A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Trial to Investigate Safety and Tolerability of Single Intravitreous Injections of ICON-1 Targeting Tissue Factor in Wet AMD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This phase 1 study evaluated the safety and tolerability of single intravitreous injections (IVIs) of ICON-1 (Iconic Therapeutics, South San Francisco, CA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). ICON-1 is a modified factor VIIa protein linked with the Fc portion of a human immunoglobulin G1. The molecule binds tissue factor overexpressed on choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in AMD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Open-label, interventional, dose-escalation trial in 18 patients with CNV due to AMD, with six patients per dose cohort. Patients received a single IVI of ICON-1 at baseline in one of three escalating doses: 60 µg, 150 µg, or 300 µg. Standard anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment was allowed at the investigator's discretion at least 2 weeks after the ICON-1 injection; patients were followed up to 24 weeks. Dose escalation was based on the absence of significant safety events. At each study visit, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmic examination (intraocular pressure, slit-lamp, and dilated fundus examination), and ophthalmic imaging (color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography) assessments were performed. The systemic pharmacokinetics of ICON-1 and presence of anti-ICON-1 antibodies were also assessed. RESULTS: ICON-1 was safe and well-tolerated up to the highest dose administered, which was 300 µg. Commonly reported adverse events were considered related to the IVI procedure or to the underlying nAMD. No significant systemic levels of ICON-1 or anti-ICON-1 antibodies were detected. Preliminary evidence of biological activity (improved BCVA, reduced central retinal thickness, decreased CNV size, and leakage) was most evident with the 300 µg dose at 1 to 2 weeks after the single ICON-1 injection. CONCLUSION: Intravitreous administration of ICON-1 in single doses up to 300 µg in eyes with neovascular AMD was safe and well-tolerated. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:336-345.].

The RESTORE study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate superiority of ranibizumab 0.5 mg monotherapy or combined with laser over laser alone based on mean average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over 12 months in diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: A 12-month, randomized, double-masked, multicenter, laser-controlled phase III study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 345 patients aged ≥18 years, with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and visual impairment due to DME. METHODS: Patients were randomized to ranibizumab + sham laser (n = 116), ranibizumab + laser (n = 118), or sham injections + laser (n = 111). Ranibizumab/sham was given for 3 months then pro re nata (PRN); laser/sham laser was given at baseline then PRN (patients had scheduled monthly visits). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean average change in BCVA from baseline to month 1 through 12 and safety. RESULTS: Ranibizumab alone and combined with laser were superior to laser monotherapy in improving mean average change in BCVA letter score from baseline to month 1 through 12 (+6.1 and +5.9 vs +0.8; both P<0.0001). At month 12, a significantly greater proportion of patients had a BCVA letter score ≥15 and BCVA letter score level >73 (20/40 Snellen equivalent) with ranibizumab (22.6% and 53%, respectively) and ranibizumab + laser (22.9% and 44.9%) versus laser (8.2% and 23.6%). The mean central retinal thickness was significantly reduced from baseline with ranibizumab (-118.7 µm) and ranibizumab + laser (-128.3 µm) versus laser (-61.3 µm; both P<0.001). Health-related quality of life, assessed through National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), improved significantly from baseline with ranibizumab alone and combined with laser (P<0.05 for composite score and vision-related subscales) versus laser. Patients received ∼7 (mean) ranibizumab/sham injections over 12 months. No endophthalmitis cases occurred. Increased intraocular pressure was reported for 1 patient each in the ranibizumab arms. Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Ranibizumab monotherapy and combined with laser provided superior visual acuity gain over standard laser in patients with visual impairment due to DME. Visual acuity gains were associated with significant gains in VFQ-25 scores. At 1 year, no differences were detected between the ranibizumab and ranibizumab + laser arms. Ranibizumab monotherapy and combined with laser had a safety profile in DME similar to that in age-related macular degeneration.

Lens-sparing vitrectomy for stage 4 retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic results of lens-sparing vitrectomy for tractional stage 4 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven eyes (24 patients) with tractional stage 4 ROP. INTERVENTION: Lens-sparing vitrectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Anatomic status of the retina. RESULTS: Twenty-five eyes had stage 4A ROP, and 12 eyes had stage 4B ROP. With a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 6-27), 32 of 37 eyes (86%) had complete reattachment of the retina. Among eyes with 4A ROP, 21 of 25 eyes (84%) had complete retinal reattachment. Among eyes with 4B ROP, 11 of 12 eyes (92%) had complete retinal reattachment. At last follow-up, 29 of 37 eyes (78%) were able to fix and follow. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that lens-sparing vitrectomy is effective for achieving retinal reattachment in tractional stage 4 ROP. This article contains additional online-only material available at .