Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 48(3): 164-171, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36607627

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective analysis of routinely collected data. OBJECTIVE: The underlying aim of this study was to identify potential treatment-related risk factors for odontoid fracture nonunion while accounting for known patient- and injury-related risk factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Type II and III odontoid fractures represent the most common cervical spine fracture in elderly patients and are associated with a relatively high nonunion rate. The management of odontoid fractures is controversial and treatment strategies range from conservative treatment to extensive surgical stabilization and fusion. METHODS: A total of 415 individuals who sustained odontoid fracture and were treated in either of four tertiary referral centers in Austria and Germany were included in the study. We included the following potential contributing factors for fracture nonunion in cross-validated extreme gradient boosted (XGBoost) and binary logistic regression models: age, gender, fracture displacement, mechanism of injury (high vs. low energy), fracture classification (Anderson II vs. III), presence of comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index), and treatment (conservative, anterior screw fixation with one or two screws, posterior C1/C2 spondylodesis, cervico-occipital C0-C4 fusion). RESULTS: In our cohort, 187 (45%) had radiologically confirmed odontoid nonunion six months postinjury. The odds for nonunion increase significantly with age, and are lower in type III compared to type II fractures. Also, odds for nonunion are significantly lower in posterior C1/C2 spondylodesis, and C0-C4 fusion compared to conservative treatment. Importantly, odds are not statistically significantly lower in the group treated with anterior screw fixation compared to conservative treatment. The factors gender, fracture displacement, mechanism of injury, and the presence of comorbidities did not produce significant odds. CONCLUSION: Higher age, type II fractures, and conservative treatment are the main risk factors for odontoid nonunion. Anterior screw fixation did not differ significantly from conservative treatment in terms of fracture union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Odontoid Process , Spinal Fractures , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Aged , Odontoid Process/diagnostic imaging , Odontoid Process/surgery , Odontoid Process/injuries , Retrospective Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Risk Factors , Machine Learning , Treatment Outcome
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 21(1): 835, 2020 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe acetabular defects require special treatment with either impaction bone grafting, metal augmented cups or cup-cage constructs. Even these options are often not adequate, especially in hips with Paprosky type 3 defects with loss of anterior and posterior columns. This study investigates the clinical and radiological outcomes of custom-made acetabular components (© Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) for Paprosky type 3 defects. METHODS: Sixteen patients were eligible for this trial, nine of whom agreed to be included. All of them completed one year of follow-up. The Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score were used to compare pre- and postoperative functional outcomes. Radiological follow-up comprised anteversion and inclination of the implanted cup and offset measurements in both hips (femoral, medial, ischial offset and center of rotation). Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time of the nine patients was 12.2 months (range: 10-18). The Oxford hip score and Harris hip score improved from 19.8 and 50.1 to 29.4 and 68.8, respectively (p = 0.009 and 0.01). There were complications in three cases (33.3%), which led to one re-revision (11.1%). Radiologic follow-up showed restoration of the height of the center of rotation and of the global offset. Significant difference was detected in the femoral offset. CONCLUSIONS: The functional and radiological outcomes are promising. However, long-term outcomes still need to be examined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hip Prosthesis , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/surgery , Belgium , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...