Inpatient pharmacists using a readmission risk model in supporting discharge medication reconciliation to reduce unplanned hospital readmissions: a quality improvement intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Reducing unplanned hospital readmissions is an important priority for all hospitals and health systems. Hospital discharge can be complicated by discrepancies in the medication reconciliation and/or prescribing processes. Clinical pharmacist involvement in the medication reconciliation process at discharge can help prevent these discrepancies and possibly reduce unplanned hospital readmissions. METHODS: We report the results of our quality improvement intervention at Duke University Hospital, in which pharmacists were involved in the discharge medication reconciliation process on select high-risk general medicine patients over 2 years (2018-2020). Pharmacists performed traditional discharge medication reconciliation which included a review of medications for clinical appropriateness and affordability. A total of 1569 patients were identified as high risk for hospital readmission using the Epic readmission risk model and had a clinical pharmacist review the discharge medication reconciliation. RESULTS: This intervention was associated with a significantly lower 7-day readmission rate in patients who scored high risk for readmission and received pharmacist support in discharge medication reconciliation versus those patients who did not receive pharmacist support (5.8% vs 7.6%). There was no effect on readmission rates of 14 or 30 days. The clinical pharmacists had at least one intervention on 67% of patients reviewed and averaged 1.75 interventions per patient. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement study showed that having clinical pharmacists intervene in the discharge medication reconciliation process in patients identified as high risk for readmission is associated with lower unplanned readmission rates at 7 days. The interventions by pharmacists were significant and well received by ordering providers. This study highlights the important role of a clinical pharmacist in the discharge medication reconciliation process.

Medication Histories in Critically Ill Patients Completed by Pharmacy Personnel.

BACKGROUND: Although critically ill adults often have extended hospital lengths of stay and are at high risk of having medication-related adverse events, the value of medication histories in these patients remains underreported. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of performing medication histories in critically ill adults and to establish the frequency of and characterize identified discrepancies. METHODS: This prospective study included patients admitted to 4 intensive care units (ICUs) in a large academic medical center and was conducted in 2 phases. In phase 1, medication histories were conducted over a 5-week period by clinical pharmacists to assess feasibility. In phase 2, medication histories were conducted over a 3-week period by a pharmacy technician. Medication discrepancies, defined as any difference between the documented and pharmacy personnel-identified home medication list, were aggregated in both phases and adjudicated for severity. RESULTS: In phase 1, 127 medication histories were completed (42.3% of admitted patients). Impaired cognition was the most common barrier encountered; however, 76% of patients were able to have a history completed if an attempt was made. In phase 2, a medication history was completed for 176 patients (58.9% of admitted patients). In aggregate, 1155 discrepancies were identified, with 78.2% of patients having a discrepancy. The median number of discrepancies per patient was 3 (interquartile range = 1-5); 11 life-threatening, 101 serious, and 326 significant discrepancies were identified. Conclusion and Relevance: A pharmacy personnel-based medication history program in the ICU is feasible and assists in the discovery of medication discrepancies with the potential for patient harm.

Positive Impact of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Advanced Chronic Systolic Heart Failure.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and advanced chronic systolic heart failure. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Large academic tertiary and quaternary care hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty-three adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and advanced chronic systolic heart failure who underwent implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD between July 1, 2008, and June 30, 2013. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline demographic data and laboratory values pertinent to glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c [A1C], total daily insulin requirements, noninsulin antidiabetic medication use, and body mass index [BMI]) were collected for each patient. Pre-LVAD data were compared with data obtained during the 24 months after LVAD implantation. The mean age of the study population was 61.3 years, 70% were men, and 63% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. The first available mean ± SD A1C after LVAD implantation was 6.21 ± 1.5% at a median of 4.8 months (interquartile range 3.3-8.9), which represented a significant decrease from the pre-LVAD A1C of 7.46 ± 1.5% (p<0.001). Average daily insulin requirements decreased by 22.9 units at the end of 24 months (p<0.001). Over half of patients with prescriptions for noninsulin antidiabetic medications were able to discontinue therapy by the end of the study. Of note, BMI increased in the second year after LVAD implantation from a baseline of 32.3 kg/m2 to 34.9 kg/m2 (p=0.004). Regression analysis revealed that baseline A1C was the only independent predictor of change in A1C. CONCLUSION: LVAD implantation was associated with a significant improvement in glycemic control. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term impact of LVAD implantation on the clinical course of diabetes.

Beyond Gout: Colchicine Use in the Cardiovascular Patient.

Colchicine is one of the oldest medications still in use today and is commonly used for the treatment of gout and familial Mediterranean fever. Its anti-inflammatory properties have raised the question of its utility in managing several cardiovascular diseases, including postoperative atrial fibrillation and pericarditis. This article will review the evidence for colchicine in these conditions and provide recommendations for use.

Comparison of the incidence of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity in hospitalized patients with and without concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the addition of piperacillin-tazobactam leads to an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving vancomycin and to explore potential confounding factors that may increase the risk of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, academic, tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred ninety-one adults hospitalized between July 1, 2009, and July 1, 2012, with normal baseline renal function who received a minimum of 48 hours of vancomycin for any indication were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 92 received a minimum of 48 hours of intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam concurrently with vancomycin, with piperacillin-tazobactam being initiated within 48 hours of the initiation of vancomycin (combination group); 99 received vancomycin without piperacillin-tazobactam (vancomycin group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A univariate analysis was performed to assess the effect of the following risk factors on the incidence of nephrotoxicity within the first 7 days of vancomycin treatment: concomitant nephrotoxic agents, advanced age, steady-state vancomycin trough concentration of 15 µg/ml or greater, elevated Charlson Comorbidity Index, and a total daily vancomycin dose of 4 g or greater. A multivariate model was constructed to compare the incidence of the primary end point of nephrotoxicity, defined as a minimum 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine concentration, between groups. Nephrotoxicity developed in 8 (8.1%) of 99 patients in the vancomycin group and in 15 (16.3%) of 92 patients in the combination group (1-sided χ(2) test, p=0.041). In the univariate analysis, only vancomycin trough concentration of 15 µg/ml or greater (odds ratio 3.67) was associated with an increased risk of developing nephrotoxicity. In the multivariate analysis, patients with piperacillin-tazobactam added to vancomycin exhibited an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity, with an odds ratio of 2.48 (1-sided χ(2) test, p=0.032). CONCLUSION: We observed an increased incidence of nephrotoxicity in vancomycin-treated patients who received concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam. A steady-state vancomycin trough concentration of 15 µg/ml or greater was also associated with an increased risk of the development of nephrotoxicity. These findings should be confirmed in larger, randomized studies.