Understanding the impact of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with metabolic comorbidities on adults: a real-world qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Limited real-world evidence exists to better understand the patient experience of living with symptoms and impacts of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This study aimed to (1) describe patient-reported perspectives of NASH symptoms and impacts on patients' daily lives and (2) develop a patient-centered conceptual NASH model. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using semi-structured qualitative interviews was conducted among adults (≥18 years) in the United States living with NASH. Eligible participants were diagnosed with NASH, had mild to advanced fibrosis (F1-F3), and no other causes of liver disease. The interview guide was informed by a targeted literature review (TLR) to identify clinical signs, symptoms, impacts, and unmet treatment needs of NASH. Participants described their experiences and perspectives around NASH and the symptoms, symptom severity/bother, and impact of NASH on their daily activities. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for coding and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty participants (age: 42.4 years; female: 50.0%) were interviewed. Participants discussed their experience with NASH symptoms (most frequent: fatigue [75.0%]; weakness/lethargy [70.0%]) and impacts (most frequent: physical and psychological/emotional [70.0% each]; dietary [68.4%]). Participants considered most symptoms to be moderately severe or severe and moderately or highly bothersome. Findings from the TLR and qualitative interviews were incorporated into a conceptual model that describes patient-reported symptoms and impacts of NASH, clinical signs, risk factors, and unmet treatment needs. CONCLUSION: Our study provides insights into patients' perspectives of NASH symptoms and their impact on their daily lives. These findings may guide patient-physician conversations, supporting patient-centered treatment decisions and disease management.

Study findings help to address the gap in current literature about patients' perspectives on NASH and its symptoms as well as its impact on daily life.The study proposes a holistic conceptual model that describes patients' perspectives of living with NASH, including symptoms and their impact, the clinical signs and risk factors of NASH, and the unmet treatment needs of the disease.Healthcare providers can use study findings to inform patient-focused decisions around treatment strategies for NASH.

Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for facial acne: the Acne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS).

OBJECTIVE: Facial acne has been associated with impaired health-related quality of life, which is an essential patient outcome for evaluating the success of acne treatment. In consideration of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) new recommendations on patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, the objectives of this study were to (1) establish the need for a new PRO measure that assesses facial acne outcomes and satisfies the criteria set forth by the FDA and (2) develop the content of a new facial acne PRO measure appropriate for use in both adolescents and adults as well as adherent to the FDA PRO Guidance. METHODS: A literature and PRO review, patient interviews (concept elicitation), and input from clinical experts were used to develop a conceptual framework for the outcomes deemed important to facial acne patients, and to construct items for a preliminary PRO measure: the Acne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS). Cognitive interviews were conducted to pilot test the ASIS. RESULTS: A review of the literature and PROs revealed that, of the 34 measures identified, no suitable PRO measure for the population of interest was available. The conceptual framework comprised two main themes: symptoms and psychosocial impacts. Concept elicitation interviews included a diverse set of patients (n=48) with facial acne, of various ages: 12-17 years (n=15), 18-25 years (n=20), and 26-50 years (n=13). The most frequently reported symptoms were: pimples, oily skin, scabs/scars/marks, blackheads, acne, and whiteheads. The most frequently reported impacts were impacts on appearance, self-consciousness, annoyance, bothersomeness, mood, social criticism, embarrassment, confidence, and social withdrawal. These reported symptoms and impacts constituted the 15-item draft ASIS. The draft ASIS was modified following the analysis of 20 cognitive interviews, resulting in the current 17-item ASIS. CONCLUSIONS: Results from both the concept elicitation and cognitive interviews demonstrated that the ASIS is content valid in both adolescents and adults with facial acne. The ASIS will undergo psychometric evaluation to further support its validity in both adolescents and adults with facial acne.

Patient perspectives on the impact of fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to elicit and assess important symptom domains and the impact of fibromyalgia on patients' quality of life and functioning from a patient's perspective. The intention was to collect this information as part of an overall effort to overcome shortcomings of existing outcome measures in fibromyalgia. METHODS: This was a qualitative study in which six focus group sessions with 48 women diagnosed with fibromyalgia were conducted to elicit concepts and ideas to assess the impact of fibromyalgia on their lives. RESULTS: The focus groups conducted with fibromyalgia patients identified symptom domains that had the greatest impact on their quality of life including pain, sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. Fibromyalgia had a substantial negative impact on social and occupational function. Patients reported disrupted relationships with family and friends, social isolation, reduced activities of daily living and leisure activities, avoidance of physical activity, and loss of career or inability to advance in careers or education. CONCLUSION: The findings from the focus groups revealed that fibromyalgia has a substantial negative impact on patients' lives. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A comprehensive assessment of the multiple symptoms domains associated with fibromyalgia and the impact of fibromyalgia on multidimensional aspects of function should be a routine part of the care of fibromyalgia patients.

Frequency, predictors, and economic impact of upward dose adjustment of infliximab in managed care patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine dosing patterns and costs among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients newly treated with infliximab in a large national health care claims database. METHODS: Using data from a proprietary database of pharmacy and medical claims for 75 U.S. health plans, RA patients newly treated with infliximab between June 2000 and June 2002 were selected and assigned an .index date. based on the first infusion. A pretreatment period of 6 months was created; patients were also followed for a minimum of 6 months after the initial infusion. Follow-up was allowed to vary beyond this minimum 6 months in order to preserve all available patient data. A maintenance number of infliximab vials was determined as of the second infusion; patients with 1 subsequent increase in vials used or 2 intervals between infusions of <49 days were considered to have had an upward dose adjustment. Differences (i.e., between those with upward dose adjustment and those with no upward dose) in patient characteristics were examined using descriptive statistics. In addition, time to upward dose adjustment and factors influencing its likelihood were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards techniques. Finally, differences in RA-related and unrelated costs (medication, outpatient, inpatient, and total, expressed in 2003 dollars) were examined using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and were also stratified by a number of patient characteristics found to differ between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,236 patients met all study entry criteria and were included in these analyses. One or more upward dose adjustments were experienced by 61.7% (N=762) of patients during an average of 15 months of follow-up (median =13 months, range=6 to 31 months). The majority (63.3%) of upward dose adjustments were due to increases in the number of billed vials. Median time to upward dose adjustment was 254 days and declined steadily based on year of initiation (from 330 days in 2000 to 224 days in 2002). Factors significantly influencing upward dose adjustment included pretreatment use of leflunomide, comorbid Crohn.s disease, and pretreatment liver function testing. During followup, patients in the upward dose adjustment group used a mean (SD) of 30.28 (20.90) vials of infliximab, compared with 15.90 (14.28) among those not adjusting dose (P<0.001). Annualized (i.e., standardized to a 365-day rate) RA-related costs were higher by more than 50% among patients with upward dose adjustment (SD $22,283 [$20,517] versus $14,425 [$10,828] for those without upward dose adjustment; P<0.001); differences were driven almost entirely by the costs of infliximab itself ($16,336 [$9,490] versus $9,573 [$6,790], P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of managed care members with RA, upward dose adjustment with infliximab was frequent and appeared to occur earlier in the drug therapy in 2002 compared with 2000. Upward dose adjustment was associated with significant increases in drug treatment costs; therefore, payers and providers should consider the impact of current dosing trends when monitoring the use of biologics for autoimmune diseases.

How much is enough and who says so?

BACKGROUND: One of the challenges of health-related quality of life research is to translate statistically significant health-related quality of life changes into interpretable clinical or medically important ones. OBJECTIVE: To calculate the minimal important difference of the King's Health Questionnaire, a condition-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of men and women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. METHODS: The King's Health Questionnaire was administered to patients suffering from overactive bladder enrolled in two multinational studies. Minimal important differences were calculated using an anchor-based approach with both a global rating of patient-perceived treatment benefit and one of perceived disease impact. A distribution-based method using effect size was calculated for comparison purposes. RESULTS: Minimal important difference values varied slightly with each method. Using the anchor-based approach, the King's Health Questionnaire minimal important difference ranged between 5-10 points when the calculation factored out patients who reported no change and 6-12 points for patients who experienced a small improvement. The effect size method indicated a minimal important difference of 5 to 6 points for a small effect and 10 to 15 points for a medium effect. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of the King's Health Questionnaire, the anchor-based approaches and the distribution-based approach provide similar results. A change from baseline of at least 5 points on King's Health Questionnaire domains indicates a change that is meaningful to patients and is indicative of a clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life after treatment. Convergence of the estimates using different approaches should give us confidence in the values derived for the quality of life domains measured by the King's Health Questionnaire.

Long-term health-related quality of life of patients receiving extended-release tolterodine for overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of tolterodine on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients diagnosed with overactive bladder with incontinence. METHODS: Patients who completed a 12-week randomized, double-blind, safety and efficacy trial comparing tolterodine with placebo were invited to enroll in a 12-month open-label continuation trial to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of tolterodine. This study reports the HRQoL results from the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) that were administered at baseline, at the end of the 12-week trial, and 3 and 12 months following open-label treatment with tolterodine. RESULTS: One thousand seventy-seven patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT(B)) population. KHQ translations were available for 838 patients (mean age, 61.1 years; 80.9% women) in the ITT(B) population. HRQoL, as measured by the KHQ, significantly improved from baseline to months 3 and 12 on the following domains: incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep and energy, severity (coping) measures, and symptom severity. Improvements were generally consistent across all analyses for the 3- and 12-month measurements and for the ITT(B) and completer (C(B)) populations. Patients receiving tolterodine in the double-blind study showed additional improvement at the 3-month open-label assessment on all but the general health domain. At 12 months from treatment rollover, all improvements from rollover to 3 months were sustained with additional improvement seen on the incontinence impact and role limitations domains. The general health perceptions domain showed a slight decline from rollover that might be attributable to a natural decline in patients' health status at this life stage. These findings were consistent with other efficacy results whereby efficacy was maintained over the 12-month open-label period. SF-36 results were consistent with previous experience of reduced sensitivity, as population groups were similar to the SF-36 Physical Component and Mental Component scores at various time points and with all populations. CONCLUSION: Continued treatment with tolterodine provides additional benefits in HRQoL as measured by the KHQ. Of particular importance are improvements on the psychological aspects after longer-term treatment not detected after a short-term trial. Treatment effects on HRQoL are evident even after a 12-week placebo run-in supporting the true clinical effect of active treatment.