Return to play after rotator cuff tear in National Football League athletes.

Background: Rotator cuff tears are rare injuries in National Football League (NFL) athletes and there are limited data to help guide players and team physicians. The purpose of this study was to assess return to play (RTP) rates, performance levels, and career length following a rotator cuff tear during their playing career. Methods: Using publicly available data, we identified players who sustained a rotator cuff tear between 2000 and 2019. Demographic information, treatment (operative vs. nonoperative), RTP rate, preinjury and postinjury performance score, position, and career length were entered into the analysis. Results: Twenty-nine athletes with a mean age of 27.4 years (±3.1) at the time of injury were included in this study. Forty-eight percent were offensive and 52% defensive players. 79.3% (23/29) were able to RTP at the same professional level for an average of 2.8 ± 3.4 years. The average time to RTP after injury was 198.4 ± 125.3 days. The average age of players who RTP was 26.7 ± 2.5 years compared to those who did not (30.3 ± 3.7, P = .02). Similarly, the preinjury NFL career length was 4.0 ± 2.2 in players who RTP compared to those who did not (7.5 ± 2.7, P = .01). Most injuries (82.2%) were treated surgically; however, there was no significant difference (P > .05) in RTP rates, performance score, or career longevity between operative and nonoperative cohorts. Conclusion: Overall RTP rates for NFL athletes following a rotator cuff injury are promising with approximately 80% returning at the same performance level regardless of treatment type. Older, veteran players particularly those over the age of 30 were significantly less likely to RTP and should be counseled accordingly.

Does the Level of Cervical Disc Herniation Surgery Affect Performance-based Outcomes in National Football League Athletes?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the level of a cervical disc herniation (CDH) procedure will uniquely impact performance-based outcomes in elite athletes of the National Football League (NFL). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Comparative assessments of postsurgical outcomes in NFL athletes with CDH at different levels are unknown. Further, the surgical decision-making for these types of injuries in professional football athletes remains controversial. METHODS: NFL players with a CDH injury at a definitive cervical level were identified through a review of publicly available archives. Injuries were divided into upper- (C2-C4) and lower-level (C4-T1) CDH. The impact on player outcomes was determined by comparing return to play statistics and calculating a "Performance Score" for each player on the basis of pertinent statistical data, both before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 40 NFL athletes met inclusion criteria. In the upper-level group, 10 of 15 (66.6%) players successfully returned to play an average of 44.6 games over 2.6 years. The lower-level cohort had 18 of 25 (72%) players return to play with an average of 44.1 games over 3.1 years. There was no significant difference in the rate of return to play (P = 0.71). Postsurgical performance scores of the upper and lower-level groups were 1.47 vs. 0.69 respectively, with no significant difference between these groups (P = 0.06). Adjacent segment disease requiring reoperation occurred in 10% of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion patients. In 50% of foraminotomy patients, a subsequent fusion was required. CONCLUSION: A uniquely high percentage of upper-level disc herniations develop in NFL athletes, and although CDH injuries present career threatening implications, an upper-level CDH does not preclude a player from successfully returning to play at a competitive level. In fact, these athletes showed comparable postsurgical performance to those athletes who underwent CDH procedures at lower cervical levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The Triangle Model of Congenital Cervical Stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study OBJECTIVE.: Identify the pathoanatomical features of the cervical spine associated with congenital stenosis SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Congenital cervical stenosis (CCS) describes a patient with a decreased spinal canal diameter at multiple levels of the cervical spine in the absence of degenerative changes. Despite recognition of CCS throughout the literature, the anatomical features that lead to this condition have not been established. Knowledge of the pathoanatomy behind CCS may lead to alterations in surgical technique for this patient population that may improve outcomes. METHODS: From 1000 cervical MRIs between January 2000 and December 2014, CCS was identified in 68 patients using a strict definition of age less than 50 years with mid-sagittal canal diameters (mid-SCD) (<10  mm) at multiple sub-axial cervical levels (C3-C7). A total of 68 patients met the inclusion criteria for this group. Fourteen controls with normal SCDs (>14  mm) at all cervical levels were used for comparison. Anatomic measurements obtained at each level (C3-C7) included: coronal vertebral body, AP vertebral body, pedicle width, pedicle length, laminar length, AP lateral mass, posterior canal distance, lamina-pedicle angle, and lamina-disc angle (LDA). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.01. RESULTS: CCS patients demonstrated significantly different anatomical measurements when compared with controls. Significantly smaller lateral masses, lamina lengths, lamina-pedicle angles, and larger LDAs were identified at levels C3 to C7 in the CCS group (P < 0.01). These anatomic components form a right triangle that illustrates the cumulative narrowing effect on space for the spinal cord. CONCLUSION: The pathoanatomy of CCS is associated with a decrease in the lamina-pedicle angle and an increase in the LDA ultimately leading to a smaller SCD. The global changes in CCS are best illustrated by this triangle model and are driven by the posterior elements of the cervical spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Spine surgery in athletes with low back pain-considerations for management and treatment.

While degenerative lumbar spine conditions are common in the general population, there are unique considerations when diagnosed in high-level athletes. Genetic factors have been identified as a more significant contributor to the development of degenerative disc disease than occupational risks, however, some have postulated that the incessant training of young, competitive athletes may put them at a greater risk for accelerated disease. The evidence-based literature regarding lumbar disc herniation in elite athletes suggests that it is reasonable to expect excellent clinical outcomes and successful return-to-sport after either operative or non-operative treatment regardless of sport played. However, those athletes who require repetitive torque on their lumbar spines may have poorer long-term outcomes if surgical treatment is required for this condition. Painful spondylolysis in the athlete can often be treated successfully with non-operative treatment, however, if surgery is required, pars repair techniques provides a motion-sparing alternative that may lead to successful return to sport.