Accuracy of automated attenuation-based 3-dimensional segmentation: in the analysis of left ventricular function compared with magnetic resonance imaging.

We evaluated attenuation-based 3-dimensional segmentation for the analysis of left ventricular function, using as our standard of reference magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography with traditional short-axis planimetry.Twenty patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were examined prospectively. In all magnetic resonance and computed tomographic datasets, global functional values were determined by 2-dimensional planimetry. Computed tomographic scans were further evaluated by automated 3-dimensional segmentation, and the results were compared by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.Agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomographic 2-dimensional planimetry was good for all values (end-diastolic volume, bias= -4.2, r=0.99; end-systolic volume, bias= -1.7, r=0.99, stroke-volume, bias= -2.4, r=0.98; ejection fraction, bias=0.26, r=0.94; and myocardial mass, bias= 2.5, r=0.90). By contrast, dual-source computed tomographic 3-dimensional segmentation overestimated end-diastolic volume (bias= -19.1, P <0.001), stroke-volume (bias= -16.9, P <0.001), and myocardial mass (bias= -34.4, P <0.001). Moreover, correlation with magnetic resonance imaging proved disappointing for ejection fraction (r=0.72). Results were similar in a direct comparison between dual-source computed tomographic 2-dimensional planimetry and 3-dimensional segmentation (end-diastolic volume, bias= -14.9, r=0.94; end-systolic volume, bias= -0.5, r=0.90; stroke volume, bias= -14.5, r=0.83; ejection fraction, bias= -2.8, r=0.74; and myocardial mass, bias= -36.8, r=0.79).Due to significant overestimation of volumes and poor correlation of ejection fraction with cine magnetic resonance imaging results, attenuation-based 3-dimensional segmentation compares unfavorably with traditional planimetry. Hence this method should be used with caution, and its time benefits should be weighed against its imprecision of functional analysis.

Advances in imaging protocols for cardiac MDCT: from 16- to 64-row multidetector computed tomography.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Since the majority of all invasive diagnostic coronary angiography procedures are not followed by therapeutic interventions, interest is growing in noninvasive technologies to diagnose and visualize CAD. The most promising of these is multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT), which can visualize human coronary arteries in vivo noninvasively. Since 1999, this technique has improved rapidly, offering faster gantry rotation times and smaller voxel sizes. The image quality has become significantly more stable and MSCT has become a robust imaging modality. Beginning with 4-slice scanners in 1999, the latest scanner generation employs 64 slices. The present article summarizes the technical principles, image protocols and possible clinical applications of the current 64-row scanners.

Evaluation of cardiac function and myocardial viability with 16- and 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.

Retrospectively ECG-gated MDCT shows a high correlation and acceptable agreement of left-ventricular functional parameters compared to MR imaging. Thus, in addition to the non-invasive evaluation of coronary arteries, further important additional information of left-ventricular functional parameters with clinical and prognostic relevance can be achieved by one single MDCT examination. For assessment of myocardial viability, low-dose CT late enhancement scanning is feasible, and preliminary results look promising. CT late enhancement adds valuable diagnostic information on the haemodynamical significance of coronary stenoses or prior to interventional procedures.