regimens, steady-state serum concentrations (C(SS)) were 13.9 +/- 3.8 and 20.3 +/- 3.3 microg/mL, respectively. MICs ranged from 2 to 4, 0.125 to 8, and 2 to 8 microg/mL against P. aeruginosa, E. cloacae, and S. aureus, respectively. For the intermittent regimen, serum inhibitory titers (SITs) at 24 hours were > or = 1:2 in 46% of subjects against P. aeruginosa, 48% against E. cloacae, and 2% against S. aureus. For both continuous infusion regimens, SITs for each organism were > or = 1:2 in all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The intermittent regimen maintained serum concentrations above the MIC for P. aeruginosa and E. cloacae in > or = 92% (11/12) of subjects for > or = 70% of the dosing interval, provided the MIC was < or = 4 microg/mL. Both continuous infusion regimens provided a C(SS) above the MIC for all organisms. However, the C(SS) was > or = 4 times the MIC only if the MIC was < or = 2 microg/mL. Only the 4-g regimen provided such concentrations against isolates with an MIC of 4 microg/mL, and neither regimen provided such concentrations when the MIC was 8 microg/mL. These findings should be applied in comparative clinical studies.

Pharmacodynamic principles of antimicrobial therapy in the prevention of resistance.

Pharmacodynamic properties can be used to divide antibiotics into two major classes based on their mechanism of bactericidal action: (1) concentration-dependent drugs, such as aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, and (2) concentration-independent drugs, including the beta-lactams. Antibiotics also differ in the postantibiotic effect (PAE) that they exert. In general, concentration-dependent drugs have a more prolonged PAE than concentration-independent drugs, particularly against Gram-negative pathogens. Pharmacodynamic classifications have important implications for the planning of drug regimens. For concentration-dependent drugs, peak concentration to minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratios of approximately 10 are associated with clinical success. Therefore, high drug levels should be the goal of therapy. This is best achieved by high doses taken once daily. This approach, however, is not feasible for the fluoroquinolones owing to dose-limiting CNS toxicity. Concentration-independent agents are most effective when the duration of serum concentrations is higher than the pathogen's MIC (time >MIC) for a significant proportion of the dosing interval. Frequent dosing or continuous infusions can increase the time >MIC. Concentrations of antibiotics that are sublethal can permit the emergence of resistant pathogens. Optimization of antibiotic regimens on the basis of pharmacodynamic principles could thus significantly diminish the emergence of antibiotic resistance.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aztreonam administered by continuous intravenous infusion.

The pharmacodynamic parameter that appears to correlate best with a successful therapeutic outcome with beta-lactam antibiotics is the length of time the serum antibiotic concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the infecting pathogen. By maximizing this parameter, continuous administration of beta-lactam and related antibiotics by intravenous infusion could represent the optimal mode of drug administration. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ceftazidime administered by continuous intravenous infusion have been evaluated previously. Aztreonam is a monobactam antibiotic with similar pharmacokinetic and microbiologic activity to that of ceftazidime. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of aztreonam administered as a continuous intravenous infusion in healthy volunteers against multiple clinical isolates. Five men and 3 women received 6 g of aztreonam administered by continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours. Blood samples were collected before the infusion and at 0.5, 1 through 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours after the start of the infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by standard equations. In vitro susceptibility testing was performed using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines for 4 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacteria (2 each of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Serum inhibitory titers (SITs) were determined in duplicate for each clinical isolate at 0 and 24 hours. The subjects' mean (+/- SD) age was 29.3+/-4.4 years; mean weight, 74.6+/-14.0 kg; and calculated mean creatinine clearance, 107+/-13 mL/min. For the pharmacokinetic parameters, mean (+/- SD) values were as follows: steady-state serum concentration, 40.9+/-8.8 microg/L; half-life, 1.5+/-0.4 hours; elimination rate constant, 0.50+/-0.13 hours(-1); steady-state volume of distribution, 0.18+/-0.04 L/kg; and total body clearance, 6.1+/-1.2 L/h. The MICs were 0.0625 and 0.125 microg/mL against the 2 E coli isolates and 4 microg/mL against both P aeruginosa isolates. The median SITs against the E. coli isolates were 1:256 and 1:512, and against the P. aeruginosa isolates were 1:8 and 1:16. At steady state, II subjects had serum concentrations of aztreonam > or =4 times the MIC for each organism. These findings suggest that further clinical study of the administration of aztreonam by continuous intravenous infusion is warranted.

A time-kill evaluation of clarithromycin and azithromycin against two extracellular pathogens and the development of resistance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the activity of clarithromycin, its metabolite (14-hydroxyclarithromycin), and azithromycin against Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus using time-kill methodology and to evaluate the susceptibility of the organisms following exposure to various concentrations of the azalide macrolides. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: Clinical isolates of H. influenzae and S. aureus were obtained from the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at University Hospital, San Antonio, Texas. Susceptibility testing was performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. 14-Hydroxyclarithromycin was added to clarithromycin solutions used for H. influenzae. Time-kill studies were performed using antimicrobial concentrations of 0.25-8x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and an initial inoculum of approximately 10(5) CFU/mL. Samples were plated onto solid agar at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours. At 0, 12, and 24 hours, samples were then plated onto solid agar incorporated with antibiotic. After incubating plates at 35 degrees C for 24 hours, colony counts were determined. RESULTS: The MICs of clarithromycin and clarithromycin plus 14-hydroxyclarithromycin for H. influenzae were 4 and 2 microg/mL, respectively. For S. aureus, the MIC of clarithromycin was 0.25 microg/mL, and the MIC of azithromycin for both organisms was 1 microg/mL. H. influenzae developed resistance to both macrolides within 12 hours when exposed to sub-MICs of clarithromycin plus 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. However, when exposed to concentrations less than or equal to the MIC of azithromycin, resistance was not conferred to clarithromycin. S. aureus, on the other hand, became resistant to azithromycin and less susceptible to clarithromycin following exposure to sub-MICs of either macrolide. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin and azithromycin elicited a concentration-independent bacteriostatic effect against H. influenzae and S. aureus at concentrations at least two times the MIC. In addition, concentrations maintained above the MIC prevented changes in the susceptibility of H. influenzae and S. aureus to both macrolides.

Key issues concerning fungistatic versus fungicidal drugs.

Are there any fungicidal drugs available today? A critical issue in answering this question is that of definition. The simplest, most stringent definitions identify fungistatic drugs as those that inhibit growth, whereas fungicidal drugs kill fungal pathogens. The immunocompetent host is usually far better equipped to eliminate fungal pathogens than the immunosuppressed host. Therefore, it would be especially desirable to have a truly fungicidal drug, one that absolutely kills and fungi, as a treatment option for the immunosuppressed patient. The critical question would be whether a fungicidal drug can be delivered to the target site in a concentration high enough for a sufficient time to reduce the intralesional fungal counts to zero. By this simple definition, there are no fungicidal drugs available today. However, an accepted alternative definition is that often used by the bacteriologist: Fungicidal drugs are those that lead to a reduction of 99.9% of the initial inocula. Although this less restrictive in vitro standard is more easily met, it has serious limitations. Whether the 99.9% kill should be an acceptable standard remains uncertain. As an alternative, the minimum inhibitory concentration, though indicating static activity, has served well; perhaps it should be the only information reported for fungal susceptibility testing.

Comparison of three different in vitro methods of detecting synergy: time-kill, checkerboard, and E test.

An in vitro method of detecting synergy which is simple to perform, accurate, and reproducible and has the potential for clinical extrapolation is desirable. Time-kill and checkerboard methods are the most widely used techniques to assess synergy but are time-consuming and labor-intensive. The Epsilometer test (E test), a less technically demanding test, has not been well studied for synergy testing. We performed synergy testing of Escherichia coli ATCC 35218, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 23355, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 with various combinations of cefepime or ceftazidime with tobramycin or ciprofloxacin using time-kill, checkerboard, and E test techniques. Time-kill testing was performed against each organism alone and in combinations at one-fourth times the MIC (1/4 x MIC) and 2 x MIC. With checkerboard tests, the same combinations were studied at concentrations ranging from 1/32 x to 4 x MIC. Standard definitions for synergy, indifference, and antagonism were utilized. E test strips were crossed at a 90 degree angle so the scales met at the MIC of each drug alone, and the fractional inhibitory concentrations index was calculated on the basis of the resultant zone on inhibition. All antimicrobial combinations demonstrated some degree of synergy against the test organisms, and antagonism was infrequent. Agreement with time-kill testing ranged from 44 to 88% and 63 to 75% by the checkerboard and E test synergy methods, respectively. Despite each of these methods utilizing different conditions and endpoints, there was frequent agreement among the methods. Further comparisons of the E test synergy technique with the checkerboard and time-kill methods are warranted.

Drug degradation during HPLC analysis of aztreonam: effect on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of degradation of aztreonam, a beta-lactam antibiotic, during HPLC analysis on pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. METHODS: The baseline (B) serum concentration-time data from a published pharmacokinetic study of aztreonam were degraded using first-order equations and a degradation rate constant (0.014 h-1) determined from a preliminary degradation study. Samples were mathematically degraded for autosampler run times of 8-13 h (D1) to approximate a normal work day and for autosampler run times of 16-17 h (D2) and compared with B data. It was assumed that B data were nondegraded and that changes in chromatography were the result of degradation of azetreonam and not to any changes in chromatographic conditions. A two-compartment model was used to fit the data and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using standard equations. Statistical significance between all pharmacokinetic parameters for B and D1 and B and D2 was determined using the paired, two-tailed Student's t-test. RESULTS: Increased variability was noted for all pharmacokinetic parameters for D1 and D2 compared with B. Statistically significant differences were found for clearance (B < D1, p = 0.0095 and B < D2, p = 0.0194), steady-state volume of distribution (B < D2, p = 0.0392), and area under the serum concentration-time curve (B > D1, p = 0.0497). CONCLUSIONS: Aztreonam degradation resulted in increased variability in pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. Investigators should be cognizant of this and preliminary studies should be performed to characterize degradation for the length of the expected autosampler run.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment of penetrating abdominal trauma.

The hospital, pharmacy, and antibiotic costs for patients with penetrating abdominal trauma were compared with reimbursement received; these costs were also analyzed to assess the potential impact of a total prospective pricing system (PPS). During a four-year period, 46 patients admitted solely for penetrating abdominal trauma were retrospectively evaluated: their discharge summaries indicated that, for 9 patients, reimbursement was based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) under the PPS; 9 patients had private insurance; and 28 were classified as "self-paying/no insurance." All costs, corrected for inflation, were reported in 1989 dollars. Antibiotics represented 22.5%, 1.7%, and 0.5% of pharmacy, hospital, and DRG reimbursement, respectively; pharmacy costs were 8.5% of hospital costs and 2.3% of DRG reimbursement. For all 46 patients, a net loss of $295 per patient was incurred. Four patients accounted for 43% of the hospital costs. If the hospital had been reimbursed for all of these patients by prospective pricing and DRGs, it would have had a median profit of $9730 in 42 of 46 patients. Costs exceeded DRG reimbursement in the remaining four patients by a median of $8210. Antibiotic costs and pharmacy costs represent a small portion of hospital costs and DRG reimbursement for patients with penetrating abdominal trauma; thus, cost containment efforts in these patients should be directed at other ancillary services and length of stay.